Yeah she's afraid of Bibo
Thats the four letter word

>>115385099
Buy an ad

>>115385116
Don't need to. Maybe (you) should - you spam so much Saba but I see no point in watching her. Buy an ad if you love Saba so much.

>>115385153
i think biboo could do with an ad or 5 lol

>>115385153
This thread is about me not liking Saba anymore though kek

>>115385081
>lists her twitter
>the only platform she's on
>says keep art family friendly (a term specifically used in marketing) across all platforms

Pretty sure it's just a request to keep nsfw out of the art tag but phrased as a disclaimer that her brand is family friendly so Wyoming SOC will let her trademark get registered. This has been discussed at length on /same/ and it's pretty cut and dry.

>>115385081
Pedo?

>>115385308
Explain the exact laws which prevent a non-family friendly business pursuit being trademarked in Wyoming.

>>115385345
Her brand revolves around a drawing of a child, if she markets it as *not* family friendly, the judges will most likely look at it as gross and obscene and not approve of it getting registered as an official trademark. What is so hard to understand?

>>115385420
>Explain the exact laws

File: Screenshot 2026-10-07 at (...).png (33 KB, 811x425)

33 KB PNG

>>115385428
Ok retard. Here's an excerpt from Wyoming SOC's statute on what can be trademarked or not.
https://wyoleg.gov/statutes/compress/title40.pdf

>Consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive or scandalous matter

Tell me, Anon. Do you really think a brand revolving around a childlike character that aims to promote adult content wouldn't be considered "immoral" or "scandalous"?

>>115385308
>Pretty sure it's just a request to keep nsfw out of the art tag
she wrote "all platforms", are you really just not going to respect that request?

>>115385498
Why Wyoming? I thought she lives in Sweetland

>>115385498
>retard who has never taken a law class in his life
This is related to the content of the trademark itself you stupid fucking retard, not the business as a whole. Clearly if you tried to trademark something like "Total Nigger Death" they're going to reject it even if the trademark is being filed by St Jude's.

>>115385524
She listed one singular platform, her twitter, before saying "all platforms". Unless she clarifies, on stream, that she's actually uncomfortable with nsfw art of her so much as existing, I and most kanikis are gonna conclude that she's just talking about her art tag on twitter (the only platform she's actually on). This is the same woman who gave her fans permission to goon to her multiple times as both Gura and Saba.

>>115385081
Wait, she disappeared for exactly 8 months? You gotta be joking. The rrats writes themselves...

>>115385562
you are being deliberately obtuse, at this point I can only conclude that you are a saba anti

>>115385524
her art tag is also used on pixiv, tumblr and blueksky

>>115385562
>This is the same woman who gave her fans permission to goon to her multiple times as both Gura and Saba.
I'm gonna need a compilation of the clips where she does this

>>115385536
>This is related to the content of the trademark itself

That's literally what I'm talking about you braindead monkey. The CHILDLIKE CHARACTER DESIGN IS THE CONTENT OF THE TRADEMARK.

File: 1789633874954868.png (607 KB, 860x1290)

607 KB PNG

>>115385524
He already made up his mind, so any evidence cracking his trashy copes won't work.

The reality of the matter is that Saba has been away from the Japanese side of vtubing for a long time + lolicon hysteria is at an all time high.
It was only a matter of time before she slowly started drifting towards "I am uncomfortable with lolicon".

All humans are shaped by their environment.
Unless you're either a specific type of autist or some kind of philosopher, you're not very resistant to your environment's opinions osmosis'ing their way into your life.

My only suggestion is to rewatch Gura's VODs and forget Saba ever existed.

>>115385612
So explain why fanart has any impact on whether the design of character limited to simply what Saba would submit which is her canonical design, is immoral, deceptive, or scandalous?

>>115385620
>My only suggestion is to rewatch Gura's VODs and forget Saba ever existed
This is unironically what I do

I wonder what's the likelihood that a bunch of kiwifarms / sharty schizoes harassed her copyright lawyer about lolicon and whatnot

>>115385569
She's been gone since January so yeah around 8 months

>>115385624
Her tummy being out is a design choice that has been interpreted by everyone, both fans and antis alike, as an invitation to depict her in a sexual manner. Wyoming SOC can easily look at that as scandalous. Especially when the controversy surrounding her design (not just the tummy window, but the whole design) could be considered a literal scandal. She made herself less loli to avoid YT killing her channel. Putting in a "pls don't lewd me, I'm a family friendly character" disclaimer is something she would absolutely do to get her Trademark passed.

>>115385690
>Her tummy being out is a design choice that has been interpreted by everyone, both fans and antis alike, as an invitation to depict her in a sexual manner.
Show me an example within Wyoming law where this has occurred.

>Wyoming SOC can easily look at that as scandalous.
Should be easy to show me some cases then.

> Especially when the controversy surrounding her design
Show me cases where external controversy in Wyoming has played a part in whether or not a trademark is accepted.

>She made herself less loli to avoid YT killing her channel
Show me a pattern of YT killing channels with lolis because of the express reason they are lolis. Also this has nothing to do with Wyoming law.

> Putting in a "pls don't lewd me, I'm a family friendly character" disclaimer is something she would absolutely do to get her Trademark passed.
Well I'm sure if she and you are so convinced these are absolutely necessary steps to make, you must have some strong case evidence to back up your claims. So I'll wait.

>>115385675
If they didn't they're retarded. The guy's name is out in public so this would be a super easy way for antis to cause problems for her. I'm sure he's recieved at least 1 email. Would be hilarious if this is the reason for the disclaimer.

>>115385081
Friend is a four letter word. End is the only part of the word that I heard. Call me morbid or absurd.

>>115385722
>Show me an example within Wyoming law where this has occurred
What I said about everyone seeing her tummy window as an invitation has nothing to do with Wyoming law what the fuck are you talking about?
>Should be easy to show me some cases then.
I don't need to because you've already shown you clearly understand that Wyoming SOC does in fact reject trademarks because of immoral or scandalous content when you said:
>Clearly if you tried to trademark something like "Total Nigger Death" they're going to reject it even if the trademark is being filed by St Jude's
Surely you're not so dense that you understand a child with an opening skirt that flashes her tummy can be seen as bad as well right?
>Show me cases where external controversy in Wyoming has played a part in whether or not a trademark is accepted.
Sure thing:
1. State of Wyoming v. Texas Stampede Inc. (USPTO Cancellation Challenge) and 2. High School Mascot & Out-of-State Enforcements (e.g., Breckenridge Public Schools). Look them up.
>Show me a pattern of YT killing channels with lolis because of the express reason they are lolis. Also this has nothing to do with Wyoming law.
I never said it did. I'm explaining what her thought process most likely was. I don't give a shit whether you think she's right or not.

>>115385099
>It's over. She's afraid of the four letter word.
what's a bibo?
did you mean dildo baggins?

>>115385169
i'd watch some biboo clips if she personally made an ad for 4chan.
not some anon making the ad, but she herself, even if it was low quality

>>115385875
>What I said about everyone seeing her tummy window as an invitation has nothing to do with Wyoming law what the fuck are you talking about?
Then why are you telling me things that are irrelevant, are you dumb?

>I don't need to
Then you have no argument. Show me cases that prove your claim.

>Surely you're not so dense that you understand a child with an opening skirt that flashes her tummy can be seen as bad as well right?
I'm sure you can prove to me with case law that this has happened before.

>I never said it did. I'm explaining what her thought process most likely was. I don't give a shit whether you think she's right or not.
Then why are you telling me things that are irrelevant, are you dumb?

>1. State of Wyoming v. Texas Stampede Inc. (USPTO Cancellation Challenge) and 2. High School Mascot & Out-of-State Enforcements (e.g., Breckenridge Public Schools).
Neither of those cases have anything to do with external controversies being part of the final decisions and both cases were resolved as basic trademark disputes. Do you just randomly google the words "trademark wyoming law case scandal controversey" and just pick the first two things that came up or something?

>>115385081
>It's over. She's afraid of the four letter word.
to be fair its really weird to have nude fan art made of you. im a guy and had a guy basically donate 200$ to push me to comision nsfw fan art of my module, i said no. its just weird

>>115386023
no one asked aspie

>>115386023
What could possibly be so embarrassing that you would turn down $200?

>>115386023
>to be fair [personal opinion]

>>115386023
>module
Saar