Youtube:https://www.youtube.com/@SamekoSaba Twitter:https://twitter.com/samekosaba Songs:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3cryiz8nJo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_2SKc25JU0 Merch:Omocat x Sabahttps://www.omocat-shop.com/collections/omocat-x-sameko-saba Saba x Roa Kaijin Festival Popup StoreNorth America Info:https://tokyoanimecenter.jp/en/information/popup-kaijinsai-na/JP Info:https://tokyoanimecenter.jp/event/popup-kaijinsai/NA shop:https://otakumode.com/shop/label/KaijinsaiRest of world shop:https://funs-mall.com/shops/popup-kaijinsai-g >Miss Gura?YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoSrY_IQQVpmIRZ9Xf-y93gMember VODs:https://nyaa.si/view/2022255or https://gawr.world(Torrent has unarchived stuff, Gawr does not)Twitter:https://twitter.com/gawrgura Songs:https://rentry.org/Gura_songsMerch:https://rentry.org/Gura_merch Omocat × Hololive Englishhttps://www.omocat-shop.com/collections/omocat-x-hololive-en jackbox Tee K.O. Shirtshttps://jackbox.tv/gallery/teeko/96ca45e6f992c9530956ec2015096c06 Previous: >>115414525
Saba sure is talking a lot today
How you feeling, shrimpies/chumbies? You guys might be finally back! (Fingers crossed)
>>115513897That’s good, before it felt like a bunch of sighs
>>115513874This. I don't get why flatties have to accept their flattiness. If they want big boobs, they can have big boobs since they're an anime girl vtuber. They don't have to be exactly the same as their roommate.
god i love her so much
Thanks for baking the bread bakerbud.
>>115513969I prefer her having a flat chest and fat ass.
>>115514080based and correct opinion
shes got the voice of an angel
?
damn she sounds old now what happend
>>115514205She's gotten a bit wider in a few places
>>115514205she hasn’t streamed in 10 years anon, she grew up
>>115513921I am feeling spiffy :)
this is just an excuse to practice her reacting skills
>>115514302Defunctland watchalong when?
>Hail Saba, still the /same/>The Doob is with thee>Blessed art thou amongst lolis>And blessed is the fruit of thy kani, /ggg/sus>Little Saba, keeper of light>Stream for us shrimpers, now and in the hours of EST>a>men
Saba should play this
MACKERELATLANTISGUREATAGAIN!
>>115514371And phantasmagoria 1 and 2.
Sabaguraette honhonhon
For King and Kani!
Gura is Sabated
>>115514371This one too
"CRUBBERS could be here" she thought, "I've never been in this thread before. There could be CRUBBERS anywhere." The cool wind felt good against her bare tummy. "I HATE CRUBBERS" she thought. The Last Stand reverberated her entire boat, making it pulsate even as the $9 Monster circulated through her powerful thick tail and washed away her (merited) fear of tourists after dark. "With a rowboat, you can go anywhere you want" she said to herself, out loud.
>>115514371>>115514415>>115514472I was one of the weird kids who had an OG Xbox and a GameCube but no PS2, are these good games or so bad they're good games
I like when her pupils dilate like a cat
>>115514595same desu
My grudge against her fades when she giggles...I'm so weak willed.
So much awkwardness and tension
I miss the 90s
>>115514775Let go of it anon it's not worth it. She probably won't be here for long so might as well watch her without holding grudges
>>115514877I suppose you're right. I shall enjoy it while I can.
>>115514543Snatcher was Kojima's first game before Metal Gear series made him famous (Metal Gear 1 came out first but he was the replacement lead for it after the og guy got dropped, Snatcher was in development for 18 months and was moreso his true first baby).It's a pretty good game but dated. But my god the soundtrack is great.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja-GyfO8Whs
damn /vt/ is a graveyard what happened
>>115515160Most of us are fathers now sadly.
>>115515160everyone moved to tower it's just third world shitters now
>>115515179I'm starting to miss the coof days
Saba really like saying APB. Is she...you know?
>>115514177Thanks for this...
She skipped break time, panic
>>115515160The jp ojisan’s either moved on/got busy with life or are more on X from what I can tell
>didn't saveshe's an actual retard
>>115515281What's the problem?
AHAHAHAHAHHAAHAH
>>115515317vt and paranormal linked up, keep it or need it
Saba...
Saba is gonna blow on it...
The fish is extra cute today.
SABOR DE STUPIDO LA MAMMARY CARLD!
>do you think they have them at the store?What, the video game store?
Saba...radioshack is...dead.
holy shit it has been an hour and a half already
>there is Gura in this game
She won't take a break. Old habits die never.
I don't want to go to the hugbox site, but this place isn't much better. Maybe I should just focus on streams and not bother with either
Saba would be a great FBI Agent.
>>115515797The FBI is a bureau of evil.
>>115515783No need to take pee breaks when she has a diaper.
>>115515797I'd let Saba investigate my man boobs if she was a federal booby inspector.
I missed the first hour. Did she say anything interesting?
what the fuck is wrong with the cursor? isnt she on a real ps2?
>>115516047Judging by the memory card issue it is real PS2. Apparently this game is just a little buggy when played on PS2.
Her mic is so crisp.
>>115516047This is a ps1 title so it has some weird bugs when playing with it on a ps2
holy fuck these niggas
>>115516186I don’t want to see you bitching about any upcoming health breaks
>>115516103>>115516085weird. thought the ps2 had hardware backwards compatibility
>she called three times stalker
Whew thank god
Break chads win again, eat shit thrombosis havers
Peebuds, how we feeling after taking a piss?
this game fucking sucks lmao.
fuck you all breakniggers
>>115516355We get fish piss now!
>>115516276It is fully backwards compatible with PS1. This is definitely my first time seeing it have issues with a game. However I do remember back in my days of PSP hacking PS1 games had a disclaimer saying they may not function the exact same as they did on PS1. But the only difference I remember on PSP was not having fps dips in areas that would dip on original hardware.
>>115516369I don't know why she's so into these relic games. It's like some secret streamer charisma training.
BEHOLD
>>115516519The vtubing equivalent of wearing weighted clothing
i have successfully carbonated my own urinenow to collect sabas and do the same
I don't understand this game.
>scheduled for herself Half-Life in November but maybe sooner
>she expects to be streaming in novemberHAPPY
She's watching The Sopranos.
>Go right, then two paces forward, move down, and two more steps forward to return to the office and see Skinner. Continue out of the office, going four strides forward, turn right, make two steps forward, and then look down at the crates. Click on the crates for a close-up. Use the crowbar to open the crate.Oh, she's never finding this.
>>115517345why you anti?
>>115517223Think she'll be insulted by the where are the romans now scene?
>>115513875>*Le touché*
Gurass
This game is really testing Saba's abilities as an entertainer and the results aren't promising.
are all vtuber followers straight up NPCs?
ook ook
>>115517650that includes you, you know
What are the chances she would play Droods?
>drip>drip>drip
This game seems really fucking boring, why would she want to play this
>>115517818Stock sounds from the 90s were peak. They sounded so crisp.
>>115517868fuck you
>>115517882>saaar fuck you bloody bloody fuck you
>>115517868We were so close to Resist or Serve kino.
she sounds more like a child today
>i've fallen and i can't get up
>>115517910stop projecting
>>115516899
>streams for over 3 hoursDisease healing, huh?
>>115518166She took a break
>>115517868do you kiss your wife with that mouth?
why cant she multistream on twitch youtube chat is cancer incarnated
>>115518209she probably has a deal with youtube
>>115518178Why don't all streamers take a break more often? Paying customers don't leave if you're afk for 5 minutes
OH
>>115518209>complains about cancerous chat>wants her to have an even more cancerous chat
>>115517673You are looking at mirror
New cover next weekend.
>>115518394how is twitch chat more cancerous than youtubes if any itll be more chill since all the bitching nigger will stay on yt
>>115518424Thank you, anon. I will beat them to death irl.
We're SO Saback.
>>115518452this applies to every singke vtuber that multistreams theres a reason they all read twitch chat and only read the superchats on yt
lol she read my chat.
>>115518209Because twitch is aids and she wouldn't be allowed to use the open version of her first outfit (pic related) without it getting her ass banned.
>>115518453break niggers deserve death i bet shes tired of seeing “PLEASE SAVA TAKE A BREAK” every 2 minutes
>>115518453>Dude wants Saba to get sick and be bedridden for months again
>>115518519saba was just pregnant
>>115518497>t.ytniggertheres plenty of loli models on twitch the mod team that despised vtubers is long gone just look at chromus vr chat streams
>gabriel knightfuck yeah
Jesas
such and odd subject to bait with
>>115518519no one wants that faggot its just the way they feel the need to type it every 30 seconds hoping shell notice them if shes feeling good shell take her break when she feels like doing so
Someone explain to me what this family friendly nonsense is about. I thought it was just memes
>>115518209Why would her Twitch chat be any different? Also it's added tech work. Also she's old and slow with catching up with trends.
TOMORROW
>>115518452wrong nigger
I was enjoying the stream but when she said family friendly it reminded me of her new rule and made me upset. I'm trying not to think about it...
>>115518626It's time to disappear for another 7 months
Its going to taking her four hours to play two hours of game.
>>115518622>>115518659you cant be this delulu
>>115518689She's not going to add more network/tech bullshit on top of what is absolutely necessary anyway.
>>115518689this nigger really wants to bat for twitch
>>115518606It's just something in her YT description since her return that says keep art family friendly. She's said nothing about it on stream and has done nothing about anyone drawing it. I suspect she just wants people to keep her art tag on twitter clean and it's worded as such for the sake of plausibility deniability with sponsors.
>>115518606She hasn't clarified what it's about on stream yet. It's most likely just a disclaimer put in place so she can't be blamed for nsfw content of herself. Wyoming SOC won't let scandalous content get trademarked and lolicon is infinitely more taboo in the US than Japan. It doesn't really mean anything.
>>115518558got that shark in her
Something tells me numbernegros are angry.
hey lol
>>115518782It's just a few part-timers feeling frustrated. No subtlety or nuance.
Why is chat so fucking low IQ?
>>115518814youtube
>>115518814it's like they let anyone use youtube these days
>>115518782When are they not?
Pass me the controller
>>115518814I wish she reopened members. You'll see why then.
It's over EST buds, we're going to sleep
The game was dumpy but my fishwife was cute and funny so its all forgiven.
Holy dicks an actual confirmation for a stream day
damn this bitch really do be streaming now
>>115518814Commenting is a waste of time.
TOMORROW>TOMORROWTOMORROW>TOMORROWTOMORROW>TOMORROWFeels so good.
MEMBERSHIPS
>>115518865Hello Saba.
>>115518900fish likes to stream again
Members asmr lovenest SOON
please saba turn them on again
>likes fanart but wont like it on social mediaWhy?
that was a great stream
really glad she brought up reopening memberships
>>115518983She will only like it on Pixiv
So what’ll the new hate angle be now that we got a long stream, member confirmation and explicit confirmation of streams ahead of time?
>>115519019>why isnt she on twitch lol
we got saba for weeks lads.
>>115518722>and it's worded as such for the sake of plausibility deniability with sponsors.>>115518731>It's most likely just a disclaimer put in place so she can't be blamed for nsfw content of herself. How many times do you retards need to be reminded that this is not a thing that has ever happened? Not a single business has ever had their application rejected because of fan art.>Wyoming SOC won't let scandalous content get trademarkedThere is nothing scandalous about anything that she submitted for registration, which is what the SOC reviews. They do not consider fan works or media made by third parties in whether to grant a trademark because that would be fucking retarded.How are you so exceptionally stupid? Did your ridiculous levels of cope put holes in your brain?
>>115519019Not only that but:>I saw all the cute fanart you guys have been drawing. Thank you.She said this without mentioning the "family friendly" policy. She's never gonna mention it on stream because it's not a rule. It's a disclaimer saying she takes no responsibility for nsfw art of herself. Their whole angle of her pulling a Nyanners or a whatever-that-succubus-vtuber-was-called has crumbled too.
>>115519019Doesn't it scare you that she could disappear at any moment without warning?
>>115519019vtubing isn't a team sport. you don't have to constantly be thinking about what some dipshit is gonna sayand if you are, maybe wait more than a week of her being back before you start popping champagne
>>115518719It's a kid.The average age of twitch users according to twitch itself is 14.
>>115519105Not him, but fuck yes.
>>115519105every god damn day
>>115519100Yes there is. That's why she changed it. Lolicon doesn't fly in the US like it does in Japan.
>>115519131whoa pal, i'm pretty sure you have to be 18 to post here.
Twitch kids get the fuck out, hit up the discord and get groomed
>>115519253>t.ytranny
>>115519296I’m not the one doing the grooming, it’ll be those freaks
>>115518983Maybe Elon should stop doxing her. Unfortunately there's no alternative to it. You just have to believe she sees your fanart.
>>115519351>Elon should stop doxing herHe's posting her street address and SSN?
>>115519419put her dna in the news
>>115519419How new can you possibly be
>new song cover confirmed alsoWe got fed tonight bros
>>115519194>Yes there is. No there's not. Go find the rules on their website that state you must actively distance your registered trademark away from adult content.That would actually be a violation of the First Amendment. The government can't even reject trademarks for adult products and services.There's even a Supreme Court case about this:https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/588/18-302/>Brunetti sought federal registration of the trademark FUCT. The Patent and Trademark Office denied his application under a Lanham Act provision that prohibits registration of trademarks that consist of or comprise "immoral[ ] or scandalous matter,” 15 U.S.C. 1052(a).>The Supreme Court affirmed the Federal Circuit in holding that the provision violates the First Amendment.>The Court rejected an argument that the statute is susceptible of a limiting construction. The “immoral or scandalous” bar does not draw the line at lewd, sexually explicit, or profane marks. Nor does it refer only to marks whose “mode of expression,” independent of viewpoint, is particularly offensive.>That's why she changed it. No, she changed it for some reason she won't tell us. It's very obvious what the potential reasons would be, but you don't want to think about them because you would find them painful and get upset.>Lolicon doesn't fly in the US like it does in Japan.It's completely legal, and was recently again upheld to be legal in the California appellate court case that said even realistic AI generated material that doesn't involve any real children in its creation is legal under the Ashcroft decision. But that doesn't have anything to do with what Saba registered, because nothing Saba registered was sexually explicit, or even suggestive.How do you not understand this? Are you a brown third worlder that doesn't understand even the most basic aspects of US law?
>>115519515Its sarcasm genius.
>>115519463Her thighs should be just a bit more thicker...
>>115519597I feel like a lot of low IQ shitters on twitter need to hear that last part. As if the FBI constantly telling people to stop reporting hentai lolicon to them because its not actionable wasnt enough.
>>115519597Go away outfitschizo!!!!
>>115519463I want her to wrap my head with those thighs while I eat out her perfect little cunny! In a family friendly way of course
>>115519597You lost, retard. If she actually became a prude or took a anti-lolicon stance or even gave just a single fuck about keeping fanart family friendly, then it would've came up when she said how much she likes the fanart people have been drawing. Cause newsflash, everyone has been ignoring the rule. The fanart in her art tag continues to be risque. She doesn't care. Go look for another angle.
>>115519748It could also be that she just doesn't want people to post actual porn where her parents and friends can see it. I don't think she's ever had any problems with risque fanart
>>115519703Outfitschizo hates lolicon and "goonerbait designs". He also doesn't curse, probably because he is some kind of religious feminist extremist. That does not describe me by any means, so stop being a fucking retard.
>>115519604Sure it was little buddy
>>115519877Being unable to detect sarcasm is a sign of autism btw.
Sex with a kanimouto.
Is Saba a lonely loli god?
>>115520004Its sad this name didn't take off with female fans.
>>115519940Do you realize what board you’re posting on, newfag
>>115520078A please have patience hat is not a prerequisite to post here.
>>115520305>I I actually have no idea, I've had no idea the whole time therefore my posts have been irrelevant and worthless time wasting posts because I just want to feel included
id love to see her do scrandle at least once can you imagine then tangents from all the fucked up food
>>115520286Okay…I’m sorry alright
>>115520488Apology accepted.
>>115519452Adenine, Thymine, Guanine, Cytosine, and Uracil.These were the ingredients chosen to createSABA, the perfect little girl.But Professor Crub accidentally added an extra ingredient to the concoction -CHEMICAL CUNNY
Goob night outpost buds.
>>115519952Christ almighty is your reading comprehension fucking atrocious. When I say lolicon doesn't fly in the US I don't mean it's illegal you retard. Do you not know what scandalous means? Having her character look that young while wearing a skirt that opens to reveal her tummy isn't illegal, but it is something that can cause public outrage. Which it literally did. Her design objectively fits the definition of scandalous. And no, I am not saying it's because it's "adult content", which it obviously isn't. Nor am I saying that marks don't get registered for being adult. "She became a mom" is OBJECTIVELY and FACTUALLY impossible seeing how her condition left her bedridden for months. I don't care if it's a "usual reason", in Saba's case it's impossible. The cuckposty reasons you gave involving the hypothetical bf has zero proof so you have no reason to bring them up. SHE DIDN'T CHANGE HER ATTITUDE TOWARDS LEWD FANART. That's the argument being presented. If she did, she would've said so on stream. Especially during the portion where she said she loves the fanart people draw. You refuse to engage with the actual argument being presented because you know you're wrong, so stop wasting your time.
This is why you ignore faggots.
wife
>>115520926An actual unhinged crazy person
>>115520926Never change. Outfitschizo...
>>115520926>it is something that can cause public outrage. Which it literally did.Maybe if you consider that jealous cunt Brittany Venti and her brigade of simps as the "public." You shouldn't even engage with retards who spread cuck rrats though. It's not worth the effort, casting pearls before swine.
Sablessed
Chu the fish
>>115520024I wouldn't let her be lonely.
You fucking retards, WHY DIDN'T YOU REMIND HER TO TAKE A BREAK/MULTIPLE BREAKS??? Do you want her to burnout again? I can't watch her live anymore because I'm europe. REMIND HER TO TAKE A BREAK MIDSTREAM YOU ABSOLUTE NIGGERS.
>>115526755She took two breaks thoughber.
>>115526878Standing up for a minute is not a break. She needs to take like 15 minute breaks where she lays down.
Guys, I'm getting fucking fat.
Goob morning outpost buds.
>>115519597Nice cope, now where's your evidence that Saba has ever even heard of the Warren Court, let alone the Ashcroft decision or any of the other abominable legal innovations which have eroded America's public morals since the 1950s?
>>115520859>>115527284Goob nite and goob morning outpost warden.
>>115527422Mornin' inmatebud.
>>115527082It's okay, as long as you don't get too fat.
https://youtu.be/jBj1URZotO4?t=1844
>>115516276PS2 has an option to make ps1 game graphics look a little better, but sometimes it fucks with the visuals. Perhaps she had it enabled.I used to fuck off at work and play Valkyrie Profile 1 on my PS2 for hours.
>>115527019you jest but these fucking faggots in chat spamming it are obnoxious as shit.
>>115527382Even antis know that loli is legal in the US because they repost pics of it while calling it cp.
So what are the buds plans for today?
I think what's best for Saba's health is lying in bed and kissing her 3DIO.
SABA
>saba exists>the average brownoid shrieks
Scrib doon indeed.
Is not using fanart for thumbnails a thing now?https://youtu.be/iiE59kHp4XQhttps://youtu.be/iiE59kHp4XQhttps://youtu.be/iiE59kHp4XQ
oh she's actually in chat
>>115530341WIFE
>>115530341She's worried the artists might draw porn of her. She's drawing her own thumbnails so she doesn't have to link their profiles. She keeps saying she sees the cute art so they don't feel like she never looks at it but won't use it for thumbnails anymore
>>115530754Outfitschizo
>>115530362What did she say?
>>115530908
>>115531019What is basedbulba? Is it Star wars noises?
>>115531056*basedbulba Stupid ass phone autocorrected
>>115531056>>115531071Anon...
>>115531056>>115531071Also I think that's just a chatter's name. Lucky him.
>>115531019the tfw when saba calls you a basedbulba.
>>115531135Ah ok, lucky bastard. Now I'm curious what he said
>>115520926>Having her character look that young while wearing a skirt that opens to reveal her tummy isn't illegal, but it is something that can cause public outrage. Maybe if you're a thirdie muslim, and everywhere you go, you must rape.>Which it literally did.Kiwifarms' The Raped having a melty because Saba's outfit made their no-no square feel tingly is not public outrage.>Her design objectively fits the definition of scandalous. No it doesn't. I sincerely hope you never go to a western beach, Mohammad.>And no, I am not saying it's because it's "adult content", which it obviously isn't. Nor am I saying that marks don't get registered for being adult.Uhh... retard?>>115518731>Wyoming SOC won't let scandalous content get trademarked and lolicon is infinitely more taboo in the US than Japan.>SHE DIDN'T CHANGE HER ATTITUDE TOWARDS LEWD FANART.She obviously did. That's why she added a rule that says to not make any lewd art of her and then she updated it to clarify that she meant ALL PLATFORMS, not just her official tags on twitter. She wouldn't be saying this for trademark reasons as I have already shown.So unless you're going to suggest she's doing this to appease Kiwifarms because they're blackmailing her or something, then it must be because her personal attitude towards lewd fan art of herself has changed. I hope it's not to appease the tranny faggots there, because that would be the most cowardly and pathetic thing she has ever done.>If she did, she would've said so on stream.You don't watch her if you actually think she would clarify anything on stream. She is always vague on purpose. That is just how she is. It's because she knows addressing it and confirming her stance against adult fan art would cause fans to become upset and she is the most confrontationally-avoidant person in the world.>You refuse to engage with the actual argument being presentedWrong. I have addressed it multiple times, including in this post. You keep insisting that she added that rule but doesn't actually mean it. You have offered no reasonable explanation for that claim, and the one reason you did provide was proven wrong in >>115519597.She went from loving loli with a cute and stylish design, praising fan art, and joking about indecent fish photos, to now asking that no one ever make lewd fan art, updating that request to clarify that she meant everywhere, not just her tags, and only using the most conservative outfit imaginable outside a burqa, complete with housewife hair covering, and you're attempting to argue her stance hasn't changed at all. You're either in complete denial or one of the dumbest autists on this board. I'd have more respect for your cope if you claimed she was being blackmailed instead of insist that nothing has changed at all.
>>115531056>>115531135>>115531372Actual thirdie underage retards...https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Sebulba
>>115531677I was more of a high fantasy, wizarding world guy myself.
>>115531677fuck off normalfag star wars sucks total dogshit out of a select few games. nobody cares about your dumbass lore
do you think she has taken her break yet?
>>115531677I only watched the movies and it's been many years since I've seen Episode 1
>>115531677I liked playing as Sebulba in the first Gamecube podracing game.
>>115531861im breaking her right now
>>115531630This post screams mental illness.
>>115531630Schizo
>>115531630Lolicon are taboo in japan bruh
>>115531630Nice LLM post. It's true that Westerners excel at the virtue of self control compared to browns but that is no reason to bafflingly stigmatize chastity as a brown or muslim trait. We Orthodox understand that it is still right for women to be covered regardless of the fact that we are far less prone to rape and we're mostly white, because woman's true beauty is her humility and it ought not to be cheapened by constant exposure.If Saba has matured past lewd content, especially if the reason is that she has embraced Christ, then good on her - the West is being resanctified, and the harder the prelest-afflicted invertebrate redditors of the world seethe the better.
The Saba doodles are cute.
>>115531861Don’t worry I’ll remind her
>>115532450Schizo post.
>>115531833You mean Star Wars hasn't ever been good in YOUR lifetime. Which is true, because you are probably brown and underage.It didn't suck back inthe 90s or 00s, even during Episode I through III. Feminists practicing entryism ruined it just like they ruined every other male-dominated hobby and IP.And Sebulba has always been a meme, which is why Saba knows who he is.>>115531999The onriginal one that you're thinking about came out on N64, not gamecube, and I agree, Star Wars Episode 1: Racer fucking ruled.
Schizo posts are objectively the highest quality posts in this thread.
>>115532450>that is no reason to bafflingly stigmatize chastity as a brown or muslim trait. I never did any such thing. Your inability to differentiate wearing moderately less clothes and being unchaste reveals your own brown identity.Imagine going to a beach and acusing the half-dressed children and teenagers there of being prostitutes. Only a muslim or christian extremist would do such a thing. Your view of chastity and the human body is corrupted by your own sin and lascivious desire, which instead of confronting, you seek to control the autonomy of others, a unique trait among brown people in the modern age. You commit blasphemy by decrying and shaming the non-sexual exposure of the human body, which is divine and made in God's image.Saba wears appropriate attire given her theme of beaches and lighthouses. It is not lewd. Nothing about her design is pornographic.
Chu the fishe
>>115534283
>>115531630>>115533542Your entire argument's foundation is built on you misunderstanding the word scandalous, which means to be offensive/taboo/immoral, as another word for lewd or pornographic. Saba's design is not pornographic. I've never stated that it was pornographic. But it is a lolicon design. And lolicon is considered offensive/taboo/immoral to most people in the US, and I'm sure it'd be considered offensive/taboo/immoral to Wyoming SOC. NOT because it is adult content, which it is isn't. NOT because it's illegal, which it isn't. But because it is TABOO. You consistently refuse to wrap your head around such simple rationale. And in doing so, you strawman my argument by claiming I'm trying to argue "Trademarks involving adult content are illegal".>You don't watch her if you actually think she would clarify anything on streamShe clarified what makes her uncomfortable during her outfit reveal. "Lewd fanart and cosplay" never came up. She had another chance to clarify how serious she is about her supposed new policy when she brought fanart up again, she didn't. If she's taking a stand against nsfw content of herself, then speaking up about it on stream is the most important step in taking that stand. Let's hypothetically say she did become a Christian (even though her trademark says she's going to be doing stage performances like an idol and The Bible explictly condemns the very concept of idols, and that's not even getting into the Fortune Telling ritual she partook in with Nimi which The Bible also explicitly condemns), speaking up about. your beliefs, knowing you'll get hated for it, is one of the most virtuous acts a Christian can take. Half the stories in the Bible are about exactly that.>She went from loving loli with a cute and stylish designA design she literally has in her YT banner>praising fan artShe did exactly that in her last stream>using the most conservative outfit imaginableIt's a french maid outfit you seething baby.>housewife hair coveringYou're thinking of a headscarf. Which she is clearly not wearing. I saw that your posts got deleted. Which means you either got banned and you're evading with a VPN, got a warning and you wanna keep pushing your luck, or meido understands that you're not only wrong but bogging this thread down with your drivel and acted accordingly. So please do yourself a favor and take your bs back to whatever bait thread (or god forbid, numbers) you came from.
>>115533542>n-n-nouThe Body of Christ is not a "modern" thing, nor are we bound by the false morality of the temporal world. We reject modernity, for we are not of the world, but strangers in a strange place. Your pitiful attempts to subjugate the eternal and sacred to your own personal, self-serving eisegesis to substitute objective morality with the convenient, ephemeral whims of worldly men exposes you as a subversive and a heretic.Modesty is not blasphemy, and shame on you - the non-Christian - for presuming to dictate that we adhere to your self-righteous standards over those of Christ, the Apostles and the Fathers You, rather, ought to subordinate yourself to them. The fact that we are made in God's image (if you even know what that means) does not imply that we ought to be nudists - did God "blaspheme" by giving Adam and Eve garments of skin after expelling our first ancestors from Eden? Did countless Godly women, including the Virgin Mary herself, "blaspheme" by dressing modesty and covering their heads with shawls? Not once have I called Saba's design "lewd" or "pornographic", that is you projecting your own brown incapacity for appreciating beauty on a transcendental level onto others. Nonetheless, the greater the modesty, and thus the femininity, the better and more beautiful a design is.You are not the arbiter of blasphemy and you hold no spiritual authority. Stop trying to lecture the standard to conform to yourself, but rather conform yourself to the standard.
>motion sickness simit's gonna be 1 hour long stream
>>115535421>no, you see, I am arbiter of God's word and as a "Christian", I know that God says THIS is the most modest, and thus most beautiful, design:
>>115535018nta and I broadly agree with you but it must be said that 1) "idols" in a theological context are not the same as stage performer "idols", and 2) the Bible condemns magick, neither Nimi nor Saba were under the impression that they were actually communing with spirits in that stream. If anything what they did is more similar to casting lots, which was done many times in the holy scriptures, including to decide on the replacement for Judas to the Apostolic College. The only people who think the way you describe are anal-retentive prot fundies, who are heterodox liberals at best and are not representative of the ancient faith.
>>115535619Nope, that clothing is indicative of a heretical sect of Arab Protestantism.THIS is what the ideal of Christian modesty looks like.
The self-papist has no response to that. How typical.
>>115533048Pray tell bud, in what way was that a "schizo post"?
Pointing emoji fish emoji
I wonder if Saba heard Ilhan Omar got raided by HSI. If she's in a good mood today then she did.
>>115535018>And lolicon is considered offensive/taboo/immoral to most people in the US, and I'm sure it'd be considered offensive/taboo/immoral to Wyoming SOC. It's not an inherently sexual design, nor is it taboo. There are plenty of stores in the US that sell lolita or goth lolita fashion and are not proscribed from doing so, neither legally nor socially.However, the point you have failed to grasp over and over and over again is it fundamentally does not matter what you or anyone else thinks of her design (outside of YouTube moderation, I suppose), because Wyoming SOC is LITERALLY not allowed to deny her a trademark no matter how indecent, taboo, or offensive they may think it is. Why are you so unfathomably retarded that you keep failing to understand this simple proven notion? Whether you or I or Wyoming or anyone else thinks her design is taboo or not is completely and utterly irrelevant to her ability to obtain and maintain a trademark on her brand. No further discussion is required because your entire premise and false assertion is that her attitude towards loli did not change and the reason she implemented her new rule against lewd fan art is because she is trying to maintain a family friendly brand image for the purpose of registering her trademark with Wyoming SOC.Your assertion is factually impossible, as shown in the previous post, and thus your entire argument is without merit.You keep insisting that Saba does not mean what she wrote, and you have consistently and thoroughly failed to explain why to any reasonable standard.And just to clarify, since you seem to need it, bringing up how adult or pornogrphic products are also protected and may not be denied a trademark was my way of trying to demonstrate why Saba's design would also be protected. An axiom of logical analysis states that if one property applies to every member of a set of objects, it also applies to any subset of those objects. By showing you that even pornography must be able to receive a trademark, I was hoping you would intuitively understand that any content that falls short of that, i.e. Saba's design, would fall into such protections as well. I feel like most people would have understood the intent of this, and not chosen to focus on the pornography part instead.
I love how the only person he upset with his samefagging "argument" is himself lmao
Sabasoonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fshcsT80CBM
>>115535751But that is entirely less modest than the picture in >>115535619, and so according to your words in>>115535421, the burqa must therefore be more beautiful.I never said that modesty was blasphemy, btw. That is you twisting my words. I am merely stating that nudity in and of itself is not sinful. However, those that wish to dominate others through the insistance that it is, especially while claiming to be doing so through the word of God, are blasphemers whose actions belie their own sin, not divine teachings.Since you seem to like arguing extremes and so brought them up, I posit you this: could a nudist, living with other nudists, completely devoid of lustful thoughts, be as good of a Christian as one that wears robes? Your answer to this simple question will reveal your entire understanding or lack of understanding about Christ.
Fish butt!
>>115536676PLAP PLAP PLAP
>>115536676?
>>115536676On my face!
>overlapping BibooWelcome....... home.
>>115536229>it fundamentally does not matter what you or anyone else thinks of her design (outside of YouTube moderation, I suppose)How do you understand the concept of being family friendly to appease Youtube Moderation but not understand the concept of being family friendly to abide by a rule literally written in a governing statute?>Wyoming SOC is LITERALLY not allowed to deny her a trademark no matter how indecent, taboo, or offensive they may think it isIt doesn't change the fact that it's still a fucking rule in the first place. It's not up to Saba to sue the government of Wyoming to get them to change their statute. If they deny it and it's unconstitutional for them to do so, it doesn't change the fact that they still fucking denied it. That is an outcome that she wants to avoid at all costs. If they deny it, it could mean fighting a legal battle that'll take god knows how long. Something that. she, the most confrontationally-avoidant person in the world (your words not mine), ABSOLUTELY would rather not do. So instead of fighting that legal battle, she's opting to just do and say whatever she can so they'll register her Trademark. >It's not an inherently sexual design, nor is it taboo. There are plenty of stores in the US that sell lolita or goth lolita fashion and are not proscribed from doing so, neither legally nor socially.You think Lolita fashion and Lolicon are even remotely similar because they have the word "loli" in them? Do you not know how basic human language works? How did you survive this long without dying to natural selection? How fucking old are you? Google the word Lolicon right now and see what you get. Lolicon isn't illegal and yet Google responds in that way when you google it. Why? Because that's how much of a taboo it is. A Taboo that absolutely fits the rule in their goddamn statute. And that is the clear cut reason at the end of the day. She doesn't want them to deny her trademark. It doesn't matter if they aren't allowed to do so. It doesn't even matter if it's illegal for them to do so. What matters is they CAN do it, as in it is entirely possible for them to do so, and she will do whatever she can to minimize that possibility. One road leads to her trademark being registered. Another road leads to her having to file a lawsuit. If a disclaimer saying she doesn't endorse adult content of her anime styled child looking character, i.e. lolicon, results in the former then she will take it. It's that simple and everyone here has had no issue understanding that except you. But basic logical thinking doesn't apply to you. Your schizo theory about her being some prudish Trad Wife takes priority I guess.
>>115537380WHO?!!!
>>115536620Nope - submission to Satan is not modesty. Submission to God is modesty. Your syllogism therefore rests upon the implication that Allah - Satan - is God, which once more exposes you as a blasphemer and a heretic.>I am merely stating that nudity in and of itself is not sinful.Hi motte, meet bailey.Nobody thinks that nudity is inherently sinful. That is not what I said, its inverse is not what you said either - when I championed modest dress, you decried this as inherently blasphemous, and now you are disingenuously backtracking to so-called "domination" instead. Even so, to slander society imposing decent standards of modest dress through the proper, providentially-ordained mechanisms of authority as "domination" is to emulate Satan in his obstinate rebellion against the authority of God; it is to channel his willfulness, his ego. Divine teachings do not cease to be divine simply because you personally do not like them.As for your hypothetical, it is just as I thought - the implication that you believe that they somehow can reveals that *you* have no understanding of Christ, and that you have no place taking His name in vain by presuming to speak for Him, as though you know better than the Church He has given us or the episcopate He has blessed with the Pentecostal gifts to do precisely that? The colony of nudists you posit would have necessarily received this teaching from a tradition unrelated to and outside of communion with the Church - syncretism at best, apostasy at worst - and in direct contravention to Holy Scripture's many affirmations that to uncover one's nakedness is shameful and inherently sexual (Genesis 9:20-27; Leviticus 18:6-18) - this of course, being one of many portions of the Old Testament which carried through to the New Covenant in His Blood, thus standing as the Law of Christ. Not to mention that such a group would obviously be practicing this deviant lifestyle without an ordained clergyman of the presbyteriate onhand to administer the sacraments or provide spiritual guidance. The eyes are a window into the soul; what we see, we touch, regardless of whether we personally think we are having any lustful thoughts or not, for the true nature of the spiritual world is far beyond our current comprehension. The lifestyle imposed through Christianity as a living tradition is not something to be treated or deviated from lightly, but ONLY oikonomically through the pastoral guidance of a priest. If you obstinately refuse correction or subordination and hold to earthly customs because you personally think them to be right, or because you judge yourself able to handle the challenges and thus the general proscriptions do not apply to you, this is prelest and Satanism.Clothing is and has always been typological of God's mercy and protection; woe to those who would discard that mercy for the sake of hubris or self-righteousness. And woe to those who would condemn the constraints imposed upon us by legitimate authority for our own good as "oppressive", "tyrannical" or any other such Satanic language - they myopically exchange the true freedom of virtue and liberation of the self from vice for the false freedom of unrestrained indulgence. This is as far from faithfulness to Christ as one can get; the only excuse would be if they knew not what they do. "Not My will, but Thine be done.”
>>115537757https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/588/18-302/>Brunetti sought federal registration of the trademark FUCT. The Patent and Trademark Office denied his application under a Lanham Act provision that prohibits registration of trademarks that consist of or comprise "immoral[ ] or scandalous matter,” 15 U.S.C. 1052(a).>The Supreme Court affirmed the Federal Circuit in holding that the provision violates the First Amendment.>The Court rejected an argument that the statute is susceptible of a limiting construction. The “immoral or scandalous” bar does not draw the line at lewd, sexually explicit, or profane marks. Nor does it refer only to marks whose “mode of expression,” independent of viewpoint, is particularly offensive.It's not a rule. It is still listed in their documentation, but it is unconstitutional. Wyoming has not denied any request for trademark registration on moral grounds since the Supreme Court decision in 2019.So no, despite your desperation to be correct and win this argument, you are not and you won't.
Bud please don't get banned again. It's not worth it
>>115537949You're right, my bad chumbie. I'll stop now.
>>115537842I have things to do so I will read the rest of your ramblings later, but for now I will address your forst paragraph.You did not champion modest dress, you decried "immodest" dress. Your own reframing of your judgemnt upon others is what is most sinful. Stop attempting to frame yourself as Christ-like. You are a heathen wishing power over those you feel are too weak to resist your control. In this particular case, you are doing so through the framing of others not meeting your standard of attire, and judging them to be immoral, when you have no idea who they are or how they live their life.>The Bible says to feed the hungry, therefore those who are starving must be committing sin.I refuse your prideful and satanic corrpution of Christ's teachings.
It's almost fishe time!
Soon we shall feast on the flesh of fishe!
>>115538184Do not eat the fishe
First it was Biboo and now it's Mint. Does her wrath know no end?
Fresh bread>>115538303>>115538303>>115538303
>>115538106If you're so overcome with prelest, pride and vainglory that you can't tell the truth about even a single thing either of us said and insist upon self-righteously claiming authority to judge everyone else for what you yourself did, then I'm wasting my breath on you. You won't hear the truth and I don't care about your heretical lies; pearls before swine.Now shut up Saba soon.
The time has scrib and so has doon
>starwars newfagPass on this stream even though it's early enough for me to watch a little.
>>115537842>Your syllogism therefore rests upon the implication that Allah - Satan - is God, which once more exposes you as a blasphemer and a heretic.Your extremism is what is blasphemous. I was attempting to let you discover this answer on your own by showing you how the error in your words leads to a false interpretation of scripture and how saying "the MOST modest is the most holy" is congruent with that of an abhorrent religion like islam. But your pride is too great, and thus you are blind to your own shortcomings. You instead attempt to reframe your intolerant views as those of Christ to spare your own ego, a mortal sin by any interpretation.
>>115537917So you concede that just because something is written in text as if it were a rule doesn't mean it actually is one nor does the party who wrote it actually mean it as a rule? And you concede said party not making an official statement about it is proof that they don't believe in nor care about said rule?Good. Yes, I have in fact won the argument. No Saba does not mean what she wrote in the description. Now fuck off.
>>115538560No.Wyoming certainly meant it as a rule. They wrote that because they had every intention to enforce it, and they did for years. Unfortunately for them, they were subsequently backhanded by the Supreme Court and told what they were doing was illegal.If anything, I am the consistent one in that I acknowledge that what people write indicates their intent. You are the one who is claiming the opposite.
>>115538535>"extremism">"intolerance"This is not Christian language, anon. You aren't a Christian at all - your religion is post-modern liberalism, which considers the faith extreme because the world has always considered Christ extreme and it is a worldly ideology. You have no phronema and you don't understand the faith.Well, that explains the prelest - imagine presuming to LARP as anon's spiritual father and then accusing others of pride and ego.Now go be your own pope somewhere else, we're watching fish.
Great /vt/ thread you have here faggots you know your fish is streaming, right?
Why is she streaming so much? I don't like this. It's TOO many streams. What is she plotting?
I like how she’s been talking to random people in chat
>>115538744And I've already explained to you that something being unconstitutional doesn't stop it from happening. Specific actions, policies, and tactics used by ICE are unconstitutional, that doesn't stop them from doing it. That original case that was ruled as unconstitutional was because a clothing brand's name sounded similar to a swear word. That doesn't even fit the definition of scandalous. And it's nowhere near the same as a trademark revolving around lolicon content. Saba is being extra pre-cautious. Maybe she's being too cautious, but it's not the first time she has. >>115539144It's just one seething twat throwing a tantrum because his Trad Wife schizo theory was disproven.
>>115539288>What is she plotting?LLD
>>115539144All of her fans that were /here/ left her after the 7 month ghosting. There are only antis here.
>>115539389True. I had my trident at one point but I don't care enough to anti anymore.>medical issuesWell say so before fucking off, bitch.Now you just look pregnant and lying.Turns out I could bring myself to anti, just a little.
>>115539359nta but>complaining that ICE operations are in any way "unconstitutional"You don't know what "unconstitutional" means, do you? Look up "judicial review" and Marbury v. Madison, you fucking idiot. The constitution's meaning, by definition, is what the Supreme Court says it is, not whatever tortured "interpretation" you or your shitlib buddies happen to like today.Also you seem to be conflating prelestbud with the anti-lolibud but I'm pretty sure they're different posters.
>>115539572Thanks for posting proof that you are a retard, we will all point and laugh at you now
You political fuckers are only arguing here because if you tried on /pol/ you'd be laughed off the board and told to off yourself for being vtrannies
>>115539702>vtranniesLmao is that how the rest of 4chan refers to people who use this board?
>>115539742brother, we're seen as on the level of /mlp/
>>115539702/pol/ has been infested with fed accounts since 2022 retard, their laughter means extremely little
>>115539574Yes Anon, the Supreme Court ruled that ICE's actions are unconstitutional. Including shooting random civilians for protesting them peacefully.
>>115539762/pol/ likes /mlp/ you fucking tourist, weren't you there for the April Fools' event
>>115539790Except neither ICE nor SCOTUS have done anything of the sort. Take your meds or go back to BlueSky to write fanfiction.
>streaming while feeling under the weatherBut I thought she hated her fans?
>>115539808Whatever helps you sleep at night, vtranny
>>115540168So that's a "no" then. Lurkmoar retard, you're embarrassing yourself
I missed the first hour. Did anything interesting happened?
>>115540543She's been swearing a lot.
>>115530130I'm playing wc3 customs and watching Saba's stream.
It’s insane how terrible most of the saba doob art is. Like how is that even possible where everyone who draws it is shit at it
>>115541323yuri is not popular with actual artists for a reason
>>115541638Now add [western] + [character specific], and the odds of good are even lower.
>>115541638They should learn to draw before subjecting us to their Frankenstein creations
