Keeps the jotnar out.
>>42666419So everything else is ice but the sun only hits this spot? Or the supposed firmament is having a magnifying glass effect keeping this part ice free?
Earth’s a sphere you beautiful retards
>>42666499
>>42666419If Earth were flat you would be able to see just as far out at any height. You can see further distances from higher positions because there is a curve.
>>42666419This looks like a big ice fishing hole with the earth shooped into it
Terru me why terru me why
>>42666521I think your retardedness just gave me brain damage. Please never say anything ever again.
>>42666516>Cognitive dysfunction is a core feature of schizophrenia. Deficits are moderate to severe across several domains, including attention, working memory, verbal learning and memory, and executive functions. These deficits pre-date the onset of frank psychosis and are stable throughout the course of the illness in most patients.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2671937/
>>42666727>There's a secret war between schizos and psychopaths>Source: allknowers.net
>>42666419its not that big dumbass, earth looks like a snowglobe>>42666496kys>>42666499kys>>42666521kysreminder that if you still haven't figured out earth is flat IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD 2026 you are hopelessly damned to hell and DO NOT DESERVE AN EXPLANATION keep your freemasonic opinion YOU DO NOT SEEK THE TRUTH AND SO THE LORD WILL NEVER REVEAL IT TO YOU FAGGOT, I figured this shit out 20 years ago
>>42666496>So everything else is ice but the sun only hits this spot? Mostly, yeah. There are probably other suns ot there that have melted their own holes in the ice.
>>42666740Yeah, and the normies always win.
>>42667404sure sure all of the pictures that people take constantly now with high zoom cameras that show no curvature are all fakewhatever you say kike
If you like this ice wall stuff you should really read Jules Verne Journey to the centre of the earth.
>>42666499glowies out
>>42667524I’m a proud normie, and I love you guys. You’re a valuable part of society.
The cosmic disc is made of gold and probably about 1 million km in diameter. The outer wall around the ocean is made of iron. "Earth" is an area of land at one side of the Meru. There are 3 other "Earths" at the other sides. We can assume that every one of these 4 areas has a local sun.
Thoughts on Phaedo?
>>42666419The real question is what generates the Sun moon planets and stars on the firmament to melt the ocean of ice in the great 26000 year. It must be circular. The occult call it the black Sun. I suspect it might be a dragon/serpent/satan the orobous. The serpent eating its tail. And there are other serpents/black suns generating other bubble worlds. Probably working for a loosh farmer.
>>42666744flatniggers are the most retarded faggots on 4chan
>>42670545Do you have any images of this new cryptid of which you speak of? This so called... flat nigger?
Patrolled by cybernetic attack sharks
>>42666744you genuinely cant be this retarded
>>42667488Oh hey! Based
The true information about the earth's bounds is the MOON MAP by Vibes of Cosmos. The moon is a plasma projection of a topographic map of the earth.
>>42670263This is kinda what I've had seen wrote about this. Basically, we are the weirdos and are kept boxed in together because we are insane and like to kill each other. There isn't too much info about what could be on the other side though. Info about the ice wall itself is kinda sparse. Fuck knows why the govt would keep it a secret though if it is real. Must be kinda fucked or something,
this pic is from 1993 or something. my reichsbürger mate had it on his drive 2 years ago
>>42673785I think this just radicalized me into a flat earther
>>42676651>cant findskill issue
>>42677034Knowledge of the mysteries is a privilege. No one can demand it. If you can't see and understand you're not worthy of receiving the secrets.
>>42677076Spoken like an ignorant child.This board isn't for your kind.
>>42666744This is the kind of vitriolic childish behavior that makes no one want to interact with you.You claim to withhold information like a carrot on a stick being constantly pulled up from us like you're some god playing with ants.Go fuck yourself, you egotistical, duplicitous piece of human refuse. You do not have a monopoly on truth or what truth-seeking is.May the bird of paradise fly up your disgusting nose.
>>42666419I want to believe in flat earth but the only thing I don't get is why are other planets globes? If they just appear circular then that means it's facing us the entire time. You can get a telescope and barely see that planets like Jupiter form a circular shape, and you can assume it's a globe. If it's a globe then Earth is the only planet that's flat? I'm open minded and looking for a serious, no faggotry discussion.
>>42678918How do you know earth is a planet?
>>42666744great pic but you need to write the curvature calculations, and write the name of the peak the photographer is standing on
>>42666419if you're gonna schizopost atleast use the cool image with agartha and shit
>>42678918>I want to believe in flat earth but the only thing I don't get is why are other planets globes? If they just appear circular then that means it's facing us the entire time. You can get a telescope and barely see that planets like Jupiter form a circular shape, and you can assume it's a globe. If it's a globe then Earth is the only planet that's flat? I'm open minded and looking for a serious, no faggotry discussion.If Earth is flat then the planets aren't what we would refer to as planets. The old name for planets was wandering stars
>>42667488I don't have time for such vitriol.
how come /pol/ believes NASA put a man on the moon, when NASA is part of zog?
>>42679575Doesn't matter which word I use. We are a thing, and other things in the sky are circular when observed. Are they turned to us the entire time or are they globes while we are not>>42680211Why do they look like that though? I believe the moon landing and everything we were fed was fake. And that the actual world map is different. The only obstacle I see is not figuring out other clearly observable things in the sky and the shape they have
>>42666419if we get out the icewall to another world can we have sex with dragons?
>>42673785Nice. Based and Moonpilled.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_9X5U17G9o
>>42666419https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhQRxr_cfYw&list=RDLhQRxr_cfYw&start_radio=1&pp=ygURaWNlaG91c2UgaWNlaG91c2WgBwE%3D
>>42666666Satan likes ice fishing confirmed.
>>42678918Space is fake, other planets don’t exist. If you look at other “planets” through a telescope you’ll see this. Does this look like a planet to you?
>>42678918All pictures where “planets” appear to be globes are photoshopped. All fake. If you get a telescope yourself to view other “planets” they just appear as orbs of light.
>>42673785>north and south america that retardedly small>africa, asia and australia that retardedly huge>the absurdly fucktarded shapes of the landmasses that don't conform to any map ever made>GIANT FUCKING LANDMASS THE SIZE OF ASIA that no one has ever seen just a couple hundred miles off new zealand and china
>>42686709This is just photoshopped slop you stupid faggot.
>>42678918Because the earth is round too. If you're even considering flat earth, you're falling for jewish lies. You can also clearly see that the other planets are actually round and not just discs pointed at us because their surfaces curve away near the edges.>>42686674You can go to a store right now and buy a telescope for a couple hundred bucks to see that the planets are actually round balls of rock/gas. You don't have to remain willfully ignorant. It's okay.
>>42686686Cool. So when are you buying a telescope to prove that?
>>42686725>>You can go to a store right now and buy a telescope for a couple hundred bucks to see that the planets are actually round balls of rock/gas.And have you done this? I assume not. The irony and ignorance you’re exuding is truly profound.
>>42686730When are you?
>>42686735Where’d you get that pic? NASA I assume. Trusting nasa in 2026. Ngmi.
>>42686733>>42686737I don't need to because my viewpoint has already been proven to the point it's the default scientific theory. You're the one who's saying it's everything we know is actually wrong so the burden of proof is on you to prove that. So far, not a single flerfer has been able to despite how cheap and easy it would be.
>>42686749I looked him up, all his pics are so obviously fake it’s laughable. Definitely a government plant as well. What a joke.
>>42686758Actually the original model of the earth was flat, the heliocentric model is the new model. Which means the burden of proof lies on you, you stupid cunt.
>>42686765>Actually the original model of the earth was flat,Yes, back when we lived in hunter gatherer tribes that never went more than a couple dozen miles from their cave. For people like that, the earth might as well be flat.>the heliocentric model is the new modelYou're really stretching the definition of "new" here. The model has been in use for hundreds of years, and even before that, we knew the earth was round for 2000+ years. Safe to say, a model won't survive that long without being true.>the burden of proof lies on you,There's about 3000 years of proof all over the internet, free for you to look up and learn from. I don't need to do shit. Alternatively, if you believe that in those 3000 years, not a single person has ever picked up a telescope and noticed that what they see doesn't line up with what they're told, you're free to go do that and destroy the globe model once and for all.
>>42686777>>42686794Except they were teaching the flat earth model in the 50s, the game is up glowniggers. All you do is lie, that’s all you can do is lie. Everything you’ve said is a blatant lie. You’ve been outmaneuvered, game, set, match. It was easy.
uhhhhh BROS?
>>42667242>there are probably other sunsProbably, huh?
>>42666419schizo slop
>>42686758>the burden of proofThe hecking burden of proof!>I don't need to because my viewpoint has already been proven to the point it's the default scientific theory.Translation:>I got indoctrinated into this religion since I was a child!
>>42688142You're free to swoop in and save us form the evil government by proving that the earth is flat at any moment of your choosing. All it takes is a telescope. We're all waiting.
>>42681965
>>42689962Interesting. Would you mind sharing what the atmoapheric conditions were at the time this video was taken so we can verify if what it shows is explainable by refraction?
>>42690260Nah dude just drive out to toronto skyline or chicago skyline or whatever place is closest to you, and see for yourself.
>>42690291Yeah I'll be able to see refraction at work. I noticed this video doesn't include the data for refraction either. If you don't have that data, you can't prove that these videos can't be explained by refraction, which means they don't prove anything about the shape of the earth.
What else are they lying about? Why is there a map of the North Pole and Antarctica from 1531?
>>42690352Where's the refraction in this image?Flat earth is just an observable everyday reality once you know how to calculate the horizon distance. Also: Why is "satellite data" considered a proof of gravity, (which cannot be tested by laymen by the way) but taking a scale onto an airplane, or up the Burj Khalifa is not considered a proof of gravity? Really makes you wonder that the proofs of gravity are only untestable things for laymen, rather than the easy testable ones I just mentioned
>>42666419Everyone arguing this and that about refraction and whatnot, all I know is what I’ve seen with my own two eyes out on the open water on an aircraft carrier. Which is that large objects are often obscured partially by the horizon and how much/how little is determined by how far I was above the water and how far away the object was. This was most apparent when passing through the strait of Gibraltar when the mountains on either side were visibly rising above and dipping back below the horizon as we approached them and as we left them behind while passing into the Atlantic.
>>42666419>this is a geometry free thread
>>42691120might want to get your eyes checked
>>42691184What am I looking at?
insane we still have flat earthers in 2026step one is building a model, we would use that model to make predictions about where specific bodies wind up in the sky at specific times and compare it to measured results.but of course you have no model nor predictions because its impossible to make a flat earth model that makes any sense vs what we can observe.as just one example, antarctic 24 hour sun is impossible on a flat earthkys glowies
>>42691450Earth is a motionless sphere at the center of the universe. It explains why the atmosphere and the oceans haven't flown off into space when flying at millions of miles an hour. Get fucked retard.
>>42691565Ok, so going based on the current mainstream model of cosmology, how long does it take for the earth to rotate?
>>42691738Why should I give a fuck what a bunch of devil worshiping liars say about something that they're objectively wrong about? Do you go around specifically learning a bunch of shit that you know is wrong?
>>42691738According to the retards and loads, it rotates, it orbits, the sun orbits the galaxy, and the galaxy is whooshing and expanding at incomprehensible speeds but somehow on earth we don't physically sense any of this. We don't sense it BECAUSE IT ISNT TRUE. Simple as. Get fucked retardo
>>42666499I can’t believe you people still exist. The science is settled. You’re arguing against literally thousands of experts around the world. Why do you think boats sail away and you can still see them?
>>42691036>Where's the refraction in this image? It's responsible for the water beyond 1.13 km being visible.>Also: Why is "satellite data" considered a proof of gravity, but taking a scale onto an airplane, or up the Burj Khalifa is not considered a proof of gravity?What are you trying to say? What satellite data exactly? Who said those aren't considered proof of gravity?>which cannot be tested by laymen by the wayYes it can. If you live near a large mountain, you can drive to its foot with a string and a weight and some way to measure angles and see that the weight on the string is pulled towards the mountain.
>>42691184>he still doesn't include the numbers for refraction because he knows that would show that this is completely explainableSad!
>>42691565>Earth is a motionless sphere at the center of the universeThat's technically not incorrect since there's no absolute reference frame, so using a reference frame with the earth as the center is just as accurate as any other. It's also not the whole truth since the earth is moving in relation to other objects.>It explains why the atmosphere and the oceans haven't flown off into space when flying at millions of miles an hourWhy would they fly off? Go ahead and use your genius understanding of physics to explain what force would cause that.
>>42691756We don't sense it because we have no senses that can detect movement. And that's because movement by itself isn't measurable. We can measure the distance between us and some other object changing via sight or sound (radar) or we can feel the air resistance from the air that's not moving, but we can't feel movement by itself without using some other phenomenon to observe its effects. What we can feel is acceleration/force, and those are so small with your examples that we can't feel them.
>>42692374>anon thinks he's in this cgi animation
>>42692433Wheeee!
>>42692433>no argumentWhy do you think we should feel anything from that?
>>42692511>galaxy is moving with universe expansion>sun is orbiting the galactic central supermassive black hole>we're orbiting the sun>we're rotating>rotation is at different speeds at different pole-equatorial distancesdude by standing on earth we're moving through the universe in one direction, around the smbh on another, around the sun in another, AND rotating. you think we wouldn't be able to feel any of those forces constantly acting, constantly changing (in a relative sense)?you're moving FOUR very, very different ways.
>>42692578Again, we don't feel movement, only acceleration. The acceleration we experience from that is too small for us to feel. If you disagree, the numbers are on the internet for you to do the math and prove we should actually feel it.
>>42692590imagine you're moving forward on an endless highway on the back of a truck at a constant 100kph.you can't feel that, right, that we all agree on.now, imagine the truck has a massive merry-go-round on it rotating at 10kph. every time you change to face "forwards" you accelerate to 110kph.every time you pass the halfway point you decelerate to 90kph.AND your carriage on the merrygoround is spinning.the sun is the truck.earth is a carriage on the merry go round.scale up those speeds to the sun's motion through the galaxy, the earth's orbit around the sun and its own rotation.if you think we wouldn't feel any of that then I can't help you.
>>42692693Everything you wrote until this part was correct.>if you think we wouldn't feel any of that then I can't help you.As for that, it depends on how big the actual forces are. If they're small enough, then no, we wouldn't feel that. You have the numbers. You can do the math to figure out if we should feel it. If you do that and prove that we should feel it but don't, then you'll have proved that we're not on a spinning ball flying through space.
>>42693073nigga where do you think you are? the burden of proof is on you here.you do the maths and report back. we won't listen because maths is for faggots and pseud coping midwits.men use intuition, and no-ones intuition says "we are deffo on a spinning ball in space that is spinning without any mechanism, orbiting an even bigger ball in an incomprehensibly massive perpetual motion device which everyone agrees are impossible but totally not when it's balls in space because GrAvItY"
>>42692433Baruch Hashem! The universe is truly glorious!
lighthouse visibility and radar ranges prove the earth is flat
>>42691450A glowie calling others a glowie, now that’s a new one. The things you speak of already exist you just refuse to acknowledge them. I guess ignorance is bliss.
>>42694531>look at this Redditor not knowing what they’re looking at! GLOBE DEBUNKED Has Venus ever been documented passing in front of the moon in any other instance? Why not try and take photos yourself of such a phenomenon?
>>42694783Tits or gtfo.
>>42687131source of that pic? seems fabricated
>>42694518what causes air currents on a flat earth?
>>42693108>coping this hardSad!
>>42694505Would you mind sharing the numbers and formulas you used to calculate this? I'm particularly interested in what numbers you used to account for refraction.
>>42696599You sure think you are winning by spamming refraction.
>>42696649I don't consider dunking on the mentally retarded "winning", but sure.
At every moment there's only one place where the Moon will be directly above your head or zenith. This point is called the sub-lunar point or the Moon's geographical position and the farther away you are from this point the lower in the sky the Moon will appear to you.Around this point we can draw a circle so that every point on it will be equally distanced from the sub-lunar point and thus every person located on that circle will see the Moon at the same height/elevation above the horizon. This is called a circle of equal altitude.Now imagine that are moving along this circle while always facing the Moon. How will the Moon appear to you from all the different vantage points? Obviously it will stay at a constant height above the horizon but the cardinal direction will change since you're moving in a circle. At one point the Moon will be to the north while at another point it will be to the east and so forth but it will always have the same elevation angle. But how will the orientation of the Moon change?If the Earth was flat and the Moon was small and local it would be like moving around a flagpole at a fixed distance while keeping your eye on the ornament on the top. How would that look? We can all agree that you would see different sides of the ornament and that it would appear if front of different background features.Is this what we observe in reality?
>>42697676>Is this what we observe in reality?The answer is of course absolutely not.It doesn't matter where you are on the circle, the same side of the Moon is always visible and the phase of the Moon will be constant. The background stars will also be the same. Only thing that changes is that the Moon (and the background stars) will seem to rotate around the center. This would be impossible if the Moon was very close to the ground like flat earthers claim.*I had to increase the apparent size of the Moon by 16 times in this demonstration since the Moon is so small and I wanted a wide view so that we could see the horizon as well.
>>42694756flat earth is a cia psyop started in roughly 2012 to discredit actual conspiracies which were becoming more understood by the mainstream>The things you speak of already exist you just refuse to acknowledge themno they do not, link me a flatearth model that can predict where venus will be in the sky at 5am on october 9th from the vantage point of honolulu. there are none, because a functional flatearth model is impossible.>>42697676appreciate the effort posting anon. it will of course be inneffective because there is no evidence that is sufficient for them. the first flat earthers that crowdfund a space tourist flight will be called shills.
>>42697859>predict where venus will be in the sky at 5am on october 9th from the vantage point of honolulu.Azimuth: 234.22°Altitude: 22.83°I used the Air Almanac to get the ground position of Venus at that time and date and then I just measured the angles in GeoGebra.
>>42697859Functional flat earth models are completely possible, you're just making your own side look bad by lying so blatantly. Or you're just hopelessly misinformed and think you have a nuke argument that nobody can beat. The only reason they ever even bothered changing the model from flat to sphere is because it made it easier for astronomers to compare notes and look at the same stars. They still were perfectly able to calculate which stars they were looking at in a flat earth model, it's just that the sphere model made things simpler. They couldn't give a shit whether or not it's "true", they're just making their jobs easier. Flat earth mathematics exists, it's just complicated. Doesn't make it wrong. It does make you and your ilk look very very stupid though. Which is funny. Kill yourself, globetard.
>>42698420>Functional flat earth models are completely possibleno>Or you're just hopelessly misinformed and think you have a nuke argument that nobody can beatyou sure can't>Flat earth mathematics exists, it's just complicated.they don't
>>42698429Simple question: you do know there were incredibly intelligent astronomers before the sphere model was widely adopted, right? That to even come to such a complex astronomical model would require incredible intelligence operating in a flat earth system? If the flat earth system were entirely incomprehensible, no one would have ever discovered enough about the skies to even posit a globe earth theory. Gotcha, fucktard. You should shut the fuck up now.
Icewall in this heatwave? I wish
>>42697696The moon is not a solid object, but a reflectionhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YimLisrreQA
>>42698420>Functional flat earth models are completely possibleThen post one.>The only reason they ever even bothered changing the model from flat to sphereThis implies there was a flat model. There wasn't, at least not one with the complexity and accuracy required to classify as a scientific model.>it made it easier for astronomers to compare notes and look at the same stars. They still were perfectly able to calculate which stars they were looking at in a flat earth model, it's just that the sphere model made things simpler.Sounds like a whole lot of cope to avoid admitting that the globe model makes more sense.>>42698448>you do know there were incredibly intelligent astronomers before the sphere model was widely adopted, right?Yes. And they looked at the sky and realized that what they were seeing was impossible on a flat plane but made perfect sense on a globe.
>>42694523If I jump inside a train do I immedietly get slammed to the back of the train?
>>42698420>Functional flat earth models are completely possibleLink me a flatearth model that can predict where venus will be in the sky at 5am on october 9th from the vantage point of honolulu.
In ancient Hermetic, Vedic, and esoteric traditions, the human being is viewed as a localized expression of the divine—a micro-torus field intimately connected to the macro-cosmos. If an individual genuinely believes they are an eternal, energetic being interacting with the universe through frequency and intent, they are incredibly difficult to control.By replacing this with a materialistic narrative—where the universe is an accidental byproduct of a big bang and humans are merely "biological machines" made of random atoms—spiritual sovereignty is broken. It creates a deep, subconscious sense of isolation, insignificance, and existential dread.A finite, material-only world dictates that when you die, you cease to exist, and that happiness or fulfillment can only be measured by what can be physically accumulated.The Scarcity Myth: Materialism inherently relies on the concept of finite resources. If energy is not infinite (as Tesla argued regarding the aether) but scarce, then the population can be easily controlled through the pricing and distribution of those resources.The Spiritual Void: By cutting off a child's understanding of their own energetic biofield or soul, a spiritual void is created. The modern economic matrix is designed to fill that void with external commodities: consumer goods, entertainment, and material status symbols.Under Hermetic law, human consciousness possesses creative power. If the masses can be convinced that they are powerless observers in a cold, random, and finite universe, they effectively surrender their creative agency. The collective consciousness is dialed into a lower vibrational frequency—fear, survival, and competition—making the population highly malleable and receptive to centralized governance.
>>42700904It's why I use AI. Because I know no one is gonna address the points brought up. So why bother typing in the first place?
>>42700931It's not for you, it's for anyone silently reading and deciding to investigate themselves.
>>42700935Don't believe me, go do your own research
>>42700922>Why do you see different stars when you move North or South?>Why does the position of the celestial poles and celestial equator change when you go North or South?Personal sky dome projection o algo
or we will know that god exists? right?
>>42666419the great iceball theory
I like Captain Gunn's take where he says the ice walls are a psyop to prevent people from sailing to uncharted lands.Saorsa ~ To Be Freed Documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcKUcTv95wgDefiance ~ Saorsa Pt2https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5tC9B1_qDY
>>42678918Is a plate round or flat?
>>42696649 Just happy to see the shills are running out of gas.
>>42691751Average Christcuck Globetard
>>42670979Who is patrolling the sky tho ?
>>42703897That hilarious because the flat earth depicted in that image contradicts ancient Asian and middle eastern cosmology where outside the confines of the firmament is an endless watery abyss.
>>42696649>post the same """""proof""""" a million times, always ignoring the one aspect that completely destroys it>try to pretend people are lazy for always pointing it out
>>42704356the flat earthers are controlled opposition
>>42697696Here's a more zoomed in version. Noticed how the Moon and the stars seem to rotate around two separate points. That's caused by parallax since the Moon is so much closer to us than the distant stars.But if you were to stand right on the sub-lunar point then both points would overlap each other and be directly above your head.
>>42704678And here's a version with the atmosphere turned off.
>>42666419From this height everyone who sees this picture is looking at me crankin my hog just there on the left
>>42673785>>42674065so...Hunter x Hunter is real???
>>42698448>there were incredibly intelligent astronomers before the sphere modelName one.YOU realize the sphere model was developed around 600 BC, right?
>>42679788your picrel conclusion is faulty.observing that just disproves the numbers we are given.if the earth was much bigger than just 24,901~ in circumference, then you would see objects that are further while earth still being a globe.
>>42692070>You’re arguing against literally thousands of expertsappeal to majority + authority
>>42674065How could he possibly get this pic Anon
>>42705598>observing that just disproves the numbers we are given. Not even that. His little "experiment" doesn't account for refraction so the data is incomplete. It doesn't say or prove anything.
>>42703746Nice vids. Thanks for the share.
>>42697676>>42697696I just learned that you can import your own images into Stellarium and overlay them on top of the star map and all you need are the right ascension and declination coordinates for each corner in the image.So I imported my image of a lunar eclipse from 2019 and then moved through all the places on Earth where the Moon had the same elevation angle as me at the moment I took the image.Thought it looked neat.
>>42706016>my image of a lunar eclipse from 2019Here it is at the top. The bottom image is a simulated view in Stellarium and the background stars are a perfect match.
Maybe you'd look less like a desperate faggot clinging to the word refraction like someone holding a cross up to a vampire if you simply explained why exactly refraction was causing that visual effect and were able to reasonably conclude what the conditions (humidity etc.) likely were in the area that day from the distances given. Then people might say actually yeah those details are within a reasonable range, this checks out. However, it seems like perhaps you don't know shit and are incapable of putting your own calculations up to scrutiny. I'm sure the refraction will distort this post though and you'll just keep doing the same ridiculous thing.
the willing blind masses of cattle deserve to be punished by their earthly masters
what if it is a giant cave?
>>42706122Fair enough. Light bends when it moves from one medium to another. Everyone's seen a straw or spoon or whatever in a cub of water bend. The refrective indices of the materials determine the direction and severity of the bend. Temperature affects the refrective index of air, so when you have a temperature gradient such as what usually forms above water or a road on a hot day, that means there's tons of really thin layers of air, all a slight temperature decrease/increase compared to above. Being gradual like this, it also bends light gradually, curving it, instead of instantly like with the straw in a cup. This causes the light to bend downwards over water and pass over the horizon making you see objects whose true position is behind the horizon.
>>42706122>why exactly refraction was causing that visual effectHere is a visual.
>>42706637what is it refracting off of?
globalists are hellbound
>>42706792It is refracting through a medium that has a density gradient.
I'm not a Flat Earther but I do enjoy the idea. It's fun looking at all the different Flat Earth maps people make. Kind of a high-fantasy/Tolkien concept.
>>42706979>I'm not a Flat EartherThat's because you're a fucking retard
>>42666419>flat earthers filtered by basic perspectivekek
>>42707078
>>42707088>>42707130enjoy hell
>>42706941>through a mediumand what is that medium made of?
>>42706979This...this is Hunter X Hunter Dark Continent arc.
kek
>>42705948I think these are the best flat earth videos of 2026, because they bring a legitimately new perspective that sounds plausible. I like listening to him back up his point of view with practical sailing and star navigation knowledge.
flat earth morons cant answer 1 simple question:
>>42708126Why does that matter regarding refraction?
>>42706792>>42708126See this >>42706199 post if you're still confused. Though judging by the fact it was a direct response to you, you've almost certainly seen it and just didn't want to respond because it was too complicated and truthful for you. It's okay. Not everyone can be born smart. Just don't pretend to be smart about things you don't understand next time.
crazy how poor flatniggers are
>>42683393>We are a thing, and other things in the sky are circulara billiards table pool is a flat rectangle with 15 balls on top of it.if you attach a bunch of spheres onto your room's ceiling it doesn't make the floor spherical.the mistake you made in your way of reasoning is make earth the same thing as what you see in the sky, effectively making it a star like others which is an assumption that needs proof on it's own.
>>42709966>if you attach a bunch of spheres onto your room's ceiling it doesn't make the floor spherical.see >>42697676 and >>42697696Why do we always see the same side of the Moon no matter where we are on Earth? Look at the attached picture. We have a pool table representing the flat Earth and we have a pool ball suspended in the air representing the Moon. Point A and B are both equally distanced from the point on the table that is right below the pool ball and thus they both observe the pool ball at the same elevation angle above the table.The problem is that they would see completely different sides of the pool ball! Also they would see it in front of different background features in the room.Imagine yourself as an ant moving around the red circle on the table while always keeping your eye on the pool ball and then look at the video in this post >>42697696Would it look the same? Of course not!
>>42710678>The problem is that they would see completely different sides of the pool ball!The only way for them to see the same side of the pool ball is if the pool ball was much higher above table but then the elevation angles wouldn't correspond with reality. You can't have it both ways.
>>42710700>You can't have it both ways.Unless you make the surface curved of course :)
>>42709966If you are on a table, looking up at a ball, then everyone on the table's line of sight will line up to all point at the thing in one spot.Why doesnt this work with the sun, and the flat earth?
>>42710678my comment was a criticism of the stupid conclusion:if things above are a certain shape, therefore earth must also be the same shape.because this is based on multiple other assumptions that must be verified first before moving forward; namely, that earth is in space and is also kind of the same thing like other "planetoids".is earth a planet? how can we verify this ?must earth be the same shape is lights in the sky? why must it?for your new comment about the face of the moon, that is also based on assumptions that need to be verified correct first. what is the moon? is it really an oblate spheroid ? is it 3D ? is it physical? is it a projection? is it just light?the same face moon argument would only work if we supposed that it is a 3D phsyical object like your picrel, then, it would make sense that we should be seeing different faces. also, what >>42710700 said.do we know how far the moon is? how can we verify.
>>42710806So are you going to suggest or do anything about this?I've offered this experiment thousands of times over more than a decade on this site.Still no takers.Almost like you WANT to not know, and have no interest in doing anything to find out.What is YOUR suggestion on ways to determine answers for your questions?
>>42710777that works based on your assumptions about the moon. those assumptions need to be proven correct first and verified.i don't know or claim what the moon is.seeing the same face everywhere on earth doesn't prove anything at all for both sides flat and globe.https://streamable.com/sk28hv^ this 2 minutes video showcases this.
>>42710848>that works based on your assumptions about the moon.Wrong, and that isnt even about the Moon.It's literally "just go outside and have everyone point at the object."Requires nothing known about the Moon.Although, speaking of knowledge about the Moon?Do YOU have any?Have you ever just gone outside and taken lots of pictures of the Moon?How it seems to change?I doubt it - the people that do come to the same conclusions.
>>42710847but that's not what the globecucks believethey believe that the sun is so big and so far away that sunlight hit the earth in a straight lineit's only flat earthers who believe sunlight is spread out because they believe the sun is closer to the earth
>>42712353>but that's not what the globecucks believeWho cares what liars say? I said I offer the experiment - one I have done - and not a single person has ever attempted it on their own.>they believe that the sunPay attention.There is no mention of the sun in my experiment.>sunlight is spread outMy experiment does not rely on light being parallel or not.Those are lines of sight, not rays of light.Again - you dont even seem to understand what the experiment says.
Okay but what is in the Farlands beyond the ice wall? Should we even go there? Who built the ice wall and was it to keep.us out or to keep something from getting in?
>>42710847The diagram on your meme is misleading. The globe model has the light source as very far away, whereas the flat model has the light source as being close.To change between flat and globe coordinates is just a simple mathematical operation that can be easily performed by AI.
>>42708383Keep ignoring this post flat-tards
>>42712751>The globe modelMy experiment does not require adherence to either model.>the light sourceThere is no "light source" in my image.There is a distant object, and lines of sight.You again show that you havent even tried to comprehend.
>>42712793>My experiment does not require adherence to either model.You seem confused about basic geometry.Ask the AI to explain to you why the mathematics of sunlight angles is transposable between both models.
>>42710848>>42710856The Moon is weird
>>42712818>mathematics of sunlight anglesThere is no sun in my experiment.Honestly, it works better at night.If only you would read what the experiment is, instead of arguing with phantoms of previous times.
>>42712822>the moon looks like earth if you heavily distort every single feature into a new shape
>>42708383keep ignoring this post
>>42708383What's your question?Flat earthers have historical sailing logs showing that the southern hemisphere circumference matches the flat earth predictions. See pic related. Eric Dubay has more on those historical records
>>42712876Why do you believe fake history that was rewritten after the mudflood?Have you ever seen anyone recreate these?Or do we simply have to blindly accept some book?
>>42712890y u blindly trust google?
>>42712876>Fake old drawing from fake history written by winnerswe live in 2026, flat-tards will shoot themselves in rockets and kill themselves but wont time a voyage around the southern pole
>>42712909you blindly trust a random image a finger on a random page of writing claiming its from an encyclopedia?
>>42712975because its from a youtube video where the guy flips through the encyclopedia and displays the cover
>>42712991first: prove itsecond: you believe a man behind a screen? showing you a book that he claims to be an encyclopedia?3rd: you dont trust youtube but you trust "encyclopedia americana"hahaha ok
>>42713002globe heads brain is shattering in real time
>>42713012encyclopedia americana funded byscholastichahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
>>42713012>Did you sail around the southpole?>Indoor hovering objects such as dustya fuck off
oy
>>42713012>globe heads brain is shattering in real timeYou flat earth propagandists lost a long time ago, buddy. Now you are just a bunch of mega losers jerking each other off trying to shill your videos etc. Some of you are even dumb enough to genuinely believe no doubt.
>>42712909I dont. I went outside and did my own experiment. And like everyone else, when I offer it you just run away.
>>42712818Could you share the numbers you used to account fro refraction when making this image?
>>42713028>stable solar systems would never formWay to misunderstand what you just explained in the same image. The three body problem just means we don't have an equation to calculate the positions of a system with 3 or more bodies like we can one with 2 bodies. We can't just plug in the current positions and velocities and get their locations at any arbitrary point in the future, but instead we have to actually simulate it step by step. Nothing about it says a system with 3 or more bodies is impossible. This should be evident by looking up and observing a system with 3 or more bodies, but apparently not.
>>42713959>we don't have an equation to calculate the positions of a system with 3 or more bodies OF SIMILAR MASS like we can one with 2 bodiesImportant detail.When one body is a thousand times more massive than the next largest body, it becomes very easy to determine the general pattern of movement.
>>42666419>ice wall >flat earthwhy can we not see the wall from anywhere??checkmate atheists
>>42690291The Curvature is allegedly near 8 inches per mile. Assuming a distance of 30 miles there should only be 240 inches of the bulding hidden by the curvature, which actually seems to align with the video.
>>42714610>The Curvature is allegedly near 8 inches per mile. Assuming a distance of 30 miles there should only be 240 inches of the bulding hidden by the curvatureThat's not quite how it works. It's a sphere so the curve increases exponentially. It's 8 inches after the first mile, but more than 16 inches after the second.Of course, this is all ignoring refraction which is what makes it actually visible.
>>42714852>It's 8 inches after the first mile, but more than 16 inches after the second.This is the wrong conception.
>>42713959>just gaslight the observerhow is this not tiring for you to do all day?
>>42714878You tell us.It must be hard to willfully ignore the fact that the solar system is 90% star, and thus everything jupiter sized and smaller is easily computed as having orbits around it.
>>42666499Nu uh
>>42714878What gaslighting is happening here?
>>42713959>Nothing about it says a system with 3 or more bodies is impossible.Hey dummie, may you dont have an advanced STEM degree, but I'll explain what it means. It means the systems are unstable. Only special solutions are stable, but the smallest imperfection to the special solution causes the entire system to collapse. That means an asteroid fly-by that alters the perfect gravitional stability will collapse the system. This is why phyiscists admit the gravitational model of the universe is mathematically unstable. Imagine tossing a magnetic ball at an iron rod, and have the magnetic ball spin in a stable circuit without crashing. Now imagine doing that with a handful of magnetic balls. That's what instability of the solar system means - you can get a "special case" mathematical solution, but as soon as a real world error to that perfection happens, the entire system collapses. >>42714610Proving yourself to have less than highschool level math skills. Sure hope you're not that same guy commenting on physics and solar system stability and refraction in this thread. 8" per mile squared.So (30 miles x 30 miles)*8" = 600 feetBut more accurate formulas take into accurate the observer eyeheight and elevation data of observer and object.
>Only special solutions are stableOne of those "special" ways is what we see if EVERY SINGLE STAR SYSTEM.When one body is more than 99% of the mass of the entire system, it becomes trivially easy to calculate regardless of the number of bodies.Remember - flerfers ALWAYS have to lie.
>>42718488>EVERY SINGLE STAR SYSTEM.Meh, overzealous, but still fully true for our own.
Icewall and flat earth roleplaying are like pleb Temu psyops. As grassroots as they are dumb - on par with those dorks that "recover" alien artifacts on Goytube.
>>42666419Is earth is flat a christfag thing? Socrates says the earth is round in Phaedo.
>>42666419i saw the ice walls but they go around the galaxy not a flat earth
>>42719555Christians are retards that will believe anything as long as you can link it to their beliefs. It’s why Republicans have used them to grift their whole political identity off.
>>42673785i take a year off from laughing at you retards and well well well.absolutely nothing changes.stagnate in piss, dummos
>>42717225>Only special solutions are stable, but the smallest imperfection to the special solution causes the entire system to collapse. That means an asteroid fly-by that alters the perfect gravitional stability will collapse the system. I don't think you understand just how big, empty and slow everything in space is. Say an asteroid flies between the earth and sun and forces the former to start moving towards the latter. Because of how small the asteroid is compared to the earth, the extra velocity towards the sun will be something in the range of centimeters per year. There's a lot of time for another asteroid to cancel it out. And there's millions of asteroid flying around the solar system in a random pattern. Statisically, their effects average out to zero.>Imagine tossing a magnetic ball at an iron rod, and have the magnetic ball spin in a stable circuit without crashing. Now imagine doing that with a handful of magnetic ballsNow put those magnetic balls in space and spread them miles apart and you'll have something approaching a fraction of how big the relative distances in space are. Also, instead of throwing them there randomly, make sure to do it in a structured way that resembles an accretion disc. You'll find that it's absurdly, cosmically unlikely that any of the balls ever hit each other. Statistically, it'll happen at some point if the system is left to spin indefinitely, but that's not how the universe works. The sun will go supernova long before that.>you can get a "special case" mathematical solution, but as soon as a real world error to that perfection happens, the entire system collapses. You still don't understant the scales. The special case would have to be something on the scale of a solar system passing directly through another one to have any significant chance of fucking it up, and that's about as likely as 2 people throwing darts at each other from 100 meters away and the darts hitting each other mid air.
>>42686674You can easily see Jupiter with an amateur telescope because the planet is so big
>>42720518Take another look at the special solutions to multi-body gravitational systems. Then tell me what the special solution is for the 10 billion asteroids and planets and the Jupiter perturbations. >Now put those magnetic balls in space and spread them miles apart and you'll have something approaching a fraction of how big the relative distances in space areYou really don't get it. The math shows that 99.99999% of the time two magnetic balls that are attracted to eachother but moving with chaotic initial starting conditions will either (1) fly away from eachother or (2) smash into eachother. Only <0.000001% of the time does a stable condition occur, but as soon as a gravitationally large object flys by the special condition is destroyed and the orbit collapses. The math for 3 or more gravitational bodies only works for special conditions, and the special conditions are extremely fragile (only existing as mathematical points rather than as a zone of stability) so that fly-by gravitational masses cause orbital collapse.
>>42690373these old maps such as the piri reis map, were put together with multiple ancient maps from before the ice was there, its only in recent times with satellites and ground penetrating radar that they realised how accurate they are.theres also a 1000 year old map of the flat earth found in a japanese budhist temple that was posted in the hawaiian gazette in the early 1900's, i compared that map too a military airforce map from the 1950's and saw the 1000 year old map showing the same flat earth layout a well as madagascar still connected to africa.
>mfw I've been arguing both sides of this debate in these threads for yearsAnd in the process I have no concrete opinion on it anymore.
>>42712975not sure about the dome but admiral richard byrd said on a tv show (Longines Chronoscope, 20min video) that the north pole is at the centre of an ocean 10,000ft deep, the south pole sits atop a plateau 10,000ft high, sometimes up to 13,000 feet, he said a lot of stuff he clearly shouldnt have, it was quite the redpill, especially if you pair it with his supposed diary, and operation high jump.in the video he talks about the world continuing to shrink with an increasing acceleration and bringing places closer together.not sure if this is a metaphor for how easier travel will become in the future, or if he literally means the dome is shrinking, its like that episode of stargate sg1.the continents on the flat earth map the beyond the ice wall usually show their sun/moon is dead or burned out, is the world actually shrinking, are we fucked?
>>42721782>tell me what the special solution is for the 10 billion asteroids and planets and the Jupiter perturbations.That would be "every bit of mass from Jupiter on down is less than 1% of the mass of the system."It's very simple.
>>42722177>the south pole sits atop a plateau 10,000ft high, sometimes up to 13,000 feetYes, this is called the elevation of what they were standing on.
>>42721782>picrelHoly shit you are one retarded fucking nigger. The slop generator you had to ask because you don't have the ability to do basic fucking math yourself literally told you that having such a small angular resolution would make it appear as a point source and you think this means the light from it would just magically disappear. No. It just means we don't have the resolution to see it as more than a point source. The literal picture you posted has the answer to your retarded fucking question if only you would learn to fucking read. Nigger.
>>42666496We'll never know. It's a magical mystery
>>42722908I love seeing shills go nuclear, happens every thread.
>>42700597i hope you're just trolling. theres extremely clear footage from amateur astronomers.
I've been working on my own model based on the CIA Project Stargate papers, the ancient world models and various things hidden in pop culture.
>>42726713
"Our willingness to accept scientific claims that are against common sense is the key to an understanding of the real struggle between science and the supernatural. We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door." - Richard Lewontin, Harvard genetecist and evolutionary biologist"Science, fundamentally, is a game... with one overriding and defining rule: ...Let us see how far and to what extent we can explain the behavior of the physical and material universe in terms of purely physical and material causes, without invoking the supernatural." - Richard Dickerson (Biochemist)
Having identified what science (se-ance) is, let us see what the great men of the science have to say about the structure of the universe. For surely that can’t have been formulated on purely philosophical grounds! Oh.“What I want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that..This assumption is made because it is believed to be unreasonable that we should be near the center of the Universe." George Ellis, Emiratis Professor of Mathematics, writing in Scientific American“In the effort to explain the Michelson-Morley experiment ...the thought was advanced that the Earth might be stationary...Such an idea was not considered seriously, since it would mean in effect that our Earth occupied the omnipotent position in the universe, with all the other heavenly bodies paying homage by revolving around it.'Arthur S. Otis, Light Velocity and Relativity"If the redshifts are a Doppler shifts...the observations as they stand lead to the anomaly of a closed universe, curiously small and dense, and. it may be added, suspiciously young.”Edwin Huble, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society“I can construct you a spherically symmetrical universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot disprove it based on observations. You can only exclude it on philosophical grounds. In my view there is absolutely nothing wrong in that. What I want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that… This assumption is made because it is believed to be unreasonable that we should be near the center of the Universe." George Ellis, Emiratis Professor of Mathematics, writing in Scientific American
>>42727250>>42727263>argument from authorityNo one gives a shit.Go outside and record some observations.The complete rejection of this alone is what disqualifies all flerfers.They would rather retreat to quote wars than just measure the ground.
eyyy it's flat and the aylamos have us contained till we can learn how not to be retarded, this is the point of human existence.
Extremely based thread.The anons defenders and scholars of the multidimensional Flat Earth are onto The Truth.Please, keep going. Where can I find more study material?
>>42727263quoting george ellis is hilarious since you clearly dont understand the contextyes a geocentric model is perfectly acceptable and will yield accurate results just as well as a heliocentric model. choosing either functional model is a matter of philosophythis of course has nothing to do with flat earth, since there is no flat earth model, and certainly not a functional one.
>>42706979This shit would be so fucking cool
>>42728641check out the video in this thread,>>42707608it has essential information thats important regarding the origins of our world and people.so you should watch that first, then you will have had a gud look inside the rabbit hole, then you can go down inside.
>>42700670is a helicopter strapped to the earth like a fucking train?
>>42666419Retard here, can you explain on this model how stars are spinning around a point in the southern part of the world? I can understand why the stars would spin in the northern part of the flat earth model, that does make sense, but this shouldn't be replicated in the south.
>>42732301>There's been a flat earth model in every culture for 10,000 years.Then post one. How does it work? How does it explain amd predict observed phenomena?
>>42732303>Depends on how fast the train is going.It doesn't. You just don't fly back unless the train suddenly accelerates while you're in the air.
>>42732794They won't explain it because they have no model capable of explaining it.
>>42705015No it’s not, and as long as you’re still gathering and admiring silly drawing of little anime girls you will always stay the same outcast social reject that you always have been. People treat you with no respect and are rightfully stomp you down in every social situations. Girls can sense you’re weirdo fantasy’s from miles away and you will feel their disgust for you every day. You will be reminded every day that something is very wrong with you and your little fantasy world will never become reality. You’re a looser. You always was a looser and you will probably always stay a looser. Life’s not easy. There are a lot of ropes in your local home-depot though
>>42732363>This guy said on national TV that he flew into the open hole at the North Pole. Landed, talked with the people of the inner world and then returned.this came from his supposed leaked diary, as far as i know he didnt say it on tv, if he did i need to see it.picrel, antarctica as most have never seen, ice caps are melting bro's.
>>42732871NASA uses computers to calculate eclipses but still checks against the Ancient Saros cycle to see if they are correct. But with NASA - there is Never A Straight, Answer.
FUCK science. unironically for faggots
>>42680289There was a book written in 1798 or so that detailed a judeomasonic conspiracy within the IS govt. >Proofs of a Conspiracy - John Robison.
>>42666419If this is the earth... why is there this big empty mass of ice?
>>42734710>please post a flat earth model that works consistently>NASA is shady! BOOOOOYeah, it really sucks to not get a straight answer from people.
>>42690373>Why is there a map of the North Pole and Antarctica from 1531?So that’s how you spell Antarctica? -> Terra Australis. Because that is exactly how it appears on the map.I have to admit, this drawing looks very similar to an ice-free Antarctica, and there is a very old map by Piri Reis that has to be classified as an "out-of-place artifact."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Out-of-place_artifact
>>42736958>Terra AustralisA name used both for Australia before it was colonized, and Antarctica.But surely you know that, and wouldnt be dishonestly confusing the two.
Personally, i dont get why white people are so rebuttal about the flat Earth (to the point the CIA used it in their psyops) thing when the Bible explicity says how it was created in first place, but totally trust Satan's poorly greenscreen and C movie tier recordings of space stations/planet penis exploration.Shouldnt be science about understanding God's nature and not viceversa?
The Icewall is not to keep us in , but to keep a global threat OUT.my theory at least
>>42666419>that picwho's fishing usWho's killing us, robbing us of life and light, mocking us with the sight of what we might've known?
Get in here>>539687784 Highly relevant thread>>539687784 Come take a look
>>42737157>the Bible explicity saysWhy do you trust a book written by ancient goatfuckers over what your eyes tell you?
>>42666499THERMOTRVKLEAR BOMBnow watch as the glowies swarm in because they don't want you to know you can just dig your way into the hollow earth
>>42737111>>Terra Australis>A name used both for Australia (...) and Antarctica.>(...) confusing the two.Shalom, not even your people's ancestors would be stupid enough to colonize the South Pole because they couldn't find Australia.
>>42739412>confusing the twoThe only person doing that appears to be flerfers.
These threads always get boring near the end when the flerfers stop posting because they've been thoroughly btfod.
How is our region of the ice globe warm according to this fucking stupid conjecture?
>>42666419
>>42706979yes, jewish vapor canopy and nephilim lore are a fun dungeons and dragons LARP that everyone on tiktok is going along with
Flat earth is literally a psyop to distract from hollow earth because they’re afraid of you finding out that’s where the aryans went. Flat earth content creators are federal agents.
>>42666419has anyone ever remote viewed the ice wall?
>>42673785>Swicherland
>>42749395it's actually the oppositeit's actually where they came from
>>42751447>has anyone ever remote viewed the ice wall?dont need to, we have pictures of it now apparently came from some email leak or some shit, i posted them up top>>42734669
>>42752418>dont need to,I wanna know what could lie beyond just the wall itself
you make creationists look intelligent
>>42752547it's quite odd that the people who can remote view never talk about it. So it's either nothing or there a government astral agents who track anyone down and silence them.
>>42753613You mean people who claim to be able to remote view. People who can remote view don't exist.
>>42753613It's almost like remote viewing is bullshit and there is no ice wall. That's certainly more likely than the CIA having billions of remote viewing agents covering the entire perimeter, who somehow have never leaked anything.
>>42666666
>>42710847It's a lot easier to tell people to set an antenna up for their TV and then ask them how they are able to pickup farther stations the higher they place the antenna on their house. Your gay ass experiment just deters flat earthers because it uses math they don't understand and assumes they have friends that can help.
>>42732303>These are the retards I wanted my time arguing withMan, just fucking end my life
>>42666744>700miles Brah what kinda retarded imagine is that
https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/for-kids-and-students/what-is-earth-grades-5-8/it's round frens.
>>42754367Sure - you are the one that used to suggest people use radios in vans and drive away from each other, yes?I think you get a lot of "you can get signal much further than you should be able to" because they want to ignore bouncing off the ionosphere, but I agree it is an excellent method to detect the curve if done with sincere people.One way to defeat that counter is to also get directional detection to see where the signal comes from, but that starts getting into tech too expensive/complex for the average flerfer.> it uses mathI dont think so. the most math it uses is figuring out what the angles are, and noticing that the angles get acute more rapidly on a sphere than they do on a plane.Or they can just make a picture of all the lines of sight and see which one has them all pointing in the same direction - but that would take an even GREATER area of sighting.
>>42752547in the pic with the chopper, assuming its flying at 30,000ft it would put the wall at around 10,000ft, assuming its flying at 15,000ft the wall is around 5,000ft,in the pic with the plane wing it show the wall, but looks like solid ground at the base rather than sea, so there could be a 5,000ft ice wall then another wall further back.either one would align with what admiral byrd said. as for whats beyond, there was a video of a guy that would paint galaxy/stars/planets for nasa, and some and he got some info from some people in the know.it goes on for some time, eventually you lose GPS, and if you dont die you will reach the edge of the dome, some of the A-bomb tests were from trying to blast a hole in it.theres also a greentext thread where a guy claimed to travel with a convoy across the ice to end up here in a mirrored version of his earth.also can anyone use Ai to guage the height of the wall compared to the size of the chopper?
>>42755640>the chopper, assuming its flying at 30,000ft>chopper>flying at 30,000ft>chopper>30,000ftflerfers, everyoneCare to explain why the chopper would just casually be achieving a top three world record for highest possible elevation a helicopter can go, and what sort of specialized engineering they put on there?
>>42666666Numbers don't lie. I'm now an Ice Fishing Hole Earth believer
>>42758914i said assuming.for a start turbine military/performance choppers can fly at 30-40,000ft, you wouldnt be flying your everyday chopper in an antarctic environment.also weather, altitude/air density plays a part.
>>42759359>i said assuming.Yes, it was very retarded.>turbine military/performance choppers can fly at 30-40,000ftWhich one is that, in the picture? Which military models are you talking about that fly at those elevations?>also weather, altitude/air density plays a part.No, the fact the the vast vast majority of helicopters arent pressurized plays a much bigger factor. Even those that are have top elevations of around 15,000ft.Where density plays a part is that fact that unless you have specialized rotors, the air itself isnt thick enough to generate the needed lift.
