>>6168668
>>6168668 bump
I found out how to install ffmpegwhy must man pages be such a chore?any other software that's worth using for this?
>>6174611Almost all other software worth using is just running ffmpeg under the hood. That said, there are a handful of programs like handbrake and shutter encoder that are decent front end guis from what I can tellFiguring out how to wrangle it directly is a bit of a slog desu, but it builds character
>>6175308Shouldn't it just be the infile the outfile + whatever modifier increases the speed?
>>6168668https://youtu.be/LqZGsO8b3rQ?is=YP6VXQtbsKZQ5r57
>>6175357Ah, I see what you're talking about. You should be able to do that, there are a few filters that can be applied to adjust the pitch/tempo of the audio, just be warned that if what you're trying to manipulate also contains video, you'll need to adjust that too. E.g.,ffmpeg -i input.webm -filter_complex "[0:v]setpts=0.8*PTS[v];[0:a]asetrate=48000*1.25,aresample=48000[a]" -map "[v]" -map "[a]" -b:a 128k output.webmThe values for asetrate and aresample should be the sample rate of your video, and the values multiplying setpts and asetrate need to be inverse to keep the audio and video in sync. Also, transcoding tends to drop the quality so setting -b:a to the bitrate of your video helps to mitigate that.
bump
>>6175772Pretty sure I can just strip out the video file and put back a jpg on loop.I saw someone suggest the more efficient way was to swap the base frequency from 48k to 56k which retains the values.My initial experiments suggest that a simple speed up is not achieving the chipmunk effect on output common to nightcored music suggesting there's some sort of pitch manipulation
>>6177070Likely so, using an image on loop is certainly better in most cases here. I haven't done much of this myself so I don't know what'll work best, but play around with it until you get something that feels right
>>6179058This one has a great beat.
it's summer and the board is too fast...
fast music slow thread...
>>6180604this is the fastest thread we’ve had in yearsbut it’s all reposts
thanks for killing the thread
>>6180813?
>>6180606The board is moving faster than usual, summer has started after all
What do you have nightcored of no doubt/gwen stefani?
great taste op and others posting so far, I have most of these in my collection. Here's a new webm I created, hope you like it
>>6182184heres one more, i bumped the audio bitrate a bit compared to the last
>>6168668>>6168670>>6168673>>6168684These are too girly, you must stop.
>>6182479This thread could and should be much girlier
>>6182479cringe!>>6183128based!
>>6183305
>>6183128I wonder how large the female following of nightcore is?
>>6183810banger
>>6183992Hard to say, but going off the youtube channels I've come across, probably not insignificant.
>>6183810It ends too abruptyly
>>6183992I’m pretty sure it’s a vast majority female in 2026. Kids now would call it fag stuff.
>>6183992Non-existent. It's all powerlifters slamming tren.
>>6185698bro it's not 2010 anymore they listen to phonk