I saw this as a teen and thought nothing of it. Now it's everywhere. It came out in 2011, before the internet become what it is now.
>>1575231I'm sure "nuancepilled" addressed it.
>>1575231I was on okcupid for over a decade with only 1 major success.>Success>Hung out with a girl for about a year platonically, but slept in bed together >Had a falling out just because of her being too busy to even hang out>Reconvened years later>Me still virgin at 23>Pity sex>Pity relationship>Cheated on me multiple times>Broke up with me>Fucked girl who made her jealous>SuccessDark times for meBut enough about that. This graph is incredibly accurate.Sure, I was a beta male when I was younger, but even after getting experienced and confident and cleaning myself up and being financially liberated I was stoll undesirable. By the end of my tenure on that cesspool women were actively begging for money shamelessly.It was always a golddiggers game. And the system favored women heavily.When they introduced pay to win that was it for people like me who were only on okcupid because it was free.The lgbt crew moved in and started writing loaded questions.You could answer "questions" to increase match %You could be 95% match with someone and still not even get a reply from a softly worded "Hey there. Would you like to get to know each other?"And then their inboxes would be full. Meanwhile men, on average, would get 1 to 2 messages a week. I got even less. It was a terrible experience and everything was just wrong. Real life dating was easier, meeting real people with real emotions instead of female predators. HATED okcupid. Only used it as an additional vector to find someone.0/10If my wife dies I'll probably reactivate my account.But the graph is very likely accurate all around, despite the monetization vs free era.
>>1575231it's worse
>>1575231Are there graphs for how men rate men and women rate women?
>>1575293Can you not read?
>>1575231It is accurate. Except it's probably even worse now.
>>1575231I've never dated/fucked anyone and I'm fine with that. I'm not gay, just not desperate for female validation. I like women platonically and get tons of amusement from hearing how Chad fucked and cucked them. I also secretly root on divorces, because I like watching sexhavers have to pay child support for all the fucking they've done.
>>1575637
>>1575231It's real, but women are more likely to date men that they don't immediately find physically attractive. Women get more turned on by some kind of emotional connection or fantasy. They have to have some kind of storyline involving you to like you, which is not as difficult to whip up as it seems. If you're not Chris-Chan levels of socially retarded you'll be fine provided you don't have unrealistic expectations of dating a supermodel.
