why are groomers allowed on the surface web grooming kids openly? like bro / sis that's little ah kids frfr that's nasty. it all started with tomoko watamote and now here we are. i suspect it's a honeypot by the feds setting up little kids for sex so they catch the freshly turned 18 year olds who missed out on kid love at a young age frfr.
>>42621472Xitter was always that way, imageboards were good for the psyops too at first, but now it's on a more wide scale.
>>42621472>groomtwtwhat the fuck is that
yeah bro the first whistle blower lips are always dirty.maybe you should be informing clitter of this
>>42621472it's egregiously incongruous that diddlers are so rampant in such high eschelons of society, but if joe schmuck down the road looks up naughty pictures of kiddos in their birthday suit, the feds blow up his house.what gives? why is it okay for some bigshot celebrity with political connections to have mountains of naughty material, but not okay for some zitface working at mcdolan's to do the exact same thing? where is the line drawn?
