What's with all the guys on here who are like "cartoony games are for babies, I want my games to be dark, edgy and mature because I'm an adult"?
Disingenuous thread
>>12689057If you're not gonna explain your reasoning or thought process, don't bother posting. No one needs your drive-by shitposts, thanks.
>>12689058Meant for>>12689056
I presume that if you're not already invested into a 'kiddy' franchise then you'll naturally gravitate towards other games, which tend to be more mature. Not saying cartoony games are bad, but some of them really only appeal to younger people.
>>12689057Disingenuous website.
>>12689240>I presume that if you're not already invested into a 'kiddy' franchise then you'll naturally gravitate towards other games, which tend to be more mature"Mature".You mean gory. Full of miserable people. In miserable places. Living miserable lives. As if joy is something to be looked down on.
>>12689056most people don't care about aesthetics, when they say kiddy game they are referring to the gameplay being too ez
>>12689257>most people don't care about aestheticsPress x to Doubt
>>12689058NTA but idk what “all these guys” you’re talking about bc I don’t spend my entire life on 4chan. Could you perhaps provide a link or screenshot of just one example?
there are 2 marios inside meone is the nicest guy youll ever meetthe other is a twisted f*cking psychopath
>>12689308>NTA but idk what “all these guys” you’re talking aboutGuys who go into threads just to say "kids game" or imply they're "too mature" for X game or say it's good X series died/got replaced by edgier sequels. Another common refrain is that it's "a natural progression" for people to leave behind "kiddy games" and move onto darker mature stuff. There's at least one in most threads on the board right now. They call everything colourful "bing bing wahoo".
>>12689315>Nintendo wanted to redesign their logo to look like graffiti around this time, but Reggie stopped themImagine...
What's with all the tendies making up fake narratives in their heads make-believe they're in the right side?
Nintendo bad
>>12689257Yeah that's why they play movie games....
>>12689056I like cool things.I don't like gay faggy kiddie things.Why is that so hard to comprehend?This is like asking straight men "why do you like tits more than penises"? We just do, okay?
>>12689582Based cool things liker and non-kiddei anon
>>12689056Different people like different things
>>12689582You are brown.
>>12689582
>>12689056Insecurity from man children.Thats why you always read "hope next x game is darker". They want to be perceived as something they arent by just showing they play mature games.I remember when we used to mock "I am a mature gamer so I play mature games for mature gamers such as myself.Those people will probably get filtered by most old Mario games and go back to play movie press x button to win slop.
>>12689056Would you rather wear a digital spongbob watch that talks to you when you push a button or a rolex
>>12689640Spongebob watch. At least it might bring a smile to my face when I remember I'm wearing it, the Rolex is just for insecure normalfaggots who are slaves to the opinions of others.
>>12689640>>12689704In this fake glasses wearing hipsters filled word you could take the SpongeBob watch and still be respected because everyone is a epic geek nerd anyway
>Spongebob watch. At least it might bring a smile to my face when I remember I'm wearing it, the Rolex is just for insecure normalfaggots who are slaves to the opinions of others.
>>12689714>What the fuck why are you prioritizing your own happiness over being another generic normalfaggot Bet that guy is more fun to hang out than you
>>12689704Based non-materialistic white man. Subhumans will never understand.>>12689624Also white
>>12689056OP got so mad in the other thread he had to make this one
>>12689640Timex or Casio, Rolex is too luxury and would get you fucking mugged.
>>12689720Actually I just thought the topic was interesting enough to merit its own thread. Are you here JUST to get into arguments and try to "troll" people or what? Because I'm here to have interesting and fulfilling discussions about retro video games and the culture surrounding them.
>>12689640I would chose the Rolex and sell it to buy games
>>12689807I'm glad you have calmed down.
>>12689812Based answer
>>12689056I mean, Nintendo has been very open about how they target young children with their first party games. Nintendo has always been the safe console for kiddies. Always.As a PC gamer I always felt very sorry for Nintoddlers. Imagine getting excited about Starfox YEARS after Frontier: Elite 2 came out. Literally a children's company.
>OP decided that the best way to rope people into this discussion of his was to call out the entire board as a whole on having a shit take no one has had for 30 yearsIs it better to be disingenuous if it gets more replies? When I make a thread, I *think* I make it with only the topic in mind and not with how many anons will respond to it in mind. At the very most, I try to find a relevant image that is likely to be noticed in the catalog. Am I doing it wrong? Or is OP's lack of integrity genuinely a *bad* thing? If so, then why does he value more replies over the replies of people who actually care about the topic he wishes to discuss?
>>12690141you must be new here
>>12690113Nobody gives a fuck about western kusoge.
>>12690142Been posting on this website since 2009. I'm still not sure what the right answer is because I don't understand the use case for (You) farming.
>>12690145Nobody cares about kiddie tendie games either. Nobody.
>>12690213Well, you seem to be seething over them, so clearly you do care.
>>12689640Kek
