There's going to be a wave of films that are essentially dark rituals on the audience. Some have already came and gone, some are still coming, some have already been discussed here.Two are set to release in May.One is set to release in June.One is planned to release in October.
>>42335478Any idea what the films are called or what makes the dark rituals?
>>42335574(((British empire))) > Global control of Narrative > Jewllyweird > Spielberg > Your answer.
>>42335478>>42335574>>42335644Page 9 bumpI’d like to know which ones as well
>>42335478>There's going to be a wave of films that are essentially dark rituals on the audience.Can you show me a few movies that ARE NOT dark rituals on the audience, just for contrast?
>>42337394>>42337419Op is just le spooky posting. Bunch of retarded children here.
>>42337429Sad but true
>>42337429Learn to play along Peter
>>42337419>Marty Supreme>The new Scary Movie>Scream 6>Michael>Project Hail Mary>The Batman>Superman>Wicked duologyMost of these are just mindless entertainment. Ritual films are a few a year, last year only had three.
>At the end of the film it's revealed that the entire movie is a ritual to summon a demon, and you've taken part just by watching it.I felt disgusted, betrayed, and violated. I was trying to find some good films to watch for Halloween and every website suggested this one without letting on that you're taking part in a demonic ritual. So fucked up, I'm still furious.
>>42337507That was an incredible scene. https://youtube.com/watch?v=ELm7C85v6YYI miss Robin Williams. He had a couple weird movies towards the end. I don’t know what that was about.
>>42338376>Most of these are just mindless entertainment.Oh how naive.You REALLY think cape movies arent part of the ritual??WICKED???lol
>>42342075robin williams was truly, genuinely one of the good ones, IYKWIM. a rare individual.
>>42344371No he wasn't. He was part of the hollywod cabal, and the guilt of his broken spirit finally got him. His behavior wasn't "normal", many times on stage, during his "improv" violent skits you could see sparks of that inner unhinged persona specially on his later years.I remember that movie "insomnia" (2002), where he plays a disgusting killer for the first time. Obviously, it was very weird and shocking, to see Robin Williams playing that role, and of course, he had to play that role in the most creepy and extreme manner to accentuate that dichotomy in the audience used to see Williams as a lovable role character. Even in those days one would wonder "why?" Why do they have to use him for that?, Why does he have to agree to do that? Today you have a better idea of "why", but back then it was hard to "see" what they were doing, it was probably that role wich affected him, (along with others, like that tragic movie "Patch Adams"), he was used to traumatize audiences, to play with people at a spiritual level. And he was a sensitive conduit and medium as that, he knew, he lived those roles and "plays". Same happened to Keanu Reeves, around those years he also played a brutal and extremely evil serial killer in a shitty movie that was promoted same as "insomnia" as a "novel experience", an actor always known to play heroes, doing a movie that would "shock you". Same happened with Jim Carrey when he did that disgusting "children movie" Lemony Snicker, when he plays a pedo abuser and child killer. All of these actors were spiritually broken at some point, for "some reason" you can absolutely tell when you look at them, they look empty like holding a terrible guilt or regret. And I truly believe these particular "movies", are those "reasons". Many such cases, like Heath Ledger, in that "Broke back Mountain" movie, that was his particular humiliation ritual, he being a "method actor", had to PLAY that "role", and surely he did. He was never the same after that.
>>42344519This
>>42344519What was that Keanu movie?
This >>42344519, he was probably a "warlock". He was also in the very esoteric movie the fisher king. He was an important asset on the world stage and i never liked his aura, even before i knew about this /x/ stuff.
>>42345729>What Keanu movie?The Watcher (2000). He was FORCED to make that movie. His signature on the contract was "forged" by his own manager. And he signed an agreement to not disclose that "forged signature situation" till a year later. He had to make that role of a serial killer, kidnapping and torturing to death young women. Maybe he thought he was out of the humiliation ritual since he did a GAY movie with River Phoenix “My Own Private Idaho” (1991), extremely gay shit, and look how River Phoenix ended, the same career path as Heath Ledger. These weird broken people know all of these things, they know. By surviving and shrugging off these brutal humiliation public rituals, they show "toughness, resilience and loyalty" wich allow them to climb high into this "stardom" pyramid of power>>42346465Sure he was. The 'fisher king' was BIG. Anons here may think this /x/ stuff is "new" in the way it is presented or discussed, but these weirdos have been pedaling this weird wacky shit way back when. Another weird "/x/" movie he did was that "What Dreams May Come" (1998), and he partners with Cuba Gooding Jr. that little rapist ugly fucker play the role of "afterlife guidance". Aside form "Insomnia", he also did another movie in the SAME year, very similar "One Hour Photo" (2002). The same evil psycho character role. The same year he also makes that creepy shit on picrel, "Death to smoochy" with that dark creepy ass poster, a Barney like character loved by kids, assassinated. If THAT's not dark and twisted for "no reason", then I don't even know. He made those three movies in that 2002 year, a palindrome number, wich we know here what it means for ((these)) people. After that Williams quite stopped making "real movies", just some animation voices, an a few "cameo roles" like those in the "museum" movies. During those last ten years he started acting really loud and "out there" in public appearances.He was like an angry Jim Carrey. A few years later he was done.
>>42346663Yes, gus van sant who did private idaho is another one of these assests just looking at his history on imdb.About insomnia, al pacino's insomniac character is called will dormer, which literally means wants to sleep. Not that deep but interesting.Also robin williams was in august rush, which was a nice movie, but he played a weird hobo character who managed homeless children street performers.
>>42346663>>42346713You guys know your stuff. I loved the movie Dead Poets Society with Williams although maybe I just don’t understand what was wrong with it. It was an all white cast and showcased how great America used to be when people were striving for wisdom and knowledge and not identity politics crap. I’m sure there’s a lot of actors that wish they never took certain roles and what not. But to error is human. They just had the misfortune of filming it.
>>42346713Oh and in insomnia Robin W. plays a Finch W.>>42346763I understand, i'm not gonna argue, i have some soft spots for illuminati assets too.But it's definitely not robin williams, never liked him and he kinda reminds me of my dad.
>>42344519>actors can't just be psychopaths and narcissists on their own who joined the industry to be famous and rich and their minds broken by that>they have to have their minds broke by a movie creepypasta style!!!faggot
>>42345161You can see the guy to his left wearing Napoleon's hat, so it makes sense that Robin did the thing that they painted Napoleon doing. I don't think this photo is really evidence of anything.
>>42335478Commercials do it:https://youtu.be/J_EYTVS5fnY?si=ZcrAoop631g8-66fhttps://youtu.be/TK7stswHB3o?si=H8HWjzQscmTOikY6So movies have to be putting subliminal messages in them as well, right?
>>42344371I want to believe but the way he called the mass-produced Evas (part of a jewish kabbalah ritual to end the world) the "good guys" was very concerning.
>>42335478>watching hollywood films in 2026really? I thought that slop was strictly third-world fare.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Pov0MKuyJfg&ra=m
>>42347696And what was this brutal faggot doing here? Doing that public shameless demonstration in front of millions of kids and families in a time where America still had some common sense left in society?
>>42346763Robin Williams was HUGE in the Hollywood project for american global control, and he paid the price of that tear and wear of his soul and spirit. Same as Gene Hackman, Mel Gibson, Marlon Brando, Charlie Sheen, Bruce Willis, Jim Carrey and many many others. They end up like a burnt fuse. Emotionally wasted and eroded.>>42346763>I’m sure there’s a lot of actors that wish they never took certain roles and what not. But to error is human. They just had the misfortune of filming itThey understand the game they are playing, and they are willing to take any risk and to risk any "mistake" to get a chance for that golden ticket. That's why that shit it's so perverse, there's a tacit understanding that risking those weird and "edgy" roles and projects will grant you more chances to get into that inner circle. Usually actors regret more the chances they didn't take when asked about it. The most tragic case could be Ellen Paige, and yet nobody acknowledges the trigger, that disgusting movie "Hard Candy", they made HER play,they made her DO that disturbing shit, a young girl, and throw that shit out there to the masses, and see society "react" to it, like some sort of "fun" depraved game. There you have the end of that poor girl. That is what they do.
As above, as below. Technically any media you consume is a ritual. Comedy and action is one of the most potent ones because you are asked to leave your reasoning at the door and to just enjoy things while the entertainment itself shapes a world for you to enter.
>>42335478https://youtu.be/4YGrvrxxob4https://youtu.be/YHlcmmkiwbUhttps://youtu.be/oRGDhgITetchttps://youtu.be/NnUPeYOTeJEhttps://youtu.be/CO_j1KQHxNEhttps://youtu.be/yW0QKrvJPaUhttps://youtu.be/cXGSKEjR6_Uhttps://youtu.be/mFNaFeIm4bUhttps://youtu.be/_ElORM9O-0U
>>42335574The one in June is most likely episode 9 of The Amazing Digital Circus.
>>42335478One of US! One of US!
>>42335574I wanna be, be a Debaser.
>>42347696Yeah maybe you're right.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLk95Geh-GQ
>>42348237He knew all about |||them|||. That's quite telling.
The 2012 London Olympics Ceremony is a ritual about Jimmy Savile (as Voldemort) assaulting children at Broadmoor Hospital.https://youtu.be/X0PC56BkNaA
>>42347620You do know that the MAJORITY of these fags get introduced into the acting scene since childhood, right? Robert Downey Jr, Nicole Kidman, Tom Cruise, Josh Brolin, Joaquim Phoenix. Whole batches of these fags get introduced at the same time when they do those juvenile movies like "Bad Boys" 1983 or "The outsiders" 1983 (same year, same type of movie) A whole bunch of future superstars get induced into the mainstream system at once. A bunch of KIDS playing rapists, murderers, drug addicts, the worst of the worst.Like this anon pointed out >>42346713>Gus Van SantThat guy did that movie KIDS in the 90s wich was forced to be a big thing, they plastered tv with clips of that movie, exposing the family and the common people to that shit. It's a perverse game for them. To have that power to stir the pot, to tap on the fish tank and see the little goyim fishes rattle around.
>>42348577>actors: have to become empty to play a role and often end up being horrible chimp brained people or depressed>soldiers: have to become empty to tap into the will of violence and often end up becoming serial killers or depressed>CEO's: Have to become empty to run a corporation and play a role of happy business man and often become horrible people behind the scenes>Office workers: Have to become empty and fill quota's>Political activist: Become empty and lead an authority figure tell you what to do to actually be somebody>All the above suffer some sort of stress and anxietyI am noticing a pattern of what allows demonic possession.
>>42348577Also mark wahlberg and Reese Witherspoon. They were in the movie Fear and were making out for almost half the film.
>>42349526That's a big thing "there". Like you get accustomed to these actors and actresses through family oriented products, and maybe you and your kids grow up with these familiar personalities with out having a clue about them. Till one day you see them fucking their brains out in other obscure movies, ALL OF THEM, All mixed up. People you see on stage all dress up with their own families, being all polite with each other, and giving awards and emotional speeches to each other, when they actually FUCKED ON CAMERA, not even for "adult films" but mainstream films wich weren't promoted on purpose. |||These people||| seem to get a perverse hard-on on that kind of impune public obscenity, like exposing the american family to an awkward display of fuckery on the superbowl half-time show or whatever.That's not normal, that's not how "normal" society works, you don't fuck your neighbor's wife and you come all together for a family dinner with the kids like "nothing happened", but these SATANIC FUCKS do it, they do it in front of the american society like is "normal". I guess the |||producers||| get a big chuckle at it.
>>42350365Well said. Have you guys seen the movie Pleasantville? Spoiler. I think that movie explains that premise perfectly. If you look at the movie from my point of view. Which the directors or whomever say the movie is about something entirely different. But I think it’s about jews introducing sins into gentile healthy societies. When everything was black and white and running how it was suppose to everyone was happy and there was order. Then along came evil turning society into colors which made things look beautiful but at what cost. They introduced adulterous relationships and cheating and lying and the order soon fell apart. I forgot how the movie ends but I think that movie resembles what happens when a white society lets jews into it. Sure enough Reese Witherspoon is in that movie too.
>>42350760Hard not to answer to that without going full /pol/. But being brief and to the point, the Great Bibi Satanyahu said it himself in that known leaked video around the 2000s talking about how to destroy Iran: "Just broadcast Beverly Hills 90210 and watch their society collapse, it should be that easy".There you have it. They know it. It's not just a "conspiracy in your head".
>>42338589>I participate in holloween >I wanted to watch a halloween themed movie>I got what I was looking for, waaaahhh
>>42347033Some o the supposed white hats have been saying that he faked his death and is playing the part of Milea or whoever is president of Argentina right now. Since he faked his death I suppose he had time to learn Spanish and he used a bit of Spanish in happy feet.
>>42338376>>42335574Yeah it’s a good question. Which films are rituals? This year? What was the three last year, and what actually makes something a ritual?
>>42351588It was a FAILED question. Do you REALLY think that Project Hail Mary was "just mindless entertainment?" One of the only movies to pretend there is still a monoculture and got everyone talking?
>>42351588The first clue is the promotion effort, promotion today is a ritual all on itself. Now the cast of the movie are forced to produce a mini sitcom about their "relationship". They go through a series of interviews together where they "roast" each other or fake a romance insinuation, or play with puppies or whatever. So much effort had to mean something, ((Someone)) really wants that movie to be seen by the people.The second issue to understand is that the "message" of this staged ceremony doesn't have to be "deep" or "esoteric" or "profound" by any means. It can be as simple as to sell a fucking toy or a brand. It's all about MONEY with (this) people, that's the one thing to have always in check about this manipulation "magick". They created the money device, and they infuse that device with "power" and "authority" by all and any means possible. That's all that this "magick" is about.They created a thing that can "buy" your house, your morals, your family, your daily routine turning you into an slave, that's what a piece of paper does, it's infused with "magick" according to them. ("their" magick)A piece of paper that has more power than your religion, and your moral beliefs, more power than the wisdom of your father, and the father of your father. And you say "..'money' has rules", but those "rules" are overpowered by "money" as well. They own the judges and the whole legal system. So when they are confronted by a social construct based on the moral wisdom of an spiritual faith, they turn on that like demonic beasts, it can be the Pope, or the eastern Orthodox leader, or a political figure respected by the people like Lincoln or JFK. Whatever or whoever circumvents or free itself from the authority of "money" in pursuit of a moral or humane higher goal, it must be destroyed. Most of the "messages" of these (((ceremonial rituals))) are in tune with that.
>>4233547It follows (2014) made absolutely no sense to me. Felt like population control to stop teens from having sex
>>42353343The killing of the lovers, (or "the whore") PLUS the killing of the child (conceived in the love act) is a KEY element and trope in all, or most, of their ritualistic film cultist shit. That's set in stone.Why? There's a movie "The Cabin in the Woods" (2011), where a secret organization keeps a gate to hell under surveillance, and they HAVE to offer human sacrifices to keep the demons appeased. And there's a key scene when a couple have sex and they are gutted by the demons, while the surveillance agency watches and they bet on the lovers cumming before dying. Yeah, that's a fucking movie, with that fucking retard Chris fucking Hemsworth and Sygourney Weaver, and a very known old faggot playing the dude in charge of the operation. I think that's one of the few times, or the only one time that I saw an "explanation" (sort of) to that trope. They always do that, in those Jason movies, when the lovers are fucking they get killed together, in every movie they do that. It's a cover way for showing the sacrifice of a child. Or a whole family, but specially a child. You can see exactly that in the "eyes wide shut" the scene of the overdosed whore in the party, there's a painting in the bathroom on top of her of a similar woman but pregnant, like insinuating the possibility or just the message, that the whore just conceived, and just died. THE HINT of it is enough. It's a play, it's a medium to plant a symbol. You will be SHOCKED in how many movies this happens, the guy fucking the random female and then she get killed by the baddies. It's one of (their) most important and prominent ritual symbols in movies in my opinion.
>>42346663I never saw death to smoochy, but I remember the ads. Ed Norton was then at the peak of his fame. I did one hour photo. It was an unsettling experience. Watching the movie made you feel hollow. Similar to that Wll Ferrel movie where he played an accountant. Will is an enigma on a certain level. I know he’s part of this, but something tells me he harbors reservations about all this stuff. And it’s true that humiliation — not just that, degradation — is deeply embedded in whatever it is that’s right out in the open. I honestly just think it’s devil worship at this point. It’s seeming to be most likely. Little wonder, then, that the world is such a shitty place. People who relish the suffering of others are calling the shots. They blame it on the way people vote or this or that, but it’s all them. The world truly could be such a better place. But I don’t think that’s possible so long as literal satanic worshipers dominate everything. But yeah, Heath Leger did seem broken after that aptly named movie. I never saw it. But there was something different about him after that. I never saw the fisher king either. That was Lawrence Fishburn, right?
>>42355625>the fisher kingThat's the movie with Jeff Bridges (another big one up there). That movie has a ton of known actors though. They used to know how to make artistic good quality films in those days. Today I can't think of any film in that tone worthy of a watch.About Will Ferrell, and "humiliation", you reminded me of that scene in "Zoolander", the one of the "School for ants". You know that Tom Cruise thinks he owns to the Scientology institution his success because they helped him to overcome his dyslexia. That's a true thing. And I really believe Ben Stiller (another BIG member of the cabal) was mocking Tom with that scene, and surely with the whole theme of the movie as well. Stiller and Cruise have had many projects together, and I wonder if these "roasting" rituals are on agreement. I bet they all hate each other, but they understand they all belong to the same cause, and they go along with these mutual humiliation rituals."The roasting" ritual shit. That's an american only crap, I haven't seen that "institutionalized" humiliation ritual anywhere else. I can't understand how people normalize that shit, how they dress all up, and prepare a "big ball" to insult and humiliate each other, as if that should be something to be "praised". It's an extremely violent and degrading shit to witness. It's a justification of that behavior, "look, we humiliate each other and we laugh, now you will be humiliated as well, so take it with a smile". And americans actually do that, they normalize that shit, and they apply it to each other. It's fucking disgusting to see that being played so blatantly and shamelessly, and the sheep beating each other, justifying the old saying "monkey sees, monkey does".
>>42355770bro you sound like a huge pussy for not 'understanding' roast humor
What do you guys think about the Frozen movies? I did not want to watch them since they are animated and thought they are for kids but I found them very esoteric and meaningful in a mythic kind of way, about the soul's journey to awakening and becoming the bridge between schizo and non-schizo
>>42355456Happens in twin peaks the return, a literal demon from hell slashes two people having sex. The room had a "box to hell" kinda thing in it... Idk i just watched the season once and it's really complicated.
>>42356009"Understanding". I understand it perfectly well, and I laugh of shit that would make you writhe. Like this shit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J51ARIJ2c34 That shit is hysterical. Or this shit, wich is the best "roast" of all times: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVFRI0h5NFwOR the greatest little bit of roast ever could happen in an obscure dingy club like this:https://youtu.be/R9TcGbaRC8A?t=260People USED TO HAVE CLASS, today you have some nasty whore roasting her own wet cunt to make a point about someone else.This retarded "roasting" shit turned into something totally different, it's not funny, creative or artistic, it's just cheap, degrading and awkward as fuck. You have a guy with his family, everyone is in there, and some nigger comes up to say he would like to fuck his brains out cause he's so hot... And some other loser comes up to say that the roasted is a retarded faggot who should have died in his retarded mother's womb, straight up. Just plain insults.. and you're watching that shit like WTF? What is this shit?...And then suddenly, you realize of what really is this shit, because of how much cheap it got, and how decadent those elites became. It's a tool to beat up society, to program society into humiliate each other. It's an ordering device, a self-applying disciplining system to lube and break the "proud" plebes.These fags are not innocent, they are not your "friends". They are up there on the stage to do a (((JOB))).
Maybe you don't believe that the humiliation ritual is so real, or maybe not everyone had to go through it. THERE HAVE TO BE some exception.. Right? Like, I don't know.. Al PACINO? Surely AlPacino wouldn't play a FAG.. Right? Right?Well, One of his first hit films, if not the first one, was "Dog Day Afternoon" (1975) where he plays a FAG who robs a bank with his boyfriend to get money for a sex change surgery for him. Take that one for the records.A fucking gender change surgery in 1975. He went all in on his first movie. And it paid off, "biggly".Yes this shit is real, and everyone single one of these faggots go through that "initiation ritual". It's like entering the mafia, you have to do something to be part of the criminal family. Something that takes something important out of you, so your loyalty and commitment to the "cause" can be proven and justified in your broken dignity and spirit.
>>42357809>THERE HAVE TO BE some exception.. Right? Like, I don't know..this one specific example I have cherry picked?!?!How about Mario Van Peebles? Any person we can cite as being an exception you're just going to weasel away by saying they werent a big enough star or the wrong type of star
>>42357843Nta. Get out of here you re just trolling or plain dumb.>>42357809Don't let him get you riled up. Only good roast ever:https://youtu.be/5wTujmZ1c0k
>>42357843Mario? He's faggy enough to have some obscure gay shit for sure. BUT, I was about to mention the other side of the humiliation ritual coin. It's the same shit, but you have to chose: you either play a FAG, or.. you play a RAPIST KILLER. Those are the two options. The problem with the rapist killer is that, it is a much tougher one to shake off. Mario plays that role in the Exterminator 2 (1984) I think the way the girl is abused, raped and killed (through out the movie, and the way she ends) it's one of the most disturbing ones that I've seen in "mainstream" filmsA good example would be Laurence Fishburne Deathwish2 1982, he plays one of the leader rapist killers, very fucked up role to play. It was his second movie after Apocalypse now 1979. Those DeathWish movies were very prone to that trope on each movie a girl is raped and killed by a gang and you will always find some known name in those gangs. What about Charles Bronson then? Huh? you would say... Well, in 1968 he made "Farewell, Friend" along with Alain Delon (pretty cool movie) he plays a PIMP. The movie starts with Bronson taking a girl to do her thing in a garage while he guards and collect the money. What about Delon then! Well Alain Delon fucking kisses himself in a mirror in The Samurai, and he Rapes, Torture and kill a Girl (B.Bardot) in "Spirits of the dead" 1968It's quite known that weird movie Stallone did where he abuse a girl along with a gang, (his son, did the most fucked up movie ever "The House in the middle of nowhere" wich is now blacklisted everywhere, and he killed himself years later, that's a whole other rabbit hole right there, an humiliation ritual gone wrong?, just like Ledger, or River Phoenix. Stallone's son shouldn't had to do that shit)Jeff Bridges plays a drag in "Thunderbolt and Lightfoot" 1974, and you could go on and on. These people come from another time, they have been doing this shit for half a century, they have done EVERYTHING, you just have to look for it
What about weener scenes. Plenty of established actors have a weener scene where they're showing off their 2 inch flaccid weener. That seems pretty fucking humiliating to me.
>>42358082>Those are the two options.Oh, so we went every single one without exception to "well there are exceptions because there are two options."So Mario Van Peebles is an exception to your humiliation ritual. You didnt have an immediate "here he is playing a tranny fag" answer.How about Sammo Hung?
>>42358203That's a big one, it is either their little limp dick (rare), or their naked asses (the most common one).
Avoid these at all costs>Undertone >Longlegs>Clayface>Smile 1/2>The Backrooms>Digital Circus finale>Is God Is>Obsession
>>42358512Oh god, I watched longlegs TWICE! How much salt will I need to throw over my left shoulder?!
>>42358254>How about Sammo Hung?Sammo? Sure, he did the offering ritual of the "raped, brutalized and killed whore" as well here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y59hThElE-AWhat about DeNiro? In the Deer Hunter he says that he loves Christopher Walken's character in the Russian Roulette scene, and then, Walken's character dies in front of him (Blood Sacrifice). When I saw that movie I didn't think nothing of it, like he says "I love you" sobbing all over him, to me that's like, "that's his friend". But along the years you read about the movie and the scene is supposed to be a "love confession". It doesn't matter "how" they do it, but it matters to them that the "ritual" was presented on the offering stage, and "it counts". De Niro also did that movie "Angel heart" where he plays Satan, and it has to be one the most satanic movies ever done. It has ALL the ritualistic tropes, the girl being fucked to death, the child at the end. If THAT shit doesn't convince you that these fuckers are into some pretty dark and fucked up evil movement, then I don't even know.That was probably the one movie that fucked up Mickey Rourke as well. Though, in Mickey's greatest "hit" (Nine and a half weeks) with Kim Bassinger, there's a scene when she dresses like a guy, with a moustache and everything and both make out. As I said, there's an infinite combination of "ways" to sign that contract with the Devil, and he's happy to "bent" the "rules" for your particular "way" to "do it".
>>42358626>Maybe you don't believe that the humiliation ritual is so real, or maybe not everyone had to go through it. THERE HAVE TO BE some exception.. Right? Like, I don't know.. Al PACINO? Surely AlPacino wouldn't play a FAG.. Right? Right?You said there was no exception to this.So far I have shown two just off the top of my head.I dont think your "without exception" is real.
>>42358651>So far I have shown two just off the top of my headWhich ones? Look, the thing about this, is that I myself could think about "exceptions" too, and I looked for them, but I consistently, through out the years, found the one thing that took that one "exception" out. It's like, I know this shit is real, and if I look for it, I will find it.I remember when that stupid movie came out with Wesley Snipes, John Leguizamo, Patrick Swayze and I don't know who else, ALL OF THEM "A" LISTERS, and the "catch" of the "movie" was that they would play their roles all in DRAG. They were supposed to be a crew of DRAGS doing DRAG SHOWS on the road. I mean, in those years (90s) shit was crazy like that, you weren't supposed to freak out "in a bad way" about it, but after the years went by, that shit became a big "WHAT THE FUCK WAS THAT?"... Like "WHY?". "Why" became this what we start to ask and notice today. We start to ask "why" do we have to "experience" this shit. "Why" do they had to do it. I don't think Wesley Snipes, or Leguizamo feel too hot about that shit today.>I dont think your "without exception" is real.hey dude, I would love to "hope" so. I WISH this shit would be just some schizo shit in our heads, and only that. But the problem is when you fact check that shit and the result just hits your face like a brick wall. Reality is weirder than fiction, buddy, always remember that.
>>42358820>Which ones?You could not give any example of Mario Van Peebles being a tranny fdag, nor Sammo Hung.When shown this, you made up an entirely new option.I could keep going showing many many ways your rule is simply not true, but two examples is enough to disprove it.
>>42358838Bud, I didn't come up with this shit. This crap is out in the open since fucking forever. You can either be a fag or a rapist. I realized about that rapist/killer trope with that movie Dead Wish 2. I thought about that rapist ritual first than the fag thing, cause I'm not a die hard homophobe to care about some cross dressing skit (until now). The violent rape and murder of the random woman in every movie from the 60s,70s,80s,90s and 2000's called my attention in a more direct wayI don't know why you name Mario Van Pebbles and Sammo as if you could stake your life for their "good name". I would choose someone else. Mario and Sammo have a FUCK TON of movies, they are in showbiz since the late 70s. Sammo did all those comedy asian movies I'm sure he cross dressed for "the comedy" at least once and Mario is even more prone to have skeletons in the closet being a Hollywood local figure active in those crazy years when anything was allowedI care for more prominent characters, like say, Chuck Norris, what's with him? How they "got him"?. Chuck was a self-proclaimed ZOGBOT, he didn't hide it. What's my ritualistic relationship with his movies? Norris did some freaky movies in the late 70s early 80s, like violent, with rape and murder. I always remember that one Forced Vengeance 1982 where his girl gets raped and killed, it was fucking shocking, when I saw that as a kid. I can't get it out of my mind, now I know, THAT's what they want when they do these films. I always remember that scene, and he made many freaky action movies with that same ritualistic trope. THEN (they) did a reverse role with him and turned him into a PG product, he was in movies for kids, and cartoons. It was like the Reverse path of Robin Williams, who started as a PG product and then in the 2000's became a "Risque Drama" character role player. They like to play those perverse "reverse of the symbols" mind game, to get the whole specter of the mental "real state" out there in the audience
>>42359206>Bud, I didn't come up with this shit.That's worse, as you havent thought critically about what you have been told.>I don't know why you name Mario Van Pebbles and SammoBecause they were two names I casually thought of that arent in this humiliation ritual of playing a faggot tranny.You had to add on "oh, and killers - they could be fags OR killers."How about Scott Adkins?Or Neal Breen?
>>42359206Could that be the one movie that spiritually broke Patrick Swayze? Suffering mockery, humiliation and a depressive hit while battling cancer, surely didn't help. How can anyone ever be convinced to do something like that?
>>42357809Before I knew about all this sick Hollywood ritual shit I remember watching this thinking how in the fuck did this shitty movie win awards.
>>42344519Good eyes anon but Jim carrey is off, he was fucking perfect, Olaf was a monster in those books, I loved that series as a kid.The author regularly warns the reader directly in every book that their is no happy ending, its fucking called a series of unfortunate events.
>>42358820>I mean, in those years (90s) shit was crazy like that, you weren't supposed to freak out "in a bad way" about it, but after the years went by, that shit became a big "WHAT THE FUCK WAS THAT?"... Like "WHY?".uhhh...no, we didn't wait until the years went by.Were you even born yet?Everyone was stunned and we said wtf when that movie was still fresh in theaters. Many people freaked, too. And the whites stopped liking swayze immediately.
>>42359983Yeah, I was a brat, still maybe too detached from that heated discussion from older moviegoers. What I mean is that, heck, Wesley Snipes was HUGE back then, he was THE guy, Blade, Demolition Man, also Leguizamo was in Spawn too wich was awesome. So I didn't felt like that shit "cancelled" Snipes, and the others. But of course, it cause me immediate repulsion, to this day I never watched that shit saving the unfortunate few seconds that you see here and there when people talk about it lolJust now I think about the effect that movie could have had in Patrick Swayze. You can tell when "something" means a "before and after", in a person's life path. You may not identify the reason but you can tell "when" the downfall happened.
>>42360093I looked up their biggest movies and the dates they were right around their peak years. Its like To Wong Foo was supposed to shatter our image of them as men. >But of course, it cause me immediate repulsionI think thats part of why they do it. Wesly Snipes Blade, 1998 To Wong Foo, 1995 <---Demolition Man, 1993White men can't jump 1992 New Jack City, 1991 Patrick SwayzeTo Wong Foo, 1995 <---Point Break, 1991Ghost, 1990 Roadhouse, 1989Dirty dancing, 1987 John LeguizamoMoulin Rouge, 2001 Summer of Sam, 1999 Spawn, 1997Romeo and Juliet, 1996 To Wong Foo, 1995 <---
>>42360093True, true...Thing is though it only really hit swayze's reputation... and self-respect apparently. Snipes was considered too badass by everyone to become persona non grata for his part in that faggot shit. People only knew leguizamo as luigi from the awful mario movie so no one cared. No. The big reaction to wong foo was about the gay angle, because people were culturally more conservative back then and just didn't like hollowood jews throwing a big gay movie at them. The fact it humiliated two of their most favorite actors was of somewhat lesser concern.
>>42359919>Good eyes anon but Jim carrey is off, he was fucking perfectOh I'm SURE he was. That's how perverse they are. They scout, they groom and they train THE BEST. But "the best" are still human beings, deeply sensitive and emotional. I loved Harry Potter back in the day, and I can understand the adoration for such type of book series. I didn't read the "Lemony Snicket" series, but I can see with cynical eyes the thing from afar. The brits (or england) developed this "tradition" of obscure and dark literature made for "children". I remember the protests against Harry Potter for being "satanic", and I laughed about it, but along the years, I have to admit that many of these new book authors for children or "young adults", really go "there". They actually delve into the dark and satanic in a deep and purposely manner. And I dare to say "Lemony Snicket" goes there. At least in the movie it truly does. That movie taps in ALL of the darkest tropes common in these kind of movies, Rosemary Baby, Eyes wide shut, etc. It touches all the core elements of the (british) masonic occultism. The all seeing eye is everywhere and other masonic symbols. The element of the "spy agencies" and all the violence associated with those organizations. The element of the (((mafia))), usurping names, disguising as other people, and killing as a way of "making bank" and acquiring capital and property. And the obsession with cruelty against children. It's quite disgusting. The thought that Jim's Character plans to MARRY his underage niece infront of the whole town in a "theater stage" and at the same time to kill the baby, it's all so "ritualistically in place". So much that the little brother plays the role of the cuckold watching the ceremony in impotence. These are things present in many of these "movies" like The Baby of Mâcon 1993. Also the pervasive element or the "acting crew", the "hollywood and theater crew" as a criminal tool in "camouflage".. TO CONTINUE>>
>>42359919>>42360325 Continue here>>There's a known "ritualistic" element in these movies, always at the minute 33, something will happen. A death or something particularly "weird", in this movie, at the minute 33, Billy Connolly's character (the uncle) opens the jail of the black serpent for no reason in front of the baby, and the baby cries like really loud, and with anguish. It's a quite disturbing short and weird moment, he immediately closes the cage, like following a mechanical ritual there's no point in what he did, just the baby's suffering scream. I am in the believe that this FUCKING movie is PROFOUNDLY DARK. And it was the one thing that fucked up Jim Carrey, as I said, you can tell "when" a person became to go a different path, to have a different aura. I think Jim understood what that movie was, he understood the fucked up "lore" behind all of it, and he just stopped being innocent about it. I have other theories about that movie that are too dark to even mention, like the baby's ability to bite the table like that. When I read about the Epstein files, I got all fucked up inside, wondering if these cabal shits can be satanic enough to mock and play at this level of demonic evilness. And I feel like I already know the answer to that. And maybe Jim Carrey knew that as well after doing that movie.Billy Connolly, good ol' Bill, he doesn't have a very "prolific" filmography, but I always remember him for that role he had in that "X-files" movie, Billy plays a p3d0phile who's used by the FBI as a paranormal medium to find a body or something. These kind of "coincidences or synchronicity" are never casual in my opinion. I'm always suspect of british figures (english in particular) about these "matters".
>>42360230Wow, good job anon. It really sticks out like a sore thumb, huh.. Who the fuck thought this was a good idea? I guess that's just how Hollyweird rolls
The film Him was more like a documentary/soft disclosure. Also put me off the comedy of Jim Jerrfries, he is a satanist.
>>42360532That guy felt evil the first time i saw a clip him years ago, just off a few seconds.
>>42360325>>42360330Sure, ill give you the movie if you want, also the movie is kinda bad, its 3 books slammed into one, but the books work differently.The baby in the books, sunny, isnt really a baby baby, shes portrayed as this surreal stoic with high intelligence.The wedding act is portrayed as a sneaky but shitty attempt to legally marry the sister to steal the massive inheritance. Olaf is a failed actor and regurlaly described as a pure evil man. Sunny breaks out of the cage easily in the books and is annoyed, not scared.Honestly, a major theme of the books is the siblings are extremely competent with a relentless amount of shit thrown at them.The secret org is a positive one, they hide in plain sight but in the books its sadly almost disolved, it doesnt even begin to show itself until way way way later, and its last job is trying to keep the kids safe. The movie and show bring it on way too fast and nothing like the books. Its like 10 people maybe, last job trying to protect the characters and another set of siblings. Its purpose was protecting from evil and subverives, hidden behind volunteer fire fighting. The snake, the 2nd book, all that shit, is regarded as the happiest. They loved monty the most and him and only 1 other character constantly take the kids side, the only ones in the series, if he didnt die, the siblings would have had an amazing life. I dont remember the eye symbolism much in the books, I was thrown off hard by the whole VFD portrayal in tge movie/show. Iirc in the books lots of its plain sight symbolism were smokescreens to throw bad people off. It really is almost dead and gone in the books which is why the kids have a hard time even finding anything about it. Its entirely gone by the end.The books are unpleasnat but you are always warned, Lemony Snickett isnt the authors real name and the books, “his” writings are a memoir so the kids history and struggles are remembered
>>42360532I agree about Jim Jerrfries.
>>42358512>>Smile 1/2Pretty sus my chicken meme was made and a few months before the 2nd one came out. Eerie actually.
>>42361912>Jim JerrfriesRed pill me on Jim Jeffries?
>>42355456It sucks that a lot of people write off Tarot symbolism when all of these Hollywood occult films use it in their storytelling (the Alchemical journey of the soul; The Fool).
>>42357809Transgenderism is mainly pushed by the Luciferian elite as the precursor to transhumanism and because Draconi's are androgynous (DRAG-on queen). The Lucferian Jesuit elite families are under heavy mind control and were installed in their positions to control humanity. Anal rape/sodomy is a huge part of 33rd degree Freemasonry and trauma-based mind control (research/techniques passed down from these families).Pic related touches on it.
>>423641912/5
>>423641963/5
>>42364201
>>423642075/5
What happens after a dark ritual? I don't want to be dark. I prefer to be normal.
>>42364191>>42364196>>42364201>>42364207>>42364215So.. all of this bullshit is just an excuse to justify raping people in the ass?
>>42344519This anon is extremely knowledgeable it seems on the occult system and cabal that runs the world
>>42335478Do you think Bruce Lee was legit and uninvolved and they killed him?
>>42335478One is going to be the Spielberg alien fear mongerer
>>42364974They said he had a problem with the Hong Kong mafia. Makes sense; he was deeply rooted in Hong Kong and the triads were extremely powerful at that time, until the early 90s.
>>42365080How do you see Asia vs the West now in terms of the competing/collaborating occult cabals?I have heard the two main occult systems are essentially the Jesuits/SMOM and the Dragon Societies/Snake brotherhood
cringe bro.
>>42365107I really don't know about that, but I would like to know more. I mostly know about Asian gang cultures and I do know that they were spiritual. They had many rituals, but I don't know about magick.
>>42365148My understanding of the gang rituals is that they were taught by the high cabals, same with the bloods, crips, 1%ers and Mexican cartels. All involved in occult shit
>>42364945He is. The best or should I say worst “magic” they do is probably the stuff that you think should be the most obvious and out in the open that most people don’t see it. For example the movie Trading Places which pretty much foreshadowed how the elites are going to stop hiring white men and replace them and so on….
>>42364942Usually, some go much further with it:>>42348656>>42365454Goats in nature are often sexual deviants and sodomites. It's probably where we get the word "horny" from. As Capricorn the goat represents Cybele / Rhea and her indulgent followers. A goat nursed Zeus and Attis on two versions of Mount Ida where they were protected (or initiated...) by the goddess' sodomite priesthood. Attis or Adonis, who would later become the Greek Dionysus, was also called Ba'al in Canaan. It's all the same cult.https://youtu.be/CiyMeTJSNKg
>>42358512I have tickets for the DC finaleI'll report back, if I end up with no mouth and the need to scream.
>>42367783You're not the target. Children are.
>>42367742>A goat nursed Zeus and Attis on two versions of Mount Ida where they were protected (or initiated...) by the goddess' sodomite priesthood. Attis or Adonis, who would later become the Greek Dionysus, was also called Ba'al in Canaan. It's all the same cult.Is that the inspiration for "Slaneesh" then?
What about the 9th gate?
>>42371164Made by Roman Polansky. Nuff said.
>>42371746What do you mean? That movie is really good.
>>42359473>How about Scott Adkins?It is common lore on the webs that Scott Adkins has been kept away from stardom success "for some reason". Not matter how much effort, hard work, professionalism and passion the guy put on the table, he can't get to be the new Van Damme, or Chuck Norris, or Jet Li, or even Steven Seagal. He seems to be in that Jay White limbo, and you can come up with many explanations, like, we are not in the 80s/90s action era anymore, but then you see big clowns like John Cena "making it" somehow, breaking through and getting "there". And we know what kind of "clown" John Cena is, he is willing to do "whatever it takes" to get there.In this segment interview Jean Claude VanDamme gives a "hint" of what means to "make it" and what it "takes". Around the 3:30 minute mark he talks about the key moment when he had to go down into the humiliation offering ritual to get through the "door":>"I prefer not to tell about what happened when I went around (((his))) desk" (in reference to Globus owner of Cannon films)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X80GvnJvlNA
>>42371746Why did they off his wife? She was in advanced pregnancy, too.
I didn't like this movie and I thought it was weak but it had something dark in it.
>>42374482>She was in advanced pregnancy, too.Exactly.
>>42374482>>42374576This guy makes the direct connection between Polansky and the church of satan a must see video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E_00d9MfzE
>>42369239Sounds like one of em.https://youtu.be/YiWcfao8e_k
>>42375413They even call it The Phoenician? (They) don't give a fuck anymore. They really believe their own delusional myths made up three centuries ago.
More obscure but I walked out of Psycho Killer. The TLDR is a satanic serial killer that was posing as a preacher tries to destroy a nuclear reactor to open a portal to hell.
>>42375576I remember hearing about it. Was it too demonic for you or just a crapfest?
>>42375851NTA but to me it was beyond crap.
>>42375851It was pretty terribly written and directed and I rented it later just to see the rest. There's a really graphic scene where the killer goes to a confessional booth and uses a telescoping pipe to stab through the screen into the priest's neck to drink his blood. Later on they have a scene at a rich satanist's mansion where there is some sex orgy ritual or black mass shown.
>>42375921>killer goes to a confessional booth and uses a telescoping pipe to stab through the screen into the priest's neck to drink his bloodCOOL
>>42375523they're pathetic but their time is almost up.
>>42375523>>42375970(Spiel*berg) went there full on at the end of the Indiana Jones series. It's like they are desperate to make that point, that (THEY) are the "chosen ones" not only by 'god', but by "history" too. The Carthaginians where the ones sacrificing babies to Ba'al, and yet that SHIT movie chose to make THEM the "victims" and the figure of "mastery" and "pioneering" at the end: the "romans are the bad and evil" and they are the "intelligent, mysterious and virtuous". Again they appropriate and steal shit, like the antikythera mechanism, as if (they) made that shit. And look how the movie begins, the spear of longinus it's supposed to be a silly prop, something that "never existed" anyways (get it?), instead what really existed is this bullshit narrative of retarded "time travel" that doesn't make any sense at all. And it is just a vehicle to propel all of their made up "historical" bullshit. A whole historical myth made up in the middle ages by these turkish tribes of nomadic gypsies, who infiltrated europe through scamming and deceiving schemes and a mastering of NARRATIVE. Today hollywood is dying, and the "magick" is suddenly going away, as if it never existed.
> Darkness/Films as rituals:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9Ij4GDvVfwhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E_00d9MfzEhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUIQB3MrWC8
>>42375523I'm no expert but there's a ton of symbolism in those posters. Probably tarrot related but also the 2 pillars, left hand and left eye, the twins, a hidden bee as a grenade. Plus tom hanks and bryan cranston, two of the most important world stage actors.
>>42358512>LonglegsI watched Longlegs. While it had some creepy moments, I thought it was a garbage film and couldn't understand what it was trying to say. I also thought the Nick Cage character was too corny.>ObsessionI've not watched this because it looks shit, but I keep seeing loads of advertisements for this. It's very odd. It does not look interesting in the slightest, yet I've seen this trailer appear far more than any other horror film I can think of. I also find it annoying it shares its name with a Brian DePalmer film which I also haven't seen, but probably will watch.
>>42358082>you will always find some known name in those gangsMaybe not a good example, but Arnie's second role as an actor (arguably his first actual role) was as a nameless mook in the main villain's gang in The Long Goodbye. The backdrop is that the villain was going to literally castrate the main character and made everyone of his goons strip down into their underwear to make the MC feel more "comfortable". It's a weird, tense, and awkward scene.
>>42378173Oh yeah, I wonder if you know that movie "Stay Hungry" 1976, one of the weirdest pieces of trash ever made. Jeff Bridges and Sally Field are the main actors but Arnold is supposed to be this cool and mysterious character. Actually I think Arnold plays himself in that movie like he really wants to be "super cool and wise". Also he often uses that "Stay Hungry" phrase as a trademark too. So I think Arnold had a big role in that movie beyond his acting part. The movie shows Sally Field (oscar winner) TITS AND ASS NAKED and she has a sex scene with Jeff Bridges too. There's also a freaky QUITE "porn-esque" scene in a gym. And a very WEIRD scene of Arnold playing a masked sort of priest character, wich surely meant something deep in those years of satanic sex cults:>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TbuwxXBfoACan't find the gif of the scene of the muscle faggots running but naked on the street and flexing on people, it is posted in this site often. Arnold was in the heart of that weird movement of muscle faggot culture, many movies and shows played that weird "kink" of exhibiting these buff gym dudes butt naked on screen, like in that "The long Goodbye" movie.I'm sure you know that Arnold played a "serial killer" in the TV series "The streets of San Francisco":> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQM6F10OgAkHe also played that ritualistic killer dude at least two times, in that episode and in Terminator. He also once said that he raped a hot black girl with a bunch of guys in the gym. Years later he was asked about that, and he said that he may have expressed out load a weird "fantasy"... These people are OLD, they did and live EVERYTHING. I find it really quite "extraordinary" that some people would fanatically VOUCH for these Hollywood freaks and weirdos without having a clue about the things these people did through out their lives.
What does that new movie called They Will Kill You supposed to mean to the audience?
What about Shivers/They came from within? Has a softcore CP scene in it basically, but none has mentioned it when talking about it. Is the worm thing a real thing that they have in their secret labs or something?
>>42335574Minions & Monsters.
>>42335574>>42380592No, really. They do a demonic ritual to summon Cthulhu so they can takeover Hollywood.
>>42335478>going to be
>>42380592>>42380597Heard little about this, wonder why more vids on this are not being made.
>>42380701>>42380592Let 'em wonder how we got this far'Cause I don't really need to wonder at allYeah, after all this time I'm still into youhttps://www.reddit.com/r/Lovecraft/comments/16jfcu0/about_the_rivalry_between_cthulhu_and_hastur/Pay attention to the cracked streets and the broken homesSome call it slumsSome call it niceI want to take you through a wasteland I like to call my homehttps://youtu.be/2ggzxInyzVEhttps://youtu.be/jUcHKQ4G1vohttps://youtu.be/Y7qu33zaYQchttps://youtu.be/m2uTFF_3MaAhttps://youtu.be/ztTpaaxhUjQhttps://youtu.be/3IKxMSPAIEohttps://youtu.be/3V7Rvo4Gvichttps://youtu.be/-S74ftNeRh4Relax, we are programmed to receive.All midnight eyes read "vacancy"https://youtu.be/1w7OgIMMRc4https://youtu.be/9UJKIZ0VH6Yhttps://youtu.be/gzbLODUb1sAWelcome to Paradise.
>>42348656If your cup isn't overflowing with The Holy Spirit, there's room for . . . intrusions.
>>42353343>>42355456>Alien (1979): Hippy Free Love Sexual Revolution Hangover>The Xenomorph is literally the haunting/revenge/demon of an Aborted Fetus>The AI Golem android that nearly kills Ripley is made of spilt seed-for-bloodAt least that's the E. Michael Jones thesis. Ridley Scott wanted to literally reskin Texas Chainsaw Massacre In Space. Self-insert being a woman ... ect. ect.IT FOLLOWS plays with the same tropes. Could be embodied STD, or unwanted pregnancy (guilt). The main thing: information is 'entropic', and 5shadowing ritual 'magick' is an attractor to resolve that 'entropy' (by fulfilling what has been shown). The more sentient minds have witnessed a thing, the more inertia's gained. e.g. those global rat maze experiments-- once it's solved once, the rates of solution spiked everywhere else as well. Extension doesn't count for much in the Nousphere.
>>42355770Marzinsky cites self-inflicted humiliation/shame being a common demon tactic among his patients. The Evo-Bio explanation is that low status females and males that can't go to war sacrifice themselves (or children) instead, just for street cred.
>>42378146Ozgood Perkins, Old Hollywood connections. Good screenwriter. Did GRETEL (as in Hansel & Gretel) and THE BLACKCOAT'S DAUGHTER. It's kind of like with summoning text, reading them in-itself is a problem and not entirely passive/needs breaking up sequencing, ect. Otherwise the armor of God ought to suffice.
>>42376112>Germans relocated the Pergamon Temple and Himmler took the Lance of Longinus, because it's 'fake'>Early Life History of Ford (complete with the gentile-passing surname)Hollyweird used to be capable of artful propaganda. 'Subversion' of tropes and endless critique is the snake that eats its own tail in the end. The Nuremberg Mythos is a blown out whore, but they could still do interesting things with all the setups. God forbid they read a Joseph Farrell history.
>>42378626>Arnold was in the heart of that weird movement of muscle faggot culture, many movies and shows played that weird "kink" of exhibiting these buff gym dudes butt naked on screen, like in that "The long Goodbye" movie.>I'm sure you know that Arnold played a "serial killer" in the TV series "The streets of San Francisco":Florida performance enhancing drug scene (and its intersection with drug running, and Gay-For-Pay circuit). Same circles as Roger Stone, and even Big Lenny.
>>42380937>Scott wanted to literally reskin Texas Chainsaw Massacre In Space. Self-insert being a womanDon't forget the involvement of H.R.Giger big time "ocultist" : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-hNhFaCC34
>>42365454Is this movie any good? People say is shit
>>42380597>>42380701Saw the 2nd trailer. The clown part was really sus in a children's movie. There was also a decapitation scene, but I am less disturbed buy it, but idk how it might play out.
This should be a general thread already. "The Theater" has been the tool to "transform" manipulate and guide our civilization since the dawn of time.
Bump to read later
>>42358838Literally WHO?This thread is about Hollywood rituals and that implies household names, not randoms you personally know because you saw them in a B movie. Being in a movie with Wesley Snipes doesn't make you part of the club.
>>42374506I thought the same thing. It feels more like a Hex than a horror film. I wasn't particularly scared by anything in the movie, but it left me with a bad taste in my mouth.
Finally a quality schizo thread
>>42358082I could not find a movie called: The house in the middle of nowhere with stallones son in it.
>>42386093That's fucking crazy. You will find the movie somewhere anyways. In porn sites there are many clips of it. If THOSE start to disappear, then, you know for sure Sly is cleaning that shit. You will always find that movie because there's a very known actor in it Kevin Gage who plays "Waingro" in the movie HEAT with Alpacino and Deniro. The guy (Kevin Gage) plays always the same killer psycho, he's the one doing all the raping and killing in the movie. I don't remember if Sage (sly's son) does something really bad in the movie. But he's there alright, and he shouldn't have been. Don't watch the movie it's really shit, it won't do you any good.
>>42335574Go watch Apocalypse Now. Literally ends in ritual animal sacrifice.
>>42335574>>42337394disclosure day is the onesome claim digital circus will be the other one>>42335478allow me to axe you a questionis the latest evil dead another one?that one was too real and so unlike raimislop
>>42386160Which year did the movie came out?
>>42335478have any anons itt seen the house that jack build? it left me disgusted and I had to take a shower afterwards to cleanse myself
>>42346663Your thoughts on david lynch and his movies?
How could nobody cite 28 years later: The Bone Temple, I've seen it a couple of weeks ago. The last 30-40 minutes are some of the most absurd pathetic clumsy satanic bullshit I've ever seen. Oh and there's also a sort of rabid giant played by an MMA retard with a PROSTETHIC PENIS. And the director is a black woman.
>>42338376>wicked duologyJudge Judy = Joudy :3Ariana Grande's post May 1st 2025 = May Day, sacrifice to BaalWho did she play on SNL shortly after? Whose podcast was she on just a few episodes apart from Judy? :3 media ritualz
>>42335478Hollywood needs a 10+ earthquake to get rid of the old "talent" then rebuild and offer something that makes sense and isnt forcefed whataboutisms
>>42386531You will find the movie also as "Chaos" (2005). "The house in the middle of nowhere" probably was the original name playing homage to the 1972 original "The last house on the left" They used the same design for one of the promotional posters. It's only "known" because of the one torture, rape and murder scene in the woods. And since then a bunch of ((faggots)) tried to do remakes and homages, a "proper remake" was made in 2009. It's just cultural and artistic terrorism. It's the only way to explain it.(They) like to terrorize society and plant evil seeds and "subverting" shit in civil population and then they watch people go insane, they mus find fun in that. And they don't even care if one of theirs suffers the consequences, like Sage Stallone or Heath Ledger, or no matter who.
>>42386783He's big part of it of course. There's a core thing here, for (them) most important than everything else, wich is: the power of the "visual artistic language" beyond the script, plot, acting skills, production, etc, "The visual ritual of subverting reality in the mind of the victim" that's the core of the ritual, as ((Crowley)) admitted: "It's only theatrics, your 'power' resides in the scope and scale of your visual presentation of the ritual ceremony" (as this anon pointed out in that zombie movie final scene >>42386893)Problem with that, ((("art films"))) generally don't put butts on the theater. People want a clear and "edible" product. So the valuable thing in ((Lynch)) was his ability to make a product entertaining enough to be accepted by the masses. And that makes the masonic fucks cum in their pants. It doesn't matter if the movies are shit, if they are "good enough" then, holy hell, they have atleast ONE guy able to use as vehicle for their weaponized fake "cultural myth". So Lynch was able to add all of that weird visual symbolic fuckery along with a plot and entertainment value good enough for normies. So he got "taken care of" by the (((industry))), turning him into a sacred cow. Lynch would never have a problem funding his weird shit, as long as he kept the final product "edible" for the massesAnd the same goes with Wes Anderson, the one who must fill that gap now. But Anderson is not the same, he's much more dry, boring and corporation pilled. Lynch liked to fuck around and make the ((producers)) sweat some bullets, with his weird porno-esque shit sometimesIt's hard to admit that the thing that allures you, and attracts you, seduces you, "the mystery", "the secret", "what was that?"... etc.. it's just theater, artificial made up BULLSHIT, to provoke you that emotion or sensation. Now the discussion could be if THAT has a value all on itself, "to be tricked", "to be mesmerized", but that would mean to accept you being a conscious cuckold
>>42387692Okay thanks. Will look it up.
>>42387865You shouldn't, unless you are into that gore porn shit, and it isn't good even at that.
what about evil dead 1 and 2. Seems related to how their changing things. Have always found Rami films interesting.
>>42387852But lynch had a lot of problems with funding during the last years during his career.
>>42388864>last yearsIt's not just him, Hollywood is dying. Lynch should be grateful by being allowed to do the Twin Peaks return series finale. That was pretty fucking big. He had a LONG successful career and he had a lucky life, aside from his unfortunate late disease. Look at how Bob Reiner ended up.
hollywoods dead, all the talent is going to overflow into vtubing since they can be anonymous.
Keep getting weird horror type movie advertisements while watching non horror type stuff on YT. You can’t even say certain words on there like suicide or whatever but they’ll put up disgusting crap for ads. That’s some chutzpah.
>>42388939What about the movies of gaspar noe? He is not part of hollywood.
>>42335478lolol he said "going to be" baka
>>42335574Lemony Snicket's A series of unfortunate events
>>42344519are you saying he and jake fucked for real?
>>42391301gaspar noe is an average sicko and pervert
>>42335574Nolan's Odyssey was likely intentionally miscast to cause the media stir, it could be one of them. OP clarified a big part of the ritual films are their promotions or memetic introductions, that would include intentionally botched PR campaigns (like Wickedest, Grande/Eviro's interviews exposed a Florida mindwipe center and got half the internet to think Eviro's a skinwalker at best.)Now Nolan brings back a literal cult classic, hypes it up for a while, and waits til now to drop the Nyongo-O / Page bomb. Subversion of the ancient Greek archetypes of beauty and strength (Venus and Mars) with a bald black and an effeminate transsexual.
>>42391778>like Wickedest, Grande/Eviro's interviews exposed a Florida mindwipe center and got half the internet to think Eviro's a skinwalker at bestQuick rundown please.
Is All Of Us Are Dead an occultic show/comic? I ask because when I first heard about it, it gave off a vibe that the title was a wink and a nod to our current situation, i.e we are in some form of afterlife.
>>42391309Yeah, no shit. Of course they did, But as the new (((cult))) proclaims "it has to be done with intention". Heath Ledger believed it in this "method acting" satanic bullshit. So he always went "all in" into "something". He was asked to play a gay dude, then he HAD to know the "material" to "be it". These weirdos, have no issues with that, "no matter the cost only the goal". Jake Gyllenhaal ended up being a weird dude after that as well. I bet he went along with this Heath's "determination" to play the role. But Gyllenhaall had a different career path, it's like he himself decided to play a low profile. Ledger on the other hand was thrown through a loop and couldn't control that shit, when he needed some healing time or step aside of the traumatizing environment that provoke him to do all of that self-destructing weird stuff.I believe the SAME shit happened with “My Own Private Idaho” (1991), River Phoenix was the one ending up with regrets and inner consequences just like ledger, and Keanu went on to do his career, but also, as a low profile weird dude.>>42391301I believe what this anon said >>42391312 Also the European Hollywood, The brits (mainly england), France and to a less extent Italy and Spain, that's a whole other can of worms. It's like they have an audience much more accommodated to consume David "Lynchean style" films. So guys like Gaspar noe are very successful in that market region.
>>42392874What do you think about luis bunuels and pierre paolo pasolinis and marco ferreris works?
>>42394025>luis bunuelsThe original David Lynch. When you make the connection, "magick and mystery" is over. It's all a planned, intentional and studied "visual stunt" doctrine to just capture your attention. Capture the soul, capture the spirit, implant something and let it go, with that new "something" implanted in that person. Wich it really matches the general core theme of this board, the "alien abduction". These strange things that capture you during a confusing moment of time-lost and implant you with something to let you go, and you always feel like something is wrong about "that", something lingers in your head.>pasoliniA piece of shit who deserved what happened to him. That's the perfect example of "one self manifesting his own destiny". He went all in, in that "sacrifice of the spirit ritual". "How hard and how much can I taint, shock, hurt, mutilate, and desecrate the human spirit?". He tried his best, and the "universe" hit back. He called those demons, and those demons came, and demons are demons, demons do what demons do. He called them, for what? to talk to them? to "reason" with them? I think it's a great example to learn from. When you do something just for the "hate of it", with no redeeming element or "weakness" for the human nature at all, then you get exactly that, absolute merciless evil. There are other films of the era touching the cruel and lustful nature of man, like "The Story of O", a beautiful made occultist piece of shit sexploitiation bdsm high production movie, BUT, wich a weakness for the human sense of beauty, it has that weakness, and that becomes its salvation and redemption. There is beauty in the lust of humans in love with themselves, there's something to be saved there. Passolinis "120 days of sodom" is ALL HATE, he doesn't even try to make anything beautiful out of it. The "alchemical transmutation" ritual, he fails at that. That shit is pure ugliness, pure darkness and pure evil, and that's what it got in return.
>>42394025>marco ferrerisI think that Federico Fellini overshadows him in a way that makes him almost irrelevant. Fellini is the David Lynch of Europe and to me Fellini is way superior to David Lynch. Lynch couldn't do for the anglo-american culture what Fellini did for the old world of Europe. That Satyricon movie, is like if some sort of device went into the ancient past and saw all of that shit happening. That's one of the most "occult and symbolic" pieces of cinema ever made. And it's like an old and ancient occult lore, but thousands of years before the "ancient occult" we are accustomed in the anglo-american lore. David Lynch kinda had that opportunity with Dune, and he fucked it up. That was his chance, and it didn't happened. Lately they (we) are trying to have "our own Satyricon" trying to push people like Ridley Scott or Christopher Nolan doing those fucking disaster epic historical movies, and it never works. It lacks, it lacks that old artistry and that feel and spiritual connection to that "mythical past". So remember, when you try to understand why this new "The Odyssey" movie is being made in "the way" it's being made, look at Satyicon. The anglo empire cultural priests WANT their own Satyricon, but it's like they don't have a soul, and they try to mimic the SOVL of Fellini. You can't mimic that, you have to have it. So they throw in the mix all kinds of weird fucked up shit, to try to "make it", to try to get the magick sauce right atleast by chance or mistake. And they keep failing. But at least you'll know what they were trying to do.
>>42391778>>42394344Never heard of satyricon, even the actors' faces look perfectly like 3000 years ago.Now i realize that nolan's odyssey might connect to 2001 a space odyssey (huge world script movie). Will keep an eye on it. One of the mottos of nolan's is Defy the Gods, which in kubrick's is shown as AI and space exploration. Just wondering idk
>>42396002>kubrickYou just pointed out the big one for the anglo-empire cultists. Kubrick did Barry Lyndon in 1975, wich "is" supposed to be the ultimate artistic visual masterpiece of our anglo empire civilization, but it fell short, we were too high on our own farts. 2001 a space odyssey was much closer to be that one visual "ceremony for the ages", cause as you said it deals with the meaning and evolution of humanity. That's why I say that "Dune" was the chance to make that ultimate narration in film form, because it would capture "the future" in that occult, bizarre and mysterious tone. Jodorowsky was a fool, he may have had the passion, but the talent, the spark of genius was in the hands of David Lynch, the movie had the visuals, the human talent, it was magical for a kid, but not magical enough for the adults. Lynch missed the mark by a lot.And yet our Hollywood priests are still looking for that ultimate ceremonial tale to capture the meaning and spirit of our civilization. The odyssey should be the one tale to do that, but we don't have the magic anymore. Nolan doesn't have it. I don't know who could do a proper movie nowadays. First of all, I'm sure they don't even have identified the right "ethos" for the project. Our society has been groomed into expecting an "action flick". So as soon as we see something weird like a "weird helmet design" we go bat shit crazy. I don't know what they are planning but, if they chose Nolan then that's a clue of what they have in mind: something overly pretentious and again high on its own farts, like TeneT was. First of all they should understand what the odyssey meant as a philosophical piece, wich is explained here as I haven't seen in any other media:> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDabNhOM0yYYou will have to activate the english automatic subtitles, I can't believe this video doesn't have english voice yet. THAT'S the Odyssey's script right there. THAT'S the base material upon wich build the script for the film
>>42335478I have a weird thing where circus aesthetic feels threatening but also like home. I'm basically a goth with jock fashion sense, you'd never think I'm an alt fag from the external appearance. What's the deal with that?https://youtu.be/4p6GWewmTYQ
So, to gather, these are the films that are rituals(In case we need to make a new thread)>Longlegs>Smile 1 & 2>Iron Lung>Undertone>Obsession>The Boys Finale>The Backrooms>TADC Finale>Disclosure Day>Clayface>Terrifier 4
>>42397103I have not seen one of these.
>>42398120Good for you. Don't watch that shit.
>>42397103>Is God Is
>>42346663My Own Private Idaho is kino of the highest order. You're just a screeching repressed fag with no taste. Also Keanu Reeves is bisexual in the movie, not gay. You'd know that if you'd seen it.
>>42398227>bisexual>not gay...
The McKenna Grace movie Troop Zero was an odd movie where she plays a little girl who keeps peeing her pants in public. Seems like a humiliation ritual to me. It made me extremely uncomfortable because it seemed to be glorifying some pervert producer's pedo piss fetish.
>>42394330I disagree with your pasolni take. He straight up showed the truth about the elite but also the christcuck elite and we cant have that can we?
>>42398592I don't have a problem with a movie exposing the horrors of the human psychopath ruling class. But THAT movie is not a movie to teach and educate in an artistic way absolutely anything. I would never let a youngster see that shit. Maybe Passolini had "good intentions" but he definitely got caught into some bad shit, he got lost in his own darkness.Some sensible creators fall into that, they want to express their inner pain about something that hurt them and they lash out in a way that produces and casts only more horrors into the world.
>>42398541You don't say...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dz0Wx3a35Ik
>>42398714WHAT THE FUCK
>>42337394He clearly has no idea.
>>42335644You don't know, do you?
>>42374506This movie is very dangerous. Watch it at the wrong time in your life and it can very easily fuck you up mentally. Some thing about the imagery used in the film I honestly don’t think we as humans are supposed to see shit like that on a TV screen
>>42401201This is one > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVptHV5z0egThen we already talked quite a lot about the others, Disclosure day, The odyssey. I'm not a big fan of Toy Story, but that's the other. Toy Story 5 closing the "circle-cycle" between childhood, and adulthood. Tom Hanks will always be in the center of the ritual.
>>42361495I like the movie but I think that's because I saw it before I read the books and I feel kind of nostalgic for it. If I had read the books first I probably wouldn't like it as much. Either way, it's Jim Carrey's best performance by far.
>>42360330>I have other theories about that movie that are too dark to even mentionWhat are they?
>>42362585What's the connection?
>>42398714Bro...
>>42401296But you said there are four. What are the other three?
>>42401380That movie is full to the brim of perverse and fucked up situations and "insinuations". This is about a guy who's planning to grape, and kill those kids. All of them. There's a scene in the movie when he tells the girl that he want to eat meat, and the girl says that there's nothing to eat in the house. And he insists he wants to eat meat for dinner. What´s the only meat in the house? It's them, it's the baby. That movie is full of dark shit, "everything that could go wrong will go wrong".
>>42401407I'm not OP. I reckon those may be the movies he refers to: Digger (Tom Cruise-Iñárritu), Disclosure Day(Spielberg), The Odyssey (Nolan) and Toy Story 5 (Tom Hanks).
>>42401393In that pic, lol!!!But to explain again, a few months before Smile 2 came out, I made a meme about this demon putting a chicken into a demonic matrix, then you had Smile 2 come out a few months after that has this happen in the film, with a human as the victim instead. I thought it was weird looking back as while this concept was not unheard of(Descartes' Evil Demon), it is not common enough to really somewhat coincide like this.
>>42401614Wrong, TADC Finale, Clayface, The Backrooms, and Obsession.
>>42401816The Backrooms.... Come on now.
>>42401820I mean it is an extremely popular/pushed topic, plus it originated from this very board, so it makes sense.
>>42401434No, he said he wanted roast beef. Beef means cows. Quit lying. The point is that they painstakingly made pasta and he rejected it. There's also a scene where he stomps across the dinner table, destroying the dinner that they had made, but that scene was cut because it was considered too upsetting.
>>42402728Yeah, I also thought that "Jerky" in the mouth of these satanic hollywood fuckos meant "Beef Jerky"...
>>42403076He specifically said beef every time. Also, when he was stomping across the table, he was just yelling "beef" repeatedly. I'm not even against the idea that movies like this are made with malicious intent or whatever, I just hate it when people like you lie to prove your point. It's like you don't think that what you're trying to say is strong enough on its own, so you have to make shit up. Just find a different argument to make if the one you're trying to make isn't convincing enough without you lying. Your entire argument hinges on whoever reads what you're saying not having seen the movie, which is pathetic. Find another argument to make if this one is so weak, which you're obviously aware it is.
>>42396218The ultimate ceremonial tale is the story of oedipus.
>>42403153No anon, I'm absolutely convinced of what I'm saying. That's just a detail. The fact that he wanted to marry his own underage niece in front of everyone in a "staged play" KNOWING THAT IT WASN'T A "PLAY" and explaining that to the viewer as well as to his victims, to me that's the most fucked up thing in the movie. (They) are breaking the fourth wall and going meta on the message, gloating about the fact that "acting", "movies", "theatrics" are not a "play", it's about real people doing something REAL in a real moment of space and time called "stage". It should be as real in your mind as it is real in that "stage". This is a very profound concept, that they understand perfectly well, and you shouldn't underestimate that, because they don't underestimate what they do, they do it with absolute intent.Going back at the scene, he doesn't offer them to buy the meat, or bring them the meat, HE KNOWS there's no "meat" or food in the hose. Yet he insist in having MEAT. To the highest point of cruelty when Jim Carrey BRUTALLY SLAPS the face of the poor kid, (if you ask me, that's way more "upsetting" than stomping on the table).Your reaction is just as interesting though, you refuse to see the monster in front of you, to the point of defending him and advocating for his "side or the history". You're an already broken child trapped in that story. In the story though, the kids resist and refuse to be broken.
>>42335478"Cinema, as a medium, is black magic *first and foremost*, entertainment second."-Charls Carroll
>>42403248Don't be so fast to rule out some "good ol´ hollyweird action" between Anne Hathaway and Tom Holland... You know how these freaks roll.
someone said the holy mountain
>>42405253El Topo is a nice movie.
>>42338589ur like one of those kids who thought watching the ring would make the girl crawl out of your tv in 7 days.
>>42403384>>42403153I see it now.
>>42338589>At the end of the film it's revealed that the entire movie is a ritual to summon a demon, and you've taken part just by watching it.What???Is this real??This catholic priest said in his sermon that you should steer away from anything demonic or stuff that has demons as subjects.It attracts them and you seeking it out is sort of your consent.However all demons can only enter with the explicit admission of Jesus Christ, like with the demon "Legion" and the pigs.
>>42376112I dont understand what youre saying but i get it
MUST SEE if you're interested in this whole Films as occult rituals:>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQyKoEMj23Y
>>42391778>>42396002In this video (at the beginning) this guy makes a very interesting point about the Odyssey and how Nolan approaches film making. The whole podcast is great if you are interesting in movies as rituals as well.>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oeoei7r-OB0
Great thread
>>42403076It's roast beef, man. I don't know why you're dying on this hill. Anyone can just watch the movie.
>>42409529God, you people are fucking retarded.
>>42411448>roast beef>JERKYWhat's with these people and their code words?
>>42410474>Hollywood lost the point of mythYes probably around the time the (((alphabet agencies))) took over. Have we ever known a true Hollywood unbound? Plenty of material to accomplish a shiny nwo religion but some must admit a bit of whimsy and distortion will only enforce their little system now that the masses begin to hunger for it. Until then let them keep failing, Defying Gods is a ritual artform in itself (and I doubt they've got that one down, either, without external help.)
>>42413843I don't know. There are old movies that I fucking love, like "Double indemnity". Or even newest ones like "Lost in Translation". At least those are "watchable". New movies are literally "unwatchable", they try to throw SO MUCH SHIT at you that you become taken aback from the whole experience.The best example of how "tired" actual movies are is Guy Ritchie. I could hardly finish to watch even the god damn TRAILER of his new movie "in the grey". They have pushed the concept of "Trying too hard" SO HARD that it just became unbearable. All movie trailers and films are like that now, ultra hyped up and convoluted at such a retarded degree that you just can't stand the product, it feels like trying to pass down a extremely sour and rancid beverage. That trailer (in the grey) is literally picrel.
>>42415487I enjoyed the movie The Gentleman by ritchie. There's a series too but i won't watch it.
>>42355625I don't think ferrel has reservations. Look up his appearance on some shitty truTV internet related show called Chris Bedard show or something. He comes on and "performs a ritual" to "save the show." All just fun and games right?>>42356137The roast of Tom Brady made me realize how nasty and disgusting they all are. It was just nasty little jewess Nicky glazer talking about dicks.
>>42335478This movie is interesting. One goes up. One goes down. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlRQ1oatOt8
>>42416364Really interesting! Thanks.
>>42416364Traumatizing MKultra shit.
Quality Thread
>>42401296I find it interesting Ice Cube was in War of the Worlds (alien/UFO movie) which came out a month before Osiris (alien/UFO movie). To contrast Osiris, the Wicked sequel came out that year (Dorothy representing Isis and the underworld story, Oz = Osiris).. Anyway, ICE was a huge topic that year. In fact, there was a tour bus that was blown up that was said to belong to Ice Cube last year. There was a huge rumor that spread where it was said the bus was mistaken for an ICE van but im not sure if it was confirmed. The new pope "blessed" a block of ice (an ice cube) shortly afterwards. A horror movie about a dog titled Good Boy also came out in 2025. The dog's name is Indy which can be short for Indigo, a hue of the color blue which is associated with the 3rd eye chakra. 3I ATLAS was a huge topic around the exact same time Good Boy was released. Third Eye ATLAS.>The atlas (C1) is the topmost cervical vertebra. Named after the Greek titan who held up the world, it directly supports the skull and acts as the crucial transition point where the brainstem becomes the spinal cord. - Wikipedia.Atlas is also one of Saturn's moons.. Sammy Hagar's Crack in the World mentions 2025-2027 as being a turning point for the world and humanity as a whole and there will be a 'great divide'. Sammy Hagar's first album with VH was 5150 whose album cover depicts Atlas holding Earth. The back cover? Depicts the Earth/world 'cracked' in half with a green hue/aura coming out. To contrast Wicked (Oz/Osiris) and Good Boy, this year The Dog Stars (Sirius/Isis) is coming out. In 2025, the Alice in Wonderland bunny (Sirius/Lepus; Alice serving as the contrast to Wicked/Oz both being movies to program child victims of mind control in the occult) holding the stopwatch was a huge meme, same as the Dax "the clock strikes 12". Trump posted the AI Grim Reaper (Saturn/Kronos) video depicting a doomsday clock, smart cities, no fly zones and zombies.
>>42422022I ALSO find it interesting CERN formed the ALICE collaboration in 1992, then the ATLAS collaboration the following year. I don't know what any of this means or if its all meant to weave together a narrative/spell but I just notice a lot of crazy patterns.
>>42422022Tha Ice Cube movie is a rip off of this much better movie, "Mira" 2022:>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3a0icUCy-egBoth were done around the same time, during the pandemic. But the russian movie is awesome, and the american movie is utter shit. That's weird, or maybe, not weird at all, but just another clear symptomatic example of the fall of the western cultural empire discussed in this thread.
>>42422022>>42422080 Yeah, I was hoping that they were going to use the og tentacle vampire aliens. Sigh...
>>42346663Also funny they whacked two jews both of mixed descent heath was of aranese Island jew descent and river was of russian and hispanic jew descent.REmeMber JEWs RUN THE WORlD, LEL BULLSHIIIEET.
>>42375413I look like fullgrim the pheonician with dark hair, lel I'm from the solare's not the retard baalists.Everyone thinks I'm afro-asiatic leb lel.
>>42338589I grew up thinking how the Christians who avoid secular music and movies was being too paranoid but oh how I've been proven wrong considering the monsters who produce that garbage.Listening to Nina Samone on mushrooms showed me how blind I was. It was pure voodoo.
Movies are diabolic
>>42423185Check this guy for music as an occult ritual device:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hTQTTb-jcM
Good thread
>>42423160Lol same. Not sure it's the best archetype to flaunt association with but we sure do do it anyway. Fulgrim = Cain.https://youtu.be/4dHNGiWrN98>>42422022>>42422034I think you're onto it. The cube is the material world, usually black... but an iced cube is usually white. Maybe that means something? As Isis was associated with Sirius, Osiris was with Orion. Lepus is the white rabbit of Eros, the chinese rabbit of immortality, the rabbit shape of the adrenochrome molecule. To the Egyptians who saw it below Orion it was the solar barque that carried Osiris-Re through the underworld.https://www.constellationsofwords.com/lepus/This archetype of Lepus, or Lagos, shares etymology with the words slack, slake, lax, lease, lessor, relax, release, relish, laches, languid, languish, languor, lush, lagomorph, and algolagnia. All reputed symptoms of substances like adrenochrome and the "divine mania" or trademark Caligula/Nero branded psychopathy instilled by programs like MONARCH.
>>42335478I swear this board is just a stomping ground for people who like to make shit up and see how many gullible retards get caught in the net
>>42428386She's right though. Talking about Charlie, everyone should watch The Parallax View (1974)>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdhgJQ1RPM4
>>42348192>>42335478Migga threaf detected.Quality will unfortunately be low even kf this is an interesting topic.I just wish hed go away or remain anonymous.
>>42403384Hey just dropping back inDid you ever do stagework? You have a brilliant and hands on understanding. It is indeed a "Stage" a "Time and Place"
>>42431183I may have the emotional manipulation tools to do that, to get in tune with a particular circumstantial moment. That's what these people do, they can get into that schizophrenic larping fun ride, "for a moment". Problem is, I'm a maladjusted 4channer schizo who took the red pill and can't go back. There's something in "acting" that I FUCKING HATE, I saw the "code" behind it, and I can't go back. I remember when anime started to do that, to make the characters "act" in the "new Hollywood code". I first felt it in "summer wars" (2009). The scene when the chara start to cry, and to baw and I saw that moment when a manipulation stunt UNRELATED with the product was planted there just for "emotional points". It wasn't "moving", to me it provoked the opposite effect, I wanted to SMASH the face of that bawing character into a FUCKING PULP. Something made a click, and unfortunately I started to understand the "manipulation theory" and modus operandi of a "film product as a manipulation/message tool". I started to ID products that included that shoehorned unrelated extreme emotional element as an humiliation ritual for the viewer (wich work mostly on children more than adults, and that angers me even more). That SHIT grew to a point when I can see it on advertising, political campaigns, and most unfortunately on VideoGames. The fact that game companies are embedding the Hollywood acting code into VIDEO GAMES it ultimately broke me. The voice acting, the head movement. Haven't you seen that? When the person just CAN'T FUCKING TALK WITHOUT MOVING HIS FUCKIN HEAD! It drives me insane, because it's so obvious. Politics, anchor men, influencers, they talk moving their head side to side (like saying no) Or when they are holding in the air a fucking gigantic coup of coffee just to talk. I can't stand it. I grew to understand what "acting" is, a manipulation tool to mentally hack a target. Used in the most, tasteless, cheap, crude and vulgar wayI'll continue my rant below
>>42431183 >>42431836 cont>the red pill landed with that casting clip of the ET kid (picrel). I understood then, how fucked up that whole shit was. That's a kid, a KID. In that "state", in that "moment" as you said. So, is that "real"? Is that not happening? Is that acting? Does that exist? We are being thrown into this hellish "dimension" where everything is supposed to be "relative", "it is, and it isn't", FUCK THAT SHIT. That kid is crying and suffering on camera, he's living that on camera, he's humiliating himself, for money, for obedience, for manipulation, FOR A REASON. And WE as a "society" decided that shit has a "justification". It's just an (((act))) goy! Don't worry about it! Make your children cry, you get money!!! See? This shit goes deep, very deep, and we got lost in it. Coincidentally in this thread we had the discussion about the "roasting" shit, meanwhile the Kevin Hart "roasting" shit happened, and I just took a look at it, because, it just happened that all of a sudden they found themselves trapped into that shithole we talked about, and they all suddenly just snapped, and went "HOL´ UP.... whaaaaat?" Stupid shits haven't realized in fucking decades how LOW they fell, till literal shit started to go down their throats, and they didn't like how it tasted. Yeah no shit. In that Rogan episode with Arsenio Hall he witnessed it, in the 70s - 80s the (((seed))) of that SHIT crawling and poisoning the cultural well. He tells an "anecdote" when (((Mitzi Shore))) (big time ""producer"") throws up an "idea" for Paul Mooney (a black comedian) to have the special night for black comedians be called "Cotton Comedy". That's how it all went to shit with america. And we live in the shit now, with shit in out heads, and shit in our hearts.I still appreciate films as an art of great value of course and this vid is a must see for any aspiring actor, I ain't have the stomach anymore for this manipulation artistry tho:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZPLVDwEr7Y
>>42335478What movies?
>>42428386She's right though. Kirk is still alive too, probably playing another role on the world stage anyway.
>>42432703Yeah, but now we are stuck with that retarded ugly fat bitch. Bring back Charlie. She sucks.
>>42403384Explain the table biting thing my jewish occult Crowley worshipping grandfather used to make me bite tables then slam his hand against my head and im trying to figure out if thats some gay nigger ritual or something
>>42344371Cookie cutter hollywood fag enabler
>>42435384I don't know if I can describe that here, it was in the latest Epstein files disclosure, (coincidentally, just before the war on Iran started). It was all over the place online, the thing about taking the teeth out of toddlers for you know what. It's fucking incredible how (((these))) people operate. They are willing to destroy the whole world to keep this shit buried. But for a briefly moment before the Iran thing, that shit was being talked about in mainstream youtube videos. As soon as the Iran thing started that shit went silent almost immediately, and it was leaked that a big "clean up" of the files went down that first week of the war.
>>42435384Sunny Baudelaire is a comical version of a reptilian toddler, hyper intelligent, sharp teeth, always biting. Anon is correct, the whole series is dark because it's about the bloodline. Don't forget the series is also about the schism between good and evil, it's not one-sided. But it does show evil tongue-in-cheek, watch JC while they make the pasta putanesca (after his joke about eating the baby), he mimics a particular animal while nipping another actor's head.
Occult Hollywood // Cinema as Ritual Magic:> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7k-aS7Ysovo
>>42435526>particular animalA Velociraptor?
A MUST SEE VIDEO:-Hollyweird Babylon | The Witches of Laurel Canyon-> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ev_OTF8wyEIShit runs so deep, that the video can only give you hints for you to do your own search and stumble on thing you would never even imagine. Like Nancy (((Reagan))), who's grand mother was one of the greatest priestesses of the theatrical psyop (((institution))).
Does anybody goes to the movies anymore?
>>42335478>>42335644why the vagueness? this thread is ostensibly to warn people about them, why stop at actually naming them?
>>42441973>>42401296
>>42358254>names 2 c list actors >seee hollywood isnt satanic jew freemason gay mafia >im the smart one dont trust pattern recognition and the 99.9% verifiable satanic ritual films and mainstream A list actors Go back to india you untouchable
>>42378146>im a retard >care what i think because reasons Go back to india untouchable
>>42428386>retarded cancer postGo back to india untouchable
>>42401614There's barely any details known about Digger, as far as I know. What could make it a dark ritual movie?
>>42442036Tom cruise of course, but more than that, the Director Alejandro González Iñárritu, who has been doing a consistent string of movies always having BIG accolades in Hollywood: Babel 2006, Birdman 2014, The Revenant 2015, all of those getting awards and nominations, and now this weirdly secretive one "Digger" with Tom Cruise, it is obvious that there's something big brewing behind this movie. Tom Cruise has been in the shit for the longest time, I'm sure he's giving his best shot with this one to get back in the "big" game. After "The Revenant" everyone is expecting a new "masterpiece" from this Iñarritu guy. I think the Revenant is shit, but I get how Hollywood works, and yeah, I can tell this "Digger" movie is clearly a pretty big deal. More than The Odyssey or Disclosure Day.
>>42442082so you're just taking shots in the dark.
>>42442091No, not about this one. I know it is the most important one. I'm more certain about Digger being a central piece of their symbolic ritual cultural war, above Disclosure Day, and The Odyssey, and those two are pretty fucking obvious.
>>42442132what is it about?
Late Night with the Devil is one that comes to mind. It's a good one!
>>42442141Hard to find any info about it, wich is a give away of they trying to make a big "unveil" on the release.The only thing you can find is that it will be a "comedy" about an "eccentric" oil tycoon (Cruise). So he will be playing some sort of "Elon Musk of the Oil industry". Again, the key element here is the Director. He won everything with that "Revenant" movie and put DiCaprio in an untouchable new place in Hollywood. That's what Cruise must be desperate to achieve again at any cost. That trailer looks quite retarded already, so it seems that shit is gonna be "something else".
>>42442160so you're just taking shots in the dark.
>>42442164Nah, that's already more info than what "Disclosure day" is giving. Disclosure Day will be SHIT same as The Odyssey. This "Digger" tho, you can tell what they are going for. They want to reposition Tom Cruise back into "Hollywood", and send a BIG message to "Corporation America", also the theme of "oil" is key today. I really wonder what particular meta message are going to "present" with that shit.Also "Birdman" was the movie that brought back Michael Keaton to Hollywood, I'm sure Cruise is aiming at that kind of "mood", he wants to at least have a "Birdman"-tier success with this one.
>>42442233What are the dark ritual aspects of Barry Lyndon, and what are some films about occult matters that were done in good faith by their creators, (trying to enlighten their audience instead of ensnaring) in your opinion?
>>42442233ah yeah, I'm sure Tom Cruise is pining to get Michel Keaton-levels of success in Hollywood.
>>42442259That's why he chose Iñarritu for his "come back to hollywood", also the trailer already gives you the vibe of the project. Birdman was a big deal back then. Keaton became a "hollywood sacred cow" all of a sudden. Cruise hasn't had that kind of hollywood "aura" since fucking Jerry Maguire. Top Gun maverick doesn't count since that's not the kind of film that produces academy awards>>42442242I don't know, I became beyond cynical at this point. I think Barry Lyndon is shit, pretentious as fuck, BUT I think that movie was made as you said "in good faith", Kubrick wanted to make the "ultimate visual expression" of the "superior cultural aesthetic hegemony of the british empire" and that's all what it tries to be. And I hate it for that, as others just love it for the same reason. I think, he made Paths of Glory with good intentions, and also 2001 Space Odyssey as well. But that's actually a GREAT question, "movies made in good faith to enlighten instead of ensnaring". That deserves a long thoughtProblem is most movies have both elements, because they HAVE TO, they are not allowed to be "good" or "bad", "left" or "right", they have to be both things at the same time, almost always. Even when retards try to label movies as "woke" just because some random trendy bitch is forced down peoples throat like Gal Gadot. Many things are negotiated (or non-negotiable) when doing a movie, specially if it is a super mega production like Barry Lyndon, it's serious business involving huge money and interests behind that money. It's extremely hard to find a creator with "absolute freedom". About Barry Lyndon similar "better"(?) movies could be the Duellists 1977, MrTurner 2014 or there's this weird movie "The Draughtsman's Contract" 1982 wich actually IS an /x/ movie full of esoteric symbology, and freemasonic shit. The director is Peter Greenaway the same freak who made the most masonic /x/ pilled and fucked up occultist satanic move ever made: "The Baby of Mâcon" 1993
>>42442336I think you're blinded by your own subjectivity, thousands and thousands of people have taken from Barry Lyndon way more than just "superior cultural aesthetic hegemony of the british empire", to me that's the backdrop of the story, not the main theme.I'm sympathetic to the gist of the idea that most Hollywood films have dark undercurrents they weave on their audience, but you're not very insightful about it and bad at supporting it with concrete examples, so I'm gonna have to unsubscribe from your blog.
>>42360532That "comedian" is demonichttps://youtube.com/shorts/wtb3Bpskhzshttps://youtube.com/shorts/DPw-7M6gvsc
>>42442336(P.S from >>42442352)It's funny you mention Peter Greenaway of all people, because while I'm not extremely familiar with all of his movies, but having watched a good number of his interviews and lectures, he's one of those filmmakers that I would have no problem thinking his films are elaborate dark rituals subjected on the audience. He definitely comes off way more as a pretentious, elitist and self-aggrandizing fool to me than a good-faith artist trying to enlighten his audience.
>>42442352That's fine, I'm autistic enough trying to do an esoteric analysis of a bunch of movies of the caliber of Barry Lyndon, inside the limitations of a text box of 2000 characters, when I could rant about the movie for hours and hours. I know what Barry Lyndon is, yet if I have to choose a movie to rant about I would rather choose Zardoz made a year earlier (1974). That's a much more interesting and entertaining movie. That's what I mean, a movie being aesthetically beautiful or "historically relevant" doesn't make it "superior" to a more "interesting" movie in my personal view.
>>42442386Oh I fully agree about that. I just named him because of the aesthetic taste of his films, similar to that Barry Lyndon "vision". Greenaway's stuff is the definition of pretentious british hegemonic crap high on its own farts. I still think that Barry Lyndon is "visually" that, but Greenaway adds that perfidious malignant element that I honestly quite despise about english "esoteric tradition". That guy is clearly a dark soul, while Boorman (Zardoz-Excalibur) on the other hand is much more candid and warm on his work.If I have to choose between Barry Lyndon or Excalibur, I choose Excalibur all day everyday without hesitation.
>>42442447my disappointment with this thread is that you're more candid about your subjective film preferences than the dark rituals aspect that is supposed to be the main topic of conversation. i'll give you some points for effortposting though, unfortunately just didn't stick the landing.
>>42442506Depends on the movie, people think these "rituals" should portray something really "arcane" and "dark" and "powerful" or "serious ceremonial shit". When it could be something really crude and low like this scene of Deniro saying that he embraced his bridal feminine side when he was being gang banged in jail by niggs and aryan bros taking turns on his ass:>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DoiR2UqktsEOn the other hand, yo have this movie >>42442150 wich DO have those other kinds of really, REALLY dark ritual symbols. That's a truly satanic movie. The whole plot revolves around the public sacrifice of a child, wich happens at the end of the movie. It throw hints around, like the masonic gatherings in the forest (it doesn't matter if it is the Bohemian Grove or whatever, freemasonry encompasses the entire spectrum of lodges). At the 33 minute, (as these satanic movies do) there's a symbol, wich none of the people "analyzing" this movie got, there's this paranormal medium character that has a sudden "health situation" and he's rushed out of the set on an ambulance, but exactly at the 33 minute mark his voice is heard like dying. It's just his voice the characters in the movie are just trying to compose themselves back after the situation, and the almost inaudible off camera voice/sound effect of the medium dying is not acknowledged by the characters. But I played it back that moment a million times and there it is, the off camera 2 seconds voice of someone in pain agonizing. That's the kind of shit that gives away the darkness of these people. Same happens in the Ninth Gate, at the minute 33 Johnny Depp finds his bookstore buddy dead hanging upside down. If you look for it you will find itBarry Lyndon though, it doesn't have that, that's why I say that Kubrick may have made that movie with pure and mere "artistic" intentions. Or maybe the money invested there was so freaking huge that he agreed on not taking ANY chances inserting any "weird and occult" shit
>>42403384Based noticer.
Hollywood is mystical beyond belief
>>42355456Alright bud I'm drawing a line. You gotta stop using scare quotes and capital letters for emphasis. Turn down the swearing a bit while you're at it. Doing all 3 of those things just makes you look crazy.
>>42446291Thanks anon, but this is a place that allows me to vent out like that and I enjoy it. I'll try to take your advice but I can't make any promises.
Everyone is yapping in this thread lmao. Yeah hollywood is filled with jewish pedophiles but like, what does Satanic ritauls have to do with it? do you guys think it's a symbolic thing for them? (the whole rebelling against god, and all that) or a literal, metaphyiscal thing?
I like seeing these occult/esoteric breakdown threads. These movies are def made 100% with intent and are rituals
>>42360532Is he really a satanist? dude just seems like a loud-mouthed frat boy type to me.
Any info on disclosure day?
>>42447463I just like reading what does "reading too much into things" leads to. It made me realize you could take any movie, ever made, break it down scene by scene and say "this one thing appears in <whatever fringe esoteric stuff>, that means it's a ritual to call upon Satan". I mean, dude... I know about "logical leaps" but this is not a leap, it's a trip to Andromeda Galaxy and back.
Interesting
>>42449045This is /x/, I wouldn't want it in any other way.
>>42357809>Al PacinoAlso Cruising (1980) comes to mind.
