Discuss why you believe bigfoot is real or fake.
>>42424507It's fake because the person who came up with it admitted it was just a guy in a costume. Any other sightings since then are either fake or just a bear walking on two legs.
Out of all the commonly discussed conspiracies and urban myths, bigfoot is the least interesting and has been since the moment I learned of it.
>>42424507There was an albino bigfoot captured on camera in my hometown. The videos online, I don't know if its real or not though.
It is very fake. Apes are only native to Africa and Asia.Unless bigfoot is a monkey...
>>42424891Yes. Literally just some guy in a fur suit. Stupid af.
>>42424507I saw it in gta san andreas
if you mean the image, from the paty video, well when you look at it... who ever it was did a good job acting. but if its bigfoot in general your talking about real or fake well...i only can say the the oldest writing in human history talks about wild hairy man beast, covered in hair living in the wild eluding traps.
>>42424507I believe in furry like aliens more than the original big foot.
I'm skeptical that a breeding population of large primates could remain hidden in North America in the age of FLIR drones.
Dude in a costume. It would be interesting though if it was some Elephant Man type case where a person with severe hirsutism escaped society into the woods.
The belief in the northern California coastal economy is very real...Need money hey stupid people have money, Cryptid tourism pumps over ($140) million into U.S.Haha "pumps" dats sexual yo
>>42424507I don’t believe Bigfoot exists today, but I do think most Bigfoot sightings can be explained by a collective genetic memory of some ancient rival hominid species possibly lost to the fossil record like so many others. It would explain why human cultures across the planet have similar stories of upright-walking ape-men despite existing in regions that don’t even have normal apes. Our brains assume various sounds and movements in the woods are ape-men because as an evolutionary protection mechanism from a time when such creatures were a legitimate threat.Of course, humans must have out-competed them eventually, but our real advantage was in the size of our tribes and group-based hunting techniques not our individual strength. Imagine such a creature might be stalking around the edges of camps for humans out foraging alone at night. It would make sense to evolve instincts which tell you to run immediately back to the camp as fast as you can if there was even a chance that the hairy thing you think you saw dash between the trees was one of them. Then if you make it back alive, you can wait until daytime and hunt them together with your tribe bros. Perhaps this is also why we hear people say they saw Bigfoot and immediately want to go out hunting for him.
Bigfoot is just boring.
>>42425230Bigfoot could just be surviving populations of Denisovans or superarchaics (homo erectus). Or Bigfoot could be oral tradition of their survival into the Holocene.
>>42424507Im split on it. It's hard for me to think every single eyewitness account is either bullshit/ mis- identification. Even if 99.9% fall into those categorize's, theres still the .1 that doesn't.
>>42424507I don't believe there's some hidden primates living in forests. Them appearing from another dimension for a little bit and disappearing again is way more compelling to me.
How are they dodging all the drone cameras?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4w_R2oIixy8
