>In genesis 1, god makes mankind populating the entire earth, male and female as just another animal, on the 6th day. They are also told they can eat of EVERY tree and fruit.>In genesis 2, god makes a "Man to tend the ground," personally ensouled by the holy spirit, who then gets to dwell in The Garden that God makes especially for him, interacting with God directly daily. God then says there's no equivalent partner on earth for Adam (even though there are other humans) and makes him a female from said self-same divinely-ensouled body. Adam and his as of yet unnamed female are commanded not to eat the fruit of comprehensive moral knowledge. This starkly contrasts with the un-ensouled animal humans, who are never given this command but told they can eat of EVERY . This may be because they don't live in the garden where they would have access. It may be because as animals, they wouldn't process it as anything but another fruit, there's no soul in them to taint, only Adam and soon-to-be-Eve were commanded to never eat it.>The Adamic lineage, ensouled but now tainted, are denied further access to the fruit of immortality, leaving them to inevitably die like all other animals.>Cain, after killing his brother, expects to be hunted by the rest of humanity for the rest of his days and is given a mark of divine retributive protection, such that he will reliable serve his exile sentence rather than immediately be killed in vengeance.>Cain then marries a (non-adamic) woman, has a son with her, and founds a walled city named after that son (presumably inhabited by and with the aid of non-adamic humans). However, his curse to be unable to work the ground remains until death. His children may also bear this curse, explaining why they became smiths and musicians and vengeful warriors instead of directly practical jobs like farming sustenance crops.>Adam has a third son Seth, who has more presumably with another non-adamic woman.So NPCs are biblically canon then?
>>42621156>So NPCs are biblically canon then?They’re real locally but not “globally” (using this word to mean relative to God). By locally I mean within the observed reality of an ensouled individual.
Note this also makes the archeological timeline line up with the biblical timeline (assuming the same day = epoch assumption as normal)Because you'd have humans for a significant period. But they're just living like their fellow animals.And then suddenly People-Humans arrive, relatively recently, domesticating animals, growing crops, forging metal, and creating large walled cities, explicitly in the Fertile Crescent.
>>42621182There’s a divine tree of knowledge and then there’s our consciousness and memory made in its image. Eating the fruit (earthly sensory experience) separated us from God, so we rely on angels to traverse divine knowledge, and our soul is the line of communication. It connects the concept of farming to the knowable information about farming.
>>42621156>explaining why they became smiths and musicians and vengeful warriors instead of directly practical jobs like farming sustenance crops.>smithsAre you saying metalsmithing ISN'T practical? Have fun tilling the ground with a stick.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCBPB1oZfIg
>believing the biblethe first liar in the bible is the yhwh entity if you paid attentionhe says adam and eve will immediately die if they eat the fruit and they don't
Its a mythEntirely fictionalAll evidence shows genesis-exodus never happenedAll genetics data proves genesis is a myth, fairy tale
>>42621486Fucking around with digging up and forging metals until you realize you can use them to make a better stick is not a thing you do if you're imminently hungry and you can till ground with the sticks you already have.Inventing incremental improvements is a thing you do when all of your needs are met so you have plenty of spare time, or you're unable to meet your needs through normal means at all so have plenty of spare time. A humanity that has barely gotten on its feet is definitely not swimming in abundance. So that leaves option 2.
>>42621156your comment has too many words for the average christian to read it. they're functionally illiterate, that's why they get all their knowledge from charismatic grifters behind pulpits.Jews read though, and I'd bet they agree with you. They'd just say the unsouled animal humans are goy.
>>42621533>A humanity that has barely gotten on its feet is definitely not swimming in abundance.So you think Genesis is literal history then. Okay.
>>42621182How do you explain the origins of farming outside of the fertile crescent?
