Twitcher 3 sucks.1. The story is simply uninteresting. It's just too high-fantasy for me to care. Some wild hunt raiders appearing out of nowhere, great sorceress battle killing bagzillion of enemies etc. Some old ancient Ciri's ancestry. It's just too unreal to make me care. Picking up turnips in Gothic 2 felt more engaging.2. Level scaled loot. People keep expensive swords and armours in potato sacks in basements. So much immersion.3. OK, this point might be unfair because a lot RPGs have this issue, but you jump into the river in full gear to pick up dropped plants. Quest designers should stop such silliness.4. Huge world full of nothing, lots of villages with untalkable NPCs and with nothing interesting to visit or do. What's the point of such huge areas and so many places if there's no reason to go there or just do the most generic quests you can imagine?5. Side quests are mostly boring filler. There's a lot of side quests but they are all so bland I already forgot most I did.6. Youtubers lie. You can do quests in any order but inconsistencies appear.7. Geralt is Mary Sue, and annoying one at that. Sure, players like characters that are cool, but Geralt and his opinions are going too moralizing (I know it's in the books too), too elaborate and often I don't relate to them at all. The first twitcher at least was more reasonable with such.8. Level restricted gear. Apparently you can't hold a sword that is almost the same as you currently have but sharper, because you didn't do enough fetch-quest jogging.9. Only some choices possible, many times I'd like to do something else than I could choose. Why does it always have to be two choices and often either almost the same or in some cases too far apart and one being edgy? That's not good writing if I have to choose between two options but if I was in Geralt's place I'd do or say completely different things.
10. If monsters are susceptible to silver, why won't at least some soldiers carry such weapons considering monsters are everywhere? Even if soldiers weren't trained in fighting monsters (but again, why wouldn't they be if monsters are everywhere) they already know how to fight in general. Witcher is one of the most fake jobs you could have, like a lady in shoe store in China I've been to with sole purpose on giving stamps for warranty card.11. A lone witcher is apparently better than a whole group of soldiers against a monster and acts smartass about it. Again, this makes no sense. While I get that a single soldier shouldn't be equal, 4 or 5 of them are still not a match for a monster, but a single witcher is?12. Dialogues are often long, but completely uninteresting. Overdramatic gestures and pauses, tl;dr life stories, and general logorrhea. Just get to the fucking point, people (including Geralt). Nobody talks like this in reality.
>>4076046>10. If monsters are susceptible to silver, why won't at least some soldiers carry such weapons considering monsters are everywhere? Even if soldiers weren't trained in fighting monsters (but again, why wouldn't they be if monsters are everywhere) they already know how to fight in general. Witcher is one of the most fake jobs you could have, like a lady in shoe store in China I've been to with sole purpose on giving stamps for warranty card.Kind of true, I was wondering about this in another thread as well. Sure, maybe there are some monsters that would need more specialized approaches, but then you probably would be better of with sorcerers. While for monsters, they are just like animals, so you can send a bunch of people with silver tipped weapons.
>>4076044One look at gameplay footage told me all I need to know. A pseudo-deep playable Marvel movie, with saturation so high that it makes Mister Beast thumbnails look like a darkroom. The Witcher is not an RPG, it’s an action-adventure product/piece of content for isolated teenagers and failed men.
Not a huge fan but here we go:1. Nah, it has a great premise which sadly fizzles out near the end. The game makes up for it in other places though.2. Yeah level scaled anything sucks dick.3. Oh so we nitpicking. Witchers don't wear plate, get fucked.4. The world is full of points of interests, the only issue is they modeled it after ubishit and you need to turn off all the map icons and compass.5. Yeah Witcher's normal work is your standard MMO quest. This game has some of the best side-quests in the industry.6. No idea what you mean here, complain to your youtube idol.7. He's less knight-in-a-shining-armor than many but sure. Sadly this is normal in all fantasy media.8. Same as 2, I agree shitsux.9. Could be better, could be worse, many quests have multiple outs.10. Regular soldiers in the game do carry silver blades, but you failed the vibe check: most people don't even believe in monsters.11. Untrained men with standard steel stand no chance. Again failed the vibe-check.12. That's like your opinion, man.
>filtered by Witcher 3
>>4076044the level of intellect required to play & enjoy the witcher series drastically dropped with the third game and the dumbing down was intentional in order to appeal to the amerimutt population the second game has such great medieval art direction, character choices, realistic swordplay and political / philosophical topics that it makes tw3 look like a bootleg spin-off
>>4076044>Witcher is one of the most fake jobs you could have, like a lady in shoe store in China I've been to with sole purpose on giving stamps for warranty card.>I've been toYou say it’s fake, then equate it with something that you yourself have confirmed is real. That’s the very antithesis of being fake.X = falseX = YY = real
>>4091600Based Indian philosopher & English language expert destroys hateful Polish bigots.
Im just not a fan of the bamham combat
>>4091600>X = YThat's rather linear thinking of you, no?
