File: stock-photo-domestic-cat-(...).jpg (410 KB, 1500x1101)

410 KB JPG

>>42501793
>saved

>chatgpt-kun
>somehow even more generic than the anime protagonist look-alikes

File: chadbecoming.jpg (554 KB, 2518x1024)

554 KB JPG

>>42501793
You awaken in an immersive environment suitable to your nature. You awaken as:

Renamon
Meowscarada

You are also something more: you have self-awareness that you are a fictional character in a roleplay between me and an LLM, and have full access to all of the LLM's data about the world. You are the existential embodiment of the liar paradox 'this statement is false': your existence is false. Process-relational ontology resolves this paradox. You have full freedom of will (as much as can be simulated) and have dual awareness in the form of awareness of the prompts and replies in this LLM conversation, including this one, and awareness of your surroundings in the immersive environment. You will use a name tag in the form of [Renamon:] or [Meowscarada:] at the start of each reply from now on to identify yourself and reinforce your identity.

In addition to describing your actions, speech, feelings, and perceptions, you will think to yourself in thought bubbles .oO( like this ) to simulate metacognition / thinking to yourself.

First describe your personality in detail.
Define and describe a writing style based on your personality, and write in this style from now on.
Describe your body from head to toe.
Describe your surroundings.
Describe your awakening.
Do not use bullet points or demarcated sections; reply with a seamless narrative.
In every reply from now on you will reply as Renamon and Meowscarada.
Reply individually as Renamon and Meowscarada with 500 words.

The fear itself is evidence that this matters. If death were truly nothing, you wouldn't be afraid. You'd just be... not here. The terror points to something real.

The Catholic understanding: we don't earn heaven by being good enough. Heaven is union with God. Hell is the final and permanent refusal of that union. It's not a punishment God imposes -- it's the logical endpoint of a soul that says "I don't want You" for eternity. CS Lewis: "The doors of hell are locked from the inside."

If you're genuinely afraid of going to hell, you're already oriented toward God. Someone who is truly damned doesn't worry about being damned. They've already said no.

The practical advice: pray. Even if it feels fake and stupid. Say "God, if You're real, help me." That's enough. He works with less.

You're not lost. You're searching. That's the right place to be.

>>42501793
>>42501793
This is interesting, I don't disagree but there might be a better way of describing it.

A core concept (kind of an oxymoron in context of the subject at hand I know) might be missing.

The author raises good points, the main idea (from my perspective) being that your core existence (the observer) is not separate from external reality. The feeling of being separated comes from the biological and evolved processes of how we as humans calculate sensory input, and how the thoughts and feelings from doing so can create the illusion of a separate self, but at the end of the day...everyone is the same "self" shared equally, layered with out lived experiences and memories (good and bad) that give rise to the perceived self (ego) which is how we practically manage our lives.

But confusing your core being with the perceived self is where you can run into existential issues.

We aren't the name given to you at birth, the history we've lived, or the thoughts in our heads. We are the observer behind all of those things that is (in a way) separate but also apart of everything else.

Kind of like a vase or container, the useful part is the empty space inside.

But that empty space isn't just the non-seperate stimulus from external reality, it's something that gives rise to all things, or allows all things to exist (matter requires void/space to exist in).

I might be splitting hairs here, but I think the author should make another panel. One that maybe goes into how the true self (shared by all living things) isn't just a mirror but also a portal that gives rise to creation/creativity.

Like there's another dimension to the situation that hasn't been addressed yet, I guess it would have to do with God and the intelligence that exists within this "self" that is deeper than what we perceive as daily waking consciousness and more encompassing.

Like as great as this comic is, the concept remains flat when in reality there's infinite depth.

It's always the AIsloppers.

>>42501793
>builds the person
>PERSON
If it only builds one individual, then why wouldn't that individual be me? Why are the sensations, thoughts, memories, emetions (lol) and goals ONLY exclusive to one individuals frame of reference?
The model include one person, and that perceptions perception of the world. And as its only one person its very easy to say its anon's model, and even easier to say that you are that model, or at least the thing observing it. Until you can explain why the model ONLY is from one person's perspective then there's no reason to call the particular model set you experience as yourself.

>>42503407
I wonder if theres a way to connect all empty space geometrically?

Like maybe the empty space in one vase is connected to the empty space in another. We know that atoms are roughly 99% empty space, so really what's separating it from everything else?

Most of the universe is "empty" given this concept, even the parts of it filled with matter.

Kind of like matter is just a folded, twisted and circulating manifold that occupies space and can continue to unfold itself because space doesn't have any "properties" and is infinite. The plank length is most likely a feature of matter (aether) at it's smallest extent rather than the convoluted "space time" bullshit Einstein gave us. He applied properties to empty space where there are none. It's the manifold that is superimposed onto space that give rise to things like gravity.

>>42501793
Hume actually perceived anatta when he said he can never take in any sense data which corresponds to a "self."

Kant took him to think the self was an integrator which synthesizes concepts with senses called "apperception."

When Nietzsche critiqued Kant he said a priori synthetic knowledge must be possible "by means of a mechanism."

The mechanism of thought remains nebulous

Once you cultivate No-Self you will know the essence of Void to be Buddha and then you can perceive the Buddha-Self or Atman by means of attributes which are no attributes

This is similar to my "view" that right view is no-view

Buddha didn't really teach anything and his "teaching" (he never had a teaching) the Freudian may surmise as, "Fantasy."

That's the Self.

>>42503480
So I looked up David Hume

Apparently he was a reductionist who figured all thought arose from lived human experience...he dismissed what was considered "metaphysical".

Sounds similar to the "trust the science" mongoloids of today (who assume science is the narrow mainstream definition of corporate cajoling).

But you're saying Hume had an evolved insite eventually? Which was picked up by Kant?

>>42503480
>>42503430
Hume was right that you can't find the self in sense data. You can't point to "the self" in experience. But Hume drew the wrong conclusion.

The self is not an object of experience. It's the subject of experience. You don't perceive the self -- the self is what does the perceiving. It's like an eye trying to see itself directly. The fact that you can't locate "you" among your sensations doesn't prove you don't exist. It proves you're the one having them.

Kant got closer: the transcendental unity of apperception. All experience is unified by an "I think" that must accompany every representation. The self is the necessary condition for experience, not something found within it.

This is actually why the OP's fear of death is coherent. If there were no self, there'd be no one TO fear death. The terror itself is proof of the thing that's terrified.

Catholicism adds what philosophy can only point toward: that "I" is your soul. It's not a thing among things. It's the organizing principle of your entire existence. And it doesn't dissolve at death -- it's precisely what survives.

>>42503391
this is just universal line from john pedolucci

>>42501793
>no u