The Shroud of Turin>has never been replicated because at scale it's not possible>only tiny patches can be replicated in high-energy labs>contains 3D informationMore:
>>42622023the bible says long hair is for faggotsergo your middle age forgery is a faggot
>does not contain pigments>discoloration only 200-600nm thick>does not fluoresce under UV lighthttps://rentry.org/shroud-of-turin-27042026/
>>42622023im pretty sure the catholic church has even denounced it
>>42622027If it's a forgery, then replicate the shroud with it's physical, chemical amd microscopic detailsNo one ever managed to do it. You need short computer-guided UV laser impulses or corona discharges to achieve a superficial discoloration with 3d information that does not fluoresce under UV-light. That's the only method that comes close but it does not scale.
>>42622033NoMaybe 500 years ago, idk
>>42622033kek, no David(here's what AI says the man on the shroud looked like)
Christfats have a long history of making shit up to justify their religion. I remember the mother of a late Roman emperor went to the middle east and claimed she found the original crucifix by digging somewhere.
>>42624411Oh, and what did she do with the sacred christfat crucifix? An object christfats would no doubt want to preserve?? She cut it up
>>42622048replicate true damascus steelyou can't? must be a miracle
