>>42563660
It enhances whatever characteristics is thought of as attractive in either men or women, even when used by trans-whatever. Although, it's illusory. The enhancement is more perceived by others than actually realized by the user. There's other forms of magic that can physically affect the user, but good luck to them when it's time to die. It'll be excruciating and all the aging and damage that was prevented while they were using that magic will catch up to them all at once.

>>42563660
I thought a glamour was an old term for a magic spell.

>>42563660
>How is it different on men and woman?
I think generally in the expression of looks and the feminine as opposed to masculine sensuality.
That is to say, parts of the glamorous beauty aspect are: physical beauty, attitude in basically a 50/50 mix. Anything /x/ related tends to fall under the attitude part, as far as I can tell.
There’s a major difference between an attractive woman and an attractive woman with a sensual attitude to you. Huge difference. Women don’t appreciate the same kind of forward-sensuality but glamor to them is an analogous concept.
There are ugly girls with “the attitude” that I find more attractive than hot girls with frumpy attitudes.