>>2519543
very stinky edition

>>2519547
SWAT SWADIANS

>>2519543
https://www.moddb.com/mods/dynasties-of-calradia
Shameless mod recommendation right here. Some dude managed to add several CK mechanics into Warband (with actual growing , playable-in-the-case-of-death children now a reality) with randomized traits for each lord every new game. One of the most unique things about this mod is that Nobles and Claimants can create the Rebel faction without player involvement, and there are a lot of ways said civil wars can happen.

Besides that, Nobles die during or after battles, of age or illness, and they arrange betrothals way faster in order to ensure an heir. Wives become way more useful thanks to the buffs Intrigue and Stewardship grant you, like more prosperous fiefs and higher income. You can also Plot to kill someone, and I'm planning to assassinate Harlaus (who is Greedy, Craven and Cruel lol)

>>2519543
I'm never plaing Bannerlord, Warband has still game left.
I haven't even tried Dickplomacy

How's Bannerlord now?

NEW PATCH
>NEW PATCH
NEW PATCH
>NEW PATCH
NEW PATCH
>NEW PATCH
NEW PATCH
>NEW PATCH
1.5.7

>>2519489
Genuinely not sure whether just a meaningless luddite shitpost or you really tried to make some point and failed miserably due to lack of understanding of warband modding

File: coats_calrads.png (65 KB, 489x733)

65 KB PNG

>>2519543
>black bear on green background
Blatant violations of the rules of tinctures in Warband annoyed me so much that I resigned their coat of arms

File: 1786301825361287.gif (802 KB, 112x112)

802 KB GIF

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GF_v7ddB7ao

>>2519615
where do you even get patch notes for the 1.5.x beta updates? i cant find anything but the big 1.5 update patch notes themselves

>>2519700
https://forums.taleworlds.com/index.php?threads/beta-patch-notes-v1-5-0-v1-5-7.470975/page-13#post-9943489

>>2519702
bless

>>2519633
>black bear on green background: bad
>black anything on a red background: a-okay!
rules, schmooles

>>2519693
this but https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRzKbNH_vCo

>>2519754
it is because black and red both colors
if you look any coat of arms, you notice they have white or yellow
That's because white and yellow are metals
It's really surprising it takes people so long to understand this.
Like coat arms in ck2 looked horrible, mostly because they didn't apply the rule

>Kinda want to do a Sturgia run
>But know it would just be a tale of losing lands and pain

>>2519786
>Kinda want to do a Sturgia run
>Do it anyway
>Come back here and post results
>Maybe Anon's might give advice, falsehoods, or funpos
>???
>Profit

>>2518577
>(personal) smuggle your own onehanded weapons up to a certain length into arena /practise fights
That'd be cool, and imagine if you get it high enough you could just straight up smuggle in a big ass overpowered weapon through too.
>(personal) can throw chairs, or have a percentage chance to trip people kind of like how blunt weapons in Warband could trip people

>>2519784
The point being made is that black on red is supposedly fine, whereas black on green isn't. Your response doesn't follow the argument, because red and green are both "colors".
>Like coat arms in ck2 looked horrible, mostly because they didn't apply the rule
I'd say it's because it tries to imitate historical heraldry while failing to follow its conventions so imitations end up looking "wrong", not because there's some rule that objectively dictates what looks good and what doesn't. Same reason why movies that don't follow the convention of 24 frames per second also look "wrong".

>>2519811
>back on red is supposedly fine
it isn't; it is a violation, and Albania's coat of arms hurts my eyes

>>2519823
Then that's what should have been said to begin with.

>>2519633
Those look great, good job anon.