>>6195099
This is like when my dad left me alone at home when I was 4 and I ended up accidentally breaking several glasses and shitting my pants.

>>6195099
showing two different countries is pretty disingenuous, anon. they’re even labeled! racist asshole.

File: 1779688380940953.mp4 (1.4 MB, 480x360)

1.4 MB MP4

No need to put so much thought and research into it. They never had winters. They didn't have to plan for the future so this part of the brain didn't develop. They have no concept of impulse control. They're angry? They attack. Feel like throwing their trash on the ground? Why not. They will never build anything because they can't think ahead. They'll never stop being criminals because they can't think of the consequence of their actions.

>>6195097
I was literally thinking about how race might not even exist or at least not in the way chuds think just yesterday.
How exactly do you define race? How many races are there in the world?
/pol/yps can't even agree on who is white so why should we take their word for it?
>but le science
Let's take a look at the graph that appears at 0:04 in this >>6195103 webm.
How did whoever edited this webm conclude that the cluster in the upper right corner represents "whites"? How far away from it do you have to be stop being considered white and start being classified as another race?
Races, if they exist, don't appear to be clearly demarcated discrete entities but rather a spectrum.
As for all studies "proving" that Black people are genetically predisposed to crime, psychology is literally the scientific field hit hardest by the replication crisis, it's currently estimated that as high as 70% of psychological studies can't be replicated.
Data collection in African countries is notoriously shoddy so the IQ tests shown aren't reliable and shouldn't be trusted.
Pretty scummy how chuds use (pseudo) science to lend legitimacy to their insane political positions, trying to present themselves as "rational" when they intentionally misrepresent the scientific literature by twisting, omitting or outright fabricating findings to advance their hateful politics.
The worst thing is that this actually works on lesser intellects and the gullible and impressionable.

File: 1770939507087264.webm (1.08 MB, 480x530)

1.08 MB WEBM

>>6195608
>Paragraph of Jewish seethecope sophistry
You love to see it

>>6195608
>How exactly do you define race? How many races are there in the world?
"How exactly do you define a colour? How many colours are there in the world?" Is basically what you're asking with that question.

>/pol/yps can't even agree on who is white
"Leftoids can't even agree on what is a woman". That's the sole lick I'll get it, but essentially you're stating that because X believes salmon is pink and Y believes it's light red, that the categories red and pink don't exist.

>How did whoever edited this webm conclude that the cluster in the upper right corner represents "whites"?
I'm vaguely familiar with the graph and I believe it's an fst difference graph. Could be wrong however. Basically it takes any group of people and plots their specific genome in terms of relatedness to another, and as you can see from it that group (who either self identifies or can demonstrate their ancestry) cluster together as you would expect, while those that aren't are distant from them. The same thing would occur if you started with Asians and then went on to plot Whites and Blacks. If however you're just asking how can you tell whether someone is White or Black, I hope you're just being facetious.

>How far away from it do you have to be stop being considered white and start being classified as another race?
When does orange become yellow when looking at a colour spectrum?

>Races, if they exist, don't appear to be clearly demarcated discrete entities but rather a spectrum.
On this at least, you're correct. Barring major geographic barriers, it becomes difficult to make a meaningful distinction if you zoom in on, say, Afghans and Persians. Your mistake is in thinking that because there are border cases at any point along the spectrum, that you can't distinguish between yellow and blue because green exists.
cont.

>>6195608
>>6195725
>Replication crisis
I agree, the replication crisis does mean that psychology, with a few exceptions, is largely bunk that should be considered just whatever the researcher hopes to prove. That however poses a significant problem for you in particular, since researchers within Western countries have a strong bias in favour of environmental explanations to explain differences between racial groups. If what you're saying is true, then any study claiming, say, that a difference in lead consumption caused the differences between White and Black IQs would have to be tossed, as the study would be considered invalid.

>Data collection in African countries is notoriously shoddy so the IQ tests shown aren't reliable and shouldn't be trusted.
Even if we were to just write off all studies regarding African IQ studies (I'm happy to), this would still leave the African diaspora within Western countries as valid.

>Pretty scummy how chuds use (pseudo) science to lend legitimacy to their insane political positions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

>trying to present themselves as "rational" when they intentionally misrepresent the scientific literature by twisting, omitting or outright fabricating findings to advance their hateful politics.
No, you're just asserting that the- no you know what, we are doing those things specifically because we just want to advance the latter, when (at least in my case) it's the reverse.

>The worst thing is that this actually works on lesser intellects and the gullible and impressionable.
I'd be disappointed if it does, but I'm resigned to the fact that propaganda is necessary.

>>6195729
>reverse
Bah, bloody character count. No, my rational analysis of the information available is what led me to develop my ideological beliefs, not the reverse.

>>6195608
>im butthurt about reality so blah blah blah semantics

>>6195100
Looks like a before and after of locations in Fallout

>>6195100
Country?

File: 1677022723704056.webm (5.76 MB, 640x360)

5.76 MB WEBM

Not related to race per se but HBD in general. Clip an excellent documentary series from Norway on the subject of nature vs nurture.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hjernevask#Episodes

>>6197264
South Africa

>>6195097
While I do agree genetics play a role in one's outcome but why Nazism at the end? Have you forgotten the Nazi regime tore half of Europe apart? Those people are no different than the violent blacks you see today.

File: MogsYourIQ.webm (5.81 MB, 852x480)

5.81 MB WEBM

>>6195098

>>6197272
>why Nazism at the end?
There's a tendency when holding heterodox positions to be more open to other heterodox positions, basically if you're willing to accept that base assumptions and claims about reality aren't actually true (I.e. the idea that we're really just all the same under the skin), then you're also more likely to reject other assumptions and claims (Nazis were the bad guys). It doesn't help that there was overlap with both, so there's even more incentive to support the other pillar to help your main pillar.

>Have you forgotten the Nazi regime tore half of Europe apart? Those people are no different than the violent blacks you see today.
Arguably that's due to the British demanding unconditional surrender from the Germans when they were in absolutely no position to demand anything of them. Then again, they were right to be wary considering Hitler's tendency to just not give a shit about international accords that weren't enforced by Germany. Then again the exact same thing can be applied to the British themselves.
I think it's far more reasonable to just reject any side being good, although the Nazi regime didn't exactly help their reputation.

>>6195099
>top
capitalism (imported from europe)
>bottom
socialism (imported from europe)
>>6197272
These retards would rape and steal too if they physically could. That's exactly what the nazis got up to when they got in power. These losers want to turn the whole world into a third world shithole but with whites doing the raping and stealing. They pretend it will all be clean and everyone lives happily ever after but then you look into it and it's the same dumbfuck policies as what turns places into total dumpster fires.
>>6197299
Nigger kys

>>6197275
jews have evolved the perfect genetic makeup to be the perfect scammer parasites

>>6195097
I think its lack of vitamin d that makes them act that way

>>6195608
Forget race for a moment if you take that away all criticism of blacks would just be criticism and those people would be in jail. Like how if theres a bad white guy we dont think of his race this waybbadbmen are taken away. With blacks you cannot do that hence the pain continues on. I have seen many blacks act with violence and just harassment all the time. Now sure why its always a black person throwing a tantrum and they see it as an good thing.

Also blacks hate blacks mlk jr hates blacks that were violent and thuggish


Maybe someone should find a way to make them behave and act normal.

Also the black community calls blacks uncle Tom if he acts Normal and civilised this type of treatment needs to stop. I don't like racism ether but we have to address the elephant I the room. We have to address the racial problems we have indians and pakistanis like to rape blacks are just blacks and on another level

>>6197272
Not going to lie grew up in the 90s we had this big influx of somalis in the area. They would just beat you up for no reasons. Not sure what to think maybe having nazis would be nice at least the blacks and Somalis would act decently

>>6198676
>Not going to lie
This phrase adds nothing. Why write it?

File: 9.webm (3.27 MB, 720x1280)

3.27 MB WEBM

Slam

>>6200975
This is the subjectivist mindset in motion. You're on the side that committed the greatest mass suicide event in all of recorded history and you smugly proclaim that you will not kill yourself. We'll see.

>>6201641
>subjectivist mindset
Closer to absurdist.

>You're on the side that committed the greatest mass suicide event
No, that was Jimmy Carter. Jokes aside, you're confusing ambivalence to engaging in moralizing as being on the other side of whatever group you want to demonize, or in other words, I don't care about your hangups about Nazis 80 years on. My description of why the two positions pop up together was accurate. My statement that the British were and are abject hypocrites is true. It's also (probably) true that the Nazis did the holly jolly. Am I going to defend them? No. Not my problem.

>>6195583
they can't swim.

>>6204135
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1OsoIZ4VqA

Single mums
https://youtu.be/KBcLD33h_c0

>>6208452
Not like they dont get millions of old washing machines from the west, the dude with the big door 100% has one

File: 1766199278946204.mp4 (1.51 MB, 620x758)

1.51 MB MP4

>>6195608

>>6208452
>wet = clean

>>6197272
The number of people who are even familiar with much less tolerant of the specific contextual geographic aims of the Nazis or their economic policies are functionally nil.

Nazi is just a word that now means "I don't want all whites to be roasted and eaten". You and I have no control over that shift in the lexicon, there's not a thing we can do about it.

>>6197272
>Have you forgotten the Nazi regime tore half of Europe apart?
thats just what the people who tore europe apart told you

>>6198672
>Maybe someone should find a way to make them behave and act normal.
Why do we have to slave away for eternity trying to "boil Indians until they're Japanese".

Why do we *need* to live among them?

>>6195608
>replication crisis
The replication rate for differential psychology is 87%, and the statistical power of intelligence research (including group differences) is the largest.

https://ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2020/06/25/on-trusting-academic-experts/

>African IQ
These books analyze tons of studies on African IQ: https://richardlynn.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Race-Differences-in-Intelligence-An-Evolutionary-Analysis-second-edition.epub and https://richardlynn.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/THE-INTELLIGENCE-OF-NATIONS-Richard-Lynn-David-Becker.pdf

>misrepresenting the heckin' authorities' consensus!
In 2004 Leonard Lieberman reviewed several surveys of anthropologists in North America and Europe and found that 31% of anthropologists in North America recognized race, while 43% in Europe recognized race

2001, Sun and Strkalj looked at 779 articles in “Acta Anthropologica Sinica”, China’s only biological anthropological journal. They were able to get 74 of the 78 issues that existed from 1982 to 2001. In it they found that 324 articles dealt with human variation.

“When we applied Cartmill’s approach to the Chinese sample we found that all of the articles used the race concept and none of them questioned its value.”

the trend to race denial in the textbooks was much more pronounced in Physical Anthropology than in Biology.

Biologists were 1.46 times more likely to accept race.

Snyderman and Rothman in 1984 found that 45% of researchers said that the black-white IQ gap was a mixture of genes and environment, 1% said it was totally genetic, 15% said that it was totally environmental, 14% did not respond, and 24% said there was insufficient evidence

in 2013 Rindermann, Coyle & Becker found that 42% of the 228 experts thought that 0-40% of the gap was due to genes, 18% said that 50% of the gap was due to genes, and 39% said that 60-100% of the gap was due to genes

17% said 0% genetic, and 5% said 100% genetic.

https://archive.fo/TDZem

>>6195608
>I was literally thinking about how race might not even exist
It does.
I'm an expert racist and you should always trust the experts.
I'm happy to have helped you with your query, have a nice day.

>>6197266
Brainwash is on Emil's website.

https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en

>>6197275
Ashkenazi Jews have an average IQ of about 108, not 115.

https://www.technotheoria.org/p/jewish-iq

>>6214663
Kek

File: 171582620532000.webm (4.34 MB, 1280x500)

4.34 MB WEBM

>inb4 some ad hominem
>inb4 cope links to junk blogs
>inb4 bitchute top kek shitposts

File: 1658382394147676.webm (5.71 MB, 640x360)

5.71 MB WEBM

>>6215006
There is only one human race. We're all mutts. We bang each others brains out on first contact.
>cope
>seethe
>and ligma

>>6195097
>aggression

The 'warrior gene' MAOA variants do replicate in modern studies, and the violence-related 2R variant is more common in Africans (about 5%) than in Europeans (0.2%). However, the 3R variant is more common in Asians than Europeans, contrary to expectations.

One SNP proxy (rs909525) for the MAOA shows the expected ethnic gaps, with the highest rate of the protective variant in the lowest aggression group (Asians), and lowest frequency in Africans.

A 2022 GWAS of antisocial behavior found one reliable hit (rs12536335), which also shows the expected ethnic differentiation: protective variant highest in Asians and lowest in Africans.

>>6215006
This video has a section explaining how this is nonsense: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_LPzsPqvKk , part 1: https://odysee.com/@C_Kyle:f/updated-race-5x:4?

>>6215008
>everyone is mixed
This is silly. Are red and blue mixes the same as yellow and blue or even red and yellow?

https://zerocontradictions.net/faqs/race#pancake-fallacy

>>6198225
hate us cause you anus

>>6215006
>Zachary Brock
Brock begins by setting up a strawman by defining 'race' in ways that conveniently fail, then acting like he's proven something.

Point One: Human populations aren't completely isolated monophyletic groups because we've had gene flow throughout history. But guess what? That doesn't mean population clusters don't exist or that they're not scientifically meaningful.

Point Two: Yes, there's more variation within populations than between them on average when you look at individual loci. But when you look at multiple loci together, which is what ACTUALLY matters, population clusters emerge clear as day. Edwards demolished this argument decades ago, but people with agendas like Hancock keep trotting it out because it sounds convincing to people who don't understand population genetics.

Point Three: Populations can cluster based on overall genetic similarity and shared ancestry without needing to show specific adaptive differences in every trait. The fact that some traits show convergent evolution or aren't adaptive doesn't erase the underlying population structure.

And his Templeton quote? 'Human evolutionary history has been dominated by gene flow and admixture.' Oh, dominated? Really? Then why can genetic ancestry tests correctly assign people to continental populations with over 99% accuracy? Why can forensic anthropologists identify someone's ancestry from skeletal remains? Why do genome-wide association studies consistently find population stratification that needs to be corrected for? If gene flow dominated our history so much that it erased population structure, none of that would be possible, you caricature of an essboy.

>>6215008
>Lewis Black
Lewis Black is a comedian, not a scientist. He's forgetting the fact that gene flow doesn't erase population structure. The ability to interbreed is what defines a species, not what defines whether subspecies or populations exist within that species. Modern genetic anthropology shows clear population clustering that corresponds to geographic ancestry. Population geneticists like Cavalli-Sforza, Rosenberg, Pritchard, and dozens of others have published studies showing distinct genetic clusters that map onto continental populations. These clusters aren't arbitrary social constructs, they're mathematical results from analyzing hundreds of thousands of genetic markers across human populations worldwide. If we were all just one homogeneous blob with no meaningful population structure, we'd all have the same levels of archaic admixture. But we don't. Different populations have different evolutionary histories, which is literally the definition of population structure. But sure, let's ignore all that peer-reviewed research because some comedian read an anonymous screed.

We're talking about papers published in Nature, Science, PLOS Genetics, the American Journal of Human Genetics, and dozens of other top-tier journals. And countless other population geneticists whose research directly contradicts this 'race doesn't exist' horseshit. And the objectively gutless shitposter's cowardly 'inb4' comments just proves his arguments are just weak trolling and he's terrified someone might actually challenge him with real evidence... which already happened. He's just shitposting because in the real world he'd be in a ditch vomiting up his intestines.

>>6195097
>Le edgy scary squigly text
You have to be 18 years or older to post here

>>6215540
>peer-reviewed
>top-tier journals
I agree with everything else, but these don't really say much.

>4 the journal system

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oWcfPSJ6eqWC9doaoBYFeRwL6lZJJ0Kb/view

It's only 20 pages.

>>6195608

tl; dr: but colors exist, continuum fallacy bro, black IQ remaining in all countries not just africa, IQ of miscegenous individuals between populations (black, mulatto, white, wasian, etc). Also culture achievments have been static, and germs guns and steel doesn't explain why.

>psychology is not a real science
fucking based.


Yeah I'm going to show you why this is retarded. Usually I wouldn't respond to something like this on Reddit, but in your case I don't think it's bait.

A quick defining of race. I take race to be a sort of bridge between ethnicity and subspecies. For the purpose of this I will focus on the subspecies aspect, because I think ethnicity is kind of retarded.

So the answer to your question is not really a number. I am going to use the analogy of a color spectrum because it is easiest to reference.

So we can both agree that yellow is distinct from red, and that orange is distinct from both. Obviously they are, but what about the point where red fades into orange and orange fades into yellow? Well I don't know. Orange is obviously orange and yellow is obviously yellow, but whatever system would be implemented for sorting the genomes would be arbitrary outside of if not X or Y but rather B.

Another way of understanding this logically is by fallacious argumentation. So what this is is a big giant continuum fallacy, which is to say that when something is a spectrum, or one thing comes another by a sequence, that distinctions between those points do not matter.

For example, imagine a number line from 0-1. If x is equal to .94, that doesn't mean that 1 doesn't exist, right? It just means that X is equal to .94. 0 and 0.2 might not be significant, but 0 and 1? I mean in certain fields of work getting something wrong by that extent can get you killed. That is the continuum fallacy.

>>6215900
But yes, you are describing what are called smooth clines. Humans are a clinal species, but clinal species can still form what are called integrating subspecies. An example is the Common garter snake.

>/pol/ can't agree on who is white
I'm going to pretend that I didn't just read that.

In a very brief and slightly inaccurate description of what a principle component analysis is, and in this context, it is essentially taking the entire genome of individuals, mapping them to other similar individuals, and then forming a cluster. Whenever these cluster group up with each other heavily you begin to see yellow, or red, where the edges are unclear but the core is obvious. If you wanted to objectify it you could "map" this PCA to geography, and if a cluster is outside of however strict we define Europe, they are not European. That is how I would go about it.

The issue with your arguments is that you aren't denying human genomic differences. And they are vast. You need a system of sorting it. Basically the differences are objective, but of course any system to properly sort them will be subjective.

But race is absolutely real. There is absolutely grounds for a taxonomic subspecies classification for humans under 20th century thought. Taxonomists agreed that if 75% of a population was distinct from another morphologically, population A could be classified as distinct from population B and both were considered subspecies. We can do this by cranial morpholoy alone in humans by upwards of 85%.

>>6215901
So in a brief and slightly inaccurate description of FST, it's basically a scale that takes the genotypical difference of the variance of two populations, and then compares those two differences two put out a number on a scale from 0-1. 0 is identical, and 1 is completely distinct. FST can be used to measure specific traits or entire populations. Homo sapien sapiens share 99.6-99.8% of our genome. So FST is calculated on the few decimals of difference. This is a substantial difference in genomics. Plants and humans share 60%, humans and chimps share 98.8%, homo sapiens and neanderthals shared 99.7% of their genome. Very significant. The FST of human populations populations is at .11-.16. Bengal and Malayan tigers have an FST of .15. Grey Wolves and domestic dogs are at .10. Atlantic and Baltic sea seals have an FST of .034-.05. An FST of .15 is considered moderate. A more linguistical understanding is that 85% of genetic variation is within group rather than between group, which is to say the frequencies of alleles.

I have yet to see a study proving black psychology in any direction. The studies that are toted are like monozygotic studies, and transracial adoption studies specifically in regards to IQ. What we see in these is that as one from our side might expect, the average IQ of populations goes in chronological order of Black, Mulatto, White, Wasian, and then Asian. That is the more Jensen type stuff. I would like you to send what you are referencing.

I agree that data collection in MOST African countries is shoddy, but not all of them. And your point is kind of negated by these scores being the same globally.

>>6215902
Also, why have these populations shown mostly the same propensities for ten thousand years now? Sub Saharan Africans barely created a written language. The few groups that did develop metallurgy did so late, and it was inferior. Their only impressive architectural feat was Zimbabwe dry stone masonry. Sub Saharan populations did have interactions and access to the muslims, and early on Islamic peoples were easily some of the most advanced. Now they're all inbred retards though. But the point is that it wasn't lack of interaction. It also wasn't coastal, look at the Yamnaya and Aryan ethnic groups. Peoples from the Steppe dominated for a while.

I am not a white supremacist, Eastern Asians, Jews, for a time the populations that corresponded to islam, etc all of these were good peoples.

>>6215903
my final argument. Wouldn't it be a shame if there were no more blond women to fuck? My dick would never recover. Argument over

>>6215902
>IQ
European-derived EA PGSs showed stronger correlations with average IQs of Chinese provinces (r = .52) than did East Asian-derived PGSs (r = .21), likely reflecting larger sample sizes.

Negative correlations were also observed between schizophrenia PGS and both EA and IQ PGS (r = −.44 and −.50).

we found that polygenic scores with a stronger genetic signal of selection exhibited slightly higher predictive accuracy (r = .25−0.27, p < .01).

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384250199_Predictive_Accuracy_of_Polygenic_Scores_from_European_GWAS_among_Chinese_Provinces

Within-sibling validated educational attainment polygenic score correlates at .64 with population measured IQ.

https://www.emilkirkegaard.com/p/sasha-gusev-wont-answer-basic-questions?utm_source=publication-search

Education polygenic score correlates at .9 with NIH toolbox cognitive score among ethnic groups in the US.

https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2023/06/a-plethora-of-evidence-for-genetic-influence-of-american-race-ethnic-gaps-in-intelligence/

>>6195608
Groups of people who reproduce in isolation from one another is what produces what people call race, ethnicity or whatever; and there's many more of those groups than the labels and stereotypes commonly used represent. Reality is more complex than propaganda.

what's with the obnoxious OP comment with the try hard characters?

>>6195097
wtf does maxism have to do with racial dynamics?

>>6217478
>wtf does maxism have to do with racial dynamics?
Intersectional neo-Marxism would be more accurate.

Intersectionality is an analytical framework for understanding how groups' and individuals' social and political identities result in unique combinations of discrimination and privilege. Examples of these intersecting and overlapping factors include gender, caste, sex, race, ethnicity, class, sexuality, religion, disability, physical appearance, and age.[1] These factors can lead to both empowerment and oppression.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality

>>6195099
They just weren't given enough reparation monies for the programs to work!

File: EGG.webm (2.9 MB, 1920x1080)

2.9 MB WEBM

Elf women are sluts.

>>6219550
Why are you posting irrelevant shit?

>>6197275
>>6214673
>115
>108
How does nobody actually check these sources? They're fake as fuck, the values that found them that high specifically tested specific schools or very small subgroups, neither Ashkenazi, Mizrahi, or Sephardi have an average IQ over 100. In fact usually it's below that.

>>6195657
I had no idea it had gotten that bad in recent years.

>>6197272
Nazism didn't tear Europe in half, a coalition of Bolsheviks and zionists started world war 2 to destroy nazism. The UK and US was actively trying to start a war with Germany, which included the bombing of civilian boats, terrorist attack on ordinary German citizens, and arming communist terrorists.