been a while since one of these
>>6143239
>>6143241
>>6143239Post 3 mr. homofaggotpedophile
>>6143242
>>6143243We love captcha timers my bad mr. homofaggotpedophile
see >>6143241and >>6143242and also >>6143243fuckwit
>>6143243go fuck yourself
bump
ah yes,""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""space""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6kwYlkhmbxfJ
>>6144369i forgot to say retards needn't post
>>6144444 quints checked for cassini you made it to saturn, you can rest now
>>6143382
>>6145040loved this series.
>>6143239this is one documentary it is worth going to a theater for. Great MGM found footage, and enormous sound.
>>6146469Simulated Betelgeuse supernova?
>>6146579>Simulated Betelgeuse supernova?correct
Space is gay.
>>6147039Guess I'm a fag then because space gets me hard.
>>6147041>space is fake and gayThe onky ones posting this are anti US/the West browns
[royal space force.mp4]
>>6147087cool it with the antisemitism
>>6147959kino
>>6149319That's nice. Stop deleting your posts.
These webms have been in my space folder for a while. Where does this footage come from?1/3
>>61495432/3
>>61495453/3
>>6149543>Where does this footage come from?Not from any real spacecraft, that's for sure. Analog horror footage like this is not possible with missions to the outer solar system because they didn't have the power or bandwidth to broadcast signals of this nature, and most of the missions used very different mechanisms to capture images than a normal camera.
>>6149543A studio in Hollywood. Imagine being so low iq that you believe this is real lol!
>>6147039and fake af
>>6149558what movie is it?
>>6149543looks like some shitty sci fi B movie from the 50's.>>6149545looks like something very poorly scanned with some cheap ass 8mm movie scanner. film doesn't do that flattening of the bands of jupiter. also jupiter has high winds but nowhere near that high. I would have said time lapse but the "spaceship" negates that. >>6149546that jumping indicates broken film sprocket holes the lens flare is badly done and nothing like any lens would make that looks like a gradient filter.whatever it is it look like AI slop. if it isn't AI then it's someones film school demo reel.
here is video from voyager 1 each frame is one picture over a 65 day period. taking the picture when the red spot is in the same place. then someone at JPL stitched them together in a movie.
>>6149857 In Israel silly goy.
>>6149543>>6149555>>6149558>>6149872If it's from a Hollywood production or a known sci-fi film, what film is it specifically? Why can't anyone identify the source despite the footage apparently circulating online since at least 2019? Why are there no obvious frame matches, archive references, movie stills, or reverse-image hits connected to these clips?If it's an ARG or analog horror project, where is the rest of the project? Who made it? If it's fake archival footage, what was the original source material before the degradation and filtering were added?The interesting thing isn't whether the footage is "real" or not - it's that nobody seems able to trace where it actually came from. Usually internet mystery clips eventually get identified. These haven't, at least not from anything I could find.
>>6149545>>6149872If it's a badly scanned 8mm or 16mm film, what was the original source? What movie, documentary, TV special, reel, or archive does it come from? Why does nobody seem able to identify a matching frame anywhere online?Why would film inherently misrepresent Jupiter's atmospheric banding? Aren't Jupiter's bands known to shift, fade, flatten, and even temporarily disappear over time depending on storm activity, cloud cover, viewing angle, wavelength, and the era the imagery was captured in?What exactly is the dark triangular object moving left to right near the top of the frame? If it's just scanner damage or film transport artifacting, why does the object appear to move coherently across the scene rather than remain fixed relative to the frame?And if it's composited or fabricated footage, where is the unprocessed or original version?
I shove spaceship dildos in my pussy! Space is so cool!! Thank you to all the great Jewish minds that brought us to space!!!
>>6149546>>6149872I saved these files back in 2019. If it's AI-generated, what AI video tools existed in 2019 that could produce footage like this? Most publicly accessible AI video generation in 2019 was extremely primitive compared to modern systems, wasn't it? What specific model, software, or workflow would have been capable of generating coherent moving planetary imagery like this at that time?If it's a film school demo reel, where is the reel from? Who made it? Why can't anyone identify the source project, original upload, or matching frames anywhere online? And if the jumping is caused by damaged sprocket holes or bad film scanning, what was the original film source being scanned in the first place?Isn't the lens flare itself unusual in that it doesn't behave like a typical modern digital flare effect? Why does it look more like a diffuse optical reflection, internal bloom, or secondary imaging artifact than a standard composited flare? And if that's the case, what kind of source, projection method, reflective surface, or capture process could have produced it in the first place?The interesting question isn't whether the footage has artifacts, clearly it does. The question is what the underlying source material actually is.
>>6150484>I saved these files>The question is what the underlying source material actually is.You tell us, you are the one claiming you downloaded them.
>>6150491That's the point. I downloaded them from 4chan back in 2019. I don't know what the original source materials are, and nobody else seems able to identify them either.People are confidently calling it AI, a 50s B movie, a film school reel, bad scanning, analog horror, composited CGI, etc. But where is the actual source for any of those claims? What movie is it from? What reel? What artist? What project? What archive? What AI workflow available in 2019 produced it? I'm not claiming to know what the footage is. I'm asking why nobody can trace it to an identifiable source despite everyone sounding certain that it's fake.
>>6150517>where is the actual source for any of those claims?You can’t prove a negative, you muslim retard. The burden of proof lies with you, YOU need to prove that it’s real and give a verifiable source. If you can’t do that it’s fake.
>>6150521I'm not claiming they're real. I'm asking what they actually are. There's a difference between saying "this footage is authentic" and saying "I downloaded some weird clips years ago and still can't identify the original source material."If they're fake, fine. Fake footage still originates from somewhere - a movie, an artist, a reel, a project, a CGI test, an ARG, an animation, something. So far there have been multiple theories in the thread, but no one has posted an actual identifiable source for any of the three videos.
>>6149457>melodysheep
>>6150470>>6150476>>6150484dude they are are badly edit or purposely badly edited video or film. the edits are so bad that it's extremely difficult to find the source media. whoever made them purposely made them to look as shitty as they could. most likely to keep people from finding the originals. whatever they are they are NOT something mysterious, secret, or whatever you think they are.
>>6150541>but no one has posted an actual identifiable source for any of the three videos.because they are so shittily edited.
>>6151154 Your mom is flat.
>>6150470>>6150476>>6150484>>6150517are you ready for this? I actually spent all of 5 minutes trying to locate it with google image search. it took longer to download the video from here, get a screen shot with the space ship in it, and reverse image search.here is the source:https://www.youtube.com/@Coelacanth-km2iv/videos
>>6151188based spacetards always falling for blender, hollywood sets, and ai
>>6150541they seem to be related to or from this music video:I tried to post the video but it is on facebook and this site thinks it is spam.I mean did you even try to find them?just google Coelacanth 8867
>>6150541https://youtu.be/w93zFPcdEoMhttps://youtu.be/AFIo8eiE1xE
>>6150541here I whipped up a my own attempt at making one of these videos.I took a clip from the movie robinson crusoe on mars.reduced color saturationadjusted contrastadded film effects hair, dust, flicker, gain, jitteradded glintadded starburstadjusted saturationdefocusedsmoothedthen I crappily encoded it.
>>6151244>>6151246lmao
>>6151246>>6151248
I wish I could see mp4/webm filenames or search for sauce on the thumbnails again.
>>6151403this fix someone posted worked for me on XT >>6141589if it's X I think someone posted another fix but I don't remember where
Jews got us to space, not whites.
>>6151617give granny a big hug!
>>6151727>no sound
>>6151728heres some soundtrack to enjoy with the vintage gifhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkpaDpwdSUI
>>6151567Song?
>>6151956https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67r2ZQigUew
>>6151974I appreciate the effort, but this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67r2ZQigUewIs not the song in this >>6151567
>>6151727humans won't be around in 50,000 years much less 1000.
>>6152107nah just your ancestors
>>6152107>bigger number much less smaller numberanon..
>>6151598IFT-5 was amazing all round.
>>6152214>IFT-5 was amazing all round.Hell yeah
>>6152203proves my point
Why don't we have Neil DeGrasse posts?
>>6152762He hates Star Trek.
>>6152762NDT is an idiot and burned his public credit.
>>6143239isn't this from the movie first man
>>6152837It's from the Apollo 11 documentary.
The moon landing is fake.
>>6153379so are your mum's breasts, phaget.
>>6152857I think I can...I think I can...I think I can...
Why is no one posting Artemis 2 videos?
>>6154268>Artemis 2this thread is for real videos not fake slop
>>6154271retard
>>6154271you're fake slop
>>6154652>>6156373>falling for it lmao
It is called Rocket Science for a reason!!!
>>6156487My rocket in your bussy.
>>6156487Stop making these weird posts you supid bot .
>>6151974heh, and I just bought a new subwoofer, nice
>>6156377>i-i'm so smart of pretending to be retardedi will mock pretend retards because pretending makes no difference, a pretend retard is still a retard, just in a different way.
>>6156554Are you pretending? Or are you actually stupid and believe the most obvious erroneous AI hackjob in recent history? Oh you're serious...? Yikes.
>>6156554>retard actually fell for itLol!
>>6156558so... are you pretending to be retarded? once again we can't tell.
>>6144612
@6156714were you born retarded or did you have to learn that skill
>>6145197>Atmospheric friction>Issues with near FTL and time relativity>absurd size of universe means like 80% of the universe we actually see is gone and we can't see what's replaced it until we're gone.>Had to discover/name a whole subset of already pretty advanced science just to cope with how all the fucking rules change if you go really fast or small. For a universe that goes really fast all the time it really doesn't like -us- going fast does it?
>>6154289My dad worked on the challenger he was so proud he took a souvenir home before it launched.
>>6156808
>>6157741>n-no ureal zinger of a counter there, thanks for confirming your feelings were hurt, retard.
>>6157754uh oh tard rage
>>6157756from you, yes.pretending to be retarded deserves nothing short of complete and utter bullying and humiliation, it is equally as shameful a behaviour as being unironically retarded.
>>6157765Lmao calm down downsy, it ain't that serious.
>>6157737idk whats wrong with you but its gotta be hard to pronounce
>>6157790
>>6157788
>>61580071:13 That is a Harrier, they are subsonic.Immediately after that they say 4,000 miles per second, which has no application here.
>>6144369Based. NASA is fake and gay.
>>6158482to me the earth is a moldy bacteria covered ball floating in space.most people cannot comprehend how insanely small we are, and how precipitous our existence is. we have existed in what is the equivalent to a nano second in the life of the universe and we will be gone before anyone else in the universe even knew we were there.but you (general you) keep pushing your personal agenda because you hate "them" whoever "they" are.you all will be dead and the universe will be better for it.
>>6157488everything you said is incorrect
>>6158049>1:13 That is a Harrier, they are subsonic.Is the one from NASA traveling over mach 22?
>>6155520Damn, not having to launch at partial throttle and do that pad avoidance wiggle really speeds things up.
The Sun is 109 times wider than Earth - It could fit over 1.3 million Earths inside.
Space is for the gays.
>>6159909Tranny.
>>6159490
>>6159490not spoopy enough.
>>6160496ywnb80+iq
@6160524even your bait is so retarded you are genuinely mentally challenged and worse is you dont even realize it
>>6158007Idgi
>>6160535Jet fuel melts steel beams.
>>6160536Jet fuel doesn't have to melt steel to compromise it's integrity desu
RIP ng4
>>6160538>it'sI'm going to toss you into orbit. It's ITS.
>>6160520I will probably never get to see the S-IC or the F-1 engine in my life, and probably never get to record a TV show about anything.So it absolutely tears my asshole that the fucker couldn't even get straight that the fucking thing burnt kerosene and not hydrogen.
>>6160663>So it absolutely tears my asshole that the fucker couldn't even get straight that the fucking thing burnt kerosene and not hydrogen.ACKTULLY!that was a Centaur based rocket that uses liquid oxygen and hydrogen. not a saturn V. I mean did you actually watch the video?
>>6160663fwiw there's three real Saturn Vs on museum display: at KSC, and in Houston and Huntsvillethere's also a fully-stacked vertical replica on display in Huntsville too
>>6160663The first stage burned Kerosene and LOX, but the second and third burned hydrogen and lox. You should try to go somewhere that has an F-1 on display, they're really impressive in person.
>>6161132I've been to the Huntsville one. You can stand under the replica and the real one is laid out really nice, old NASA guys who built the thing are sometimes on staff and give a guided tour. There's also an Apollo capsule in the same building.
>>6160535
