Is what we are doing with art what we are?I dont care about the movie in picrel, i have no idea the plot or what happensbut its what we are doing with it that is making me think, but you schizos have reached different levels of thinkingso i come to youAre we being played by beings?and also when you say disclosure is it like those beings letting us know about themLike breaking a 5th wall or 2nd wall, i have no idea which wall is being brokentl:dr as they sayhelp explain the nonsense on this board, make it make sense to me, use art as an analogy not a medium
I want to emphasize that i have no idea what happens in this film. if you want to explain it, dont use what you explain to answer my question
>>42659760Stfu. It's the fourth wall. Do your own research before you come asking dumb questions, or you will deserve what you will get.
>>42659784its not a dumb questioni was under the impression that breaking the 4th wall is something only characters inside the play can dolike directly addressing the audienceno need to get upsetAlso, there was a query in there
What are you asking?
>>42659749>Are we being played by beings?Usually not, but possession is real and some people on Earth are mentally remote controlled by "them" (but normally only members of the elites).
I reckon a wall would be considered a partition between dimensions like a partition on a hard drive.In terms of disclosure, I see it partially as being a shift of orientation. Instead of typical highschool group think, where the group is defined by who is not in the group, it's more so defined by shared goals (resonance).There's a lot of moving parts, and I think the best way to be an active participant is to literally just be a high vibe person, for lack of a better term.There's a lot of narratives surrounding disclosure.Also, I'm this anon >>42659892I reread the OP and made sense of it
>>42659898They give people "spiritual tourettes". It's possible for an entity to impersonate you spiritually, and say whatever in your internal monologue. If you believe your ego is your true self, then you cannot differentiate the two. It is often underestimated how broad and exploitable intrusive thoughts are. You would not believe how often archons abuse this mechanic.For example, All the "gang stalkers" schizos talk about are probably just normal people who got seemingly innocent intrusive thought at the time and acted on them; the meaning that is conveyed to the schizo is a lot more purposeful and malicious, like a message from the entity itself. This leads to an "everyone is out to get me" mentality. The plausible deniability it creates is the densest of armors for them. That they can give you messages of hopelessness without anyone ever realizing.
>>42659832Im not upset but your op is weird vibes. Spoon feed me vibes. Or just lying, which makes the whole thread suspect. What you described would still be the fourth wall unless you want to call it the 5th wall nominally. It would seem you know that. So what is the real point of this?
>>42659923Why isnt it instead along the lines of you return to source in the sense that you become a watcher yourself, thats how i think the source is, the fact of existence, its there, being the source everythingso to use the analogy of the author, after a character dies in the book, its just in their mind now, there was a character which was like this. The character might have done somethings, or been some kind of way, such that they keep showing up in future chapters. For that exact character to exist again as that exact character and the character remembers their other universe, the author has to do some kind of literary device like multiversebut i dont mind if its how you say it is. If thats the case then i have some qeustions that need answering
>>42659749>are we in a painting?Yes, but not like you think. When our sun novas, it will make a very specific color which will be exactly the pixel shade God will need to keep watching his soaps.Everything we're doing is to change earth and solar system to make sure the hue is exactly right.
>>42659898can an entity which is not self aware be possessedwhat are the conditions for being possessed?What i think is you have to be enticed by some desire, call it what you want. The moment you decide to give in you are possessed. Lets drop the talk of possession. You want something. You decide to get it. You have to be self aware enough to make that kind of decisionThere is a lot of ideas im picking at here, im getting lost in the tangled messthe way you phrased what you said implies a lack of will on those possessedwhich absolves those possessed for what they do. But im following a chain of reasoning here. I would like to hear more thoughts on how you think the whole system works, if you can find the time to share what you think
>>42659954>partition between dimensionswhat even is a dimension, i can only guess from what you have said>shift of orientation...highschool group think..shared resonancethose are the same things>to be an active participant...be a high vibe personi think there are ways, what you mentioned can be one of themlet's continue sharingi will post everything i know as well
>>42659749>use art as an analogy not a medium very well. first, art is a medium (for potential) but i know that’s not what you meant. everything you do is a painting. what do i mean by this? the process of making a painting can be applied to everything and anything you do. the end result, the “artwork”, isn’t so much the goal, not so much as being aware of what you are doing, while you are doing it. that is art.regarding quality, making a “bad” painting is easy - an expert eye can tell when the painter is distracted, or feeling uninspired. making a “good” painting, however, is much more difficult, because it requires focus on the present issue - moving the paint itself around to obtain a desired result. “painting” (even the wall of a house) is a direct interface to chaos, and being able to manipulate it to create an final image. the image, again, is not as important as what it’s made of - the paint itself has depth, form, and three dimensional structure, which creates more interesting and unpredictable effects on perception than a flat, or printed, two dimensional image. the incremental development by which a painting is created is a meditation on this issue of “interdimensionality” itself, as the time and patience required to make the painting (including research, pallete and canvas prep, brush selection, and execution) demonstrates the privilege of human consciousness to be able to take an idea (which lives in the 6th dimension, or the realm of possibilities) into the 5th dimension (the realm of probability, in which the idea is completed in your mind) by way of the 4th dimension, or incremental manipulation of otherwise static, 3rd dimensional material. in essence, a painting is a collapsed, 2-dimensional recording of consciousness.regarding “cause and effect”, this plane itself is a only a canvas, and this life is your studio - are you making a mess or a masterpiece?
>>42660469https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1783633418914615.mp4
>>42659964are you the same anon?>theyYou forgot the markers " "i wish the gangstalked schizo were here to speak for themselves, i tried joining their larp but its too complicated. Was facing too many contradictions so i just started ignoring them. I think it should be taken seriously though instead of like worldview so i must have been doing it wrong.also, we need to talk some more about who "they" areand what if you dont have an internal monloguei have more to ask, i will continue posting
>>42659982Im looking fot interesting takes on the nature of our realityi know, as much as i can, that no one has the correct interpretation. else reality would be solved. Or we would be having some crazy discoveries being made by one person onlysidenote, we have been getting closer over timeyou can answer my other questions?>Is what we are doing with art what we are?if this is so obvious to you that it feels like you would be spoonfeeding, i will to understand why that is soThanks for the bumps
>>42660134that sounds extravagant
>>42660624Im not a wordsmith like you so i will speak simplyI was following along just well until you mentioned dimensionswhen you say dimension do you use it interchageably with plane as in>this plane itselfIn either case, how many are thereI would say plane includes all accessible dimensions for human cosnciousness. For things which are truly beyond us, they wouldnt appear in any dimension at allim on your turf using your words, correct me if im wrongand then your closing just lost me>this plane itself is a only a canvas, and this life is your studioso reality, yours, mine, everything else's, are in this plane, within it. You call it a canvas. We are inside a canvas. How can an object in an image change the image? Your analogy is only useful for me to point me to some kind of self awareness. But the mechanics that we are objects painting on the canvas are inconsistent, i dont deny that there are such mechanicsit needs to be cleared up
