STARCRAFT IS RETURNINGAs an open-world shooterOn a scale of Over to Over, how Over is it for RTS?
>>2488400RTS exists outside of blizzard
>It ends up being a Valorant clone.The Golden Century of Real Time Strategy is upon us.
>>2488400What makes you think blizzard would make a good RTS game when their latest WC3 campaign is made by dogshit Hive modders and looks like absolute garbage.
>>2488427I don't care whether it's good, I just want large companies to continue making them
In an alternate universe where SC was a bigger deal than WC, they have World of Starcraft, just imagine.
>>2488545I think it would've been mid, SciFi RPGs are difficult
>>2488400>On a scale of Over to Over, how Over is it for RTS?RTS at Blizzard died the day WoW was released and got officially buried with no honors when the superstar team behind SC2 got the boot.If you were expecting these fucks with no RTS development experience and no reason to even try to make a new RTS game, well that's a problem on your end. They will only entertain the idea if SOMEONE ELSE does and succeeds with it first.Same as those remakes of theirs. And Classic WoW. They could only unfuck Overwatch by copying a Chinese game, that's how Over it is for Microsoft-Activision-Blizzard.
But bro, we got female marines in the new STARCRAFT game, I'd say the progressive gesture more than makes up for the fact that the game is set in a different genre!
>>2488491>I just want large companies to continue making themwell go play AOE 2 DE, AOE 3 DE and AOM DE then
>>2488400One look at that screencap and I can already tell it's going to be shit.
>open-world shooter...in what sense?Anyway given how Blizzard seems to be giving up and going back to milk the classics some more I think there's a chance they'll sell a new campaign or two for SC1 and/or SC2 ($40, made by a contracted modder)
If its like natural selection 1 it will be GOAT
>>2489016It's what Blizzard said the new Starcraft will be rather than RTS.
>>2489040yes, i got it. what i mean is that i don't know what that really means.
>>2489016>in what sense?They don't know either, it's just buzzwords for the investors. Probably haven't even started working on the game yet.
>>2488400Can't believe they got Shemar Moore for this
>>2489034You now remember C&C: Renegade
>>2488400>>2489016>>2489084They'll halfass it by making Overwatch with Starcraft skins and bigger maps.>Pick one of several classes from Terran infantry.>Added vehicles to spice it up.>Other players pick Zerg units like in AvP2's multiplayer; high mobility but limited attack options like the Xenomorphs.>Protoss are DLC.>You move in the world from arena to arena like in WoW.It's gonna be shit and they would make more money by releasing another SCII expansion pack.
>>2488400Hold on if its an fps why are you posting on a strategy vidia board?
>>2488407ya but they suck
>>2489257rts franchise
>>2488400What, did they finally release StarCraft: Ghost or something?>>2488545The only good "World of" would have been Diablo.
>>2489366starcraft 2 isn't even good, and has nothing on starcraft 1
>>2488545sounds like planetside 2
>>2488400Blizzard doesn't make games anymore just store fronts for whales. I'd also note I like the idea of this game honestly they couldn't of made a starcraft 3 rts because how retard the ending of starcraft 2 was. I wonder why they turned the Queen of Blades into a higher being made of light.
>>2489802Contrarian levels going off the charts
>>2488572>long range sniper rifle with extra +range talents and stat stacking>maximum achievable range: 93 yardsYeah guns past the flintlock era just don't work with that type of gameplay.
>>2489809>having an opinion is contrarianokay zoomer
>>2489803
>>2488572I can't think of a single good example. I guess the Fallout franchise. Surely there's more than that?
>2030 releaseodds this get cancelled?
>>2488400>Clear propaganda messaging against US armyhope trump deports them
I have no faith in the current trannies working at Blizzard to produce anything of quality in any genre or media
>>2488400blizzdrones will refuse to play any of the 50 new starcraft and warcraft inspired rts games that come out every goddamn year and when those inevitably flop and Blizzard predictably pivots to actually profitable genres declare the RTS genre dead
>>2489991>2014fuckhow long ago was this fucking games beta
>>2488400They already tried releasing a 3rd person shooter but they cancelled it.
>>2489803...shit, I'd play it
>>2490846yeah like TWENTY YEARS AGO UNC
>>2490002KOTORRogue Traderthe first act of Encased
>>2490406This 100% this.
>>2488400I wouldn't say its over for RTS but I wouldn't expect the faggots at blizzard to make one any time unless its a remake of a videogame before that.
>>2490445>50 new clonesNone have its pathing or it's anythingSc2 is still the king
I’m praying for an Xcom reversal. >tease new Xcom>it’s a gay FPS>betrayal.exe>Xcom: Enemy Unknown from Fraxis announced>Game is awesome and reinvigorates dead franchise>Xcom: the bureau (fps) releases after and maybe 5 people buy it.Hoping same thing happens here, but I doubt it. Wouldn’t be surprised if this shit gets canceled.
>>2492997The Bureau was a third person squad tactics shooter, not an fps. It's also not nearly as bad as the people who didn't play it think it was. I'm not saying it was good, mostly because of the shitty levels (from the "chest-high walls everywhere" school of game design) and dogshit AI for both allies and enemies, but it had some pretty neat aspects as well, including one of my favorite third-act twists inn videogames.
