You guys think this game is gonna be an FF6 style game with an ensemble cast or will it continue the Fire Emblem tradition of being shackled to decades long tropes?
I hope atleast the porn will be good
It will 100% be shackled with decades long tropes, but as long as it pulls back on Reclass Emblem being the standard I'm going to like it.
i think it will continue the Fire Emblem tradition of sucking ass
>>2277215
Why no attractive female characters?
>>2277385>implying
>>2276712We should make a bingo chart>Really clumsy>Really likes sweets>Really dumb>Really doesn't know how to socialise>Really likes X character>Really shy>Really dramatic>Really edgy>Really a slut>Really can't stand X character
>>2277990Add a "but actually..." to half of those and we'll have ourselves a Fire Emblem cast!
>>2277385Are you gay? There's 4 in the OP pic
>>2276712I'm not speculating and I'm not watching any previews. Gonna be as blind as can be.>>2278027kek
>>2277215Yeah, Pull back on Reclass emblem and all the side garbage that come with it and we might have a half decent game for the first time in a decade.
>>2277990I really think most of this shit is to FE's detriment.
The most important part of being a fire emblem fan is hating fire emblem
>>2276712>Blue haired guy has some special power>edgy one can warp because ???Shit
>>2282472I don't think it's that big a deal. Archetypes and character gimmicks aren't a problem as long as they're written and handled well.
>>2282630Why do people ship her with Eliwood?
>>2283531The game pushes them in the plot unfortunately, despite how boring of a character Ninian is. Me personally, I like her with Fiora better.
>>2284312*Himholy unintentional Yuri
>>2284312Ninian is boring, Eliwood is boring, it's a match made in heaven.
>>2284323Ninian has no character. Eliwood is boring. He deserves someone who is also boring. Not a pliant sex doll.
>>2283531Gee, anon, that's a tough one. I wonder why that could be?>>2286349Ninian has character, don't act dumb. It's just not terribly exciting.
Is the bald Danish dude's romhack any good or what do we think?
>>2289872I've seen exactly enough of the first and enough shilling of both to dismiss them as dogshit.
>>2289872Honestly the first one (as it is, not whatever the DE is going to be) is around on par with mid tier romhacks, but has better presentation and aesthetics than them.The second one is ironically one of the better ones I've played, but does suffer from typical prequel issues, like not being a good stand alone game, kinda knowing how it's going to play out, and still hilariously missing up House Ring's lore.With that said I feel like the two games are easier sell's than something like Hag in White, which as a pure gameplay and story narrative, are much better, but Hag in White also has extremely ugly characters, fags galore, unironic trannies, and on top of not really being a hard game. So I guess the real question is, are these two games fantastic on their own? ehhhhhh, they're alright. Do they look better(key word, look better) than what's surrounding them? Hell yeah they do. Are they must play games? Not at all no. Would I rather play them than half the shit on FEU? Sadly yes.In my opinion if your a gameplay fag that loves quirkly characters and a bad story that tries to be serious, like Engage, you'll enjoy his game, otherwise you can take them or leave them, like most rom hacks.
