[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/vst/ - Video Games/Strategy

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1792689563466674.jpg (1.2 MB, 1920x1080)
1.2 MB JPG
For example: can you have a WW2 strategy game, and painstakingly recreate WW2 with troop movements, builds, production, policy decisions, etc, and have the in game engine/AI remember it, thus creating an AI that will naturally replicate WW2 and naturally replicate how WW2 could have gone as a reaction to players as they do their own gameplay.
>>
>>2508525
Can you reverse engineer taking your meds?
>>
>>2508542
But that's illegal
>>
>>2508525
I would play this game. The highest goal of a historical strategy game should be to perfectly replicate history, barring the player’s actions.
>>
>>2508552
Molecules aren't illegal, just scheduled and controlled under various legal frameworks.
>>
>>2508525
you mean like the game dynamically adjusts things to constantly push the player back to historical accuracy? That sounds like an awful game
>>
>>2508525
Yeah that sounds like you're scripting things
>>
>>2508525
no one would play that
>>
>>2509165
no he meant that the recreation of tactics, strategy, and skill for each commander/country is perfected so you can play what ifs
>>
File: 1790509614444896.png (99 KB, 728x663)
99 KB PNG
>can you have AI accurately simulate human behavior 1-to-1 in realtime across every single participant in a massive global war involving hundreds of millions of people?
Shut the fuck up, retard.
>>
inb4 some midwit tries to point out
>"nuhhhhuhhh he wuz talkin abut the tactcz n stretgys not da individul peeples"
as if all that shit wasn't determined on decisions and events that took place on a non-generalizable and fully interwoven individual level
>>
>>2509286
this wouldnt make a historically accurate game either, a huge part of ww2 is just luck
>>
>>2508525
No. The idea fails at the core because even if you make an AI capable of pulling off a convincing Rommel o algo, you first would need a very convincing and accurate simulation game in first place to actually get that AI to behave correctly. Chasing that however at some point would become a folly in of itself because you'd end up with a documentary movie rather than a game.
>>
Imagine being able to trace your failed offensive back to the soldier who decided to wack off to a pinup in the bunker.
>>
I just want hoi4 AI to not D-Day me with one Belgian and Greek division every few weeks. Is that so hard to ask for pdx?
>>
>>2508525
we are already in a simulation, so something or somebody already done it
>>
File: mr bones wild ride.jpg (68 KB, 680x408)
68 KB JPG
>>2509573
skill issue



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.