Suppose we have organ printing tech. We can print hearts, livers, stomachs, guts, lungs, everything in the body. We can print brains also and copy over everything inside, but younger. But you can't exactly transplant a brain? Well I guess you can, but it won't be you anymore. Your consciousness isn't connected to the new brain.People can lose chunks of their brains and still function, remember themselves etc. In fact people can lose an entire half of their brain and remain themselves.So what if we do it like this>copy brain's contents (synapses, ridges, everything) into a freshly printed, young brain>carve out 1/8 of the brain and the same 1/8 of the original, replace them>person's brain is 1/8 new 7/8 old>wait for the fresh brain part to "set in">do the next 1/8>repeat until the brain has been replaced fully, and your consciousness hopefully occupies the new young brainAnd you get another 60 years added to the clock.Do you think this would work or no?
>>42516908>Your consciousness isn't connected to the new brain.Your consciousness isn't about the brain anyway, Anon. The mind is located at the heart chakra.Also, all the fancy new technologies will be available only to the ruling (luciferian) elite. The pleps are schedued to die. They decided that we're useless, so billions_must_die.jpg
>>42516918Oh don't worry about thatI know how to make AGI and I'll use it to wrestle power away from evil
>>42516922(and then the AGI might kill everyone instead)
You would have to use nanotech and go neuron by neuron and basically go ship of Theseus. Our bodies replace cells all the time so going cell by cell should not disrupt consciousness.
>>42516946I didn't think of it that way damn
>>42516924>results may vary:p>>42516908Perhaps we'd just need to replace the "insulation" of the neurons, that might even prove relatively trivial.
>>42516908we invented that technology ages ago, it's called the>reproductive systemtechcels can't compete
>>42517014reincarnation isn't real dipstick
>>42516922how do you make AGI, do you have your own country sized data center?
>>42517266You don’t need a country sized data center to do quite a bit.
>>42516908your consciousness isn't tied to the brain, it's tied to your personal electro magnetic field that surrounds your body. Your "aura".
>>42516908The brain/nervous system is a transceiver. YOU are the living signal made of bioplasma.You don't need tech to transfer the brain. You just need tech to copy the structure of the original brain and then transfer the bioplasma field or the "soul" of the person from one body to another.
>>42516908that's called the ship of theseus argument for consciousness https://philosophyterms.com/ship-of-theseus/
>>42516946>You would have to use nanotech and go neuron by neuronthat's the only way we could ever get a cyberbrain and not just copy our brain data into a machine that would pretend to be us. I read about this process years ago and I think it has a name, but I can't find it anymore.
>>42517471Bro got nerfed by God
>>42517471But science is no ready for this.
>>42517266Yeah your mom's butt
>>42517471>"just trust me bro"
>>42516908>Recent advances in biotechnology now provide a pathway to producing living human bodies without the neural components that allow us to think, be aware, or feel pain. Many will find this possibility disturbing, but if researchers and policymakers can find a way to pull these technologies together, we may one day be able to create “spare” bodies, both human and nonhuman.https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/03/25/1113611/ethically-sourced-spare-human-bodies-could-revolutionize-medicine/They will never let non elites transfer their consciousness though
>>42521010this is awesome though because you could print a body and instead of a brain put chat gpt in there and be rude to it
>>42521027Look up biological computershttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_computinghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yrPZZi_gm4
>>42516908The whole "printing organs" or "conciousness transfer to a new body" approaches to biological immortallity are futile and short-sighted. The brain is especially hard to replicate as it is ever-changing with literally every experience and I guess you could never replicate it with single-neuron accuracy.What really needs to happen is a biotechnologic/genetic engineering revolution that will allow the extension of telomers without rampant cancer etc. Think about it. All aging really is, is the accumulation of oxidstive damage and cell replication errors. We pretty much have all the knowledge already, we just lack the technological know-how and people with enough balls to do human trials. Now imagine creating designer humans that:>stable telomerase that can prevent telomers from shortening each replication>more efficient antioxidative enzymes>more efficient cell replication governors (no more cancer)>damage-repair mechanism on par with axolotls (lost organ/limbs regeneration)And so on. You could live for hundreds of years while still looking and feeling like being in your 20-30. Imagine>child now: 0-18 vs in the future 0-20>young adult 19-30 vs 21-80>middle aged 31-50 vs 81-140>elderly 51-70 vs 141-250>deaths door 70+ vs 250+And if you get tired of living for a couple of centuries yo can always an hero at any moment.Scientists found some sharks in the north sea that were 300+ years old, so it is not impossible for multi-cellular organism to live for that long.
>>42521298>but what if I change your premise?
>>42516908why not just use nanotech to replicate/replace every cell in your body, one at a time. maintaining consciousness but replacing all organics with longer lasting synthetic cells.
>>42521298Some families are already living far beyond what you see as normal. My grandmother was still working her garden in her late 90s even starting her tiller and plowing on her own. Lived alone until 99 and a half. Most of the family lives to be 90s or beyond with only a very few months of limited function right before they pass.>>42521298As if the public would be told the size of the balls of those hidden elites who have hoarded knowledge away from the public for millenia.This technology has been pursued in private by people who consider the public sector population to be their property.
>>42516908>Suppose we have organ printing tech.ok I'll take a 1958 Hammond B3>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeK_Pyb7-JM
