Are these games any good? I heard they're more faithful to the books than the films kek
Can someone post the picture of PS1 Hagrid?
>>12924492It's the 6th best selling PSX games of all time despite being released in 2001.So it must be bad
it had soul.
>>12924492They are charming with very colorful art style but gameplay is clunky. It also gets particularly frustrating when you realize that it's a separately developed game by a different team on every single platform and they all have their pros and cons
>>12924504best games always come out at the end of console life as by then devs figured out hardware.GTA5 came out at the end of 360 era too as one modern example
>>12924656>GTA5 came out at the end of 360 era too as one modern examplebut you said best games.
>>12924492Someone needs to make a Malfoid mod.
>>12924492Played it last year. PS1 version. Terrible. No reason to touch it without any nostalgia for it. It's clear it only sold thanks to the Pottermania at the time. Prisoner of Azkaban on 6th gen platforms is much better.
>>12924492It's good
>>12924492>>12924493GBC 1 and 2 are good, they're essentially lite-RPGs.
>>12924492The PC games for the Philosopher's Stone and Chamber of Secrets are genuinely good. Good puzzles and exploration. Hasn't been replicated since, even with Hogwart's Legacy.
>>12924716>picrelunbelievable amovnts of sovl
>>12924492>Are these games any good?No, play Barry Hatter instead.
>>12924493Haggord is a sensation.>>129247165th gen graphics peaked here.
>>12924672Trvke
>>12924492First 3 games are pretty charming regardless of he version, the games take a huge dip in quality with the 4th game5th and 6th games are an improvement but still not greatWe don't talk about the Deathly Hallows games
>>12924672>Mutts jerk to female Bowser and MalfoyAmericans are the gayest trannies of all time
>>12924656I disagree with that framing a bit, there's a difference between late gen and last gen holdover releases after the new consoles have already come out. the latter can have some technically impressive titles but its mostly slim picking after the major players have moved on.
>>12925102There's no overlap between the Bowsette and Malfoid audiences.
>>12925007>We don't talk about the Deathly Hallows gamesDidn't they go full "We want the CoD audience" with those?
>>12925102>muh mutts muh jeets muh...Oh piss off, closet faggot.
>>12924492first two are great on PS1, solid action adventure titles of the era. The PS2 versions of them are also the better versions.
Anyone have that pic of Harry from this game talking to Morpheus from the matrix
>>12925239Depends, was his penis out?
>>12927308Why do you want to know? Are you into little boys?
>>12924492I still found amazing that titlles from late 2001 and late 2002 were this huge on psx.
>>12928590PSONE re-releasePS2 could read PSX gamesPSX games were cheapPopular franchiseThe game isn't too bad
>>12924492>>12924504>>12924672>>12924861FLIPENDO!FLIIIIIIIIIIPENDOOOOOO!
>>12924492harry potter is for faggots
>>12927312Just trying to fit in, this IS a Harry Potter thread after all.
>>12928590ps1 was a very popular cd player
>>12924492CoS is peak harry potter gaming
Reminder that Nintendo wanted to acquire rights for Harry Potter games back in 1998. But EA won the rights instead. I'm actually glad about this because 1-3 PC wouldn't exist otherwise.That said, I recall there are assets for HP1-2 PS1 on IA. In the current age of jeetcomps, have anyone tried to port them to the N64?>>12925135Yeah, Deathly Hallows games are actual shovelware by definition. Even HP5-6 at least had some effort put into them with their Hogwarts hubs. HP7 pretty much encompasses everything wrong with many licensed movie games and why do people believe they suck shit.
They're all kino. And fun fact they're all different versions. PC version is different from PS1 which is different from PS2. So you can play Philosopher's Stone 3 times - 4 counting Gameboy which is obviously also differentI'm done after Chamber of Secrets though. Rest is non-canon as far as I'm concerned
>>129298255, GBA and GBC are very different.
Harry Potter 1 on PC is super comfy. Except for the quidditch thing, that sucked.
>>12924504>>12928590It is almost impossible to understate how insanely popular the Harry Potter books were. They had midnight releases, and you could preorder them in order to collect them. And you NEEDED to preorder them.Of course, now it's easy to look at how mid the writing and world-building was, especially when Rowling realized she could just write whatever she wanted and the plebs would eat it up.
>>12924656Much like you came out of your mom in her 40s. The special gifts come late
