[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/vr/ - Retro Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_6946.jpg (65 KB, 750x399)
65 KB JPG
What contemporary gaming magazine was the most negative in its coverage and reviews? Most gaming mags at the time were glorified adds so I’m wondering if anyone made any money off being contrarian assholes? Or is that just a modern Internet era design?
>>
>>12923678
Most gayming rags in the United Kingdom were written by snarky assholes, even when giving positive coverage to things, they'd throw a backhand somewhere.
>>
File: zone.jpg (137 KB, 600x800)
137 KB JPG
>>12923678
PC Zone supposedly had an algorithm which ensured their scores would average out to 50% in the long run, so they definitely gave more than their fair share of diabolical reviews. Like this infamous example, which got the author the bollocking of a lifetime
>>
>>12923768
Any examples? Like a high percentage score but a shitty snarky review
>>
>>12923768
autistic tendie who cant cope with a bad nintendo review detected.
bong reviewers are hilarious
>>
>game was a cease and desist to the player
>>
Gamefan
>>
>>12924691
Since you wanted examples a great one is their negative reception of Final Fantasy 8
>>
File: IMG_6971.jpg (1.36 MB, 3024x4032)
1.36 MB JPG
>>12924694
Huh? They seemed hype as hell for it
>>
>>12924775
this was a preview, what does the review say



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.