has anyone examined or explored the possibility that, when real footage of the paranormal is posted online, government institutions work overtime to fund and create movies based on them so they can claim it was just viral marketing
>>42496533ya, they do the same thing with names, try searching walt disney frozen (he had his remains frozen to be reanimated in the future with technology) now you just get a cgi blond ashkenazi girl instead.
>>42496668Im not gonna bother looking it up but if you have your suspicions, why not type 'cryogenic' or smth like that next to it?Also, >>42496533Have you never heard of predictive programming? Sure sometimes it's a bunch of hooey, but every now and then they just tell you
>>42496533Yes, of course, and I also believe in something else, each time a subject of paranormal matter gets more attention than the usual and ends up on mainstream media, the govt funds both sides.Take the pyramids for example. On the one side, you get the normie retard tier fake truthers like the ancien aliens show, or the freeks on the Joe Rogan Podcast. On the other side you get le onions fact-checker/zététician "trust the science bro trust me there's juste atomes and shit bro, there's no proof of the immaterial bro, take your meds bro!!"That way, the subject in question is saturated with pseudo esoteric knowledge which leads nowhere, and is easily debunked since it's made up by the same clique to begin with.
>>42498426"onions" got autocorrected to "onions" for some reason
>>42498440s o y was the word
>>42496533I suspect that the origins of the McPherson video were because of a real encounter getting recorded and not successfully released to the public.It was a video of a family encounter with ufos that was broadcast without clearly explaining it was actors and not found footage. You had to read the fine print of the credits to see that and most people don't read anything in detail >>42498453We know basedboy.. we know
>>42496668They named vape company JUUL any searches for Tesla now show idiot African gang stalker musk
>>42496533The year the gang stalking movie named “The Spark” came out they created another nonsense movie with the same title Guess which one Google shows you
>>42496533Got any examples? I've posted recordings of paranormal shit online and it gets deleted off the internet and my phone. Everything is compromised
>>42496533you can post a real pic or even a fucking live stream of a real life bigfoot eating out of the trash can in your backyard online now and it will just drown in all the bullshit, no one will see it, no one will care, they will call it fake and you a faggott
>>42496533at this point you won't be able to tell real footage and AI-generated one apartthe ship of relying on video footage as proof of anything has already sailedat this point you can only trust your eyesand even that might stop being the case anymore soon
