>>42431505It's an observable reality that life forms evolve to fit their environment, via beneficial traits being passed on to offspring.
There's no proof that today's organisms are improvements over the trilobytes. If organisms change over time at all, if deep time is even a thing, if life isn't merely thousands of years old, if if if if and a thousand more ifs that have no definite answers, if the theory of evolution wasn't a satanic project to undermine the authority of the church, then, AT BEST, I would call it a theory of transformation. Do you really believe the fat negroid welfare mom at Dollar General is a superior form of life to the Velociraptor which spawned her ancestors? Is the theory of TRANSFORMATION true? Without a time machine we will never know.
>>42431505There seems to be no biological evidence of it happening in the last 250,000 years, so, it's not interesting to this one anymore.Dawkins let the cat out of the bag awhile ago.
>>42431505Humans were bred by a space faring annunaki. This led to a offshoot of extremely intelligent lesser primates called the Rhesusians. The went to the moon on the dark side and look like this.>see picAfter the fall of the Giants due to inbreeding between the nephelim and men, the space faring monkeys came back to earth and genetically engineered Rh+ humans through hybridization.>sourcei made it up
>>42431790> There seems to be no biological evidence of it happening in the last 250,000 yearsbitch can you drink milk? if so you evolved
Darwin is a retardLamarque got it right
