I'm not kidding, But there are numerous chain of events that happen with an insane alignment, If you are able to observe them, You can actually prepare yourself for the future, or Gather a lesson from them or atleast save yourself.I was able like the last 4 months to return to observing patterns, And realized how much some events work well and I realized their importance after only time passed, And it all kept piling up until the end in which it was a horrible ending that I wasn't able to prevent There is a pattern that keeps repeating, And there is someone moving the strings, I swear to god, No one will believe me, But there is definitely something that stirs up events, And we're just puppets, With the ability to control what we feel and what we can do to prevent or not, But in the end it'll happen.Please I need to understand this, This is the only place that could understand me, Literally someone is actually running something, Literally everything that happens, Actually is stirred
>>42827151bump
>>42827151>Literally someone is actually running something, Literally everything that happensLike...God?
>>42827151me i am the some one
>>42827151Jung says that whatever synchrounous acausal bs. is happening to you has more to do with your unconscious issues than some external pupetmaster. It wasn't solved inward so it projected itself as coming from outward, like a kettle boiling over. So the thing to do is to treat is as a message directed at you, some convoluted way in which your unconscious psyche is aiming to unfuck itself by trying to get your attention. I should follow my own advice sometimes. Fuck.
>>42827151are you talking about events in your own life or on a larger scale? >There is a pattern that keeps repeating,can you describe the pattern?
what is there to understand?You can only walk away and hideevery other choice is part of the chain
>>42827246in my own life, The events have some odd placements, It's like they're flawed, But this flaw is so perfectly aligned.The pattern is that, Whenever I attach, It completely goes astray from my reach, But in Detachment it remains, But i cannot touch it.This is the only pattern i am exactly sure of
>>42827229Jung says, studies show, sources report, etc.
>>42827229Look dude, The events that happen are so well tied to each other, That it is absolutely retarded to just ignore them, Like really, it's just has to do more into what it leads to, I read Jung too, But what I have has more to do with the Unconscious
>>42827151Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
>>42827229>God doesn't exist, goy! It's just your mind playing tricks on you!
>>42827151You are composed of 3 individual entities. You yourself are the free will, the person who decides. The other two are the subconscious and the superconscious or higher self. The subconscious is the oldest, the reptile brain whose basis is survival. Think motor skills, chemical stimulus, be it sex, drugs, dancing, food etc. The higher self exists in a reality of symbols and thoughts. Think creative, morals, higher thoughts, ideas etc. So these two entities have shaped who you are as best as they can from early life. They're on your side, but they are doing what they think you want. However, these two do not communicate and can often be at odds with each other if you are giving them conflicting wants/needs. Imagine your whole self (all 3) is a two party democracy and you're the sole voter. You decide what happens, but the other two are helping steer in their respective fields. For example, you're driving a car. You are not consciously aware of every action you take, you decide where to go and know how to drive and your body does most of the work. The gas pedal and brake instinctively get used appropriately. That is your subconscious behind the wheel, for the most part. Alternatively, if you take a test in school, or brainstorm ideas, or even basic writing. The words, ideas, letters all come from your higher self. You "reach up" and grab those thoughts and put them to use. However, in both of these examples you are in control, you decide what to do. Everyone involved in your overall self is on your side. They want what's best for you, it's just recognizing that and learning how to communicate with the sub and super together where you can find purchase in your life and feel like you have control.
>>42827398I never said that, you turbonigger. Unless of course, by mind you mean "Mind" and by "tricks" you mean "arranging your local reality bubble to try and get a message across to your dumb disconnected conscious monkey self.">>42827375I'm not saying they don't have objective reality. I'm saying they (probably) happen because you've not learned something you should.
>>42827398> It's the jew, always has been!Mmmh... grow up.
>>42827151Why don't you RAMPAGE and become the one that moves the strings of others?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCxNzdvBRUoGetting an SP is an example, but only because that's something people consider hard to do, this can be used for anyone.
>>42827762> I'm saying they (probably) happen because you've not learned something you should.You're the one basing your understanding of reality based on some ideology written in a book instead of observing reality. Discounting someone's observations of reality is extremely disingenuous, and all that you're really trying to do is force someone to conform to something some retard wrote.An honest person would ask for more information and to better understand the phenomena instead of forcing your predetermined cardboard cutout NPC golem worldview onto them.
I understand, you.I don't understand reality!
>>42827807I'm basing this on personal experience. >Discounting someone's observations of reality What exactly am I discounting? He's yet to give details of the events, nor his personal status. Nor any interpretation contradicting what I said.>An honest person would ask for more information and to better understand the phenomenaUnderstanding the "how" of things is not as important as the "why", even if that's not a popular opinion in our scientific age. The "how" only contains the general mechanism. The particular "why" contains the solution you need.
>>42827912The trouble is you already have a framework with which to catch all undefinable and indeterminate events into. Because of the broad and cast-iron shape of your framework (All events which seem synchronous/coincidental/intentional imbued with intelligence are always the result of an unresolved unconscious psyche) you cannot permit any possibilities beyond your framework. If an individual presents you with some kind of extraordinary evidence you immediately jump to "AHA! This is Carl Jung's flavor of bullshit!" because they seemingly match in character, even though I can tell you with absolute certainty that Carl Jung is totally wrong.If you want to know the truth, you'll have to learn how to forget. Forget your theories, frameworks, and ideologies. As for the OP's experiences, it is called synchronicity.
>>42827151Yeah this shit is all rigged. All of it.
>>42827973As an addendum, I'd like to add that this is the first time I've read Carl Jung's work and I find it extremely subversive. He is trying to remove all mysterious and unexplainable phenomena as some error or misunderstanding of the subconscious.He is quite literally forcing you to retard your own intellectual development if you take him seriously.
>>42827151i said the same thing in reply to another anon:the universe is speaking to you. your righteous path is near. find the way. be careful of the jester.
>>42827151Just ride the train anon. Let the conductor do its job
>>42827973>The trouble is you already have a framework with which to catch all undefinable and indeterminate events intoI've said it again, I perceive this as the most common answer. It's by no means all encompassing. Eg. there are cases where lovers or twin brothers will perceive what affects or may affect the other, even when separated by wast distances. Shared dreams, premonitions, sudden opportunities, forewarnings of catastrophe, not everything relates to your unresolved psychic issues. But, at least from my experience, most of those things do. >....Alright. Might as well.Synchronicity happens (or can happen) because reality is built (or "woven") out of relationships, not things. When you poke at a thing, the "knot" of relationships that is that thing tightens in such a way that the properties you're interacting with become sharp. When you're not, they gradually loosen and unweave into a much wider nexus. Because these things get more "loose" in time, synchronicity is not about magically rearranging a set of sharply defined objects to have coincidental properties. It's about pulling the right rope in the weave so that out of the set of "possible" sharp properties the now-loose objects "might" have, the coincidental ones get chosen (or "tightened").
>>42828987Okay, you seem to know your stuff, so let me ask you, what's up with the synchonicities that seem to affect the past?Like, I play three random songs in a row, the first one has some harmonica solo at the very end, the second one has a similar sounding harmonica thorough the song, but then it goes hard with some samba and batucada with double tempo, and the third song is a bossa nova in that fast tempo that fits nicely.It's as if the second song inspired the ending of the first and the bossa nova inspired the part of the second one where it goes insane.Note that without the one in the middle, if I picked some other random song, there wouldn't have been a connection, and the harmonica parts needed to be like this to make one, so they had to be sorted like this.Things like this happen very often, as if the composers of the songs could listen to the next ones on my random play lists. The songs synchronize and if I sort them manually I can decide which ones inspire which, even if I know them well, sometimes I notice a percussive instrument that "wasn't there before" that is shared between two songs in a row, is it just me or people are inspiring the content of songs in the past by the order they listen to them via synchronicity?
>>42827151You separate the falling of the first domino from the fall of the last domino. You're under the impression that they are different events, but in reality, it is a single string of causality. Of course everything aligns, because it is only one event. I think you can nudge the result a little during the unfolding with a good amount of willpower, but otherwise, some decisions are more important than others and snowball through space and time. That's not even /x stuff—that's everyday physics.
>>42829370The mandela effect disproves this, the first domino may have never fallen at all, and now you have to wonder what caused the chair reaction, and you may find that the only explanation is a domino from the future causing so much havoc that it spilled into the past.
>>42829178Part of it can be explained by pareidolia or just the sorting algorithms in the music player. The other part is that "true" randomness is one of the easiest things to be "imprinted" on by synchronicity. You don't even need wierd causation from future to past for it to work. You can just say the first song "inspired" the the second which "inspired" the third. Events in the future that have no imposed causal order can "move-around" time-wise to fit better. Now, to eliminate or reduce the amount of synchronicity, have your music in a standard (eg. alphanumeric) non-random ordering, then play it according to a fixed algoritmic order (eg. jump every 6 songs: 1, 7, 13, 19, 25, 31 37..). This should "tighten the rope". Synchronicity only happens where it is free to happen, and a rigid, simple, inflexible causal ordering is the opposite of that.
Bumpi
Well at least you are noticing even if you are not comprehending. You are seeing something real.. but you have much more to discover
>>42827151You should read the final chapter of Itzhak Bentov's A brief tour of higher consciousness.
>>42827151I get those tooAnd even other people have experienced it with me, this shit is undeniable after awhile
>>42827151>But there is definitely something that stirs up events, And we're just puppets, With the ability to control what we feel and what we can do to prevent or not, But in the end it'll happen.its the jesuit order OPand their predecessors they just plan things out by name and date decades in advancesomethings centuries and therefore are designed while the calendar was being constructed
>>42827151meds
>>42832707Link ?>>42834522Yes, Finally someone who gets me, I genuinely want someone to explain this to me, I can't actually understand it, I believe it's my Unconscious brain making sense of it all, But then i don't know
https://www.scribd.com/document/291241343/How-We-Create-Our-Own-RealityThis is a really good article for the thread
Search about Nonlocal consciousness
>>42838313made me think of this: many physicists are beginning to come around to the fact that locality and unitarity are not fundamental, when it comes to quantum mechanics. more and more, each day, they confirm what mystics have been saying for thousands of years.
>>42838494It's as if proof of something existing actually is there
>>42839369sorry, but i dont get, what you mean exactly. is there any chance you can rephrase your statement? not trolling, this topic is interesting to me.
>>42839415The fact that we are actually reverting to mystics really tells you about how There is more to life, I really believe that we control what we perceive, Only we need to keep a higher consciousness
>>42827151What are the winning numbers for tomorrow's Powerball lottery?
>>42839566ah, ok. yah, similar boat, you and i. the way i like to see it is, mysticism holds the answers to scientific mysteries, and scientific knowledge can better guide the mystics. in short, i think its another way to view THE duality. instead of good/bad, right/left, positive/negative, compassion/logic..... mysticism/science. the way i stated my idea is imperfect, but i think you know what i mean.
>If I do x stuff>it will trigger stuff related to X :OThis board is full of morons that they really need time to figure this one out
>>42838310Is there another source for this? Scribd fills up all my ram and makes my browser explode before I can read the third paragraph. And it asks me to upload 5 documents before I can download it.
>>42839659I still believe these concepts are not the fundamentals of life, they're man-made, and adding rules and punishment to that river that flows from the universe, I just believe is what blinded us from seeing the true image, Which were hidden by Religious leaders.
>>42839706It's just 3 pages, It wouldn't take that long
>>42827151Over a long enough period of time it seems everything is possible. Existence is an epicyclic setup and we are on one of the tiny gears.
>>42839887? i never said its the fundamentals of life. i said its another way of viewing the big duality. i feel like we are no longer talking about the same thing. all the best to you.
>>42839935rules? punishment? religion?
