>They really added SengokuWhat does it have to do with exploration? They literally fought among themselves during that time. Felt like it's only picked cause of Samurai Warriors/Nobunaga's Ambition.
>>2432092Also Sengoku just means "Warring Kingdoms"
>>2432092>2 new leaders: Toyotomi Hideyoshi, Yi Sun-sin>4 new civilizations: Heian Japan, Sengoku Japan, Goryeo, Joseon>4 new Wonders: Mireuksa, Nirayama Reverberatory Furnace, Seongsan Ilchulbong, Nachi FallsSo what, is that like their new strategy to release expansions to "finish up" the timelines of the notable civs already present in the game?
>>2432130Yeah, the release game was just a beta, it's half-finished.
>>2432130>So what, is that like their new strategyThis is their strategy but it is not new. They release the game as a mere skeleton ask for full price and then slowly add on the rest for paid DLC and paid Expansions and 3-4 years after release after players paid like 3-4 times the game's original price with DLCs and Expansions we "might" get a decent civ game. But this is the industry standard this is how Civ6 went as well why do think this is new or something?
Some civs i want to see:ManchuHungaryPolandAustraliaOverall the game is pretty decent now with the new update.
>>2432130But why would they do that if you can play as one civ the whole game now? I would focus on releasing a lot of new civs.
>>2432152qing dynasty was in the game, would like to see some emperors like kangxi or something, after they add zheng he
>>2432092Have they added the 4th age yet or does the game still end in 1960?
>>2432168Wait for the finished version in 2028
>>2432150>But this is the industry standard this is how Civ6 went as well why do think this is new or something?At least in Civ6 civs weren't split into three parts you have to buy separately.
>>2432092>>2432094This is the same deal as 3 chinkdoms in aoe2
>ToT will save the g-ACK!Losing 2-3 Thousand players after each weekend, oh no Civ VII bros
>>2434502
>>2432092>is this the GAYEST CIV EVER
I'm guessing making Civ switching optional didn't help much. Makes sense since all the bad design choices are completely baked into the game. No band aid fixes are going to help.
>>2443219I think the game is a lot better then it was at launch. And the era system isnt as bad with some neat ideas how they handle playing one civ the entire time. But its still got weird stuff to it that will always cap the fun, my biggest complaint about the game right now is warfare is really fun but peace deals are ONLY city trading. You cant do any resource, gold or ANYTHING else outside of white peace or city trading. Its nonsense how its still like this. Plus, its also going to run into the same problem all civ games have, where a portion of the player base will always find the old game more fun and just stick with it. I honestly think even if they launched the game in a good state it would struggle with numbers (although not this low) cause of how many people would just prefer 6, like how many think 6 is trash and just stay with 5 and so on.
