[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vst/ - Video Games/Strategy

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (184 KB, 281x354)
184 KB PNG
its the best civ game ever and its not even close
>>
have a "you" friend
>>
>>2438243
It's the best civ game ever at sucking dick
>>
series peaked with civ2 space victory into SMAC playthrough
>>
>>2438243
buy an ad, nobody is buying this dogshit.
>>
It's easily the worst one that I've played. The Test of Time update did fuck all to improve the game btw.
>>
>>2438243
I heard they added hotseat, the game might actually be playable now.
>>
>>2439273
Who the fuck uses hotseat in 2026
>>
>>2438243
Bait used to be good
>>
>>2439277
It's fun to make a sandbox and play against yourself wish I could do that on Age of Empires/Mythology
>>
What are pros and cons of VII compare to VI?
I don't care about CIV inheritance, also I remember players hated VI when it came out, but after I played it - it became my fav game in the series.
>>
>>2447593
>What are pros and cons of VII compare to VI?
pros:
>mixing and matching civs and leaders adds a lot of depth in terms of making builds
>combat is the best its ever been by a fucking mile
>they finally figured out how to make diplomacy and the tall/wide split not retarded

cons:
>civ switching is awful if you like to roleplay (mitigated by most recent update)
>UI is still iffy and there are bugs/stability issues
>$30 dlcs for like 2 leaders
>game is currently missing 25% of its timespan

everything not mentioned is basically the same as prior entries (eg. religion is still ass)
>>
>>2447580
>play against yourself
sounds stupid
>>
>>2447639
>combat is the best its ever been by a fucking mile
What changed? Previous games have pretty much solid combat.
>>
>>2448814
NTA but they revamped how generals work and its a really fun change. The army units themselves no longer promote but the generals do and provide buffs to the units around them, they also let you pack up units into the general to move them around so it makes mobilizing armies a lot more user friendly. They add a lot to unit positioning and make wars a little more fun to manage. Even some people who hate the game overall admit the generals and finally adding navigable rivers were the two good things to come out of it.
>>
>>2438243
Did they ever fix the map sizes being ridiculously small?
>>
>>2438243
for me to poop on
>>
>>2447639
Biggest con is that its basically just 2 ages and a half. Someone is always winning 40-50% into modern era, games feel super short because of it

Antiquity and exploration are pretty fun though



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.