Christians want to be assimilated into the Borg. It makes me sick.
>>42687746Yeah they're gay as fuck. A male christians marriage to his wife is also removed so he's "single" and only married to God lmao
>>42687746Mormons are alright, but yeah, Dionysian Hellenism is the way to go tbdesu
The cube must be destroyed. And not metaphorically, but literally. Well, maybe metaphorically as well.>Grok, can you please email printable instructions on how to destroy the cube at a quantum level so that it can never be reformed, and in such a terrible way that even the witnesses blanch.
>>42687821Dionysian Hellenism is the gayest larp happening right now and infested with trannies. Let me guess, youre enby autistic pansexual, unemployable, and do all your socializing on discord
>>42687746you wish to be seen as better than others that you'll stoop to any sin in order to continue judging
>>42687837Christian priests literally fuck male kids and don't marry women because they love JESUS (man) so much. Nothing is more gay than this shit.
>>42687746How many threads are you going to make about this? You know cubes exist in other places besides Star Trek, right?
>>42687842I am better than people who justify atrocity because "god" condones it, yes.
>>42687854>You know cubes exist in other places besides Star Trek, right?No shit, idiot. I'm saying, *why* are borg ships cubic in shape? I'm not saying the borg is literally real, I'm saying its based on the god of abraham Isaac and Jacob
>>42687844On the gay and cringe scale pdfs are way less gay and cringey than autistic trannies larping as hellenes.
>>42687824The Cube of Satyr?The goatman cube?This cube?Why half of this board is afraid of satyrs?
>>42687906Being mind raped by TikTok to the point that you call pedophiles "pdfs" is a million times gayer than both, you should kill yourself so no one ever needs to hear your opinions again.
>>42687930missed opportunity to tell him he should "unalive" himself
>>42687746>borgtake you lame gay hollywood crap out of here
>>42687746Don't forget about constant singing to the Big Jew how awesome he is to not be burn alive.>This feeling when deity is so unlikable that it needs to blackmail followers with eternal tortures to force them to love it.Sick shit.I hate "Stick in butt religions".
>>42687940brown
>>42687930Lol this a special brand of tranny seethe. You realize your emotional instability gives you away immediately? You'll never be a woman.
>>42687990>trannies trannies trannies trannies trannies trannies
>>42687949>randomly defending hollywood>everything is brownwell Shalom rabbi
Don't forget hellraiser where the golden cube(clearly a nod to the new jerusalaem) is an endless horrible hell maze whose inhabitants crave pain and suffering.
Don't forget that the cube comes down only after "Satan" has gathered a massive sacrifice(billions) of people for it to be sacrificed by fire.
Aren't pneumatics equally as cucked? Seems like psychics are the only ones who would have a decent deal.
>>42687746>reeeee I hate sharing so much, it's not enough that I have everything, you must also be separate, have nothing and be my enemy and lose.... rèeeeeeeeeeWhats wrong with being part of the mentally high on love amalgamation that can think/imagine/create at a speed you can't comprehend that knows everything there is to know and just chills in bliss having any and every possible positive experience you could think of all at once?Just don't like it because there isn't someone getting tortured by your hand to scape goat and make lesser, more stupid, less capable, more ignorant, more helpless? Or is it another reason?
>>42688203if you only feel "love" you actually stop feeling anything at one point because you forget what hate is. you need polarity to truly appreciate either of those feelings.also if you are a hive mind you are not yourself anymore. sorry but I don't went john braincell #45621 moving my body or telling me what to do. if you ever went out of your basement you'd find out how retarded the average person is and oh boy I want nothing to do with such retards and especially not the elites
>>42687837>Let me guess, youre enby autistic pansexual, unemployable, and do all your socializing on discordNo, no, and no. I was thinking of starting mine own cult and calling it the Cult of Dionysus of Latter-day Heroes
>>42687990you can't even say pedophile
>>42687746>(thing) is just like this thing from pop culture!Monstrously gay
>>42687902Because they wanted a unique ship that had no distinct sides to show how collectivized the Borg are. It's an artistic choice for a fictional TV show. Obviously an artistic choice for a fictional space cyborg race is not related to the holy vessel of the Lord of Lord's.You've clearly watched too much Star Trek, and this is coming from a hardcore trekkie. For God's sake, one of the key aspects of Christianity is that God gave us free will.
Low iq gnostic trannytard thread
>>42688869>he doesn't know gene roddenberry channeled the inspiration for star trek from actual aliens
I am projected by the Spirit from the Tree.
>>42687746that's because you are evil and we are good. we have nothing to fear inside the cube!
>>42688869There is an orchestrated effort to demonize pyramid / cube stuff throughout all of media. There is a Tom Cruise movie called Oblivion where the world's energy is being siphoned by some pyramid shaped entity in the sky and it ends with Cruise destroying it as the "hero". There is an orchestrated effort in media. What I wonder is whether or not the cube / pyramid will actually be from God or Satan. Our pop culture is controlled by Satanists, so are they trying to brainwash people into thinking the cube / pyramid is evil to make people attack it, fulfilling the battle of Armageddon where the Antichrist and his follows gather to fight Christ at his Second Coming, or is the demonizing of the pyramid / cube a double bluff from Satan. Is it the Antichrist / Satan's arrival that will be with this cube / pyramid structure? In that case Satan would be demonizing his own / the Antichrist's arrival in an attempt make them appear as heroes when they expose the deception.The thing, the Bible doesn't mention New Jerusalem whatsoever during the tribulation, it only descends from the heavens at the end of Christ's millennial reign once God has destroyed and created the earth anew. Not to mention it is New Agers who keep insinuating we must fight against such a thing, and I think New Agers are silly puppets Satan will dispose of once they've outlived their usefulness. I don't see New Agers being part of Satan's deception, or at least, they only exist to be killed so Satan can paint himself as a hero. It is the Antichrist who claims to be God, not us, so it seems unlikely the Antichrist would be pro-New Age.
>>42689273the world is flat, calling it a ball is Baal work. Sacrifice the fetus! Worship the ball, worship BAAL! They would stand outside staring up at the sun until their eyes milked over blind as a bat but said they could finally see the light inside the light and would promptly die of thirst on purpose. Absolutely mental.No the world is flat and everything you are matters bro!
>>42689290I'm aware it's flat, the Bible says so.
the weakness are the corners
I just want my own planet to rule over as a mostly benevolent demon
>>42687746so if not christian what should one be?
>>42689791>please someone tell me what I should be, I'm retarded and can't live my own life
>>42689791Every religion is evil but also secretly teaches the truth, that is, if you know how to read their material(i.e. the entire old testament is both a literal history and a brilliant compilation of case studies on states of consciousness). And the truth is that the only valid spiritual path is to connect with the divine within you, it will guide you from there. Following any religion as is will lead you to zodiac worship, and I mean ANY religion.
ITT hurr durr
>>42690006Contribute or don’t post
>>42687821>Dionysian HellenismWtf is that?
>>42690065earthly folly. drugs, sex, money. pretending orgasms are spiritual.
>>42689791Be yourself, not a follower of any religion or ideology. Examine every claim or belief you hear individually, and use your critical thinking and intuition to determine if it's true. There is some truth and some lies in every belief system, including Christianity.
>>42690015>Hur dur religion bad god bad secular humanism good Happy?
>religion bad god bad secular humanism good
>>42688310>if you only feel "love" you actually stop feeling anything at one point because you forget what hate is.False premises, if one feels a ''something'' than that something is what they feel. Also the idea that the absence of a feeling causes a lack of understanding or lack of feeling is also not necessarily true. I don't need to be raped by my father and all my uncles in a giant gang bang line as a child to understand I would not like this event to happen in my life. Also, I am capable of enjoying my life after not being raped, and be happier for it, still directly ignorant of the exact experience by directly experiencing it. Likewise, a drug addict can likely tell the first hit of crack cocaine feels great without ever having experienced it before, and if there were no reference experience to contrast it, they would likely still enjoy the experience. Alternatively a baby before it has ever experienced heat will immediately take it's hand off something hot if it burns it's self without the experience to know to do that, it will almost certainly begin to cry. Simply because you do not have a reference does not make the unpleasant, pleasant and the pleasant unpleasant when it comes to ''feel''. This is a false context as far as I can tell. Not only this but how you know, how you reference and how you utilize memory can be altered or changed from state, making this relative to how perception is formed in the first place. >also if you are a hive mind you are not yourself anymoreTrue, but is the self real in the first place? You also moving through life are not the same self you were a moment ago. What frame of reference equates to a true form of death? An ego death? A physical death? A total eradication of memory as a human would understand it? A true loss of the ability to experience? What if the experience and how it function simply shifts to a separate context? Still you? Not you?
>>42689791You think belief is some fun little whimsical goofball silly willy billly type of cream soft haha LOL type of thing?! We live in a very specifically crafted reality. You either feed this reality with your soul or you learn what it's teaching you and leave. Which means there's only one true spiritual path.
>>42690065Hellenic Polytheism with an emphasis on Dionysus
>>42688163>Don't forget that the cube comes down only after "Satan" has gathered a massive sacrifice(billions) of people for it to be sacrificed by fire.STOP NOTICING
>>42690103Don’t post if you have nothing to contribute, obviously.
>>42690085Orgasmss are spiritual tho
>>42690452Love is spiritual.
>>42690452##They are a 100% corporeal phenomena. The flash fire of the flesh. To romanticize it beyond that is to simply degrade your definition of what is spiritual. >>42690466##Love is an opinion. Outside of material reality or physical insecurity what even is if?
>>42687746>muh christiansgrow the fuck up
>>42690570Love isn’t an opinion. To us, it’s an abstract construct, but it represents a divine truth. Picrel. Orgasms can be part of the expression of love.For comparison, nourishment is an abstract construct. Fruit has sugar in it, which tastes sweet, but the nourishment of fruit is what’s important.Love is spiritually nourishing.Orgasms are an earthly delight, like sugar.
>>42688163Yep.
>>42690608##To “us”? What do you mean to “us”?A divine truth? What does that even mean?Nourishment is not an abstract concept retard. It’s an artificial biological insecurity that exploits people into taking artificial resource scarcity seriously. It’s a humiliation to need. If you “need” organisms to nourish you there is something empty inside you sex will never fill. You just become dependant upon the flesh. Like I’ve said all you’ve done is degenerate your definition of what is divine or good to the point where you’re glamorizing sec and a need for food. Stupid fucking slut.
>>42690621>To “us”? What do you mean to “us”?humans >A divine truth? What does that even mean?The information that reality is projected from>Nourishment is not an abstract concept retard.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstraction>It’s an artificial biological insecurity that exploits people into taking artificial resource scarcity seriously. It’s a humiliation to need.Only if you have an ego. Our body is a part of a larger whole. To be clear, I only brought up nourishment and sugar as a analogy to explain why love is different than an orgasm.>If you “need” organisms to nourish you there is something empty inside you sex will never fill. You just become dependant upon the flesh.The spiritual is the exact opposite of the material. You have inverted and misrepresented my views and are tilting at a phantom of your own creation. You are correct, though: love fills you, sex does not.>Like I’ve said all you’ve done is degenerate your definition of what is divine or good to the point where you’re glamorizing sec and a need for food.Again, that is the complete opposite of what I’ve said. You’re talking to a phantom, not me. The divine and spiritual is not the material or worldly.
>>42690819(Continued) I think I’ve discovered the issue. You’ve misread this post of mine: >>42690608Sugar is sweet, but the taste of sweetness isn’t nourishing.Likewise, orgasms feel nice, but they aren’t love.As it stands, your post completely inverted that. You thought that I was saying orgasms and earthly delights are a spiritual thing in and of themselves, when I’m arguing AGAINST.Remember, my original post said, “Love is spiritual.” How you twisted that into me saying I’m “glamorizing sec [sic] and a need for food” is honestly shocking, even for 4chan.
>>42689273>defending hexagonShalom.Cube is evil shape because its 3d hexagon, a shape of saturn north pole.
>>42690907Oh shit, a shape? On a PLANET?! Must be evil.
>>42690570>They are a 100% corporeal phenomena. The flash fire of the flesh. To romanticize it beyond that is to simply degrade your definition of what is spiritual.Pretty much all magickal systems agree with me
>>426881631.9 billion Muslims.1.4 billion Catholics.
>>42690578>grow the fuck up and stop caring about this giant cult that is in all western nations and influences politics
>>42690819##To say for “us” implies it is of a different nature for different beings. It would be a universal thing so right off the bat it’s all fucked. The “information” reality is “projected” from. Meaningless poetics. You identify with your body as a part of your true identity. You identify with the flesh. You go in to babble that orgasm is an expression of the spiritual “love” but the at the spiritual is not the material etc etc. you’re just a fucking clown. You can’t even go two sentences without contradicting yourself three times. I’m not inverting or misunderstanding or misrepresenting you. You’re a materialist whore who seeks to apply a poetic layer of depth to their own hedonism. Stupid bitch.
>>42687746No the cross is an open box. Symbolizing freedom from the box Jews are in.
>>42687746Nigga the fuck you talking about.Same as Hindus and Buddhists and Muslims becoming “one” with creator universe etc is the main goalIt’s like mommy forced you to go church too much and now you have some chip on your shoulders specifically against Christianity
>>42691521You’re just misreading everything. Or maybe I’m bad at communicating. Either way, since you aren’t talking to or about me, this will be my last reply.
>>42691521Changed my mind because I’m bored. I will reply to you.>To say for “us” implies it is of a different nature for different beings. It would be a universal thing“Universal” smuggles in an anthropic perspective. Reality isn’t what we see. For proof, study quantum mechanics. By spiritual, I am talking about that which resides in the immaterial essence of reality, not the material universe. I am not talking about entities in a religious realm. I am talking about truth that exists outside of material reality (see: math, linguistics).>The “information” reality is “projected” from. Meaningless poetics.Here is the definition of a word: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/metaphysicsHere is a scientific theory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle>You identify with the flesh.No. I identify with spirit. That has been my explicit message since my first run-in with you.>You go in to babble that orgasm is an expression of the spiritual “love”No. Everything you just said is your misinterpretation of my “poetics.” I said that orgasm is material and love is spiritual. Tasting sugar is material and nourishment is immaterial.You are tilting at windmills here, Don.>you’re just a fucking clown.You are wrong and arrogant. You deflect from an inability to abstractly reason given my text with the word “poetics.” I’ll be charitable and assume there’s a language barrier here.>You can’t even go two sentences without contradicting yourself three times.I have not contradicted myself.>I’m not inverting or misunderstanding or misrepresentingYes, you are. If I called you a Jeet, that would be me baselessly misrepresenting you. That is exactly what is happening here. I am telling you that you have misread my words. I suspect English is your second language, so I’m holding back the insults you probably deserve.>You’re a materialist whore.. Stupid bitch.Humble yourself.
>>42691773##And again contradicting yourself you open by swearing that orgasms and fucking are part of “immaterial truths”. What’s universal is universal. Your babbling word salad means nothing. Again your “projected reality” is a materialist paradigm. A fork via matter of info and data. And you identify with your body as a vital part of your “spiritual identity”. Again all you do is demonstrate a mutilated barrier between the flesh and spirit. You don’t even pay attention to what you said and are just lying at this point hedonist trash. I can tell when someone is using word salad and pretty language to confuse the audience and possibly themselves into a bullshit position. You are a materialist idiot. U like calling me a jeet I gave reason to call you such. You swear you identify with spirit but say you physical body is a part of your identity or whole. Then you say orgasms with your body are a non material expression of truth. Then you say truth is a physical expression of projected matter. You’re just a braindead idiot and if you’re telling me to humble myself you’re just broadcasting insecurity.
>>42691888I never said orgasm is immaterial truth.I never said truth is a physical expression.I never said the body is part of spiritual identity.I never said projected reality is materialist.I never said orgasm is non‑material truth.I never said truth is matter.
>>42691949##You’re one of the followingA complete deranged liar (less likely)So stupid you can’t even keep track of the bullshit coming out of your mouth or going through your head and have confused yourself into your pathetic and swinish muddle of a belief system. (More likely).
>>42691971You’re reacting to a version of my position that doesn’t match what I’ve actually said.I’m not trying to deceive you. I’m trying to explain my view clearly.If you want to continue, I need you to quote the exact sentence where you believe I said the things you’re accusing me of.Once you show me the specific line, I can explain what I meant.If you can’t show the line, then we’re arguing with a misunderstanding instead of each other.
>>42691993##Moron you’re just a bad faith actor full of contradictions and double speak. I don’t have to repeat the nonsense you’ve said. You’ve said it once you’ll just deny and obfuscate it again. It’s all there already. You’re just a hedonist and materialist tool who wanted to give themselves a layer of depth they didn’t deserve and that you weren’t capable of constructing soundly.
>>42692009Is this quote from me that’s hanging you up:>Orgasms can be part of the expression of love.I can see how that might be read as materialist/hedonistic, but the whole point of that line and my sugar analogy was that orgasms are incidental to the pursuit of love. How they physically feel is irrelevant to spirituality because I am the polar opposite of a hedonist. I seek love in the abstract, which is spiritual, over orgasms, which are of the flesh.Ironically, I see a statement like “orgasms are spiritual” (which is a quote from you) as hedonism. It glorifies an earthly pleasure, no? Perhaps I’m misunderstanding exactly what you meant by spiritual in that context. What is your worldview such that earthly pleasure is spiritual? How is that not hedonism?
