>>6196361
>>6196363
>>6196365
>>6196367
>>6196388
>>6196360Was agent Smith's voice/pronunciation in the matrix modelled on sagan?
>>6197444Not directly. Hugo Weaving is from New Zealand, it's his impression of an American.
>>6196363that was awesome
>>6196366It's so cool they show the limit of understanding at the time. To answer the question posed, yes there are quarks inside a proton held together by other force mediating particles. The problem is that at this scale we've far overcome the normal wavelengths of light and at the nuclear scale we're entering the territory where the energy of light particles affects the subject so much that it's impossible to draw solid conclusions. Elementary particles is also the point at which size and color stop being a things. Color and size are only effects of light interacting with a system of particles like an atom.
>>6197930Ah yeah, that's the good stuff.
>>6197458Damn Americans are badass
Good thread
>>6198030It seems everything is infinite in every direction. Regardless of whether you look deeper inside or further away, there is always more
>>6196361cool, my physics teacher showed us this clip.
>>6198996King of the Reddit midwits
>>6198030>>6198421Which makes me wonder, what if these small particles are, relatively speaking, as large as the universe is to us, to something even smaller inside them? And we'll probably never learn about what happens there because we can't detect it in any way with our tech. What then? One can only wonder the possibilities, what if inside these "small-yet-gigantic universes" there are equivalent structures to our galaxies, made of infinitesimally small particles, or something else entirely? What if there's something akin to life in there?Even more wonderfully: What if the universe as we know it is just something infinitesimally small inside something even larger? Something so stupendously larger and completely beyound our wildest dreams? What if our universe is something akin to what we know as a living cell? What if our universe is just a small cell of a large super-organism that completely defies even what our wildest dreams could project?
>>6196361>>6196363>>6196365>>6196366
>>6199962>video ends at the beat dropgenuinely kys
>>6199994Scientist at the time didn't know the inside of the atom yet, I fid the abrupt cut apt
>>6199994
>>6197458You're thinking of his character, Elrond
>>6198412legendary video. remember seeing this years agocan't imagine how much progress was made in biomechanics since
>>6200343Alright I could have sworn he was a Kiwi by his natural accent but apparently he's Australian. And Elrond is still an American accent but a different one.
>>6199991Nice bait, very well done.
>>6198996I still listen to this on repeat.
>>6199870Sagan was legit, not his fault redditoids latched on. Although that's really more 2011 reddit.
>>6203489>Sagan was legitHe spewed leftist universalist tripe that is contrary to anything even remotely based.
>>6196361>>6196363>>6196365>>6196366Im slightly more impressed with the traditional film-based special/visual effects used to make this.
>>6198412based
>>6204590More impressed than what?My wife does this alk the time –stating things are more, less, bigger, smaller, better, worse – but doesn’t finish the thought. More… than what?It's similar to how people say something is "so good", or so bad, so funny, etc. It's so funny that… what? WHAT WAS THE CONSEQUENCEEEEEEEEE
>>6205354>he's so funnyyou mean he's very funny? he's quite funny? those absolute statements don't need further clarification.yes, I'm very fun at parties.
>>6205357or should that be>I'm so fun at partieskek get it? funny joke.
>>6205354I feel sorry for your wife, that she has to put up with your all caps Reddit funnee.I hope that was blatant enough for you.
>>6197930memories of my youth on my ati 2400bps modem
>>6206426do you have the rest of it?
>>6207256Why are you so transphobic?
>>6206438neat
>>6206263NTA, he is right that women suck at communicating and telling stories.My gf starts any story with the point first and then gives me the background because I made it clearly obvious listening to what she has to say without stating the point first is impossible because women ramble on and on with little respect to the listener.
>>6207651https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYAw79386WIEnjoy.
>>6207763Thanks. I think civilizations function in a similar manner. In this case the wolves are somewhere between "hard times create strong men" and "strong men create good times".
>>6208004>did you just have a hecking winning strategy on a evolutionary basis?
>>6208004The wolves are a good example of how things are always more complicated than people think. No matter how much they think they have it figured out they're definitely missing most of it.
>>6197444>"We must imagine the mere shadow of a three-dimensional object... Mister Anderson."
>>6199991Holy fuck that was atrocious. I think that was, what, at least 3 lies of omission in the first segment alone?
>>6196360https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLlwDyTIHvxgZwoiRPJ70KzjcrC7iW3xvlhttps://yuotu.be/xZCpzbA_VJQ
>>6205354>More impressed than what?NTA but are you retarded? Anon clearly meant he is more impressed in the making of this, rather than the content itself.
>>6210817It may be an obvious implication to you and me, but autistic sperglords have trouble reading between the lines. It becomes literally painful for them to process.
how is it that William Carpenter is not totally dominating this thread?4chan has truly fallen
>>6196367im sorry if my question is very stupid, but how tf they know about all those sars outside the unvierse? justcalculations or they tech they use are really that pro ?
>>6199989ayyyyy
>>6200045what is the purpose to know a triangle size?
>>6205260its so cute, it looks like a bussy
>>6206426it makes me feel instantly more inteligent
>>6206428i love him, and his pretty eyes
>>6206438thank you wolfies
>>6206441wait, what was he saying in the last clip? i didnt understand much we cant see the sun in outer space?
>>6207716its biology
>>6208001thank u anon
>>6212878My interpretation is the guy in the last clip is expanding upon what the guy is the first clip talked about. "[light] will blind you, but you cannot see it." He is referencing the dimensions discussed here >>6196360. The guy in the last segment is saying since we cannot see light in our 3rd dimension it must exist in a higher dimension beyond our perception since we can see what light illuminates . In this case, the tesseract is the sun, the cube is illuminated matter and the visible light is the shadow. White Light (4D) passed through a prism (3D) creates the color spectrum (2D). In our 3rd dimension visible light is not transmitted it is filtered and reflected. We cannot see the Sun in space because there is no atmosphere to filter the light and nothing for the light to bounce off of. If we attempt to see something beyond or comprehension we will go blind. This happens at a smaller scale in our dimension with lasers, screens, solar eclipses, fire, etc. Staring at any source of light on earth for extended periods of time can damage our eye sight and, depending on the brightness, can cause temporary or even permanent blindness. Similarly, if someone were to see true shape of the tesseract they would have a seizure due to trying to comprehend a 4th dimensional object with a 3rd dimensional brain.
>>6208010Machiavellianism and other dark triad traits in our society serve a greater purpose.
>>6206428>>6212875Here's the complete documentary - Mechanical Marvels - Clockwork Dreams (BBC)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMDFRwxCSwA
>>6210817If that's what he meant then he should have stated as much. It's not fucking complicated.
>>6206263I don't call her on it because she’s not capable of understanding the logic and/or correcting her behaviour; she would just get defensive or sad or whatever, so I say nothing about it to her and instead vent every few years on 4chan to you retards buy also to the few people in the world who actually understand.
>>6208910why the pic of the tranny's? this is going over my head
>>6196360this video sparks profound carnal interest to me
>>6196388>>6196389That's pretty fucked
>>6199991>>6208964The trouble is they let the female character do it. If it'd been Adam himself you'd probably listen to it, but we know from testing that humans (including women) tend to filter out shrill, high-pitched voices and disregard any information they render.
>>6199989Man, what's up with the actors onion hired? What a great looking mature white woman.
>>6213547>It's not fucking complicated.and yet...
>>6213589Because reality is deterministic. Lightwaves will never be particles, men will never be women, and blacks will never be whites. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAYPi0nqJ50LGBTQuantum theory is demoralization disguised as science.
>>6208001Interesting webm.
>>6206438Cool stuff.
>>6196360I thought the 4th dimension was Time and "moving a cube at right angles equal to itself" where the right angles are forward and backward in time.
>>6213371thank you so much!
>>62159163 dimensions of space and 1 of time. A tesseract exists in 4 dimensions of space.
>>6215916
>>6216408
>>6216409
>>6216411Thank God they decided to stop someplace
>>6213358>This bubble in this jar is at 10,000 degrees bro. It's hot enough to cause fusion, but not hot enough to even cause smokingI love these modern scientists
>>6216444But how would it cause smoking if there is no fuel?
>>6216549His mind is going to fucking explode once he realizes that a stovetop can heat up without any smoke appearing.
>>6206433Watching this while in the process of replacing the CV axles on my "modern" vehicle
>>6216411I'm saving these vids for the next time I'm high on edibles. Ty.
>>6206441
>>6216444
>>6217238You want the mantis shrimp, actually. The pistol shrimp doesn't do that thing with the cavitation bubble that produces light. Sadly I don't have any webms of this.
>>6217254Both the mantis shrimp and pistol shrimp produce Sonoluminescence via cavitation bubbles when they strike.
>>6199993genuine kek
>>6215880I'm more confused now. The tranny in the vid you linked explains that what we see visually is contradicting what is happening on a subatomic level. which helps him reconcile mental illness but you sating men will never be woman, while true, contradicts that what we see visually is not what is happening on a subatomic level
>>6207787You're unlovable
>>6212820just curious but how old are you?
>>6212820https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Space_Telescope
>>6216408>time is physicalWhat a fucking absolute idiot. Every single one of these dimension brainlets always says the dumbest fucking shit ever.
>>6216411>big bangAnnnnnnd there we go. Doctorate in retardedness. There's a million ways to calculate the impossibility and absurdity of a big bang, you will get laughed the fuck out of any real scientists gathering.
>>6217335your mom produces sonoluminevenaessence we when i fuck her in the butt.
>>6218545>>6218547I haven't watched the video but it's really easy to tell you're a retarded redittor
Full video herehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BqnN72OlqA
>>6218584He's right though. The info in those videos is retarded. Same with the guy in this webm >>6206441 that claims you can't see the sun in space.
>>6218584Retards experience time slower than someone with an extremely active mind. You ever had a friend? You ever had two friends? Probably not. But everyone else on the planet besides you has had a friend or more that are just-fucking-slow... People experience and perceive shit differently. Time is subjective to the viewer. i can be in a moment of time, tripping my fucking baaaaaaaaaaaaalllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllssss off on LSD and Shrooms and weed and alcohol in a circled caravan of 100 cars of friends from highschool in the dried out lakebed above Big Bear Mountain in Southern California, watching friends paint shit tripping balls, then sing karaoke with a friend DJing tripping balls, then lose my focus on reality as the terrain begins to change, the sky illuminates, turns from a blue-gray to cotton candy, feel the floor wobble beneath my feet like a bounce house, jump inside my OG Hummer, try to collect myself, need to piss, the entire planet around me shapeshifting and leaning left and right with my dick in my hands, trying to convince myself this isn't real what i'm experiencing with my dick and my hands and my stream spraying all over the place as the silhouettes of the mountains dance like a Looney Tuness cartoon; ONLY to be able to fixate reality on the beat being played by my friend DJing as i try to ignore the wacky Earth, looking up, watching every element of the sky separate into different sections like a pop-up book; the clouds are separated from the background sky, the moon is it's own slice, the birds and bats and insects flying by are their own slices in the sky, the ominous glow above the mountain ridges their own moving slice of a page floating in the sky...ALL in over an hour, i experienced what felt like a war of the senses over a day, a friend comes up and thinks he spoke to me 10 seconds ago.i am running out of room, but experiencing existence is subjective.
>>6218969moar
>>6219419
>>6219536
>>6219538
>>6219540
>>6216408>>6216409>>6216411haven't seen this in 15 years, thanks anon
>>6219540Holy shit. They did ebonics in educational videos even back in 1961, in order to appeal to the kids.
>>6203609Most scientists are idealists. In an ideal world, we all get along and there's no racism, hunger, etc. etc. He also had a show for all audiences even kids so of course he preaches that shit, just like all family and kids shows have done. I won't fault him for that, but he was still a jew and I'm wary of anything they peddle ofc.
>>6219755>In an ideal world>there's no racismwrong.
>>6219816I'm talking about their vision, retard
Full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqhwyYajCd4
>>6213365Name one
>>6202363>>6208964IQ "science" is only one step above MBTI, which is only one step above astrology. Fact of the matter is that intelligence is a very vague and subjective concept that can't be quantified with any certainty in the first place. When people try, it doesn't work.Look up the Flynn Effect. If IQ was an objective measure, this problem wouldn't exist.IQ is a sacred cow for midwits. Move on from it.
>>6218547The James Webb telescope literally up ended our understanding of the big bang when it peered back 13 billion years and saw fully formed ancient galaxies which should not have been possible. The big bang fundamentally has always been a metaphysical construct devoid of serious materialist analysis and the biggest problem is the ‘primary moved’ needed to make all the movement occur from none to cause the big bang which idealists naturally assert is god or something of this nature. The philosophical school of Dialectical Materialism understands that motion, matter and time are inseparable and thus matter has always been in motion forever and always will be and thus the universe is infinite and size and scale and can be subdivided infinitely as well as >>6198421 accurately predicted. The philosophy of Dialectical Materialism has continually been proven correct and also predicted that Einstein’s Relativity was also correct (barring some minor disagreements) but is nonetheless suppressed because of the ultimate conclusions it draws about society, politics and the economy.
>>6196360
>>6220316They are a catalyst for progress. Take for example those highly detailed anatomy books that are used in medical schools. I doubt your average person would have the constitution to dissect enough bodies to be that detailed and accurate with those illustrations. However, there is no doubt that those illustrations paved the way for many advances in the medical field. It takes a degree of psychopathy to be able to kill a living creature, let alone dissect or butcher one. The machiavellians who push for population control are no different from the wolves in the video. Too much demand constricts supply and the quality of life of everyone will tank. Overpopulation leads to the fighting over resources and bellicosity stifles progress. Narcissism allows for competition which pushes people to become better.
>>6220361Anybody from ancient times with enough curiosity could do dissections and autopsies. You don’t need to be a psychopath do autopsies/dissections. There are non-psychopathic people that do that everyday.
>>6220361Also most of the world is below replacement birth rates. Trying not to sperg up this thread but you are a fucking retard.
>>6219536heck yeah
>>6206428That's just absolutely fucking insanity. Holy shit
>>6217831>while true, contradicts that what we see visually is not what is happening on a subatomic levelThere is no such thing as atoms.
>>6220256>>6220257>>6220258Context? Sounds like some q-matching ending numbers shit.
I feel like I'm being trolled with this one.People are saying you're smoothbrained if you can't get the arrow to go clockwise, but the arrow is counterclockwise no matter which way I rotate my perspective. Do people just not understand the difference between clockwise/counterclockwise?Am I retarded???
>>6222320You're not retarded, whoever explain it probably didn't do a good job. It's possible to see this rotate clockwise or counterclockwise.If you see the counterclockwise view, you're assuming you're looking down at the arrow.Try to imagine you're below the arrow looking up, you'll see it go the other way. It's the same in real life.
>>6222320I can flip it at will as soon as the tip of the arrow is obscured.
>>6222515This was how I got it as well, but even then it only works clockwise if I imagine blue on the inside and yellow outside. I can see it counterclockwise with both colors swapped no problem.I guess I'm only 75% of a true ensouled shape-rotator...
>>6220324Certainty is for midwits and you sound steeped in cope. The things you just listed are only categorizations, and are at best only potentially useful in some contexts and frameworks. It's not a dunk to insist they aren't 'science'. It's like saying it's not science to sort people by eye colour. It's only when you start to make predictions based on the categories you chose that it can even start to be 'science' or stupid -and IQ/g-factor is one of the most successfully predictive metrics we have in psychology.
>>6223010IQ bullshit sits next to dream interpretation, big pharma pill pushing, and therapy grifting for women and dipshits.Psychology is a colossal scam from top to bottom. You wasted your money going to college, congrats. They're all cranks and now you're one of them.
>>6220275More of this?
>>6223116You really think dream interpretation has the same validity as IQ testing? Psychology has too many variables that can't be isolated for the same certainty as other sciences but that doesn't mean it's impossible to model. I had a scholarship in chemistry but that's not anything to brag about, most phD students are midwits too, but thanks for congratulating me anyway. And well done scoring double digits when you tried for mensa!
>>6223270All you retards can do is assert that IQ science works because of studies you can't seem to remember in any detail.At a baseline, what you retards even mean by intelligence is suspect. Like "consciousness," it's a load-bearing term for philosophers. It's semantic, but you clearly don't know what intelligence is, or have a working definition. At best, you claim that these pattern recognition tests prove intelligence, but in reality they just correlate with your vague, self-indulgent definition that means whatever is convenient for you.Second, everyone always says "Hurr durr, it's reproducible," when it fucking isn't. Whether or not you're in a shitty mood can influence your ""IQ"" by multiple standards of deviation. You retards speak out of one side of your mouth about how it measures intelligence, which is a stable, intrinsic characteristics, and out of the other side of your mouth you're telling people to study and get rid of stress, because it can massively impact someone's score. Both things can't be true at the same time. You're experiencing cognitive dissonance because of how stupid that is.There's also they Flynn Effect to consider. We've been using IQ tests for 100 years. We have archived data going back to the fucking 1920s, and when you compare those test results now to the same tests done in similar conditions, it turns out that in 1920 the average IQ was around fucking 70.So how do you explain that? Everyone back then was just literally retarded? Have we evolved into a different species? There isn't anything that can answer that massive a discrepancy other than the fact that IQ tests don't measure intelligence. Whatever they do measure is several stages removed.And I don't care about your faggy scholarship in chemistry, if you even had a degree you'd be bragging about that, not just the scholarship. So you're a failure, first up. Second, it's not the right discipline; you're an insecure fuckwit establishing meaningless accolades.
>>6223280Kek did he hit a nerve?
>>6222320the trick I used to flip it's direction was to pretend blue is the outside of the arrow or the other way around right as the tip disappears like this anon said>>6222515
>>6220324partially right. it's not vague it's just hard to quantify because intelligence is more than just having a large vocabulary and solving puzzles. there's definitely correlation but the two aren't directly related. there are no low iq top chess players, but being a top chess player doesn't mean you have an extraordinarily high iq. intelligence and iq are two different yet related concepts.
>>6196360If you like this video, you may also like a film called Flatland. It's on Youtube for free. I don't quite think a fourth dimension exists. Everything we can see is in the third dimension, so is there anything that exists in the fourth that exists within our universe?>>6196367When I see videos like this, I am reminded of people who centuries ago mapped the landmasses of Earth. However, they did not know the shape of Earth's landmasses, so they would often-times draw continents inaccurately, or would draw clouds to represent the unknown.
>>6200045Please can you tell me the name the song that plays in this video?
>>6213589trannies try to appear as women, but that appearance only exists when observed. without the performance for said observation (the viewer/subject/audience) then theyre just their original state aka a man. so they will never be a woman.
>>6220325>muh gommunismywnbaw
>>6200045>>6223649>Please can you tell me the name the song that plays in this video?JAM Project - Shugoshin-The guardianhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=In5fBfkCavk
>>6206438And then Trump came along to sell all this 'unused' land bit by bit to jewish developers.
>>6223772iirc said land is well outside the park area.
>>6223739Thanks.
>>6223748nice scarlatti sonata in E
>>6221497I agree in so far that we can't know if there are atoms. But believing there are and using these Ideas of atoms can be help to enable industrial production on a higher level. How are you gonna teach nuclear fusion without the idea of an atom? The heat of nuclear energy is real and can be measured. Even though atoms might not be real, the idea of the atom enables humans to activate this nuclear energy.
>>6219816I mean, Hitler tried to end racism with his own vision.
>>6223924based scarlatti recognizer
>>6220901I am not saying you need to be a psychopath to do dissections. I am saying there is a degree of callousness or lack of empathy, which are psychopathic traits, which is needed when doing dissections.>>6220903Most of the FIRST world is below replacement. The third world seem to be doing just fine. So much so that they are being brought over to the first world by the thousands to help boost their fertility rates.>>6221520There is a lot of mystery surrounding William Shakespeare and his works. He is similar to Pythagoras in the Math-magic land clip, hiding messages in his work to communicate to others. To answer your question genuinely we would have to discuss sacred geometry, hermeticism, masonry, etc. I'm trying to keep this thread more on the /sci/ side rather than /x/, out of respect for OP of this thread. Though, personally, I believe the two subjects are one in the same.>>6223230I was on vacation last week. I'll post more sometime this week if this thread is still up.
>>6201381
>>6205260this will never be profitable as long as jet fuel is tax-free.
>>6222320this one's mind raping me, i can finally get it to swap directions at will, but it took me 10 minutes of staring and visualizing
>>6223813For now.
>>6207787No one cares that you talk to your hand, retard.
>>6223116Said the dumb faggot who probably did not even get through high school.
>>6225023How much money have you spent on this crap?
>>6196361I watched this while tripping on acid for the first time, shit fucked me up for a minute. I fell asleep right after and I had a trippy dream where I could see myself floating outside my body, then my perspective kept zooming out more and more and more until I was standing on the moon staring back at the earth. It was one of the single most beautiful things I had ever experienced even if it wasn't real. I ended up learning that astronauts call that feeling of awe while staring back at earth the overview effect. It made me evaluate my place in the universe and how our sense of scale is all relative. We're just a tiny pixel moving around on an infinite grid floating on a tiny rock out in space just spinning in circles until we die.
>>6206438damn you greedy deer may wolves of angels feast on your rest
>>6223943>How are you gonna teach nuclear fusion without the idea of an atom?Why would I teach nuclear fusion in the first place?
It's the /k/2 tank https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWxSkJGu-oAHaha
>>6221497do everyone a favor and stay on your compound with the rest of the fruitcakes
>>6208964adams whole shtick is lying.i generally agree with him but his tendency to lie even when the facts are in his favor is annoying.
Bump
>>6220324The importance of an IQ test is to simply predict a persons ability for pattern recognition. Yes, it is not a complete picture at all of an individuals "intelligence", but its a pretty sound predictor if someone is generally a destructive retard or not. Pattern recognition has a lot to do with intuition. People without pattern recognition are prone to fucking everything up, consistently.
>>6198412>Tfw he lifts his pants legsAbsolutely astounding.
>>6199900Witness. >What if our universe is just a small cell of a large super-organism that completely defies even what our wildest dreams could project?And that super organism, that our entire reality is but a mere neuron in its synaptic cleft, but a branch on a dendrite in a neural network, zooms out of its mind in an unfathomable scale to but a single grain of sand on some beach stretching farther than the eye can see in our own reality again. Is all reality simply an infinite loop? >How do I do it, how do I turn my dreams into reality?>What's the first thing anyone does before they start their day?>They wake up>>6198410Best in a long time
>>6199991The IQ test the most replicated test of all time. This segment willfully disregards over a century of data. And while they are right that it doesn't capture the whole scale and magnitude of the human intellect, it is highly accurate in its testing the aptitude of a certain facet of intelligence, and to deny this despite literal billions of data points is the height of hubris. One could even call it chutzpah
>>6205354Are you legitimately retarded? Do you not understand context? Is it that hard for you to get what he was saying? >ERMAHGERD! YOU FORGOT TO PUT A WORD IN! LET ME JUST BE A TOTAL CUNTY FAGGOT!!
>>6206428That's really is astonishing
>>6206430Cool
>>6196360My respect for Sagan vanished the moment i saw him post that retarded "human scientific progress through history" reddit chart where for medieval times it looked like it reset to fucking cavement. Dumbest fucking thing for pseudointellectuals.He was a typical Jew with his retarded:>Oh look goy, you are an insignificant speck of dust in the universe, your ethnicity, religion, nation, family doesn't matter because universe doesn't care. Send 10 billion $ to Israel btw.
>>6222320It's easier than people are describing. It's a rotating ring. Look at the yellow/red part and think that it's the outside of the ring. Clockwise. Look at the blue and think that it's the outside of the ring. Counter clockwise. You can just look up and down and think about which side is outside to rapidly change them.
>>6206443Neat
>>6199870old king. black science man is currently reigning
>>6206431same tard energy as dumbasses that show you the 10000 hours they spent playing terraria
>>6212867triangulation is very good a pinpointing location, the GPS on your phone is in constant contact with three satellites so it can constantly triangulate your exact location.
>>6230712
>>6230548>>6196360Yeah Sagan benefited from the bullshit Hippie culture of the time, but was basically the first science "entertainer" that flunked out of serious Academia and pranced around as a pretend TV scientist instead.I'll give him a tiny bit of credit, because his follow-up addendums on the topics he presented were far less pretentious and LSD influenced, and had more informative and matter-of-fact portions. Given that he was seriously ill by that time, merits at least some sort of recognition.But unfortunately he was the blueprint for the sloppified edutainer that Niel De Gayass Tyrone will emulate, badly, and then further flanderise.Richard Feynman on the other hand, despite being a jew, was far more honest and direct in his TV appearances. He was happy to rattle off simple thought experiments, and classic colllege anecdotes, but when he felt that the program was devolving into empty platitudes he did basically say on camera, that all this glazing around is all fine and dandy, but the really tough part is trying to actually make the masses study and understand hard sciences like math physics and chemistry, and that TV bullshit won't move that effort forward. It felt weird because he was clearly going off script, and introduced a very unexpected uncomfortable bit of honesty into the interview.
>>6230548>>Oh look goy, you are an insignificant speck of dust in the universe, your ethnicity, religion, nation, family doesn't matter because universe doesn't care. Send 10 billion $ to Israel btw.You realize the whole point of the "speck of dust" monologue isn't to highlight that nothing matters, it's to highlight that you personally have to give your own life meaning because the universe won't. You're completely missing the point, yeah the sun will explode and everyone will turn to dust, that just means to take advantage of the time you have now, and here we are on 4chan blaming the jews.
>>6230748He's probably one of those freaks who thinks you can't have morality with the bible or something.
>>6217809That's some of the dumbest and most pretentious shit I have ever heard>The native American can't see Columbus ship, because he can't imagine itTHEY WENT OUT IN CANOES TO SEE WHAT THE FUCK IT WAS?!>Acktuhally nothin existsUtter chutzpah, I couldn't make it more than a minute
>>6213365Now I want a pet fox
>>6220324See>>6230481
>>6223116You went from reasonably skeptical to utterly fucking retarded in one reply post. Congratulations
>>6223280>Whether or not you're in a shitty mood can influence your ""IQ"" by multiple standards of deviation.Why do you say something so wrong with such confidence? And the Flynn effect is almost entirely a result of increasing access to higher protein and better public health.
NTA but I don't believe in the Flynn effect because I know for a fact that people in my lifetime are not only getting dumber with each decade but are definitely dumber than people from the early to mid 20th century. You can also just look at what achievements they had back then, the level of craftsmanship they had and their level of achievement in the arts. I mean for someone to try and tell me that people in the 40s were dumber than people in the 80s is just laughable. I mean it's honestly ridiculous. Hell, someone people have even posted academic tests from the 30s~50s and the level was so much higher then than now that it's honestly depressing. You can also watch interviews of random people on the streets from back in the day and even the way they spoke was much more thoughtful and intelligent. It's far more reasonable to explain the so called Flynn effect by changing standards of the test rather than asserting there's some sort of nutritional factor making people smarter, especially when we know for a fact that the food back then had about three times more nutrients than the slop we eat now. Then that leads you to thinking about the levels of obesity we have now compared to then and the medical fact that obesity leads to cognitive decline yet again the Flynn effect is claiming that people now are significantly more intelligent. It just doesn't hold under any sort real scrutiny and seems more of the typical hubris trap born of ignorance where many people fall into thinking that past humans were dumber than people are in current year.
>>6230828Funny you should mention thathttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10401237261438653
>>6230748i'll gladly take some of my time hating on jews
>>6206441lmaoYou can see light when it hits your cones. If it is directed into your eyes, you can see it. If it isn't going into your eyes (like the laser) you can't. If you shine the laser into your eye, you will see it again.
>>6226481This is so retarded.The last frame is exactly the reason you would consider intervening at the stage in frame 1.If America could have stopped Russia from gaining nuclear capabilities, they absolutely would have. Absolutely. The fact that they no longer can exercise that power over them is why they so badly want to prevent a country opposed to them, which is attempting to gain that capability, from doing so.>Why would I teach nuclear fusion in the first place?To make electricity?
>>6230710>three satellitesTry anywhere between 4 and 32.
>>6230748Don't worry, the Jews gave me far more reason than saying words. Every damn day, I learn about more bullshit that they cooked up to extort and destroy what could've been amazing.
>>6230985Fair, I should have said at least three
>>6230987>destroy what could've been amazinglike what you did to your social life?
>>6231215If you're going to jump straight to insults, at least bring something that actually stings a little.
>>6231248good point don't know why I was critiquing something that never existed in the first place
>>6231256The same shot that didn't work before? I miss when this place had trolls that didn't suck. You're boring the hell outta me.
>>6231272I'm not trolling, I genuinely mean it, also if you're bored stop replying... oh wait you can't, you have a deep seeded need to feel correct and superior even though you live in abject filth and despair, this small corner of the web is the only place anyone will actually humor your ideas because you remain anonymous here, but in reality you are a hideous husk of a human being who repels other people with almost 100% efficiency
>>6231346Sounds like you are intimately familiar with all that.
where are the videos
>>6196361>>6196363>>6196365>>6196366i saw this video in 7th grade or something. so beautiful
>>6230732my favorite feynman story is when he tries to argue with some orthodox jews that employing shabbos goys must be unethical . . . but they talmudically out-argue him lel
>>6230904>If America could have stopped Russia from gaining nuclear capabilitiesNuclear weapons do not exist. Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki got firebombed. So called video proof for any nuclear explosion is just as real as Terminator 2 nuke scene:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzRdpYBrOJMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGpseJ39keA>To make electricity?It didn't work in the last 100 years. People pay for R&D but when it's time to show the results, government will just fake some incident like Chernobyl and start all over again with the next generation?
>>6231679Ah, you're one of these retards.
>>6231346Lol, at least you showed a little effort this time, so I'll give you a little credit. You've read me incorrectly, but I can appreciate that you tried. One little question. Why are you so bothered by me pointing a finger at the ol' nose tribe?
>>6218584>redditors disavow the Big Dud??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Yo israel your bot is broken. it's fighting itself.>>6220325>expansion>red shift>conservation of angular motion and momentum>basic mathematics>yada yada yada>Darwin admits his single ancestor theory is his biggest blunder; spends the rest of his life trying to disprove his own theory that STiLL is taught in textbooks>Einstein admits his biggest accomplishment in the press was his biggest blunder and regrets being known for stating absolute bullshit; spends the rest of his life trying to disprove his own theory that STiLL is taught in textbooks>Hawking admits his biggest accomplishment with the singularity among the science community is his biggest blunder and regrets it; spends the rest of his life trying to disprove his own theory that STiLL is taught in textbooksList gos on endlessly... Many such cases.>Darwin>Einstein>Hawking"i was wrong">random stupid nigger on the internet"these outdated theories from a hundred years ago are correct! Even though all our modern processes disprove them every second of every day in modern labs"Tell me your lab doesn't get 500 million a year from the DoD without telling me. Get good niggers, then maybe the DoD will fucking pay you.Spoiler: you even mention any of that bullshit to any funding agency and they will attempt to sue you for wasting their time and have you shut down.
>>6223748God fucking damn it Bret-esh pee-pol are fucking hideous. Clearly some pharisee had their way with her ancestors. That is one of the most hideous pharisees i've ever seen. Look at the side of the eye line lining up with the top of the ears, the pharisee mouth and nose, the pharisee brow, it's literally the caricatures from 5,000 years ago painted on Egyptian and Assyrian walls.
>>6206431*licks*
>>6231952I dont give a shit about the jews, their religion is archaic and they all come off as whiny, persecuted bitchesI was just provoking you because someone posted a webm in here I made a while back and wanted to keep bumping the thread lol
>>6233877>I'm not trollingSeems we're both trolling.
>>6196367Is Minecraft really that big?
>>6233897Just checked. This scale got it right. The world size is 60,000,000x60,000,000x384. Very thin, but also very huge.
>>6230904>If America could have stopped Russia from gaining nuclear capabilities, they absolutely would have.But they could have. They just needed to nuke Moscow and a few other critical points in the Soviet Union, and continue the Allied push through Germany into Russia. They developed nukes after WW2. During, they didn't have them.
>>6198412This is where Niggalink got the idea for George Droyd from, btw.
>>6230473That big, huh?
>>6233930>ALL they had to do was destroy the capital city of their ally>they Just had to raise public support for this in the 4 years where Russia had no bomb>it's THAT simple
>>6199994Kek.
>>6220162:'( at least we're not speaking German....
>>6199991>>6220324"blacks and whites had exactly the same order of hardest to least difficult questions. Moreover, the correlation between how often whites got a question wrong to how often blacks got a question wrong as a function of total score was 0.95."https://archive.li/gMydrDifferential Item Functioning (DIF), occurs when individuals with equal ability from different groups differ in their probability of answering an item correctly. While predictive bias is rare (Jensen 1980), DIF can stem from cultural knowledge or strategies (Tatsuoka et al. 1988; Must & Must 2013). Most tests show minimal bias or DIF cancellation at the subtest level (Drasgow 1987; Linn et al. 1981; Willson et al. 1989). The PPVT generally shows low bias (Reynolds et al. 1984; Conoley 2003; Restrepo et al. 2006), though the K-ABC Achievement test showed bias against Mexicans (Valencia et al. 1995). In SAT/GRE tests, Black examinees may over-perform on hard items and under-perform on easy ones (Santelices & Wilson 2012), though increased time does not reduce gaps (Wild et al. 1982; Bridgeman et al. 2003).LCA shows that inclusion into different statistical classes isn't race-related (Webb et al. 2008). Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA) generally supports measurement invariance (Hu 2017; Trundt et al. 2018). The weak SH model fit as well as non-g models for Dolan 2000 and Dolan & Hamaker 2001, whereas it fit better than non-g models for (Frisby & Beaujean 2015; Hu et al. 2019; Lasker et al. 2021). Scheiber (2015) and Hajovsky & Chesnut (2022) both applied the CHC model and confirmed racial/ethnic measurement invariance, though the former found small non-invariance in the intercepts of Hispanics and Whites (ΔCFI=0.007).humanvarieties.org/2023/01/02/fair-and-square-a-conclusion-on-iq-test-biasIf you're interested in intelligence research, read this: https://arthurjensen.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/The-g-factor-the-science-of-mental-ability-Arthur-R.-Jensen.pdf.
>>6231595The Chabad site says that shabbos goyim are unethical.
>>6233930Russia's production was moved behind the Urals.
>>6234002Cool so genetics as a factor of intelligence has been busted.
>>62340292 + 2 = What?If one group of people get this correct 100% of the time but another group only get it right 95% of the time, I wouldn't say that there's "no difference," or even that the difference is "only" 5% because getting that question wrong at all would exhibit profound retardation, not just being a measly 5% stupider. It wouldn't actually be the difference between 100IQ and a 95IQ, it'd be the difference between a >60IQ and a <60IQ.I'm not insecure so I can admit I have a hard time parsing a lot of the science jargon in that post, but at the end of the day, it really seems like you didn't understand what you were looking at all.Plus I checked some of those links and the genetic angle seems pretty explicit. I think if a question is common sense when it comes to dogs, then pretending it's not obvious when it comes to humans is completely disingenuous. If a dog is stupid and violent and it's from a stupid, violent breed, its pups are probably going to be stupid and violent too. It'd be cool if humans sprang from the womb with a clean slate, but they just obviously do not.
>>6233903Me again. Forgot to specify that those measurements are in meters.
>>6234029>shown wrong>starts seething>"Well, what about this other thing, huh!?"Heritability is consistently shown to be ~75% (Jensen, 1998, pp. 177, 202).Twin family studies find no passive rGE for IQ (van Leeuwen et al., 2008; Vinkhuyzen et al., 2012; Wolfram et al., 2024). Sibling, virtual twin, and adoption designs validate classical twin designs (Rowe, 1994; Segal, 2012; Kendler et al., 2014, 2019; Willoughby et al., 2021; Segal & Pratt-Thompson, 2024). There is no evidence that these designs consistently bias heritability (Bouchard Jr, 2023). Correcting for error increases heritability estimates (O’Connor et al., 1995; Riemann et al., 1997; Lake et al., 2000; Van Leeuwen et al., 2008).Dalliard found similar correlations between same-sex and opposite-sex twins across traits. Scarr (1968) found no IQ differences in misclassified twins, and Scarr & Carter-Saltzman (1979) found no pattern when regressing cognitive differences on perceived or physical similarity. Matheny (1979) observed that MZ IQ differences remained identical regardless of parental classification. Munsinger & Douglass II (1976) found small differences for MZ correlations and DZ correlations, and Grigorenko & Carter (1996) found that similarity attitudes increased intrapair correlations only among DZs.Bishop et al. (2003) and Koeppen-Schomerus et al. (2003) noted that twin-sibling designs may be biased because twins are often tested simultaneously. While Koeppen-Schomerus et al. (2003) found that shared environment differed between twin-twin and twin-sibling pairs for cognitive measures, t^2 was zero for behavioral problems. Vogler & DeFries (1986) argued that the twin effect is test-specific and unrelated to g.Bishop et al. (2003) found that removing the special twin environment did not deteriorate fit. Derks et al. (2006) and Vinkhuyzen et al. (2012) showed that constraining correlations between DZ twins and regular siblings, or among same-sex DZs, did not worsen model fit.
>>6234250Thanks Grok. Gonna have my agent read that for me later and get back to you.
>>6234259>I Uhh, my agent, uhhhI accept your concession.Because of the character limit, the source is here: https://humanvarieties.org/2024/10/20/sometimes-biased-but-not-systematically-twin-study-assumptions-with-a-focus-on-the-equal-environment/
>>6234263the joke______your head
>>6234002>>6234250Say it in your own words.
>>6234264>He isn't laughing? It must be because he didn't get my joke!Hey, not everyone is a comedian, man.>>6234267>spend hours writing what others already have while using the same sources regardless!No.It sounds like neither of you are able to actually back up your claims.
>>6234272Summarize it in your own words. Everyone knows what you're doing and it doesn't work.
>>6234071I was responding to >>6234002 where the obvious sentiment is that IQ test results and race are mostly uncorrelated.Now, if I read the archived article, it says the opposite, but I didn't read that article because I'm not going to read everything everyone links to because that's a waste of time.
>>6223813
>>6223230https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjSKugN9K2YIt seems this thread got derailed while I was catching up with work. Here is the source in case the post limit is reached and I am not able to clip the video. The channels are "The Shakespeare Equation" and "Bard Code". If you are in to sacred geometry you should also check out Randy Powell's intro to vortex mathematics linked below. In short, he explains The Tesla Sequence (3-6-9) through geometry pic related. If there is time i'll post a few clips along with some other Cymatic ones.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pvuTZ5u6Kg
