video from 2024, the jew was right
>>6199491
>>6199494
Amerimutt base in Jordan
>>6199490Fascism is alive and well. and its not America.
>>6199497so automatically, Canadian governent is guilty of those crimes.isn't it ironic. don't ya think?
>>6199558holy delusion.
crooked system,imprisoning a man for making good music.Free Mr Bond!
bloody legend,hope he lives to make more bangers music out of jail.if not Heaven Awaits.
last one, another fave.
>>6199306How does it feel? Go out with a whimper
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUBTHMylewE
>>6200428
>>6200560Vikings, were a seafaring people originally from Scandinavia (present-day Denmark, Norway, and Sweden), who from the late 8th to the late 11th centuries raided, pirated, traded, and settled throughout parts of Europe.Chickens coming home to roost o/
>>6199506
>>6200563Equal rights and duties? Yes.Equity and equality? That's bullshit and more of an anti-thesis to a free democratic society. They merely sound similar and because many people stop thinking when something sounds nice, they don't realize so.Screw the collectivist activists claiming the "democratic" tag for themselves these days, because they fucking hate their people and would prefer if they were to disappear from the face of this planet, and that tag facilitates that a whole lot.
>>6201319Are foids people?
>>6199816>holy delusion.He ain't wrong tho. Their golem(USA) is now the most powerful country in the world with Europe as their colony.
https://x.com/angeloinchina/status/2080349163225793000I initially found it strange that India, a country known for its boasting, had been so quiet lately. It turns out that India has recently been engulfed in nationwide riots.India has pointed the finger at the US for instigating a color revolution. Initially, India wanted to blame China, but then realized that earlier this year, India had blocked all Chinese apps, and only the US had the capability to orchestrate a color revolution simultaneously across India.
>>6201957The United States lacks the strength to defeat China alone. Many American politicians have stated the same thing: China's true comprehensive national strength is more than three times that of the United States; otherwise, a multipolar world would not be gradually emerging.China truly desires a multipolar world where all countries rely on their own strength to break free from the constraints of the United States.https://x.com/clashreport/status/2080684351004484046>Former U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken on China:One of the most complex and arguably most important relationships we have is the one with China. There are aspects of contestation, there are aspects of cooperation, and we want to avoid conflict. They're a lot bigger than we are, their market's a lot bigger, their manufacturing is three times ours, they've got more ships, they put forward more papers and more patents. >As strong and as powerful as we are, playing one-on-one can be tough.
>>6201957Former US Marine intelligence officer Scott Ritter: The US knows it can't fight and win against the Chinese. So it's using the Philippines to stir up conflict"Friends don't let friends die in quantities." You (Filipinos) think America is your friend. So did the Ukrainians, and they are dying by the hundreds of thousands.
>>6201957https://x.com/World_At_War_6/status/1949824664043442253>HEGSETH: "U.S. LOSES EVERY WARGAME AGAINST CHINA" U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that the US “loses to China in every war game” run by the Pentagon. This is a troubling revelation, as war games are designed to simulate real-world scenarios and assess the readiness of military strategies. The fact that these exercises suggest a U.S. defeat against China underscores the need for a reassessment of current defense strategies. For the U.S. to be able to deal with China in the event of a conflict, they will in the short term be dependent on allies in the region.>Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth: "China is building a military force specifically dedicated to defeating the United States of America""So if our whole power projection platform is aircraft carriers and the ability to project power that way strategically around the globe - And if 15 hypersonic missiles can take out our 10 aircraft carriers in the first 20 minutes of a conflict, what does that look like"
>>6201957https://www.americanmanufacturing.org/blog/chinas-shipbuilding-capacity-is-232-times-greater-than-that-of-the-united-states/According to data from a leaked U.S. Navy Office of Naval Intelligence briefing slide, China's shipbuilding capacity is 232 times greater than that of the United States. This stark disparity highlights China's dominant position in commercial and naval manufacturing versus the heavily diminished state of U.S. shipyards.
>>6199303now show the ghettos and shitty small towns of Europe
>>6201957https://x.com/TheEconomist/status/2080699809095184492Elonmusk says there’s a “good chance” China will be the world leader in AI. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO also speaks to Zannymb about what’s holding back Chinese models—and why banning them won’t stop China from overtaking America.
>>6201957I can't think of any other significant advantages the US has over China besides high-end chips and Hollywood.
NIO ET9 (China) vs. BMW and Audi.
China's electromagnetic catapult and the US steam catapult represent two different eras of carrier technology, with the primary differences lying in energy efficiency, launch control precision, and maintenance requirements. Electromagnetic systems offer variable power control and faster recharges, whereas steam systems rely on high-pressure mechanical force.Core Technology DifferencesPower Source: Electromagnetic catapults use linear induction motors driven by electrical energy, while steam catapults use massive pistons driven by pressurized steam from boilers or nuclear reactors.Energy Efficiency: Electromagnetic systems achieve roughly 90% power conversion efficiency, compared to only about 5% for traditional steam systems.Recharge Time: Electromagnetic tracks recharge in roughly 45 seconds, while steam systems require 30 to 60 seconds to build up and cycle pressure between launches.
Operational PerformanceWeight Flexibility: Electromagnetic systems use software feedback control to adjust output force dynamically, safely launching both heavy strike fighters and lightweight drones. Steam systems deliver a fixed, rigid pressure pulse that can over-stress fragile or light airframes without complex adjustments.Maintenance & Crew: Electromagnetic designs feature solid-state electrical components that require fewer below-deck spaces, lower maintenance overhead, and a smaller operating crew than piping-heavy steam systems.
>>6201957
https://odysee.com/@naturallawinstitute:c/abrahamism-method-of-deceit-curt:8Some good parts if you can pick out anything.
Europeans are more foolish than Americans. At least Americans have long admitted that the United States is no match for China and have long realized the fundamental differences between China and Russia or the Soviet Union. But Europeans have only now discovered the huge gap between Europe and China. It seems that Europe has long categorized China as a backward country similar to Russia.https://x.com/BowesChay/status/2080714167808365038Chinese company Unitree reveal their "all terrain" wheeled robot. The military potential for this technology is obvious. Europe is so far behind China, its scary.
If it weren't for intelligence provided by Ukraine's largest drone manufacturer, almost no one would know that Europe's drone technology is supplied by China. It seems that both European and Russian military technology are stuck in the Cold War era.Besides China and the US, all other countries in the world are garbage. China and the US are playing StarCraft, while other countries are playing Age of Empires—the technological gap is too huge.https://www.euractiv.com/news/ukraines-drone-producers-warn-of-chinese-dependence-for-components/Ukraine’s drone producers warn of Chinese dependence for components"Europe is not prepared for this," a drone manufacturer told the EU-Ukraine Business SummitEurope and Ukraine’s dependence on China for the production of drones poses a huge risk, a Ukrainian military official and drone producers warned.The war in Ukraine has fundamentally changed modern warfare with more than 95% of frontline casualties in the Ukraine war now attributed to drones. While these are fairly cheap to produce, they rely heavily on supplies from third countries, which could cut off exports at any moment.
>>6201997they'd never admit this publicly if it was true>appear weak when you are strong
>>6202076What country are you from? If you're a foolish and ignorant European, I won't blame you. After all, Europeans are generally more foolish than Americans.If you're American, don't you know about the military standoff in the South China Sea in July 2016? During Barack Obama's presidency, three carrier strike groups were deployed to engage in a naval standoff with the Chinese navy. World War III nearly broke out. China recalled all its retired and reservist troops, and its strategic nuclear forces were placed on high alert.At that time, Chinese citizens were notified by the government to go to nuclear shelters at any time. China was determined to fight a nuclear war with the United States and perish together. Ultimately, Barack Obama ordered the three US carrier strike groups to withdraw from the South China Sea, and the US Navy's voluntary withdrawal prevented a hot war.Since 2016, the Pentagon has conducted countless wargaming exercises between the US and China, and each wargaming exercise has ended in US defeat.
>>6202076The maintenance and upkeep costs of nuclear weapons are extremely high, especially since the nuclear weapons of the United States and Russia are mostly Cold War-era relics, with over 50 years of service. The missile bodies are very old; assessments conducted by the US Life Extension Program over the past 20 years indicate that extending the life of each Minuteman III missile body costs the equivalent of rebuilding a new strategic ballistic missile. Not to mention the nuclear fuel in the warheads.During the Cold War, both the US and the Soviet Union engaged in extensive falsification of data to threaten each other. Therefore, it is questionable whether the US actually possesses 3,700 nuclear warheads or Russia 4,400, or even how many of these warheads are well-maintained and ready for launch at any time, because both the US and Russia are adept at lying.
>>6202076The main reason is that Trump's extremely unusual behavior has aroused serious suspicion among all Chinese people. The Chinese military has not released data on the actual number of nuclear weapons China possesses, while the US military has consistently claimed that China has only 500 nuclear warheads, while the US has 3,700.However, Trump has repeatedly tried to bring China to the negotiating table to reduce the number of nuclear weapons. The Chinese government has never heeded US threats and has instead become suspicious of the actual number of US nuclear weapons.Does Trump actually want to reduce the number of US nuclear weapons to the same level as China's? Or does he hope that China will significantly increase its nuclear arsenal to the same level as the US?Therefore, China's actual number of nuclear weapons is very likely greater than that of the US, or the number of nuclear weapons capable of normal launch is very likely greater than that of the US. After all, most of China's nuclear warheads are newly developed models, and the average lifespan and maintenance status of Chinese nuclear warheads are certainly higher than those of US nuclear warheads.In short, whether in nuclear or conventional war, China holds an overwhelming advantage over the US.>Nuclear weapons, US urges new three-way agreement with Russia and China>6 February 2026https://en.ilsole24ore.com/art/new-start-glimmers-renewal-usa-and-russia-negotiate-agreement-AIKCUPHB?refresh_ce=1
>>6202076This year, the United States has held numerous internal discussions on how to threaten China to bring it to the negotiating table to reduce its nuclear weapons. The conclusion of these discussions has been that China is not afraid of the United States' threats and that the United States is incapable of doing so.Given the level of corruption among US government officials, what do you think the actual number of nuclear weapons the United States possesses?
>>6202076Now you understand why the US has consistently claimed it wants to avoid war with China, while the Chinese government has repeatedly stated it is not afraid of war with the US. China doesn't want to replace the US as the world's policeman; the US can continue to act as China's black glove, doing the dirty work. As long as it doesn't challenge China's bottom line, China won't interfere no matter which country the US wants to attack.https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2026/02/secretary-of-state-marco-rubio-with-john-micklethwait-of-bloomberg-newsSECRETARY RUBIO: Today is different than yesterday, but it has parallels, not in that China’s the new Soviet Union but that in our future, collectively we’ll be stronger if we work on these things together.So we expect nation-states to interact with one another. In the end, we expect nation-states to act in their national interest. I don’t think that is – that in no way runs counter to our desire to work together on things that we share in common or threats we face in common. But I don’t think visiting Beijing or meeting with the Chinese is – on the contrary, I think it would be irresponsible for great powers not to have relationships and talk through things and, to the extent possible, avoid unnecessary conflict.
If this is a materialistic world, and China's true national strength far surpasses that of the United States and Russia, and even China finds the cost of maintaining its nuclear arsenal extremely high, there is no reason why the United States and Russia, whose overall national strength is weaker than China's, could easily maintain their nuclear arsenals.So there is only one truth: whether it is the modern United States and Russia, or the Soviet Union and the United States during the Cold War, their nuclear arsenals have been seriously exaggerated.This may explain why Russia refrained from using nuclear weapons during the Russia-Ukraine war, and also why the United States dared not engage in a nuclear war with China in 2016. It is highly likely that China's nuclear arsenal surpassed that of both the United States and Russia by 2016.
This also explains the US government's panicked reaction to China's test-firing of a new strategic ballistic missile in July of this year. In this world, only China possesses a nuclear arsenal large enough to destroy humanity; the nuclear arsenals of the US, Russia, and Europe are significantly exaggerated.Furthermore, the US even criticized the Chinese government for providing too little advance notice. Doesn't this prove that the US has virtually no ability to monitor China's nuclear weapons in real time? Through repeated probing, China has likely figured out most of the US's cards.This is why China is not afraid of any of the US's petty actions on the international stage. With its nuclear arsenal as its trump card, all other countries in the world are rendered useless.>US criticises China for short notice ahead of missile testhttps://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/china-gave-little-notice-detail-to-us-before-july-6-missile-test-state-dept-official-says
What is the end goal with the destruction of the West? Is it really just Jews trying to create a hellscape on Earth to rule over or is it the Chinese getting rid of any future competition? Seems like the end result is far too horrendous for anyone to take advantage of. Whoever's manipulating things is either going to be trapped in a caliphate where their power will be centered on psychopathic mullahs or all of society will collapse and our progeny will be a bunch of primitives hoarding what little technology remains. On top of that, the lack of a homogeneous society and the destruction of high IQ people by miscegenation means nothing of the old world will ever be reproduced again. Is extinction of a human race the ultimate goal here?
>>6199303Signed. I know nothing will come out of it but it's not like it's an hard task either. Immobilism is death, we have to organize and every bit help.
>>6202168First, Jews aren't good at long term planning. Their culture is to get their hands on a piece of clothes and to sell it as fast as possible. You can think of niggers but a lot more tribalists and with good short term decisions. Nations states have proved to be hostile to them, and I am not only talking about the last iteration, so they destroy them. To a white person, changing the only demographic that have ever given them any rights by people who want to kill them seem like a bad idea. A Jew do not think about the future. Second, it make the world a cultureless blob and that's much better for business. What is the problem if they have to flee it, then they will just live in their ethno state. Now, encourage them to take one million pajeets to make Israel stronger and see how they react. Do not blame China. China do what is good for China and do not care if it benefit you or kill millions. The destruction of their main trade partner and, let's be honest, the source of their technology isn't in their interest.
