notice how most animals have 2 of everything2 arms2 legsetc why?
>>42494814Balance.
>>42494833why cant life be balanced around 3? as long as all the rules remain consistentbalance doesn't care about the number
>>42494814There are three types of biological symmetry on Earth: bilateral (eg humans), radial (eg starfish), and asymmetrical (eg sponges). Read a biology book you feckless cumsock,
>>42494880we're on /x/ i want to know why god designed it this way
>>42494814Symmetry. Starting froma central point and then radiating out is the most reliable wya to generate a complex structure. See eg neural tube formation.
>>42494913symmetry is not unique to 2 tho you can be symmetrical by 3 or 4 or any number
>>42494944Why would you?
>>42494843> why cant life be balanced around 3? This is not a one size fits all sort of thing. The triangle (3) is the strongest shape structurally. Not just physically. Think of the family unit (man, woman, child), the holy trinity (Father, Son, Holy spirit), the principles of rhetoric (Ethos, Pathos, Logos), states of being (mind, body, spirit), politics (legislative, executive, judicial), etc. The reason almost everything has two is because of change. Change does not occur on its own (one), change requires a minimum of two. Life is balanced around changes and these changes give birth to polarity/duality.>as long as all the rules remain consistent balance doesn't care about the numberYou are correct. You will find that the rules are consistent regardless of number. Just as in the examples I gave for three there is balance. The number is more or less irrelevant. What matters is how far can those numbers be reduced. Two is the most basic and thus the most prevalent.
>>42494814I've got three legs. Gnome sane?
