There is scientific evidence of reincarnation, there is scientific evidence of the Yuga cycles, there is scientific evidence of the Brahmanic cycles of destruction. People in this forum still believe that Yahweh is the demiurge, because, when Brahma is obviously the demiurge.
Science is not a barometer for truth
>>42443867Are you going to link us to any of this evidence, or are we supposed to just take your word for it?
>>42443867>People in this forum still believe that YahwehI don't.t. buddhist Anon
>>42443949I remember reading articles but I've forgotten the websites where I read them, sorry.
>>42443981I suspected as much
>>42443949Dr Ray Moody, Dr Brian Weiss, Dolores Cannon, Michael Newton, etcJust read a book dummy
>>42443867It's all the same gods in every religion dude, so yeah, brahma is the demiurge, so is yahweh
>>42443867you are the demiurge of your own world
>>42444045No evidence provided.Ray moody is the big one in this field and he has t actually proved anything. This is still opinion.>>42443867> Brahma is obviously the demiurge.You should stop using the word obviously.
>>42443867you don't need scientific proof of reincarnation. logic will do. 'nothing' existed before you were born, 'nothing' will exist after you die. if your life is 'something', then 'something' always follows 'nothing' because 'nothing' requires 'something' to be defined.