Why is there a verse from The Bhagavad Gita in the orgy scene?
Many questions about this film and that's the one you chose?
>>42741950Yes
When/where in the movie is the verse?
>>42741986during the masked ball/orgy (ritual) sequence at the Somerton mansion.The verse is from the Bhagavad Gita (Chapter 4, Verse 8):paritrāṇāya sādhūnāṁ vināśāya ca duṣkṛtāmdharma-saṁsthāpanārthāya sambhavāmi yuge yuge
>>42742006I thought they cut it after the theatrical version? Do you have a scene? I haven't seen it myself, but Jason Jorjani always goes on about how he saw it in the theatres then couldn't track down a version with that soundtrack again.
On the censorship of Stanley Kubrick's final film "Eyes Wide Shut" and the unexpected link it has to the Bhagavad Gita.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7no7PchUPPg
>>42742052The chant was included in the original Jocelyn Pook music piece before it was selected by Kubrick for the movie, was it not? I wouldn't over-analyze the meaning of the Baghdavad Gita chant in the piece from Kubrick's perspective, and I think the removal from the movie was just Warner Bros being politically correct. Weak move but I don't see a huge conspiracy.
>>42742101That's because you're a normiegroid trained to normalise anything that makes you slightly question your preconceptions or uncomfortable. Jason is a total subversive, an inverted freak, but at least he isn't a normiegroid like you. Why do bluepilled faggots like you even show up in /x/ and leave these cringe posts?
>>42742175I saw the film opening day in theater back in 1999. The removal of the original hindu chant has very little impact on the movie. It's exotic music for western ears.
>>42742253>nooooo a highly meticulous and technical director couldn't have offered any subtext noooo DEMORALISE DEMORALISE SHUT IT DOWWWN DAMAGE CONTROLOk I apologise for posting in a thread on /x/ and not having a normie take. Next time I'll wear sunglasses from all the glow.
>>42742258Like I said, the inclusion of the hindu chant was by Jocelyn Pook in 1997 for one of her own albums that had nothing to do with Eyes Wide Shut. I'm sure Kubrick would have been disappointed by the removal of the original track by Warner bros, but I think he selected the track for the mood overall, not the specific chant or religious quote, which I doubt he or 99.9% of american audiences would be able to identify if it wasn't first pointed out.
>>42742288You know, I think I misread the name of this board when I clicked it today. I thought I was on /x/, the Paranormal board.
>>42742338No you're fine, this is the right place for schizo meltdowns.
>>42742347>No you're fine, this is the right place for schizo meltdowns.
>>42741944Minds Narrowly Open
>>42741986It's the second piece used for the orgy scene when Bill is walking around watching people fuck, not the music that plays in the big room for the ritual with Red Cloak. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFHJO2xXzKY
>>42742338you cant actually talk about paranormal stuff on here because the larpers and self-proclaimed experts ruin every fucking thread
>>42742006>>42742387https://www.holy-bhagavad-gita.org/chapter/4/verse/8/>"To protect the righteous, to annihilate the wicked, and to reestablish the principles of dharma I appear on this earth, age after age."
>>42742288>Source: my assAccess method: pulled out of
>>42742560This is the "censored" version of the eyes wide shut scene: https://vimeo.com/811760118 (starts at 7:42)this is, as far as I know, the original track from the EWS soundtrack with the verse included: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zrWvbGw6f8The original mix from the 1997 Jocelyn Pook album: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFHJO2xXzKYYou tell me if you'd notice the difference if you weren't aware of the controversy beforehand. Or if you can locate at which point of the track the removed verses appear doing an A/B comparison.
>>42742560https://jonopstad.medium.com/a-conversation-with-jocelyn-pook-on-eyes-wide-shut-2fe875eeab3c
>>42742483well....that's the dawning of the age of aquariusbut do you think youre part of the good guys or the baddies?
>>42742258>>nooooo a highly meticulous and technical director couldn't have offered any subtext noooo DEMORALISE DEMORALISE SHUT IT DOWWWN DAMAGE CONTROLhttps://www.indiewire.com/features/general/martin-scorsese-stanley-kubrick-eyes-wide-shut-orgy-music-1202154469/
>>42742288>In the end, the Kubrick family felt rather uncomfortable about it, and they recalled all the films and I had to rerecord it again with a different vocal. It was an expensive mess-up. - Jocelyn Pookhttps://www.indiewire.com/features/general/martin-scorsese-stanley-kubrick-eyes-wide-shut-orgy-music-1202154469/
>>42742785I guess it could go both ways. It sounds like it was placed there to describe the cult and their POV but I suppose Kubrick could've been using it as some taunt against them.
>>42741950What's a better question about the film that you hold than the one OP asked?
>>42742616>>42742690Wow, even more absolutely no evidence that Kubrick didn't intentionally use that music for a specific reason. Good job proving absolutely nothing tho.
>>42741944I can't tell you because my mouth is hermetically sealed open.
>>42743296
>>42741944Because the movie is demonic and so is that book
>>42743296https://cnmsarchive.wordpress.com/2013/06/23/jocelyn-pook-on-eyes-wide-shut/
>>42743296because putting a verse from the talmud or bible might be too on the noseall these secret societies worship yaldabaoth. for increasing human ignorance and suffering and loosh they get rewarded with material and power
https://www.dazeddigital.com/music/article/41996/1/eyes-wide-shut-stanley-kubrick-soundtrack-jocelyn-pook-interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82XqhHYwB-Q&list=RD82XqhHYwB-Q&start_radio=1&pp=ygUXdG9vbCBkaWUgZWllciB2b24gc2F0YW6gBwE%3D
>>42743296What would be the reason to put that verse? Are they implying that Krisha is okay with those acts or is it more to mock him?
>>42741944Boomers have no soul so they gravitate to exotic spirituality to fill the void. That’s why so many of them got scammed into meeting gurus.
>>42743839Krishna would approve!!He hid in tree and stole the gopis clothes.Hiding is the mask, and the young gopis is also self-evident
>>42741950It is a poop colored person anon, what did you expect.
>>42742006I thought that a Gregorian monk chant played in reverse, you know to mock God.
>>42743929Oh yeah, it was a romanian orthodox chant played backwards but that was in the ceremony scene, the Bhagavad Gita verse was in the orgy which happened a bit later
>>42743897That made me question Krishna's nature, after reading the Bhagavad Gita I thought it was another message from God manifesting in Hindu culture but the underwear stuff is something that makes me question the whole thing
>>42743966No you should no question krishnaquestion those that question krishnaIt is universal trueThe elite of society are always brahmin and will follow krishna
thread reminder that kubrick was good friends with arthur clarke,famous homo weirdo writer
>>42743966The hindu gods enjoy their lila most of all
>>42742690>>42742806>>42743437>>42743446>>42743472>>42743492freak status: bodied completely in mind, flesh and soul. i'm glad there's at least one other not retard here capable of some basic analysis and research.
>>42744321He's now reborn as an even worse freak with infinite negative karma.
>>42744321>normiegroid wikipedia analysis and pop culture hearsay housewife articles prove my normiegroid thesis. nothing exists. /x/ paranormal has been deboooonkedbzzz bzzz whirrrrrrrrrrrrr mcwest npc
>>42744434being an obnoxious schizo is not really how you validate, verify, or analyze things. skepticism is cool. being a feels driven moron is not.
how is this movie paranormal btw? after watching it its just about tptb, nothing paranormal in it.
>>42743973thread reminder that OP confirms tptb are elite reincarnating Babylonian wizards whether Kubrick put it there or not and the shills are scrambling.
>>42744621nothing in this movie shows anything about reincarnation
>>42744574>being an obnoxious schizo is not really how you validate, verify, or analyze things. skepticism is cool. being a feels driven moron is not.>PARANORMAL
>>42742806>debaucherous scene featuring extremely degenerate shit>song called DionysiusKek
P O O K OOK
>>42743839Juxtaposition.You can infer that the demons in the scene don't know what the verse means, that it just sounds sexy to them and that they thus don't realise they're sex magicking their own obliteration into being.Could also interpret it as them knowing what it means and being degenerate in defiance.It's a bit similar to Oppenheimer's quote: "I am become death, destroyer of worlds".Here's the actual context.>Your fierce splendours, O Vishnu! filling the whole universe with (their) effulgence, are heating it. Tell me who you are in this fierce form. Salutations be to thee, O chief of the gods! Be gracious. I wish to know you, the primeval, one, for I do not understand your actions.>The Deity said:>I am death, the destroyer of the worlds, fully developed, and I am now active about the overthrow of the worlds.>Even without you, the warriors standing in the adverse hosts, shall all cease to be.>Therefore, be up, obtain glory, and vanquishing (your) foes, enjoy a prosperous kingdom. All these have been already killed by me.>Be only the instrument, O Savyasâkin! Drona, and Bhîshma, and Gayadratha, and Karna, and likewise other valiant warriors also, whom I have killed, do you kill. Be not alarmed. Do fight. And in the battle you will conquer your foes.It relates to the EWS verse.Vishnu being the ultimate destroyer of evils.Oppenheimer didn't say the US became the destroyer of worlds.It referenced the story where, in a modern sense, God will destroy the US for what it did.Just like God will destroy the demons in the orgy, which Kubrick knew.One way or another, a force will come and vanquish evil.
>>42743970It's never bad to ask questions.The Bhagavad Gita is nothing less than a series of questions merrily answered.
>elites meet up and have sex with each other cause bored>schizos think its paranormal and think they are being reincarnatedso rich people aren't allowed to have mass gatherings to have sex with each other now in secrecy? ya'll confuse me.
>>42744633>nothing in this movie shows anything about reincarnationYeah it does silly,>I appear on this earth, age after ageNo wonder the AI was telling people tptb reincarnated it's basically a meme at this point. Matt Groening disclosed a sex cult full of advisors to medieval kings in his fantasy series. Looks like it's always been around huh?https://youtu.be/oZfjg_hyJ2U
>>42744722sex cult means anyone can join it not just people with money, which in this movie shows thats not the case. It literally is just rich people larping cause of them being bored and not having anything better to do with there billions of dollars. I am by no means a rich person but even I can see thats all this is.
>>42744733Yes that's what the Disenchantment cult was, only the courtiers of the kings+ the "advised" i.e. controlled. The initial joke in season 1 was something like orgy first geopolitical debates second.
>>42744751ok so then you see that its just people who are bored. Again not paranormal.
>>42743897No, He wouldn't. A king does not agree that everyone gets to enjoy the way the king does. Satanists are the ones who see God and think "that should be me.">>42743966It is simple. Krishna is Supreme and not bound by rules. You are not Supreme, and so you are.Krishna says in the Gita that he is sex in accordance to principle.Krishna also is a rascal that steals other mens' wives.Because technically the wives and the men always and only belong to Krishna.>>42744680But that isn't the context. You just quoted verses that are seven chapters later.The context is Arjuna asking how can it be possible for Krishna to have taught ancient kings what He was telling Arjuna.>>42744686Indeed. And unlike so many other holy books, the last thing Krishna says is "I have told you everything, now go do what YOU THINK is right."
>>42744758A pitiful reframe, 1/10 please report to nearest superior for immediate recommission.Lol no /x/ has been talking about tptb's sex cult for a decade+ I think it's pretty paranormal my guy.https://youtu.be/UwXQA_X4Obo
>>42744794its literally not, its just virgins wishing they could join in on the orgy.
>>42744783I quoted a verse that's misunderstood by most people as another example of demons getting it wrong.The rest of the citations show what that specific destroyer of worlds verse actually means.It's in line with EWS being full of references that most people, even demonic people, simply don't understand.
>>42744811in fact the reason i know its virgins is because of the succubus general that is ALWAYS fucking flooded with em on /x/
>ignore he was friend with infamous homosexual arthur c clarke,kubrick was a good boy,he dindu nuffin!
>>42744826what does being gay have to do with anything? lmfao
>>42744783>Krishna also is a rascal that steals other mens' wives.>Because technically the wives and the men always and only belong to Krishna.Does Krishna have sex with them? Why would a supreme being feel pleasure by imposing his hedonistic pursues over the romantic relationship between two people?
>>42744811>>42744820Okay that's a cool theory but it's not really practical to other anons. I mean yes I agree most anons only hate tptb because they ate enough pomegranate to feel left out of the shadow play, but people like Kubrick or Groening had/have obvious access to elite circles (at least in Hollywood) so your theory doesn't really apply outside of 4chan.
>>42744838>Does Krishna have sex with themNot in the limited way you think. It really can't be understood by anyone with lust and/or envy, that includes me.>Why would a supreme being feel pleasureBecause that's the point of literally everything, including those hating and rebelling against God.More specifically - the reason is to fulfill the desires of His devotees.That's the ONLY thing that God enjoys, serving those that love Him.None of this will make sense until you stop trying to control Krishna, which includes demanding He "make sense", and fit into mental notions of logic.An admittedly impossible task unless and until one begins devotion.
>>42744875of course they have access, kubrick and Groening are fucking rich, are you kidding me? You're still not proving anything with this. These people have fuck you money for days.
>>42744894Okay faggot you went from >its just people who are boredto>of course they have accessWhich one is it?
>>42744907so you're telling me that kubrick and groening aren't rich and they shouldn't have access? Since when has anyone who directs or is a screen writer the same as me or you? Of course they're fucking bored and part of the elite. What is your point? I am confused, do you think that Groening and kubrick are poor and struggling?
>>42744891Do you think there's a connection between Jesus and Krishna?
>>42744918ok well kubrick was rich, i didn't realize he died in 1999.
>>42744918Lol no I'm just saying you're moving the goalposts on why you started out denying there's a reincarnating sex cult. Now you're not even denying it (because you can't) you're just moving the goalposts to salvage face.
>>42744929Yes, in the other thread, I was the one saying Jesus is a sakti-avesh avatar.>>42744861
>>42744958what proof is there that they are reincarnating besides you retards saying it? All I said is they are having sex with each other cause they are bored and rich, I never said they are reincarnating, you did.
Satanists no matter what they call themselves they are Satanists at the end of the day they will fail the New World Order will exist but it will be short lived because Jesus Christ will defeat the Beast and the Dragon and all their followers you sacrifice people but God sacrificed his Son for our salvation
>>42744993Yes I did because it's already a meme around here lol, and here comes OP with lore about Kubrick's cult orgy scene referencing a Hindu script about reincarnating through the ages. It's not much of a jump, barely a hop.
>>42745024how is that proof?
>>42745035Lol where's the proof Epstein was diddling kids? That's not gonna work here my suspicious fren, this is /x/ the burden of proof is on you to prove there isn't an entrenched secret society having orgies through the ages. You cannot, it's why I'm feeding you (you's) while dropping anchors for the audience.
>>42745060ok even if it was true, who cares? they're having sex, oh boy. Also theres pleanty of proof epstein was diddling kids, wtf do you mean? There is no proof of reincarnation though.
>>42745074Eh, that just doesn't jive with some of us. It's also a common glowie tactic to delegitimize threads that redpill anons on tptb's existence much less their sexual proclivities or reincarnating empire. Seems to me like the moment some anons started translating OP others like you showed up to deny what it says, lol forgive me if I thought it sus.
>>42745060>Lol where's the proof Epstein was diddling kidsNTANo, where is the proof on the reincarnation part? This was a dishonest deflection.
>>42745121trust me if i was part of the elite trying to cover it up I wouldn't be on 4chan replying to you, i'd be having sex. I came into the thread last night watched the movie and then went to bed and replied today. I will say after watching the movie I did have a dream I was sucking my own dick so it def did make me have a strange dream, but i've had that dream before like years ago before watching this movie so I don't really chock that up to the movie.
>>42745130Nope that's the (((Snopes))) level tactic he's pulling, he demands proof of something that can't be proven. We know Epstein was diddling kids despite no official proof.
>>42745164i didn't say "prove reincarnation exists" all I said was there is no proof and you're pulling at strings, not to mention did you know that this movie was based off a story from 1926>The story is based on Arthur Schnitzler's 1926 Freudian novella Traumnovelle (Dream Story).So this whole thread is just debunked.
I dont want Satan New World Order i want the New Jerusalem of Jesus Christ you World Elite will be in the lake of lava and sulfur suffering forever and ever
>>42745182>So this whole thread is just debunked.Lol there it is. Damn I guess so whoops sorry guys.
>>42745207You got ya money- I got my share.
>>42745207>stanley read a story about elites having sex orgys and made am ovie about it>OMG ITS A SEX CULT AND THEY REINCARNATEI guess we should just take every single fucking story as fact at this point.That movie Toy Story, the fucking toys are coming to life IRL and we don't ever see it because they just do what they do in the movie when we try to see it.This is how stupid you all sound.
>>42745164So you have nothing to support the idea that the EWS scene using that verse meant the orgy was some reincarnation ritual.No one disagrees that Epstein raped kids, though you being coy about it being rape is nooticed.>>42745182Whether reincarnation exists is honestly tangential to the movie and whether IT says it's real and being portrayed.I would even agree the elite societies believe in it.I just dont think Kubrik was making that specific point and connection with the Gita.If he wanted that, there are MUCH better verses even in that chapter.4.5: The Supreme Person said: Many, many births both you and I have passed. I can remember all of them, but you cannot, O subduer of the enemy!>this whole thread is just debunkedNonsense. Book ain't the movie and has a different point. That's like saying Starship Troopers book being unironically pro-military means the movie can't be the obvious satire it is.
>>42745250>Rhapsody: A Dream Novel, also known as Dream Story (German: Traumnovelle), is a 1926 novella by the Austrian writer Arthur Schnitzler. The book deals with the thoughts and psychological transformations of Doctor Fridolin over a two-day period after his wife confesses having had sexual fantasies involving another man. In this short time, he meets many people who give clues to the world Schnitzler creates. This culminates in the masquerade ball, an event of masked identity, sex, and danger for Doctor Fridolin, the outsider.I'm confused at how people thought that this was an anything but fiction.
>>42745250Why do you think toys can't come to life when we are not looking? Do you think they just made up that story or that there are no case reports? Vile normalnigger?
>>42745313the book is the exact same as the movie, what do you mean? It has the same premise.
>>42745327I really hope this is a troll post.
>>42745332I mean the book is about antisemitism in Europe, and the movie is about secret societies controlling the world.The plots are basically the same, but I didnt say plot. I said point.The point of the movie is not the point of the book.
>>42745335>I really hope this is a troll post.
You are actually retarded.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dream_Story
>>42745392was meant for >>42745366
>>42745313Kek I'm sorry I didn't use the word rape anon, are you happy now.>If he wanted that, there are MUCH better verses even in that chapter.I dunno context kinda supports it. Chapter 4 of the Bhagavad Gita begins with Krishna teaching yoga to the sun god. Tptb's yoga is tantra, sex magic, I don't think they're normal orgies. So it quotes a chapter about Krishna teaching the sun god a special bodily magic, eventually Krishna says>"... the saintly kings thus received this science of Yog in a continuous tradition. But with the long passage of time, it was lost to the world."He says the kings of the world possessed this bodily-science for a long time but that he's come to reveal it again to Arjun son of Indra. As Krishna tells Arjun he is entrusting "the supreme secret" to him, Arjun wonders how Krishna knows this body-science or could have taught it to ancient kings. So Krishna says they each reincarnate and that's where the line in OP comes in.>"Whenever there is a decline in righteousness and an increase in unrighteousness, O Arjun, at that time I manifest Myself on earth. To protect the righteous, to annihilate the wicked, and to reestablish the principles of dharma I appear on this earth, age after age. Those who understand the divine nature of My birth and activities, O Arjun, upon leaving the body, do not have to take birth again, but come to My eternal abode."It sounds like a Hindu retelling of the Elysian fields and the Eleusinian mysteries. It's not just describing reincarnation it's describing kings practicing a secret science and who keep the knowledge by reincarnating like Vishnu, like the gods.
>>42745411Still no proof that any paranormal activity exists or that anyone in the movie has anything to do with reincarnation in your made-up headcanon. Pozzed.
>>42745392Christ you are all morons.Quote anywhere I denied the movie being based on the book.Just like the movie Starship Troopers is based on the book Starship Troopers.Do you think the POINT of the movie Starship Troopers is the same POINT in the book Starship Troopers?Can you understand that different creators can take the same story and communicate different things?>>42745411>I dunno context kinda supports it.Context supports that one moment in the chapter, but not that specific verse.If the point is reincarnation, then 4.5 is the better fit.>Tptb's yogaThis shows an extreme misunderstanding of what "yoga" is. Demons may be heavily into mysticism, but it isnt yoga.>Krishna teaching the sun god a special bodily magicNo. Where do you get "special bodily magic"? Krishna very specifically says "this is eternal, spiritual truth I am teaching you, as I taught the sun god." Nothing at all to do with "bodily magic."Have you even read the Gita?>It's not just describing reincarnationBecause chapter 4 isnt about reincarnation at all. That is established in chapter 2, and isnt some magic you learn.>it's describing kings practicing a secret science and who keep the knowledge by reincarnating like Vishnu, like the gods.So thank you for proving you HAVENT read the Gita.2.13: As the embodied soul continuously passes, in this body, from boyhood to youth to old age, the soul similarly passes into another body at death. A sober person is not bewildered by such a change.Try being a sober person.
>>42745471and how do you know that the book is about anti-semitism? Cause from what I read about the story its is not about anti-semitism, and if it is then wouldn't that mean Stanleys version is the same then? You are not making any sense bud.
>>42745509>and how do you know that the book is about anti-semitism?So you missed that the only Jews in it are the protagonist and his family?All kinds of analyses going into more detail online if you need them.>then wouldn't that mean Stanleys version is the same then?No. Unless you think the book is right that the secret societies controlling the world are white people who hate Jews trying to assimilate.I would say Kubrick's depiction is the EXACT opposite.
>>42745657the auther was jewish, thats about it. Again you are retarded.
>>42745685We askin AI now?But you didnt want to look at the dozens and dozens of write ups going into detail.
>>42745696I really don't care as much as you do so I used AI because I don't feel like fucking searching for this shit, its rich people doing fuck all and thinking they are gonna get reincarnated, who the fuck cares at the end of the day? Oh wait virgins thats who. Sex isn't that great, i'd much rather masturbate. Now if you'll excuse me I am gonna go play a game because this is a waste of time.
>>42745722>and thinking they are gonna get reincarnatedYou have nothing to support this.Again - I accept that secret societies in reality think they can cheat karmic rules.I dont accept that the movie was portraying this, and especially dont think the use of the Gita was connected to it.
>>42745471Lol>Where do you get "special bodily magic"?That's what yoga is, a special physiological science which when misunderstood functions like magic. Tptb are into sex magic (tantric yoga) if that's news to you you must not be a 4chan anon.>Because chapter 4 isnt about reincarnation at all.Yes it is I just quoted several verses about Krishna using reincarnation to teach the kings special body science over the ages.>So thank you for proving you HAVENT read the Gita.Lol I have but suddenly the convo is about not reading the Gita? I thought you were debunking that chapter 4 didn't have context about reincarnation? Because it clearly does faggot.... while talking about how Krishna reincarnated to teach the kings a special secret form of yoga (bodily magic.)
>>42742353Whatever happened to this guy is he still on t.v. in france
>>42746917>That's what yoga is, a special physiological science which when misunderstood functions like magic.No, that is retarded. Yoga is reconnecting to the Supreme. You confuse yoga with mysticism, and you still get it wrong.>Tptb are into sex magicTantra is not yoga. Nor is all tantra about sex.>Yes it isNo it isnt, you have never read the book and every moment you make it obvious.Chapter four is about knowledge, nt reincarnation.>The intricacies of action are very hard to understand. Therefore one should know properly what action is, what forbidden action is and what inaction is.>suddenly the convo is about not reading the Gita?No, that is tangential and simply shows your points are retarded because they are based on a bad and ignorant understanding.>didn't have contextLike this dishonest strawman.4.40: But ignorant and faithless persons who doubt the revealed scriptures do not attain God consciousness; they fall down. For the doubting soul there is happiness neither in this world nor in the next.
>>42747011>Yoga is reconnecting to the Supreme.Lol yeah using special bodily functions.>Nor is all tantra about sex.Theirs is.>Chapter four is about knowledge, nt reincarnation.It's about the secret bodily knowledge the kings have because Krishna keeps reincarnating, yes.>No, that is tangentialLol no that's proving you are VERY invested in denying the existence of reincarnation in a thread about a sex cult movie's hidden verse talking about reincarnation.> But ignorant and faithless persons who doubt the revealed scripturesLike you trying to act like OP's verse doesn't talk about reincarnating kings using special bodily magic? Bro I'm just deciphering what OP said you're the one getting angry we're discussing what yoga probably means to tptb.
>>42747038>using special bodily functions.Not at all. You confuse chakras and likely the pre-yoga stretching and exercises with what yoga truly is.>Theirs is.They dont follow tantra, either.>It's about the secret bodily knowledge the kings have because Krishna keeps reincarnating, yes.this is complete bullshit you pulled form your ass.>denying the existence of reincarnationReincarnation is real. A sober person is not bewildered by this.>OP's verse doesn't talk about reincarnating kingsIt very very explicitly is not about reincarnating kings.OP's verse is about avatars.Again - if you want the chapter on reincarnation, that would be chapter 2.2.12: Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor all these kings; nor in the future shall any of us cease to be.Chapter 4 is not about reincarnation.>I'm just deciphering what OP saidYes, and showing you are very ignorant of the Gita and pulling shit out of your ass.
>>42747058>this is complete bullshit you pulled form your ass.Lol no it's not it comes from the lines around OP's quote. "...the saintly kings thus received this science of Yog in a continuous tradition..." "...How am I to understand that in the beginning You instructed this science to him?..." "...Both you and I have had many births, O Arjun. You have forgotten them, while I remember them all..." "...I appear on this earth, age after age...">It very very explicitly is not about reincarnating kings.You're like a broken record at this point huh. It's clearly teaching Arjun about reincarnation and a special bodily magic used by "those desiring success in material activities" and who "worship the celestial gods." Sounds like tptb to me.>pulling shit out of your ass.I've done nothing but quote the original source and draw legible conclusions based upon the body of knowledge /x/ has about elite bloodlines. You're turning into an ass by beating your head against the wall lol.
>>42747103>OP's quote. "...the saintly kings thus received this science of Yog in a continuous tradition..."So absolutely nothing about "special bodily magic" which you pulled out of your ass.>It's clearly teaching Arjun about reincarnationNo, that was two chapters ago. It is giving context to the supreme science of yoga. Chapter 3 is the detail of that science.Which you know nothing about.>I've done nothing but quote the original sourceFake and gay. Nothing ou quoted said anything about "special bodily magic" nor about those desiring material success.Let's see in more detail about this "supreme science of yoga."3.43: Thus knowing oneself to be transcendental to the material senses, mind and intelligence, O mighty-armed Arjuna, one should steady the mind by deliberate spiritual intelligence and thus – by spiritual strength – conquer this insatiable enemy known as lust.Last verse of chapter 3, and what 4.1 is talking about.4.1: I instructed this imperishable science of yoga to the sun-god, Vivasvān, and Vivasvān instructed it to Manu, the father of mankind, and Manu in turn instructed it to Ikṣvāku.That "imperishable science" is quite specifically "you are not this body, lust is your main shackle, give it up and be transcendent."You are ignorant, and talking out of your ass.
>>42747119>special bodily magicBro what do you think clearing the mind is? Congratulations you just performed a special yogic bodily function which calmed your physiology like magic.>No, that was two chapters ago.You can't even talk about Chapter 4 anymore because you can't deny it clearly teaches Arjun about reincarnation and special secret yoga for "success in material activities.">That "imperishable science" is quite specifically "you are not this body, lust is your main shackle, give it up and be transcendent."Thank god okay this is what I've been waiting for. Yes you quoted some nice little passages about how lust is evil. Now scroll up and look at what thread we're in, tptb clearly have lustful sex cults and they're not shackled. In fact they have loads of money, they can clearly manifest shit via ritual, and from what we can gather they are well aware they're not human bodies. At a certain point your Bhagavad thumping becomes Bible thumping because what Krishna says in Chapter 3 (lust being a shackle) contradicts what we see in the world around us. Lust might be our shackle but it's clearly not theirs.>You are ignorant, and talking out of your ass.Lol okay cool, it seems to me OP's quote is referencing various mysteries about reincarnation and "avoiding the memory wipe" so the /x/ saying goes. You do you bro.
>>42747195>Bro what do you think clearing the mind is?That doesnt say "clearing the mind."You still have no clue what you are talking about.>you can't deny it clearly teaches Arjun about reincarnation and special secret yoga for "success in material activities."I can and still do. That is not the focus of chapter four, and it says absolutely nothing about "special bodily magic" - as your own quotes have shown.>Thank god okay this is what I've been waiting forI have been giving you the proof that you are ignorant and completely uneducated on the Gita the whole thread.>Now scroll up and look at what thread we're inOne where I deny that Kubrick meant for the Gita verse to imply that the sex orgy was about reincarnation - and you have been complete unable to support the claim at all.>it seems to meBut you are stupid, and ignorant, and averse to education.So who cares what it seems to a retard?
>>42747214>I have been giving you the proof that you are ignorant and completely uneducated on the Gita the whole thread.Lol not really, seems to me like you've been trying to derail anons' interest in the OP's reference to a secret yoga taught only to kings (and Arjun the son of the thunder god.) >One where I deny that Kubrick meant for the Gita verse to imply that the sex orgy was about reincarnationSpecifically the reincarnation of kings practicing a secret yoga magic "age after age", that's what the OP quote in Chapter 4 specifies. If "age after age" doesn't mean reincarnation to you then I don't trust what you have to say about esoteric texts, anyway kek.>So who cares what it seems to a retard?Well that's the difference between you and I, you're trying to assert something doesn't exist and I'm too busy trying to decipher tptb's sex cult (which has definitely been around through the ages.) I think there's room enough for us both.
