Best book on Inner Earth & lost civilisations such as Atlantis? I read the short sections in The Biggest Secret and Blue Blood, True Blood. The parts about Inner Earth really intrigued me.
>>42618025Nos: Book of the Resurrection. Only problem is the author is a bit of a Gnostic and falls to into venusian nostalgia traps. Amazing poet though.
>>42618025The Smokey God
>>42618025
>>42618025Land of no horizon by Kevin and Matt Taylor
>>42618025"Inner Earth" isn't actually inside this planet. It's a separate dimension accessible via portals. The 2 largest ones are indeed close to the Earth's poles.
>>42620792it really is inside earth, the people who've been there described the journey through the holesyou can even seen the waters curving downward into the north hole
>>42621783>it really is inside earthIt's physically impossible.>you can even seen the waters curving downward into the north holeDuh, cos it's a persistent portal. And a really huge one at that.I don't know if it's a different dimension or just a different planet connected to this one, but it sure isn't literally underground. The reason it was described like that is cos the concept of portals/wormholes/warped space was hard to grasp for most people a century and more ago.
>>42621890>It's physically impossible.lol, don't talk to me about muh science when you're claiming the north and south poles extra"dimensional" portals anyway, I've OBE'd to hollow earth through the north hole before, it's a totally physical place and so are the holes
>>42622181KekFor reals though
>>42620792>it’s not physical it’s an inter dimensional portal It’s actually both
>>42622181It's not about basedence, it's about logical consistency. The notion of a fully-functional world literally undergroud within this planet is a flattard-tier woo-woo which you cannot even envision a working, non-contradictory model of.The portal theory makes perfect sense however.But you are of course entitled to believe whatever you want, no hard feelings.>>42622195Well of course the portals are physical since they exist in physical reality, kek.
>>42622238>non-contradictory...of muh science's notoriously obsolete and dogmatic "laws," you mean>basedenceMore like faith-basedence.I've actually seen the north hole and the hollow earth in person, while all you know is some debunked 17th century mumbo jumbo about gravity. Go away.
>>42622283i typed "basedence" obviously. forgot there's a wordfilter on "onions". since you don't know it, you're probably very new>I've actually seen the north hole and the hollow earth in personAnd I just have to trust your word on it, right? Unlikely.>some debunked 17th century mumbo jumbo about gravitySo you're basically a flattard. No more questions.
>>42622311ffs, they added cyrillics to the filter, kekbasedence, s-oyence
>>42622311how does someone be "basically" a flat earther? it's such an extreme position nothing can be compared to it, it's like saying someone is "basically" hitler because he thinks pitbulls should be sterilizedpiss off with thatspeaking of flat earthers, you're no better, with your scientific orthodoxyyou and they both are clinging to an outdated model of the world>And I just have to trust your word on it, right?I honestly don't give a fuck what some anonymous jagoff in israel wants to believe
>>42622931ah yes, the famous scientific orthodoxy that allows interdimensional/interplanetary travel via portalsi'd rather trust my own logic and sensibilities than some self-important tard who can't explain shit except "i seen it myself trust me bro"keep huffing your own farts i guess
>>42623320Hey, lots of people believe in contradictions without realizing it. Pointing out your own doesn't make *me* the tard. Be safe out there anon, it's pretty steep at the top of those bell curves.
