[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/vst/ - Video Games/Strategy

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


>Broken arrow devs update roadmap
>the updated road map is already out of date because the China DLC is delayed until 2028
>>
Chyna*
>>
>>2520087
Oh this thing. I followed it closely pre-release and played it in the betas. While the game was ?FUN? on a casual level and I don't really care all that much about high level balance issues, it quickly became apparent everyone involved is profoundly incompetent. The ruzzians coded it like shit so the outcome of battle depends on whether chinks run their lag spike generators, the arrogant french fuck has no idea how to design a game and the publisher are legit retarded and have no idea what is actually happening with the game they are putting their name on.
Also they will stubbornly insist on outrageous blatant lies, I don't mean just overpromising, making statements they already know are false way beyond the point they have any plausible deniability and than quietly dropping it and pretending they never said that. With all that in mind I decided I'm not willing to support the game which I'm still a bit buttthurt about because the only competition is warno and that is just a worse game to play.
>>
i still dont fully understand how BA has more players than WARNO. at the beginning, it was due to much better marketing, even more modern settings, and i hear it was fun casually, but with the shitty balsnce, prolific cheating, etc i dont know how it still has above WARNO numbers.
>>
>>2520224
Because the modern setting makes it more appealing to private niggericus sanchez, bufuckingville base jerking off about equipment he's only ever seem while power washing it and on russian side given all those paper designs like t-14 crushing the nato imperialists.
Even with warno pushing the setting as much as possible with prototypefaggotry cold war is already a historical setting and with not that many dedicated fans, at least nor compared to nationalists wanting to jerk off their militaries' hardware.
Like for real the community seemed to have a bizarrely large amounts of people who were in the military (or at least larped as one) and people who weren't really traditional RTS players so they had no frame of reference what is good or bad.
>>
>>2520224
>wargame
>called WAR NO
Maybe they shouldn't have given it such a retarded name.
>>
>>2520224
BA is a decently fun competetive game, WARNO is an awkward quasi-simulator



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.