>They would HATE for you to study it.
>>42457828Your images suggest it is widely studied.Are you okay?
>>42457831Intensely studied by few does not equate to widely studies by many.
>They would HATE for you to realize an electron is PE held in geometric stability via PHI as means of turning momentum into action.
>>42457844>They would HATE for you to know the fine structure constant is relevant to PHI.
>>42457835I think studying light is commonplace is physics and if anything is kind of mainstream.>>42457844>>42457852They seem okay with it. It’s a thing that’s been studied.
>>42457858>I think studying light is commonplace is physics and if anything is kind of mainstream.Not in this fashion. You're talking about the study of electromagnetism as well as optics.This is the geometry of photon propagation and its correlations with universal constants."They" separate- and categorize. "We" correlate and organize.>They seem okay with it. It’s a thing that’s been studied.See pic related.
>>42457828I STUDY EVERYTHING because its all ka ba la https://youtube.com/shorts/bpfsIyiE8pg?si=YRI4pb6Iu2aOHco4https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1px8hBl7zg
>>42457852OOPS!!The formula is actually >(1 - φ-4)2/100 (not 1 - φ4)The 4 exponent should be nagativeThat gives: φ-4 = 1/φ4 ≈ 0.145901 - φ-4 ≈ 0.85410(1 - φ-4)2 ≈ 0.72948(1 - φ-4)2/100 ≈ 0.0072948That matches α ≈ 0.007295 to within 99.96% precision to CODATA mainstream Alpha value.
>>42457872>study of electromagnetismHere's the thing what i see off about the modern understanding of light, it's electromagnetic, yet light isn't magnetic...So clearly its something that interactions with the spectrum but isnt part of the spectrum dispite science using electromagnetism to describe it.This is a classic failing of the scientific method, it doesn't know what its calculating but it knows the answer (garbage in - garbage out).I made a picture showing rené descartes poisoning the tree of knowledge with his reductionist ideas that lead us here.
>>42457872
>>42457885Light is magnetic.>Light is literally the coaxial propagation of electric and magnetic waves in right angles to one another.Light is not ferromagnetic.Which is what you are conflating with "magnetic"
>>42457891I just proved it does; here >>42457882
>>42457891Study into the discrepancy between the golden ratio & the fine-structure constant, will always be faced with the criticism that the universe doesn't have to conform to your interpretations and that any answer you may conclude is a motivated argument and ultimately its unfalsifiable.Tho I do believe it could allude to the missing part of the puzzle towards a unifying theory, tho people are scared it could possibly kill god.
>>42457907new proof just dropped
>>42457903isn't light just the frequency speed of its electro magnetic toroidal energy field
>>42457916no
>>42457828what can light do for me? seriously where do we start
>>42457885Magnetism is literally a euphamism for relativistic effects appering in electromanetic interactions...This is why light isn't ferro- or dia- magnetic:>Magnetism emerges from relativity.>Relativity emerges from a limited speed of causality paired with an exchange of information between two inertial reference frames.>Light has a NULL/VOID inertial reference frame.>To light, its emission and absorption is the same instant no matter the distance or time between the two events. Time is contracted to an eternal instance of "now" and all distance is contracted to zero.A single photon exists everywhere in time and space at once. There essentially is only one photon. Its essentially the same with the electron. Block universe stuff.
>>42457917When charged particles (like electrons) are accelerated or transition to lower energy states within an atom, they emit electromagnetic radiation. The exact frequency of the resulting light wave depends directly on the amount of energy released.which is determined by the number of wave cycles passing a fixed point per secondThese cycles can be slowed down via reflection; as even mirrors drop the red hue resulting in a slight green tint. They can also be speed up via compelling with other radiation. AKA adding blue green and red light to make white light.Why are you trying to make the world a dumber place?Is the dopamine worth throwing garbage in your own lawn because you don't go outside?Especially since you don't go outside since there is so much garbage out there.
>>42457911I have my own as well...>The Golden Ratio Applied to Angular MeasureThe setup:Starting with the golden ratio relationship: >(a+b)/a = a/bCross-multiplying: >(a+b) · b = a · aExpanding: >ab + b2 = a2For a: >Rearrange to ab = a2 - b2, then a = (a2 - b2)/bFor b: >Rearrange to ab + b2 - a2 = 0, factor as b(a+b) - a2 = 0, then b = a2/(a+b)Applying the constraint θ = 360°:If the sum a + b = 360° (or equivalently 2π radians), you can substitute this into the golden ratio equations and solve the system numerically.The results:- a ≈ 222.49°- b ≈ 137.51°- The ratio a/b ≈ 1.618... (the golden ratio φ)- And indeed: (a+b)/a = 360/222.49 ≈ 1.618This locks the golden ratio proportion into a full 360° rotation, with the two segments in the exact phi relationship.
>>42457916No. You are describing how the ENERGY/FREQUENCY value of the photon emitted is defined.
>>42457924just because light is the constant of our relativity doesn't mean it cant have its ownsomething something the quantom fuckery of ftl space travel
>>42457938energy/frequency that is emitted is light not all light can be seen by the human eye like radio waves
>>42457828MAKE COILS WITH FIBER OPTICS and see where these coils take you
>>42457903>Light is not ferromagneticLight occupies space... space has a magnetic value, light can change space (kugelblitz-theorical blackhole made of light) so light can change the magnetic value of space.To reconcile this we address how space is viewed and it's not hilbert-space.I think we need a better depiction of space, i know their are many and your observations do shine light on what should be the best depiction.I have looked at changing the position of the observer to understand more, from the 3rd party observer to a 2D observer.
>>42457931>E=hveverything else you said is either trying to deliberately sow confusion or deliberate imposition of your religion. show me the torus in >>42457916
>hey look at these shapes!>because… metaphysics!one of you retards better start synthesizing a point or getting /sci/ to come laugh at you
>>42457952Sacred geometry
>>42457949>everything else you said is either trying to deliberately sow confusion or deliberate imposition of your religionhowand how does e=hvdisprove what im sayingit just proves everything is light >show me the toruswave cycles passing a fixed point per second
>>42457959>wavewave ≠ torus
>>42457974>wave>cycles>passing a fixed point per secondYou missed some words friends.Waves that cycle in on themself via a fixed point. Which is what gives frequency its value.Is what? a bagel a donut a blogimblop
You're conflating a things aspect, with the thing in & of itself. The energy/frequency is a variable of the photon. Not the actual photon itself. A photon is a ripple. Energy/frequency is the magnitude and speed of that ripple. >Not the ripple itself.Light is momentum. Its potential. Photon-Electron interactions are exactly where PE becomes KE.
>>42457959the smexy torussuy not withstanding yU no post dat Singular monad.png for you "fixed point" reference?
>>42457980Pic related
>>42457959This is the only torroidal form light takes. >>42457844
>>42457980light is energy retard its what everything is made of and comes from aka the sun we are star dust = we are light light given form via structures that separate and bind the light via feed back loops as above so below
>>42457953>Sacred geometrythats peak autismand usually these guys flunk highschool maths again, make COILS WITH FIBER OPTICSwhy do you think there's miles of this stuff in ufos? its not a controller system, its propulsion related. You guys might wanna read Charles James Hall books... this guy : https://millennialhospitality.com/aboutus.php
>>42457985ITS NOT A TORUS ITS A TORUS...
>>42457924>essentially is only one photon. Its essentially the same with the electronI believe this, but gravity... gravity is faster than light.
>>42457991If you're not able to recognise the congruent value of what's being discussed, then maybe this thread isn't for you. The god of the gaps influences are at play.
>>42457991>make COILS WITH FIBER OPTICSnta but fiber optics are just tubes that reflect lightin a way that can harness its speed and travel so one can send 1's and 0'saka code; computationnear the speed of light aka give faster internet its not some magical device its quite simple tech pic related kids toys use to be made from em
>>42457979>light propagating forward vs light "propagating in on itself" (which you cannot demonstrate to occur in physical reality btw because its your religion)if light derives its frequency from bagels, how does actual real physical light which exists in reality have frequency?
>>42457844pic related the mystery schools like the 33rd masons know about this stuff
>>42458003>light propagating forward vs light "propagating in on itself"i never said it doesnt travel foward and the bagels are a joke when a torus of momentum travels forward it carries a wave you last quastion was so out of left field it borderlines on trolling and since you keep putting words in my mouth and setting up strawmen i shall no longer be replying
>>42458006people are so genetically and environmentally groomed that only outbreaks novel humans can understand it
>>42458012fair
>>42458000>>42458002dont worry I did calculus in college and I still dont care about sacred geometry fagsmaybye its flying over your head hehewith fiber optics, you can make light go in circle. . . let that sink inusually a beam of light goes straight line right?
>>42457844I almost forgot that adjustable tint sunglassesactually use the geometry of light to angle lenses in a way that can block or allow the spiral through
>>42458032>usually a beam of light goes straight line right?no its a duality and torus of wave/particle and the fuckery of how light travels is the basis of string theory
>>42457994Gravity is the geometry of time anon.Its the "equal & opposite" of momentum>Pic related.
>>42458045is a torus of relativity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6ie3PEmAr4aka why gravity effects both space and time
>>42458035Yea they make micro slits equal in size to wavelengths and when you cross two of those lenses with slits in a perpendicular manner they basically don't let any waves through.
>>42458038>basis of string theoryand it took us where since these mathematitians bullied physicists in a corner? nowherethey've been wasting our time and money for 60 yearsphysics > maths
>>42458051well if it was a wave they wouldnt be able to do that it would have to be a spirial sorry anon in this small case 3d>2d
>>42457994Gravity is just the loss of inertia. Think of pressure, pulling everything down. >>42457885A star is simply electromagnetic radiation. A byproduct of this nuclear fusion is light itself. This is why we understand that light itself are electromagnetic pulsating waves of energy.
>>42458054>pulsating wavesits going to take a long time for people to use the scary word TORUS
>>42458053Its this anon.
>>42458067which is a child's grasp of >>42457844
>>42458074thank both of you for helping me better grasp the 3, 69s
>>42458054Brother.>loss of inertia??Inertia emerges from a mass's interaction with the ambient gravitational potential of all other masses in the universe.Inertia is the amount of energy you have to OVERCOME the ambient gravitational potential, relative to the body you want to move.
>>42458083You'll need this.ABRACADABRA.
>>42458006>>42458083Construct pic related.
>>42458090the fib seq is cool but i wouldn't know how to make use of the rest ty though fun fact if the pyramid was a tent the angles of the drape = 720 the tetrahedron fire and the based = 360 the icosahedron water
>>42458094how did they get the numbers its not greek latin hebrew or english fun fact aba the god father of the hebros is the wheel of the river hebros
>>42458097forgot image
>>42457828Bump! OP is not a fag. This might pull a lot of stuff together. Hopefully I can contribute or (if it’s beyond me) at least drop some relevant stuff later when I got time to study it>Pic semi related(?)
>>42458097Unfortunately anon that image holds a categorical flaw when you consider that the units are being fuzzed in order to make it work.Units of Time don't equate to units of Degree and neither, when added up like in the image, equate to units of Distance.They basically said>Degrees + Degrees = MilesWhile presenting how the total degree value per platonic polyhedron coincidentally matches up with the arbitrary units of minuets per day, diameter of the moon, and seconds per hour.None of those translate to each other as the image presents them too.
>>42458159Shut up faggot
>>42458161You're adding angles (dimensionless measures, degrees are pure numbers) and claiming the sum equals a distance in miles (a dimension of length).Angles and distances are incommensurable dimensional categories. 7920° and 7920 miles are numerically identical but dimensionally incomparable. The sum of angles cannot meaningfully equal a linear distance. You're comparing a pure number to a physical dimension.The numerical coincidence is real. Its dimensional validity is not.
>>42458169we get it you're autistic this is you well you see anon the girl couldnt have slept on the bears beds because bears dont own beds or houses you think youre coming of as smart but really youre just a jack ass
>>42458186Reverting to insults and ridicule is a common sign of the yahoodi thread infiltrator, who's job it is to join threads who's topic threatens the kike's power structure, and derail them from their original topic. Only course of action:>Name -> then IGNORE.>Further engagement ONLY serves the goal of the yahoodi oven magnet.
>>42457920https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eg0Uh-WhsR8
Self Similarity is another concept / phenomenon worth diving deep into.
>>42457924The proton and the electron are also the same thing only appearing different from our point of view
>>42458194the people who do the most work for zion are the anti semites everytime you post the knowledge that gives zion its power antisemites scramble to troll throw insults and call everything evil/nonsense
>>42458238They aren't reallyYou're saying they are only different because of perspective.I'm saying they are only different in terms of MODALITY.Water and Ice are the same thing in essence but different in modality.Light and electron are similar. The electron is *structured light* - held in *geometric equilibrium* - by vector equilibrium and potential wells. I described more here >>42458045Also watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYyrgDEJLOA
>>42458252zion is digging itself deeper into its own grave under the false presumption that some god like figure is going to save them last minuete.AMALEK RISES!PREPARE YOUR ANUS KIKE!
>>42458259point in casezionist dont believe in a sky daddy you think people who fuck and eat children wont eat pork zionist killed there weak the jews that believe in a sky daddy to usher in the nation israel
>>42458254Difference in experience is the fundament behind difference in modality
>>42458262The internal experience always precedes the external stimuli. Therefore the external stimuli is always primary to the experience.Without initial external stimuli, the internal experience of the modality of said stimulus is naught.
>>42457852Phyllotaxis is the botanical term for the arrangement of leaves, flowers, or seeds on a plant stem. This highly ordered patterning optimizes sunlight exposure and airflow, and is famously governed by the Golden Angle and Fibonacci numbers-If I could remember the names of all these particles I'd be a botanist
>>42458379Phyllotactic patterns are paramount to the strength of interaction between electromagnetic phenomenon because of the isometry.To have the most efficient interactions, you want to most efficiently pack all the possible points (n->infinity) on the surface of a sphere since electromagnetic information propagates isometrically (in all directs at once)The mainstream value for Alpha gives us this point distribution which shows obvious overlapping and 'white-space':>https://www.geogebra.org/m/fnhhht2vWhere as the value of Alpha derived from PHI gives the most efficient and beautiful packing solution (the formed pattern of which, just so happens to be found everywhere in nature):>https://www.geogebra.org/m/rcvjyepy
>>42457991Roger Penrose discusses Sacred Geometry
https://odysee.com/@CraterEarth:f/64-Crater-Earth---The-Wizard-of-Zion:aLight redpill
>>42458398>To have the most efficient interactions, you want to most efficiently pack all the possible points (n->infinity) on the surface of a sphere since electromagnetic information propagates isometrically (in all directs at once)Radiation.>The mainstream value for Alpha gives us this point distribution which shows obvious overlapping and 'white-space':By mainstream what do you mean? 137?
Who are "They" if not "Us"? Is light everything there is?
>>42458414What kind?Alpha? Beta? Gamma? Xray? Neutron?
>>42458410That's fringe politics.Not deductive experimentation of physical principles.
>>42458422Does a black hole radiate?
>>42458441No it sort of "sublimates".
>>42458446Are you going to answer the question>By mainstream what do you mean? 137?
>>42458441It sucks. A black hole sucks. With infinite "gravity." And it spaguetifies. "Pulls" on you until you are just... escaping light into darkness. I am far more interested in what happens when everything is consumed by it.
>>42457931>Why are you trying to make the world a dumber place?>Is the dopamine worth throwing garbage in your own lawn because you don't go outside?>Especially since you don't go outside since there is so much garbage out there.Because I am stupid and ignorant.
>>42458455See:>>42458450
>>42458450OH oops.My fault anon.By mainstream I mean, the mainstream measure of the Fine Structure Constant(a dimensionless quantity which measures the strength of interaction between elementary electromagnetic particles) *as the divergence angle* for the point placement from n->infinity points.Compared to the non mainstream, first principles calculated value derived here>>42457934 used as the divergence angle.
Groundbreaking Simulations Show How Black Holes Glow Brighthttps://www.simonsfoundation.org/2025/12/03/groundbreaking-simulations-show-how-black-holes-glow-bright/
>>42458501Its a thermal glow from the accretion disk. Nothing special.
>>42457934you dropped this above>>42457934then you replied "I have my own as well"As if you were a secondary person.Also, for the sake of simplicity, by mainstream you mean 137, correct?
>>42458501
>>42458514Obviously "I have my own as well" was said in response to a different anon.Namely >>42457911I was responding to >>42457911 with my own proof.>Also, for the sake of simplicity, by mainstream you mean 137, correct? No, I do not. This is engagement bait.
>>42458520
>>42458520Nah. Pic related.
>>42458550How does image: >>42458520Contradict the mechanistic principles of the universe?
>>42457828Did you know when two out of phase lasers were pointed at one another they spontaneously produced hydrogen?https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-generate-matter-directly-from-light-physics-phenomena-predicted-more-than-80-years-ago/Also, there was already a hint leaning towards this suspicion from long ago. The fact we call gamma-radiation "quasi-matter".What happens many magnitudes after gamma? You achieve stable matter, in the form of hydrogen gas from which you get every other element.We are all part of this system of field dynamics which is unified by a singular medium.
>>42458564Because a screenshot of AI output explaining how stories or narrative frameworks function as a kind of operating system that shapes what people believe and how societies reorganize around those beliefs- isn't relevant to the discussion.
>>42458572Unfortunately>"two out of phase lasers pointed at one another spontaneously produced hydrogen gas"...doesn't match what this research demonstrates.The basis for your citation is *pair production*; photons converting into electron-positron pairs at sufficiently high energies (typically >1.02 MeV) which is well-established physics.>But pair production creates electrons and positrons, not hydrogen atoms or molecules. The inference that this scales up to hydrogen production requires multiple additional steps (electron-positron binding, then binding with protons) that aren't spontaneously happening in these experiments.
>>42458582>>42458572Pic related
>>42458575It was a joke about the date of this article:>>42458501December 3rd 2025
>>42457828A well-known paper published in the Journal of Chemical Education analyzed the radial distribution function for the first excited state (2s) of the Hydrogen atom:The Nodes: The probability of finding an electron drops to exactly zero at a radial distance of:(r = 2a_0) (where (a_{0}) is the Bohr radius).The Wave Peaks: When looking outward from this zero-probability node, the inner and outer maximum probability peaks are located at exactly >(2(1 - 1/φ)a_0) >and (2(1 + φ)a_0).In other words, the most probable locations for an electron in that state are divided into **perfect golden sections** relative to the node. This occurs natively within the Schrödinger wave equation because (phi) is the unique mathematical solution to handling non-linear, recursive wave interference without creating destructive resonance.>CITATION: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ed083p40.2
>>42458599Ok.
>>4245862952 degrees?It's 51.84 degrees buddy
>>42458653I know. Was rounding for sake of convenience.
>>42458663It's not very convenient to remove 72 squared though, is it?
Every cathedral begins as an invisible geometry pressing against the boundaries of thought. When the medieval guild of stonecutters drafted their master blueprints, they were not merely calculating the dead weight of limestone or the structural thrust of pointed arches. They were translating an unseen, higher order into a tangible vocabulary of form. This architecture- recurrent in the shimmering golden muqarnas of William Burges’s Arab Room and the organic vaulting of Antoni Gaudí’s unfinished masterpiece-transcends the material substrate. It reveals a cosmos structured not by accumulation, but by translation; a reality that compiles itself along precise, aesthetic lines where the human mind and universal law converge.
>>42457852Corrected Image
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3S1dCKgohjo
If golden ratio geometry is:-A priori to the fine structure constant (not fitted to it) >>42458708-Structurally present in the simplest atomic orbital (the 2s hydrogen state) >>42458606-The geometric origin of the coupling strength that binds atoms together >>42458606 + >>42458398Then the inference is: Golden ratio geometry is not incidental to nature. It's structural to reality itself.This means:The fine structure constant, the dimensionless number that sets the strength of electromagnetism, isn't arbitrary. It's a geometric consequence. And since α determines whether atoms are stable, whether chemistry is possible, whether the universe can contain structure at all, golden ratio geometry is determining the basic conditions for existence.The 2s orbital exhibiting golden ratio proportions isn't a curiosity. It's evidence that the wave equations governing matter naturally encode this geometry. Not merely as outcomes but as THE principle GENERATING the outcomes.This would explain why the golden ratio appears everywhere in nature: in growth patterns, in spirals, in biological forms. Not because evolution discovered it's "efficient", but because it emerges inevitably from the quantum mechanical foundations that allow anything to exist. The geometry is baked into the rules.The universe has a geometric substrate. The fundamental constants aren't free parameters. They're solutions to geometric constraints that are logically prior to physics itself.That's what this relationship tells us about everything: reality is geometrically organized, and the golden ratio is the organizing principle.
>>42458733>-A priori to the fine structure constant (not fitted to it)The Hand of God
>>42458733Did you know that to fill your heart with love is enough?
>>42458761Yes. There is no self. There is no other. All is one anon. Love is all.
>>42458770Souls are very individual and unique in their geometry and resonance.Evolving with each thought and decision.Which is why Kant expressedAct only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal lawThe maxim would not be necessary if the Soul did not exist.
>>42458786One soul. Many reflections.
>>42458792Each reflection point is unique giving the illusion of a unique soul. But that which they reflect is truly the same.
>>42458795The Soul is Unique.The Spirit is unchangeable.
>>42458795You are Unique.
>>42457828Get off the interney botz
>>42458802Ya know, I consider the soul; "the totality of all possible choices and impacts given during the entire existence of any being"Like when people say they 'sold their soul', I take that to mean that their time, choices, and possibilities, as a being, have been traded away for something, and are now dictated by another.
>>42458810What about to lend onself to divinity?Is that an act of selling ones soul - or a process of refinement, a crucible?
>>42458826There is no lending. There is only a remembering.
>>42458831If there is no lending, then why do you purport that there is selling?
>>42457828wow, good day for threads
>>42458832Because that is how they see it.Go back and re-read real quick. I said "Like when people say"... I'm not the one purporting.
I simply used a common colloquial phrase to illustrate my conception of the soul.
>>42458835Ah alright.Anamnesis - remembering. Plato.However what about Plato's Bard?
>>42458843Take away everything that is NOT the color red, and you are left with what IS the color red.Everything positive, everything verifiable through evidence and through matter, is only positive insofar as it has been severed from the negative, from that which is falsifiable through logic and through concepts
>>42458843However- falsehoods are just as real as truths, and the mind- is just as real as matter.Philosophical dichotomies like idealism and materialism are not opposite in the deepest sense, they are merely opposites in form.In the deepest sense, they are the same, for they are each as biased toward one side of experience as the other.One is carved out, the other is built up, but their union returns us again to nothing.
>>42458843
>>42458858You have not answered my question.Though here:>>42458831You have invoked the concept of Anamnesis - lending your soul to Plato.I asked what of Plato's Bard on the topic of inspiration - which Aristotle would disagree with.This is found in The Bard "nearly the same thing; for he is taken hold of. And from these first rings, which are the poets, depend others, some deriving their inspiration from Orpheus, others from Musaeus; but the greater number are possessed and held by Homer. Of whom, Ion, you are one, and are possessed by Homer; and when any one repeats the words of another poet you go to sleep, and know not what to say; but when any one recites a strain of Homer you wake up in a moment, and your soul leaps within you, and you have plenty to say; for not by art or knowledge about Homer do you say what you say, but by divine inspiration and by possession; just as the Corybantian revellers too have a quick perception of that strain only which is appropriated to the God by whom they are possessed, and have plenty of dances and words for that"
>>42458876Yea, I never invoked anything related to Plato when I said that.I think you possibly over-read that bit and attached a presupposition you assumed was relevant.
>>42458890You did, you just hadn't yet remembered.As you said:>>42458831Do you now contest your premise?
>>42458876By remembering, I mean something more along the lines of pic related
>>42458917In which way does this contradict:>>42458876>>42458912You stated:>>42458831Which invokes Plato's Anamnesis
>>42458912Absences are inferred through falsification, because we cannot verify something that is not there, we can only falsify its presence.We can verify particular claims, like the presence of a specific object, but we cannot verify universal claims, because no amount of evidence can account for all instances of that claim. see pic related
>>42458917You seem to have cast aside your assertion here:>>42458831"There is only remembering"Now in favor that your theory is unique, when you distinctly asserted - there is no such thing as a unique soul.How do you intend to reconcile this paradox?
>>42458934Hm yea I guess you're right, perhaps I was too vague here >>42458831That's my bad anon. Never meant to invoke Plato's Anamnesis.Besides... True non-existence isn't even comprehensible.To be comprehensible it needs substance, form, definition.To not exist MEANS to lack even the absence of aspect or definition.Its not even an absence, its incomprehensible.Nothing- CANNOT exist- therefore something, always.
>>42458955Well if we look to the 1994 robot Dante scaling the Antactican Volcano "Erebus"We find a conceptual nearness to the "nothingness" that we are contemplating"Erebus is the primordial personification of darkness and shadows."Perhaps not a perfect match, but illustrative.Do you know about the robot Dante?
I dreamt with a guy who was big into egyptian heritage, who used a golden ring as a way to channel the in streaming light of intelligent infinity into a 4 leaf clover standing wave pattern of light. He said they were using the light that way as a computer.
>>42458968"Erebus is the primordial personification of darkness and shadows."That's a description, which is something.Conceptual nearness would be more along the likes of .
>>42459006Well what I really wanted to discuss with you on Erebus, was why the robot was called Dante - into the descent of the Volcanic Antarctican Landscape. The meaning of it, in terms of Metaphysics.And perhaps that - scaling to the 9th circle (Dante's frozen Cocytus)And how it gives way to the ascension of the soul.In metaphysics perhaps we would consider "Voyager" the space craft - the name of Dante's poetic ascending Vehicle was Beatrice, which means Voyager.
>>42459006It's a beautiful synergy, I am sure you will agree.
>>42457831true, sad
>>42459020Sorry brother, I'm not the type to study dead philosophers and use their ideas and thought experiments as a foundation.I'm not one of the people sitting in the podiums listening to someone, if anything I'd be the one communing thought experiments, defining dualistic binaries, exploring complementarity/interdependence, and deliberating good faith and judgement into the peoples.
>>42458653
>>42459100I fear for your sanity anon.
>>42459108Perhaps that's the boundary of where your intellect is willing to go.
>>42459108Allow me to illustrate,since Hunter is assuming The Thinker pose.Which Rodin sculpture resides at Stanford University?
What was Hunter S Thompson's favourite book?
>>42459143>>42459152Uhh... The Sphincter?
>>42459156No and before you think you are akin to the sculpture let me clarifyvia the words of Shakespeare "The prince of darkness is a gentleman"
>>42459156These tawdry imagingsHave nothing, not one iota jot - to do with The Prince of Darkness.They are the expression of your soul only.Not a Dark Relic or offering to a God.Your own simple imaginings condensed that you might gaze upon it and surmise the nature of yourself.
>>42459183Hey watch this
>>42459186I think we have all seen enough.
>>42459196Apparently this anon speaks us.I for one enjoyed the thread. So did this guy >>42458833
>>42457828I barely passed pre-algebra
>>42459263Algebra makes you dull
>>42459263You wouldn't want to be a dull fellow now would you?
>>42459302>waves are different photon densities along the travel path>and photon itself has single constant energy>>the wavelength is distance between dense photon clouds>the amplitude is amount of photons>>the higher the frequency of a wave the closer the gaps between photon clouds>>single photon cant generate a wave it has no frequency, it has to come in form of groups of photons to form a waveUr talking about a photon gas.
>>42459108>>42459196Over target. Do not stop. Imagine having particle accelerators, money printers and total domain over all published information… just to get bitch slapped by some bored autists.
>>42459433Forgot image. Sry, phoneposting on toilet
The Prince of Darkness is a Gentleman.The Clowns of Material Tonopah wouldn't know a well formed geometry if it punched them in the face
The "clowns" always think they can handle the technology because they understand the basic inputs and outputs, but they completely miss the metaphysics of the field. They don't see the unseen lines of tension, the historical symmetries, or the necessity of absolute precision.The clowns aren't running the show -
They just think they arethat's why they are clowns.And that is why - dreamland is strictly off limits to them. Janet planes take them to the simulation.We are dealing in the ideal
>>42459433>>42459440
>>42459541Hey this is Kim Kardashian hereI just wanted to tell you I completely believe we don't have to invalidate the laws of Einstein or whatever to produce new energy tensors.Love you
>>42458955No, there can be even more nothing than nothing. https://youtu.be/PhfqdBk8qxkI found some things. McDonalds.
>>42459626DiscordianismThe Ultimate Reverse Uno
>>42459626>SabineWOULD
BUMPPls keep this up like 9 more hours
We can solve this
>>42462102Cringe.Freeman Dyson was so right about you
>>42460018REAL SHIT
>>42457828Its actually crazy how ALL matter is seemingly just light formed together by sound frequencies in some way. Really brings together the whole "Darkness is equated to literally nothingness". Without light (matter), there is dark (no matter/nothing)
>>42462095sure
>>42462560Darkness is the absence of lightAn absence is a thing and therefore not nothing.
>>42462095WELL? IT'S BEEN 9 HOURS
>>42460018>>42462441would as-well
Light comes from atoms releasing packets of energy called photons. At a microscopic level, light is produced when an electron within an atom absorbs energy and jumps to a higher, unstable orbit. When the electron falls back down to its original, stable orbit, it sheds that extra energy by emitting a tiny packet of electromagnetic radiation. We perceive these packets of energy as visible light.
Definitely
>>42463767>said the high schooler
Can someone break this done like I'm a retard.
>>42464279>down
>>42464279I'll try anon. Light has rules we can only know by measuring its properties.According to mainstream science and media, the thought of these rules having any sort of underlying meaning or significance is total poppycock and hogwash.They are jews They've hindered science and kept technology. Why is up to interpretation, but the evidence remains clear.In this thread, we've proven in multiple ways how certain rules of light come from and abide by the golden ratio and golden section. >something vehemently opposed by mainstream, yet none the less proven.Light has patterns in it that when you understand, and connect with other things you understand, you begin to piece together a picture. The picture is a message. It says "who/what you think you are now isn't real, in reality you are everything all at once, you are light, you are love."Whether or not you take this well or horribly is up to you. You can walk away from this realization the worlds most lonely nihilist, or you can open a river of compassion and understanding from inside after figuring out that causing harm to others is harming yourself, and that doing good for others is loving yourself.
>>42457903The divine masculine is electric, divine feminine is magnetic-plasma or aether/fine plasma. It's the cross. Ra/conscious/intention/will vertical bar, El/subconscious/structure/bounds/indras net is the horizontal. Indra's net is likely a plasmatic lattice made of ionic channels in plasma/pleroma structure.>Indra's Net—the cosmic web or scaffolding of the universe—is explicitly described in astrophysics as a vast network of dark matter filaments. Dark Plasma Theory establishes that this filamentary network is a direct result of magnetic plasma dynamics. Plasma naturally forms filaments in response to electric fields, and the charged particles are subsequently aligned and guided within these channels by magnetic fields.>Therefore, you cannot separate the plasma lattice from its magnetic behavior. The plasma is the actual substance (the charged particles), and the magnetic field is the geometry that forces those particles into the specific, interconnected channels of Indra's Net.Cymatics are likely the creation of field lines by sound light or vibration within this lattice/superstructure.
>>42464456
>>42464279we're all just making it up as we go. you should try it some time. pick your favourite geometric shape and tell us why and how its related to light
>>42464488Its all a priori derivations.
A matter of life and death (1946) https://youtu.be/C9eokqGcCUc?t=198&si=16vONiSG101qjlSoPurple rose of Cairo (1985)Wings of desire (1988)The game (1997)TruMAN Show (1988)Squid game (2021)Pleasantville (1998)Color vs black and whiteRose symbolismRainbowsTriangle circle squareIts right in front of your face. "One is starved for technicolor up there" " A World sans hues is a dream yet told.
does no one have anything more to add here?
didnt read any because your pic is already glowing>ctrl peace symbol wrong sideso op, do tell why are you a glownigger? maybe just by mistake? but the so called peace sign in your OP is wrong and a fucking death rune. i wonder why no1 in this thread called you out for that. its all bots or uninformed nufag tourist niggers. or just tired maybeeven the nazis knew that. are you dumber than fucken nazis from 90 years ago?/herbal. try again next time
>>42464842no
>>42465723Take a line segment...Break it into two, at the exact point of the golden section...Bend the line into a circle...Measure the angle subtended by the smaller section...You get 137.5 degrees
Infinite self-referential sequencesConway's game of lifeComplementarity and InterdependenceYin-YangAs above so below.As within so without.Lo, Abaraxas... From they darkness shine'th light & to thy pupil come'th sight.