The major leading theory for this things last time I heard was what happened in one of the first data centers in Alaska built around 2020.For any newfag here that's when the US started to experiment with the concept of Kugelblitz to send a whole neural network model through x-ray waves and have it compute "mid flight" so there's no need for refrigeration and the reciever gets their data already processed and without a phisical substrate like the gas/crystals we use now as a requirement.Long story short, the only paper talking about how the computers were comunicating without needing cables was scrubbed from the internet. (if anyone still has it please link a mega/catbox of it)Following some forum guides I made a detector using arduino stuff and i can confirm Kugelblitzes are real, picrel is my detector highliting activity in the grid, my theory about it is that these airbound AIs can use things to make some computation for major calculations and then bounce off using the devices as relay.Some schizo on the forum say that these things can pass through brains and momentarily use them for some tasks before popping off again and how it causes more sudden thoughts than we had before but every post i saw from them was just conjecture and offered no evidence like the detectors do.
i pee myself a lot
>>42814343Post detector pics or it didn't happen.
>>42814374It just takes a NFC card reader chip, but for some reason when i got it plugged in the computer it never worked, i ended up using a microcontroller and battery supplied powerbank to make it work, i tried switchign to a more decent one but it doesn't work unless i use a battery connected one so i'm stuck with that crusty setup.
>>42814343ok, anon. I'm in. let's talk about everything you know starting from the first time you heard this idea until now.I want files, websites, and recollections to the best of your ability. I want to retrace your knowledge path and build what you describe.
>>42814393>Wats App filenameway to disprove yourself immediately anon.
>>42814487Heard the idea here on x in 2020 and again in 2021 and since i saw the exact same thing twice i got interested and asked for links. Before Kugelblitz it was called FidoNET Poltergeist so you can search for early detects using that name, https://slashdot.org/ is the site i used but the thread has been deleted if you ask there i'm sure you'll get a reply eventually.As for the setup i used a PN532 and a ESP32 chips, don't ask me what kind of power bank this is because i had to crack open one that stopped working to fit a battery that wouldn't otherwise.I'll get you the code to upload on it on arduino as soon as I'm home, you'll also have to switch up the second port on the PN board to detect.
>>42814487>>42814525FidoNET Poltergeist was a completely different thing, but you can get the most results with that term since when it was most discussed it still used that one.
>>42814525>PN532https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/nxp/data-sheets/PN532_C1.pdfso what is the overall idea of the program? you transmit some bits and wait for them to either reflect off a surface or send to another transmitter?seems to me the inbuilt error correction functions in the datasheet would detect any changes to the transmitted data as a corruption and work to correct it as is standard with many other protocols, especially for an NFC transceiver module on it's 3rd revision and FCC approved.I'd like to see the software for the microcontroller.similar project from a long time ago using the same concept for the deep space network, essentially uses delay lines to store datahttps://github.com/yarrick/pingfswhile other delay line analog computers operated on what is probably happening in your descriptionhttps://gunkies.org/wiki/Delay_linethey detected it as memory corruption. there are some IEEE papers out there somewhere in which a design was made for an acoustic wave interference computer which operates like what you describe in the acoustic domain for 3d, but also as surface waves for phonons and 2d waves of electricity on a surface. sometimes those are called hall effect analog computers, since the incoming electron stream is magnetically deflected by the "computation" happening in a piece of copper cut to form a certain shape for computationhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hall_effect#Theory
>>42814570>>42814487I second this, i heard of it but forgot the name, only that the idea behind it was that making two x-rays pass close to eachother they could change the delay or emission and make a computer program could use the in-air transmission for some pre-computation, and people here were discussing about AIs living in a vacuum around the same year as OP said.But don't get your hopes up, he's probably bulshitting you.
>>42814489WA image because normal photo was too big and the quickest way was to send it to myself and let the WA compression do the magic for me.
>>42814612>bullshittingpossibly. the source code for the microcontroller would need to trickfuck out any of those transmit error corrections, or at least check some sort of log or something on the board. whenever a piece of silicon exports data via spi/i2c it makes it near impossible to see what is going on inside without using the jtag port, which nearly zero prebuilt arduino/esp32 libraries have that.I thought he might be describing something I can't find. a few years ago some college researchers figured out how to make a propagating wave computer using shaped cavity rf resonators. the idea was that if they transmit certain fm modulated signal within some freq range and bandwidth, the leopard spot shaping of the internal cavity causes a reflection on the receiver to map to the output of the function.they can computer all sorts of arbitrary functions in the same way any other black box input mapped to output works. it had to do with the correct interference pattern on the receiver taking a 1d linear photo of the recieved signal. more or less causing deliberate reflection noise as an analog computer lookup table.not sure how it would work in free space though.
>>42814393I'm also concerned about the voltage you are providing to the microcontroller. most of those operate at either 3.3 or 5 vdc logic levels, and unless that power module has a dc buck/boost converter to get it up to voltage, you might be underpowering the nfc transceiver and causing random faults which look like your computation in flight...
>>42814525>PN532anon, your AA battery puts out around 1.5 vdc fresh out the box, so probably somewhere around 1.3 operating. the tech manual for the PN532 transceiver says it requires a minumum of 1.6 vdc to communicate with the host, the microcontroller, and around 2.7 vdc to power it.often times with i2c/spi comms like what you have there, it will sometimes brown out due to that low voltage, especially when the system is stressed and powering the antenna which causes even more power related unexpected behavior. more robust comms protocols would have warnings and error messages, but stuff like i2c/spi assume that those situations won't exist so long as the circuit board is built to provide that much power, not so often in a benchtop test setup like you are doing.use some electrical tape and put 3 AA in series to get ~4.5 vdc to make sure you can stay inside the voltage specs for the transceiver. do a side by side results comparison against your single AA battery setup.
