Seriously WTF is the deal with these things
>>42519673distractions for mid wits
>>42519675By whom? From what?
>>42519673DEW calibration and testing.
>>42520864kek most likely explanation besides farmers making shit up to attract people and make them pay to see
>>42519673Crop circles are old newsAll the cool theorists are researching starforts
They were far better back in the 70s/80s when all that spiritual stuff was about and everyone was stoned. Kinda just good to look at these days.
>>42519673The correct answer will not be acknowledged by the mainstream narrative so most people will reject it on the grounds of lack of consensus. Their version of reality is that which has been agreed upon by their equally uninsightful peers. They will place heavy value on the volume of their own voice while ignoring substance of argument that they do not comprehend. It's relatively simple to determine that the authentic extraordinary examples are not being formed by humans. Just beyond public sector knowledge is the simple fact that modern surveillance observation is continuous and seamless and extremely high resolution even when the observation platforms are deployed many tens of thousands of feet altitude. Otherwise said, the intelligence community clearly know exactly what is responsible for the creation of these phenomena.My first point here is that the technology responsible for forming these is more advanced than our current technology by many orders of magnitude; we see only one tiny aspect of the effects.. at our level of technology we perceive "defective malformation" of the genetic structure of these plants onto which these images have been projected. To what extent do we understand the genetic materials? How exactly does genetic material function?The question is not as dismissable as presumption and assumption will conspire to believe.To what extent are the material components of DNA capable of perceiving electromagnetic energy and then to what extent are they able to engage in functionality that extends into these realms of energetic field?Humans are not even seeing the scene in its entirety. They are qualified only to laugh in ignorance at this technology that they do not comprehend.
>>42519686CCs from CC things.
>>42521554The thing is, in the lack of any knowledge beyond that which is implied, falling back to the consensus is understandable and arguably preferable. that is to say it takes a lot of bravery not to mention energy to go against the grain even if its the right thing to do
>>42521857Imaginary grain provides only imaginary resistance.. consensus establishes value.. if there is none there is no loss in ignoring the community joined together in agreement At some point in the gathering of knowledge comes the realization of the necessity of abandoning fools
>>42519673Glowie stuff to prep us for project blue beams
>>42519673Spaceman 2000
>>42519675looks like it worked
>>42519673The beings in the sky know the names of places down here. So the crop circles are a signal to them, like the huge Glastonbury outdoor music festival. Also fires. Whenever I see a fire in the news, I think about where it happened. They use word codes. glastonbury - our lag by stn - dour slag boy stun
>>42519673Jeffrey Epstein
>>42519686Epstein files. If everything was revealed, the current societal structure would be failscading in real time, before our very eyes.
>>42519673They're instructions. Blueprints. They're 2 dimensional topological cross-sections of field configurations. They show magneto-dielectric relationships.Kingweston and the Tower look legit, as in, extraterrestrial in origin. The rest are likely humanThe ET ones are encouraging humans to build those configurations. Any species that has seen the structure of the universe at the lowest level will know what they are. These cross sections are a literal universal language. You don't need 20 pages of material to describe a device if you just show a picture of what the effect itself does. From there, you can reverse engineer the hardware requirements needed to get that effect.>What do they do? I'd tell you if I had a LAB and could make them.
