Can anyone post the generic (or out of the ordinary) ugly pictures of Zendaya?Google is being extra kosher today and probably changing my image search into "Zendaya pretty".Thank you.>pic related: natural beauty
touch fucking grass broseriously like damn who fucking cares
>>1569974nigger, who cares that who cares? seriously, why did you bother to write a response to this?
>>1569975I posted it in an attempt to make you snap out of it and realize how inconsequential, irrelevant, and time-wasting this is.The fact you're literally refreshing the thread every minute shows the extent of the problem.What epic feat do you think you're going to be able to accomplish with some ugly pictures of a multi-million dollar actress? Be able to win some epic /tv/ or twitter arguments? It doesn't fucking matter, bro, spend that time developing yourself as a person, or even just doing something you find fun. You don't want to look back at your life 50 years from now and say you spent your youth spamming ugly pictures of people you'll never meet as an own.It's not too late for you bro, you can get better.
>>1569978hey anon, no, I'm not refreshing the thread every minute. I happened to refresh it after you posted. I want to get the pic/s I've seen before, send them to my friend, and end the debate promptly. I don't care to watch this thread all day and argue with people like you. In fact, your argument is littered with assumptions about me. I'm just arguing with a girl about which celebrities are hot. It's relatively inconsequential. We could talk about the intentional decline of conscious beauty standards and the problems that is creating for the West as a whole, and what it signifies, but I actually don't care to. I just want to prove my point to someone in my personal life.The way that Google clearly censors ugly pictures of this actress, in the same way they censor offensive (read: funny) memes should tell you something, but I'm not sure you realize the implications.
>>1569981Of course you are, anon. You're discussing how (((hollywood))) is casting ugly people to sap the will of the huwhite man with a real life girl and that's why you need ugly pictures of Zendaya, so that she'll realize just how deep the conspiracy runs and fall in love with you.Do you not even realize the irony that you're unironically posting "I need ugly pictures of this woman because the small hats behind goygle keep heebing my search results, she's hot in every image!" I mean, if you were doing a bit it couldn't be any funnier than this.
>>1569982actually anon, she's already in love with me. moreover, showing her that this girl is actually kindof mid will, in a very small way, expose the broader conspiracy.regardless, this is actually the situation that I'm in. I just want to find a picture I've seen a dozen times on this website, so that I can send it to a (special) friend and show something to her. it's not a waste of my time. I don't even mind the back and forth with you. do you realize how many assumptions you're making about me though?I can appreciate that it's coming from a good place at least, but give it a rest.
>>1569983Fine, anon, I've searched the tv archive for images of Zendaya that people usually say are ugly and this is the ugliest one I can find. My point stands though, this is a complete waste of your time.Ugly casting exists, like the female ghostbusters, but it's not some great conspiracy to depreciate beauty standards, if anything it reinforces them. It's done for rage-marketing. Everyone saying how bad/ugly something is are still generating engagement, and thus advertizing and ticket sales, regardless of whether or not the end product is good. And by buying into the game like YOU are doing you're perpetuating it further.
>>1569984>I've searched the tv archive for images of Zendayasorry, should've done so myself, and thank you.>It's done for rage-marketinginteresting point, never thought of that.>And by buying into the game like YOU are doingI promise I'm not. It's just a little back and forth about Zendaya. promise I won't spiral this into a racial diatribe. I just think she's a little masculine looking and I'm annoyed that she was cast as Chani in dune, who's described in the books as blond and fair. again, the race thing isn't that important to me. she's just not beautiful to me, which kindof spoils the movies :/Whatever, she's not my gf. speaking of which, I really thought I saw Tom Holland a few days ago in Irving, Texas (the nice part), but it was probably a really close doppleganger. kindof regretting not asking him, it was just me and him on the sidewalk, no one nearby.I appreciate your concern and I'll get to work.
>>1569992From my point of view almost the entire film and TV industry now is solely based around this culture war nonsense. It goes both ways. On one side you've got Sydney Sweeney and her great genes advert to drum up engagement (which it did), and on the other side you've got that trans bud light advert to drum up engagement, which it also did.And inbetween you've got grifters of every persuasion posting slop about how THE WOKE MOB is ERADICATING the UNTHINKABLE with THE MESSAGE, it's all so hackneyed and cliched. True art and cinema is dead because of bottom feeders caring about this shit, and subsequently media executives selling to that demographic.No matter how good you make a reboot of a TV series it will NEVER get as much attention and thus revenue as simply making the main character an ugly black woman. It's free advertizing to the hilt.If you were to make something like breaking bad today, a good TV show with an interesting premise and story in it's own right, there'd just be a million grifter channels talking about the woke feminist woman stopping the chad alpha husband and their shoehorned disabled kid, and because that was driving engagement those elements of the story would be emphasized and the actual relevant story would be sidetracked.I suppose I should take it as a blessing and either watch arthouse stuff OR spend my time on more productive hobbies like learning a language or scolding people on 4chan.
>>1569995Yeah I definitely agree. I've basically tuned out of Hollywood entirely for the past decade or so. I watched the Avengers trilogy / quadrilogy which for me was better than a guilty pleasure, and then I saw Demon Slayer twice last summer, alone, and then I just recently saw Disclosure Day, which was interesting for a while, but seemed meandering, pointless, and very mid towards the end. I guess the takeaway for me is that YouTube and anime have essentially replaced Hollywood. Most shows I've seen are either hunger games X (Squid Game was pretty decent I suppose) or crimeslop, which keeps your attention, but again, isn't really going anywhere. I like Landman, but again, it seems pointless and I don't really care to finish the show (I saw it with a friend who has since defriended me).>No matter how good you make a reboot of a TV series it will NEVER get as much attention and thus revenue as simply making the main character an ugly black woman. It's free advertizing to the hilt.I don't really know about this. Are you sure? Or is this speculation?>If you were to make something like breaking bad today, a good TV show with an interesting premise and story in it's own right, there'd just be a million grifter channels talking about the woke feminist woman stopping the chad alpha husband and their shoehorned disabled kid, and because that was driving engagement those elements of the story would be emphasized and the actual relevant story would be sidetracked.Landman isn't on that level, but no part of it seems particularly pandery to me. There was a non-binary character in season two who was presented as being particularly demanding and ridiculous, but still competent and helpful, so that was kindof a wash. It seemed like a realistic thing you might run into on a college campus.>I suppose I should take it as a blessing etc [char cap]Have you seen any good movies lately?
>>1570044>landmanOnly Taylor Sheridan show I've watched was Yellowstone, which I watched in its entirety.All seemed phenomenally self-indulgent, and basically wish fulfilment. Got increasingly less watchable as time went on for that reason, went from a show with a solid premise (conflict over land rights between a rich self-serving casino owning native American ostensibly pushing for control of the land "for his people" when in actuality he just wanted his share of the pie vs settlers descendents with a conscience trying to navigate the reality they find themselves in) to cowboyslop, a fantasy for lead poisoned boomers. All nuance of the show was dead, practically the perfect example of the phenomenon I'm talking about where all shows with a self-contained narrative become flanderized to the culture war.>Have you seen any good movies lately?Last movies I watched that left an impression on me was when I binged practically everything Wong Kar-Wai ever made. They're a little incoherent, plot wise, they're more about the aesthetic than anythingMy favorite film of all time though is Brazil, the whole thing is up in good quality on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JoXo-gYLYgI am telling you, this shit is unrefined pure kino. It takes a few rewatches to really appreciate and enjoy it. I rarely rewatch films but I must have seen this at least half a dozen times.It's about a guy that lives in an bureaucratic authoritarian dystopia, he starts having dreams about breaking free from it all due to the nature of his work as a cog in the machine, it has sort of dark comedic elements in it, a satire of contemporary Western society and state more than anything. Visually it's stunning as well. The film speaks to me a lot about yearning to be free yet having no viable way of achieving it and being unsure of what freedom would even look like. I try to find films like it but I can't, everything else feels too formulaic.
