Why is it that seemingly nobody cares about the GameBoy and its library beyond Pokemon?
>>12812889Why is it that you can't make an original thread and instead spam the same one on multiple boards fishing for replies?
Pokemon was more of an after party (albeit a very big one). Game Boy was very popular the years before.As for me? I'm a fan of games like Gargoyle's Quest II, Castlevania Belmont's Revenge and Wario Land
>>12812912Erm look at the filename, OP is just inspired by my awesome idea for a thread yesterday.
>>12812935Batman (89)Wave RaceNBA All Star Jam 2
Because the Gameboy had NOTHING on it besides Pokemon and Tetris.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWOaXSrAgrU
>>12813686Picross is also alright.
>>12813686>it's the N64 of handheldsXDD
>>12812889Original GB was great. I loved the little fucker and still have well over 100 carts. Pokemon only jolted it back from the dead after it had lived a full and rewarding life.GBC was the actual shitter in that family. Barely contributed anything substantial and rightly died young.
>>12812912It's bots. They make strange threads and repost them over and over for datamining. All the posts like that aren't from real people. Since the hack it's veen way worse over the whole site.
I stopped liking the Game Boy
>>12813709the dragon quest gbc games were worth it
>>12813709>Original GB was great. I loved the little fucker and still have well over 100 cartsName 5
>>12812912>>12813713Not OP but you guys are legitimately too low IQ to understand what's going on here.If someone posts a thread on multiple boards like /v/ and /vr/, it's not some conspiracy, they're just maximising their chances of getting a good thread going and getting discussions happening. It's perfectly reasonable and logical. This hysteria you guys go into over people reposting threads is a sign of your own emotional instability. Calm down. It's not somethign to get so worked up about.Also, no one forces you to open these threads or post in them. Not every thread is directly targeted at you, it's not all about you.
>>12813715Agreed.Backwards compatible too so you don't need to use that POS GBC.