Are zodiac signs real? My friend makes fun of me for looking at them but they seem to accurately describe me like 9/10 times
Yes they’re fake. Those descriptions are vague and slightly complimentary on purpose.
>>42483137On a superficial level, like MBTI. I mean, if you have only 12 or 16 types for billions of people, it can't go very deep. But it basically works.(t. pisces INFJ)
>>42483137It works and gaslighters aren’t friends they’re our handlers
>>42483714##How do they work? As in function?
>>42483137The harmonies/ratios/angles are probably the realest part
>>42483153>vague and complimentary That makes it accurate by designYou literally just proved it’s realFucking retard
>>42483899They work like placebo. They’re vague enough to apply to everyone and positive so people will be more likely to believe creating the placebo effectThis is the basic bitch interpretation that nonbelievers need to understand before progressing to practicing
Modern interpretations of horoscopes and the M B T I garbage is poison for the mind, or opium for the masses. Whatever phrase sits best, that's it.On the point of horoscopes, they are not accurate if you are reading from sensational interpretations meant to create clicks on webpages.Still, there is a subtle effect denoted to a person depending on the order of objects around him both before birth, when he was born, and all of his formative years.Environment and proximity of things changes who we are, in other words. For better or for worse.This is the truth of the matter. Its never going to be something you can apply to everyone born at a certain time, however, there are some similarities and conditions stemming from the time of year and alignments which existed during someone's conception, birth, formation.It's very subtle, in other words, and it varies from person to person. Even twin-brothers may be very different from one another in many ways concerning their mind, body, spirit.Point I'm outlining in the subtext is you are in control of your life, and your destiny.Don't hook yourself to limitation simply because a horoscope interpretation told you you could or could not.Be yourself, by yourself. Define who you are, and be ready to change if you see it necessary or beneficial.
>>42485942>da heckin plabeo effect!
>>42485942>placebo effectwtf?people have the character shown by their natal configurations who don't even know anything about astrology, it's not a matter of belief
>>42483156>>42483137True.When you read other types, it's pretty easy to see, yeah, I'm not that one, or that one, or this one, while a few may sound close, but not quite as close as the one you got.MBTI is a decent macro indicator.And it's not based on starting or woo, strictly how your are socially.Try it, OP.Star signs are woo, nd you know the Zodiac has shifted into new signs since it was invented? Something like that >Precessionis the term. Planetsry precession.https://www.astronomy.com/science/your-zodiac-sign-is-probably-wrong/
>>42485997>>42483137Anon is true, OP.Don't let signs dictate who you are.Be yourself.>>42483137That said, MBTI types can be helpful for finding compatible personalities, e.g. employees. If you need a bean counter who is slightly autistic, or you want profile the people most likely to unionize so you csn quietly and secretly fire them/coach them out.Don't let someone else's definition define your behaviorBut being able to "measure" a personality has its uses.Normies use it for dating. You do you.
>>42486501>>42486508i find this to be true npc behavior for the fact you are boiling yourself down to something so meaningless in order to try to find meaningif you want to use these tests to cripple yourself into a one dimensional mouldgo aheadbut to me it's extremely repulsive hive behaviorand im not trying to be mean saying thisbut it's difficult not to bebecause you are taking a complex being and slapping a convenient label on them in order to try to "find yourself"it's all too corporate in the way it's presented and doneit's like some NWO bs in the way it removes you from identity in order to pin you to one point of pre-determined conformityif this is what you chooseso be itbut for meit's like watching someone harm themselvesyou see it different, and i can appreciate that too all the same
Its real. Ignore the hylics and redditors. Its an incredibly deep and misunderstood thing. Look further than Sun sign stuff. Understand the houses, the placement of the planets in your chart, the aspects. You could study your chart for years and still not fully understand it.
>>42486522>one dimensional mouldYou dont have a clue about astrology if you think its about fitting into one dimensional moulds you retard.There are more ways to shuffle a deck of 52 playing cards than there are atoms in the entire universe. An astrological birth chart has unfathomable amount of possible combinations that astronomically dwarf the combinations of a 52 deck of cards.
>>42486526This. You can only understand your chart fully once you know what your past lives were. Every feature on my chart is referencing past lives.
>>42486534i was referring to the "mbti" bsnot astrologyyou should learn2read anon
>>42483137>Are zodiac signs real?nope. they've never been zodiac signswhere did you heard this?
>>42486534you know what? my badbecause re-reading that just now i didn't greentext what i was ranting about in particularsorry for the confusion on my partand my last post at as wellit wasn't your faultit was my own for not being clear enough.
>>42483137Ancients and billionaires were right bros
>>42483137They're real, but they describe unconscious behavior, not conscious choice. The degree to which they guide you are inversely related to your capacity for free will. So of course they're pretty good big picture predictors for the masses.
Seems legit
