nerd>who?If you aren't aware, Fallenshadow is the most hard-working schizo loli on the internet and enjoys the company of her husbands very much!! Please treat her well.>linksTwitch: https://www.twitch.tv/fallenshadow/ASMR Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@fallenshadow/VOD Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@fallenshadowtwitch/Clips Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@fallenshadowclips/Ribbon Cage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWMyb4vKRU0You Are My Sunshine (Cover): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vX_vx_p_YfcTwitter:https://x.com/fallenshadow_YTOtis Twitter:https://x.com/managerotisShondo Store:https://shondo.store/Schedule: https://x.com/fallenshadow_YT/status/2063677913170317823Please refresh yourselves on global and board rules before posting, you might be surprised!Remember to ignore, report and hide shitposters. It's easier than you think!Previous thread: >>112697286
>>112779971Thanks for bake
the lion doesnt concern himself with furniture
>>112780968He's just as otisic as ever
bee?
>>112781554
I love her
What is Pilates girl opinion on Otis?
i love my kamioshi, shondo
>>112781582
>>112782063She loves stretching and petting Shonder's phat pussy!
i wish she would do what deme did on stream
>>112783943Cutie>>112784361Yuck!
>>112785154I miss the daily subs counter
I think she would make a lot of money if she set up something like maros but you paid to get her response.
>>112786042That's just old sub messagesAlso weird, just ask in chat. If you don't have the courage to ask a public question then don't bother. When she had maros on her alt before it would always get to some weird anonymous or troll questions
>>112786134I was thinking that the "weird anonymous or troll questions" would be what gets her paid but she would just reply "lol" to them and then people would stop paying. Things aren't bad enough for her to read schizo email messages for money.
https://youtu.be/F9oCthz-fKQThoughts???
>>112787510hopefully we get more 3D streams soon.
>>112788396sorry, but that amount of effort and parasocialism reminds her of old Shondo things like live ASMR that she's phasing out
>>112788748it is funny how she spent a fortune on a model that she never uses. she's super responsible with money btw
i miss her
>>112790067I miss the Shondo that did this too
This could be us, right now!
>>112790973Me on the left btw
>>112790973Me on the right :3
https://x.com/i/status/2067289640424354062She is so cute and funny
>First off, you can't get rid of metaphysical assumptions without formulation a metaphysical system which contains the previous metaphysical assumptions as ontological principlesPure nonsense. By your logic, anyone could simply declare any ontological proposition to be true and demand that critics accept it as a necessary assumption.>Secondly, when taking at a metaphysical level, we encounter the problem of language precisely because language refers to the physical.Language is not restricted to things that physically exist. We can meaningfully discuss fictional entities, hypothetical objects, mathematical abstractions, contradictions, and even concepts that turn out to be incoherent. The mere fact that a sentence can be formed does not establish that its subject exists; it does not even establish that the sentence refers to a coherent concept.>Thus, when we talk about the metaphysical world, we only formulate ideas or statements about it, not limiting it to language and communication.But ideas and statements are themselves products of human cognition and language. Describing something as "beyond language" does not allow us to step outside language in order to describe it.> Think of Plato, his metaphysical system can be described and talked about in various ways, either more allegorical or more theoretical. Neither approach fully encapsulates what he was thinking about, but we have to make due.Now you're moving away from Aristotelian metaphysics to something even more retarded. The fact that a philosopher's ideas are difficult to fully express does not make them immune to criticism.> Yet, this does not mean that every formulation of metaphysics is based on anthropocentism.You are using "anthropocentrism" in a different sense from the one being discussed. The claim is not that reality itself depends on humans; it is that all human attempts to understand and describe reality are necessarily filtered through human cognitive capacities. In that epistemological sense, every metaphysical system developed by humans is anthropocentric because it is a human attempt to model reality.> When Plato says "there are unseen Forms or Ideas which make objects in the material world what they are", he doesn't submit reality to his knowledge or person (as anthropocentrists do), but instead relies on his knowledge to formulate a paradigm for the reality in which had aquired knowledge in;The issue is not whether Plato believed reality depended on him. The issue is how he justifies his access to these Forms. A claim that something exists beyond empirical observation requires an explanation of how we know about it. The burden of justification falls on the person proposing such entities.> a paradigm which posits his being and knowledge as contingent on reality, and not the other way around, as david hume, john locke, and immanuel kant do (all of them being anthropocentrists).Wrong again. Neither Locke, Hume, nor Kant argued that reality depends on human existence or knowledge. They argued that our access to reality is mediated by human faculties. The dependence is epistemological, not ontological. In fact, Locke was explicitly a realist, Hume was skeptical about our ability to justify certain beliefs rather than claiming reality was mind-dependent, and Kant explicitly maintained the existence of things-in-themselves independent of human cognition.> Thus, when we talk of the problem of paradigms, we have to understand what we are doing and why. The metaphysical foundation of our paradigms ought to be formulated without submitting it to the epistemological.You're completely backwards. Before making claims about what exists, we must first ask how we can know those claims are true. A metaphysical system with many detailed claims is actually weaker for being more comprehensive, because it contains more unsupported commitments. This is why modern philosophers and scientists prefer metaphysical minimalism.> The Christian worldview does exactly this, at least the traditional one doesYes, that's why they're retarded. The Christian tradition, like many metaphysical systems, attempts to ground reality in an inaccessible transcendent source. However, this does not solve the epistemological problem at all. By what method do humans justify their claims about this transcendent reality? Appealing to a being beyond human understanding cannot simultaneously provide knowledge about that being and exempt those claims from critical examination.> But also, the categories are different from his metaphysics, just that his metaphysics uses the categoriesHis categories are part of his metaphysics.
https://x.com/i/status/2067291682903925118Spoiler: it's demonic
i am a better person than you, prove me wrong
You have been accused of shondoingHow do you plead??
>>112794862You're right
>>112795959I shondid it and I would shondo it again.
>>112792630Religions are systems of law and morality that have thousands of years of proven success in the real world in the sense that followers lived and reproduced, and non-followers died or converted.That's it. That's all there needs to be. All your faggot philosophy and "ehrm, ACSHUALLY" is irrelevant.Religiosity wins in the end and all you can do is cope about it.
>>112796683> Religions are systems of law and morality that have thousands of years of proven success in the real world in the sense that followers lived and reproduced, and non-followers died or converted.It is a naturalistic fallacy to conclude that because religions helped societies survive or reproduce, their doctrines are therefore true. Evolution and historical success select for what is effective at preserving and organizing groups, not necessarily for what is true. A belief can be socially useful and still be false.Furthermore, the claim that civilization, law, and morality originated from religion is itself a religious narrative rather than a historical fact. Human beings developed systems of cooperation, social norms, concepts of fairness, and mechanisms for resolving conflicts long before modern organized religions existed. Religions did not invent morality; they appropriated moral systems that already existed. Civilizations developed despite religions, not because of them.Indeed, if we look at contemporary societies, the relationship is the opposite of what this argument suggests: the countries with the highest levels of education, wealth, health, social trust, and human development tend to be among the least religious. This clearly undermines the simplistic idea that religiosity is the source of successful civilizations.
>>112797069>erm AKSHUALLY>erm AKSHUALLY>erm HUMAN DEVELOPMENTAll irrelevant. Please, though, keep seething and coping. You will tire yourself out chasing your tail and be overtaken.
>>112797374You're essentially conceding the point now.Also, theocratic societies are the ones perishing, not secular ones. And this isn't because they're being "attacked or persecuted," but rather because their beliefs lead to actions with worse outcomes in terms of survivality.
>>112797374>gets logic raped>sperg meltyYou lost
Erm
>>112797635>theocratic societies are the ones perishingwrong
https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=RvijK6PgYDw>>112792630>Pure nonsense. By your logic, anyone could simply declare any ontological proposition to be true and demand that critics accept it as a necessary assumption.I never said that any metaphysical system is automatically valid; there are some base metaphysical requirements, but as long as those are respected, then it's fair game in terms of serving as a coherent paradigm>Language is not restricted to things that physically exist. We can meaningfully discuss fictional entities, hypothetical objects, mathematical abstractions, contradictions, and even concepts that turn out to be incoherent. The mere fact that a sentence can be formed does not establish that its subject exists; it does not even establish that the sentence refers to a coherent concept.All those things are part of the physical world; they exist within time and space, just not materially>But ideas and statements are themselves products of human cognition and language.How can you prove that? >Describing something as "beyond language" does not allow us to step outside language in order to describe it.I never said that. I said we use language (which, as a symbol, refers to the physical) to appropriate what is beyond language in a manner which allows for expression and coherence>Now you're moving away from Aristotelian metaphysics to something even more retarded.Why are you limiting me to Aristotelian metaphysics?>You are using "anthropocentrism" in a different sense from the one being discussed.How? I am the first one of us two to use this term. Why do you get to say what was meant? Especially given that I literally said what I meant by it? >Wrong again. Neither Locke, Hume, nor Kant argued that reality depends on human existence or knowledge.Locke posited human knowledge as initially blank, but that everything we know is known through sensory experience. That places the human being at the centre of reality, making it contingent on human faculties: anthropocentrismHume believed that what we consider "reality" to be is composed of impressions, making it, again, entirely centred around human beings: anthropocentrismKant explicitly criticised the metaphysical approach to formulating paradigms, promoting an epistemological approach: the Copernican Revolution he spoke about, in other words, anthropocentrism>Before making claims about what exists, we must first ask how we can know those claims are true.The whole problem with founding paradigms on epistemology is that it's incoherent on the basis of circularity in reasoning, and that it contradicts itself in its goals by its (metaphysical) presuppositionsHow do you know that you know? How can you have the possibility of knowledge? These questions illustrate the problems with epistemological anthropocentrism, and they cannot be done away with in a strictly epistemological manner>This is why modern philosophers and scientists prefer metaphysical minimalism.And how do they justify a minimalist approach to metaphysics? Isn't that literally what I'm talking about? Laying a coherent foundation for paradigms?>His categories are part of his metaphysics.No, Categories is a different work from Metaphysics; the former is about perceptions and understanding of reality, how everything can be classified into 10 categories>>112797069Isn't it just a pragmatic view of things?>>112798362What a weird thing to say
>>112801510NooooJewish women don't wear those
>>112802337Shondo is a trans man.
https://x.com/i/status/2067552903858888877Thoughts?
I saw a post in lig that had tuff's post patterns and i physically flinched
>>112803933He posts there so it's probably him. You can't actually that autistic >erm proofYou can still find his ID on 8ch and he's the barbie love ritual poster
>>112803933link i could do with a laugh
>>112804084I will not help you in damaging your soul for entertainment
>>112804133found it, yeah that's him
bee
>112804019>You can still find his ID on 8ch and he's the barbie love ritual posterErm proof?
>>112782372Shondo got jealous over this girl because she felt threatened by a young female in her shark tank. Bonus old woman rage points because she isn’t trans https://x.com/frillflan/status/2067694043690418486?s=46
>>112808908She loved the weird group too much to risk losing them so she had to say something and take them back...
>>112808298Good luck with that lol
i love my lesbian wife
https://x.com/shennaichuan_/status/2066979620487069972when shondo do this?
>>112810581If she can't figure out zip ties by herself I doubt she can manage this.
https://x.com/i/status/2067837613508067595Thoughts? The saints of God are wonderful!
baldo
>>112810505lmao cuck
http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx-Xl6Nw6QqtdQM6AsOuXDTxHGt-VlPRBZStream canceled
>>112814028 (me)I haven't checked twitter and this just showed up on my feed
>>112814028>>112814051woman moment
>>112814386I get her, hair is an important asset to her cuteness, it is a big crime for someone to give her a bad haircutShe's certainly still cute, though
>>112814386What hair?
>>112814386pretty princess moment
>>112816270trvth nvke
>>112816270She really is
Any good playthroughs recently? I legitimately only watch Shondo for gameplay
>>112817222as dusk falls was pretty cute
https://x.com/zachbussey/status/2067977624844902614
>>112817437How would that work for people who cancel as soon as they sub (to avoid recurring payments)?
https://x.com/butterbeerkegs/status/2065503192276738253Why does this say bee niga
https://x.com/i/status/2067993996316545518Thoughts?
>>112817685its bee nige as in nigerun dayo
>>112817685it's bee nise
>>112817923i dislike this
>>112808298female vtubers when they say they're going to stream forever when their biological clock kicks in lmaofirst they distance themselves from GFE to make themselves more appealing to men outside streaming, then they do a million subathons, they buy a house and move in with "family" (you are here), and then once they've made enough they retire.the only difference for shondo is she's managed to have a few melties along the way
>>112818046i bet you don't like anything
>>112818134ok groomer, pay her more maybe if she won't do what you want for your chump change? nothing more pathetic than you posting this on 4chan in her thread being a regular desu!
>>112818140i like things that arent grotesque ai generated shondo bees
>>112818234i'm pretty sure i know who this anon is based on the pic they decided to use. feel free to disregard this scorned groomer faggot.
>>112818134>>112818234custard melty
>>112818252such as this? https://files.catbox.moe/ov6ecv.mp4
>Tubby self replying after anti postingGrim
>>112818364he got called out for being around and posting in other threads so he is having a moment
is the new strat to just call everyone who calls you out tubby as some kind of argument? stick to antiing her in lig and making sure to put "shondo" in the post so she sees it!
If it posts like a TMelts down like a TAnd uses language like a TAnd is wetCat like a TDon't be surprised when it gets called a T
>>112818804cool, what would you call then, since you have such good and not pathetic intentions >>112818134 ?
>>112818913
>>112818949i want to pet the cat that's wet
>>112819026https://files.catbox.moe/0sapln.png
>>112819215wet shondo pussy
>>112818804>>112818949KEK
>>112818913banned groomcuck melty
>>112814028>>112814386these problems are not real
>>112820916They are real to her, and that's what matters
>>112820940wrong
>>112820916wrong
>>112821046>>112820979wrong
UGLY HAIR LMAO
>>112821175mean post ltd
https://youtu.be/uXubVdTbJ3w>>112820979That's how it works in a marriage
>>112821230You're a genuine cuck
>>112802337
>>112821230the challenge is stuuupidone does not consume a blackhole by being fat, you're only making the black hole larger and larger.
>>112822592Wrong
i want to pat her cute bald body
hair hort?!!???really??0 points for creativity.
>>112823965actually that is pretty creative, bitch
>>112824128yeah, even if it's made up somehow I'm looking forward to next stream so I can hear the whole story the reality is she's not creative enough to make it up
>>112824128Dream hort and Laundry hort will always take the cake.
>>112824479you're worse than a woman
>>112824522Your bra strap is showing.
t shitting himself is what this general was missing for the past several months
>got a bad haircut so i cant streamcome on really shondo? youre better than that.
Mort gauge btw
The way the regulars /here/ post about T you would think he's Pyro.
>>112826349kek
the home of sexuals.
>>112825535he must be having a bad day
>>112827970I understand being upset over this
Erm proof?
nade nade nadeee~
>mocking her hairloss condition on twitter and in her discordYeesh.
>>112830495cry
>>112830790Shadow will be the one crying, anon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oL6sQfYxrpI Alice and her twin sister Amber's parents died when they were infants. The two babies ended up at the church where they were raised by the strict minister, Frollo. He often abused the children, punishing them for their curiosity and such. He always favored Amber over Alice because she was quiet and more timid, less likely to get into trouble, so Alice got most of the abuse. He eventually snaps, killing Alice for her reckless behavior while Amber looks on helplessly, knowing she will more than likely be next.
https://x.com/fallenshadow_YT/status/2068049113816449050things are going to be okay
>>112830955What is this twin
>>112831158Amber
>>112831007I can't believe it took 3+ hours for them to fix her hair... It better have been free.
>>112831178She spent most of that time sobbing inconsolably.
Who is she fixing her hair for??????????
>>112831483she's a pretty princess
me
>>112831483Me (in my thoughts)
