a new law in the united states went into affect making ai nude fakes illegal..

>>1569772
>a new law in the united states went into affect making ai nude fakes illegal..

I mean, there's loads of things that are illegal that we don't post here, but we don't tear down boards for it? was it just too hard to enforce?

>>1569773
>was it just too hard to enforce?
they would have to actually moderate /r/ or pay thousands in fines every day. i guess no one wanted to moderate /r/.

>>1569779
Well, that sucks. rip /r/ I guess

>>1569768
aidiots got it killed.

>>1569795
See, this sucks, since I just found some porn .gifs I'd love to see if anyone can identify, but I guess not.

>>1569799
I wonder if you could have a "sauce please" thread on /gif/ and/or /s/ where you post videos or gifs (in the former) or pictures (in the latter) in the hopes that somebody will tell you "dumbass that's Bailey Jay". If it's just one thread per board (because people just post their questions in the one source please thread instead of starting a new thread for every request) it would not be very disruptive. It would need a critical mass to really get going, if I just post three videos, ask who the girls are, and keep bumping in the hopes that somebody will answer it would be obnoxious.
Alternatively you could just find a thread in /gif/ where your gifs would fit in and post them there, asking whether somebody knows the source. If you post a couple of big boob videos on the big boob thread probably nobody would mind that you are requesting sauce, you are contributing to the thread anyway.

>>1569803
Interesting idea.

>>1569803
>If it's just one thread per board
that's never going to happen

as long as you're not a douchebag, you should be able to ask questions in relevant existing threads without getting banned.

>>1569799
>>1569803
Just make a thread on /trash/, and ignore the furries.