>>42896180
Female body is vastly superior in this regard but because of lack of emotional regulation most fail to utilise it properly
Women's intuition is a phrase for a reason

>>42896194
is this why men troon out?

>>42896194
>Women's intuition is a phrase for a reason
The reason is that women want you to believe that their confirmation bias is a superpower. Everything has a reason, and sometimes that reason is retarded.

Concepts about God can usually be traced back to the person's childhood relationship with their father figure. That's why women often see God as a friendly figure who helps them out, while men see God as an authoritative figure who has exacting standards.

>>42896200
In some eastern traditions yes

>>42896180
Women go from 0-60 faster. They can blow through fire and hit water cycle in less than a year.
Men go from 60-100 faster, once a man masters the waves, the sky is the limit.

>>42896180
Men are better at austerity paths. Women are better at devotional.

>>42896180
I'd argue maximizing one's own potential in sincerity is better than worrying if we're tied randomly to a group for meager bragging rights.

File: rwryemyietbg1.png (1.38 MB, 733x1079)

1.38 MB PNG

Women are better at it on average because most men are closed off to the paranormal because of their logical mind. It's pretty common for women to talk about divination, rituals, moon phases, constellations or whatever and the average guy is opposed to this unless it gets him laid.

But when it comes to spiritual cult leaders you will see a sudden increase and majority of men. Manipulating, grooming, fucking their followers and taking their money.

>>42896200
We all know this is why you made this thread. You're obsessed.

>>42896180
Women are purely earthly beings

>>42896180
Women are constantly impure and too hysterical but feminine creativity is intense and powerful. If you're asking capable, then men are more capable. If you're asking about potential, then women have a higher potential

>>42896180
Spirituality is a yin pursuit, meditation is a non-doing, and it requires submission and devotion, so men naturally struggle with it. At the same time, the masculine body is much stronger and can withstand more intense energies, so it is more equipped for higher states of consciousness. That means men who get over that initial hurdle tend to make it further than women. A balance between masculine and feminine is ideal

>>42896180
I would give the slightest advantage to women. They seem to care a little more about spirituality. Although, it is difficult to find a completely spiritually healthy person of any gender.

>>42896688
Unfortunately true. A lot of their feelings are essentially surface level

>>42896742
Then why are all the best inventions made by men? Because men the closest to God that you can get. The primary thing blocking man from his divine nature is his pride and horniness.

>>42896762
>Spirituality is a yin pursuit,
Wrong. Yin is the force which consumes yang energy. Yang is pure potential, pure creativity. Yang is like the sun and yin is like the black hole - opposing forces that work together harmoniously.

>>42896672
"In a First Among Christians, Young Men Are More Religious Than Young Women"
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/23/us/young-men-religion-gen-z.html

This is because women's views on spirituality and religion in the past were led by men. But without men's leadership - women naturally gravitate towards nature and witchcraft as they are naturally led by desire. It's a void that needs to be constantly filled - there's always something missing, something that's wrong, and always something to get in their world. Whereas a man can be content with very little - the truth is all man needs is God

File: 1766327011623394.jpg (31 KB, 800x600)

31 KB JPG

Only women can be fully spiritual. Men can only partially simulate spirituality.

File: 1746914338814946.png (3.25 MB, 3000x3857)

3.25 MB PNG

>>42896807
Oh yeah not surprised because men have a need to submit to a "Daddy" figure real bad and women are more spiritually rebellious and want to go their own way instead of being someone's servant or cuck.

>>42896775
Many of them are primarily drawn to witchcraft, because they have a lot of volatile emotional energy and strong desire, and both go hand in hand
>>42896840
Wrong

>>42896856
Yes, you got it. Women are generally more inclined to lean towards sin, because it 'feels good.' Feeling good is their god. Whereas men are more connected with the God of the universe who places hard boundaries - and this means sacrificing the stuff that 'feels good' for righteousness. The world is in trouble once men starts sacrificing righteousness for what 'feels good'

>>42896867
More inclined to think for yourself and not be someone's obedient, brainwashed toy is my interpretation.

Especially if the "Daddy" figure is absent and abusive as fuck.

Foundationally, no. For spiritual warfare purposes though, me and my powers from servitors I created when I was 5 while falling from the tree 45 feet onto my head to all my other powers, and those of my allies apply rules on schedules and in response to stimuli.

Take, for example these rules: The needs of the Manny outweigh the needs of the few, so whichever gender has more numbers. Here in this Creation that's women, so when I apply that rule women rule. But I don't always apply that rule but instead what I do is apply whichever rules help people achieve their prayers and avoid their fears, but also to punish their sins, such as broken promises, etc.

So Earth women pray to become submissive to men more than men do toward women, and men pray for dominance more over women. That is then what we usually give them, sometimes to little or to much for their liking to punish sin WHILE answering prayers, sometimes the exact amount they want if that realistically possible in their near future according to their DNA and other biological factors, including from environment and upbringing, or if it's required for them to properly achieve their fates. In both cases, the body must change some from time to time, flesh or metal, light or evil, in Manny places that are part of this Creation, and do.

Personally was part of my closeted or half closeted transgenderism and how mine prefers me to be submissive, I've caused brain damage and growth to myself for decades to make me more sexually submissive and needy of men, hoping I get another boyfriend some day and not a girlfriend, and a top boyfriend. It's a hobby of mine, though I use those body changes of mine to do many other things like powers too. Dominance and submission in energy work can be channeled through me to empower them in whole civilizations as well as on individual basis, to support them out of they're sent to me mixed together, to diminish, to make into emotional synthesis mixed with other emotions, etc.

File: compressed_1788053558802.jpg (1.66 MB, 1224x2176)

1.66 MB JPG

>>42896180
Asexuals and hetero males and lesbians with good taste of aesthetics.
Anybody who is atracted by men or ugly people is fucked up orc soul.

>>42896180

Yes females are much more capable of quickly dominating their spirit, sadly we as a men it take us longer.

Thats because we as a men are a version more physical of the woman, we are more physical more rooted to the physical world.

>>42896989
>Especially if the "Daddy" figure is absent and abusive as fuck.
Mother nature is cruel and does not spare the gazelle from being eaten. However, man is spared if he aligns himself what God the father intends.

>>42897289
This is backwards. Women are more grounded and rooted in the physical world. They represent raw nature itself behind meticulously crafted beauty. Man is absolutely more spiritual - think of all the inventions, great works of art like the Sistine Chapel, grand architectures, even the body of a chiseled man is divinely inspired (Logos). Man's libido actually comes from this innate separation - the desire to procreate is actually a magnetic 'pull' - the desire to seek union with the physical realm in which he is separated (Eros). You should read about Jung's interpretation on man's dual nature - The logos of man wanting order, structure, discipline, while eros of man (his libido) wants to come back to the womb of the mother because living as a man is too painful

>>42896180
Women are more capable of atavistic spirituality.

That is a bad thing and is the reason why women were excluded from esoteric societies in ealier times, and its also the reason why women were spiritual leaders in even earlier times. But now is the right momment to start accepting women again.

>>42896180
Women believe in what men profess.
This should explain a lot.
Men trust in their faith.

Whether this is relevant to the thread is up to you

>>42897344
>>42897344
>This is backwards. Women are more grounded and rooted in the physical world. They represent raw nature itself behind meticulously crafted beauty. Man is absolutely more spiritual - think of all the inventions, great works of art like the Sistine Chapel, grand architectures, even the body of a chiseled man is divinely inspired (Logos). Man's libido actually comes from this innate separation - the desire to procreate is actually a magnetic 'pull' - the desire to seek union with the physical realm in which he is separated (Eros). You should read about Jung's interpretation on man's dual nature - The logos of man wanting order, structure, discipline, while eros of man (his libido) wants to come back to the womb of the mother because living as a man is too painful

Thats totally wrong, thats the trap of the modern era, most religious have adopted the male figure as the dominating spirit but they got it wrong and thats one of the reasons most religions and society in general is failing because they praise men traits in their religions, stop praising fake gods.

I know this by myself just by watching female friends and how they quickly adopt energy abilities while men costs us longer.

By energy abilities I say, intuition, guessing, future reading, healing abilities, OBE experiences and others.

Now we have women trying to be manlier which is getting out of hand in society it is a disease.

>>42897477
>I know this by myself just by watching female friends and how they quickly adopt energy abilities while men costs us longer.
>By energy abilities I say, intuition, guessing, future reading, healing abilities, OBE experiences and others.
Fair point, a lot of intuition and these types of abilities come from receptivity and vulnerability, and men's superpower comes from having strong boundaries and proceeding with force and resilience. These are reactive abilities, not proactive abilities in which an aligned man operates.

>Now we have women trying to be manlier which is getting out of hand in society it is a disease.
Of course, because yin and yang have always been opposing forces. Give yin and inch and it takes a mile. As a man your energy should be predominantly yang driven. Any yin should just be a reaction to yang energy. Right now men have been seduced by the consumptive nature of yin - weed, hookup culture, porn, comfort - which leads to men putting women first because they lost the plot. As they say: "strong men create good times. good times create weak men. weak men create hard times"

>>42897344
>align with a father who is omnipotent but passively watches as his children get abused, degraded, raped and killed because he respects the free will of pedophile rapists too much

Yeah, don't think I will.

>>42896180
>[Śrīmālā:]
>“Please be compassionate and protect me,
>Causing the seeds of Dharma to grow within me
>In this life and in future lives,
>Please, Buddha, always accept me.”

>[The Buddha:]
>“I have been with you for a long time,
>Guiding you in former lives.
>I now again accept you.
>And will do likewise in the future.”

>[Śrīmālā:]
>“I have produced merits
>At present and in other lives.
>Because of these virtuous deeds
>I only wish to be accepted.”

>Then Śrīmālā and all of her attendants prostrated themselves before the Buddha’s feet. The Buddha then made this prediction among them:

>“You praise the true merits of the Tathāgata because of your virtuous deeds. After immeasurable periods of time, you will become sovereign among the gods. In all lives you will continually see me and praise me in my presence, in the same manner as you are doing now. You will also make offerings to the immeasurable numbers of buddhas for more than twenty thousand immeasurable periods of time. Then you Śrīmālā will become the buddha named Universal Light, the Tathāgata, Arhat, Perfectly Enlightened One. Your buddha land will have no evil destinies and no suffering due to old age, illness, deterioration, torments. . . . There will be no evil whatsoever, not even the word for evil. Those who are in your land will have the five desires of the senses fulfilled, longevity, physical power, and physical beauty, and will be happier than even the gods who control enjoyments created by others. They all will be exclusively Mahayana, having habitually practiced virtuous deeds, and assembling in your land.”

>When Queen Śrīmālā had received this prediction, the innumerable gods, humans, and other beings vowed to be born in her land. The Buddha predicted to everyone that they all would be born there.

>>42897629
That's mother nature for you - automation based on programmed survival mechanisms (the matrix). Matri-arch, matr-ix, mat-ernal - nature is the matrix. A man who is aligned with God enforces stability and order working against the forces of nature. And by being aligned with God, man develops the courage to enforce boundaries and stand up for others, thus creating safety, peace, and harmony. That's man's true purpose - is to act in accordance with the will of God

It's semen. Men need to retain and women need to absorb semen from men. Too much and they go crazy. This is why witches tend to be massive whores and usually powerless.

>>42896180
First I was about to say women, because they can't get shit done and require divine intervention, but then I remembered that men excel at everything, so Men, i assume.

>>42896180
Women like symbols and aesthetics of spirituality, but I don't know many who go into philosophy and how symbology manifests through life.
It's all in vain. It's the same with those "trad" men who like Roman Catholic aesthetic.
I think both are equally capable of spirituality, but the path may differ because of the differences of the opposite sex and how they navigate through life.

>>42896180
Women are better with magick, men are better with asceticism. Both can be potent if utilized properly and can work well in tandem with one another but individualism kind of screwed up that balance.

>>42897901
read as
>women are better at being evil while men are better being good

>>42897695
Mother nature was programmed by God and follows God's design.

>>42898112
Yup, nature is running on an automation. The duality of nature is that it can be cruel but also giving. And men were able to harness the forces of nature and form civilizations through working with it - being aligned with a higher power which gives men the capacity to endure pain and hard work for a better future for everyone

>>42896807
>>42896856
>>42896867
Watching someone keep trying to have a genuine interaction about spirituality with someone having a random meltdown about their daddy issues is so funny for some reason

>>42898537
It's hilarious that I don't know which side you think has "daddy issues". Trad Cath bros that think they are Templar Knights and feminist Wiccans dancing naked in the forest are both larpers who's beliefs are downstream reactions to not understanding the divine masculine.

>>42898537
KEK

>>42898699
>>42898022

>>42897244
dumb ai poster

>>42896200
Everybody on this board should troon out if they want to spiritmaxx.

File: compressed_1780924254649.jpg (647 KB, 720x1280)

647 KB JPG

>>42898790
Retarded meatbag bug.

>>42896194
Women basic behave like they have severe adhd, little to no impulse and emotional control.

For most women being spiritual is some sort of New Age garbage with crystals and sage.

>>42896180
Women seem to stumble upon some great things without even really trying but they aren't willing to dissect what they realized. Then the men get a hold of it and try to graph their hunches but go about it in a way that doesn't improve it since they don't understand the original flash of brilliance as they try to come up with a classification for what it was fit it cleanly into a grid of what has already been deduced so as not to disrespect those that have come before them and put so much effort into understanding it.

>>42898699
the one who referred to god as an absent and abusive as fuck daddy figure >>42896989

>>42899165
It's an accurate description of the Abrahamic God though. People who stay in those religions have Stockholm Syndrome, while those who leave want to strike back at something that doesn't exist. It's hilarious all around.

Spiritual/divine ability for women is social and related to mental inference, subtle observations, fuzzy logic, identifying specific things to learn. Powers associated with deities in the sphere of Ishtar.

Magical/spiritual ability for men is solitary and comes from accumulated knowledge, straightforward observations, hard logic, studying subjects pedantically. Powers associated with Enki and Hermes Trismegistus (Utnapishtim).

File: IMG_6586.jpg (100 KB, 1264x1600)

100 KB JPG

>>42896180
women are useful for men who know how to use them, as they are capable of larger spiritual transmissions and possessions.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FgxacX72snA&pp=0gcJCRoMAYcqIYzv&ra=m

>>42898428
So if mother nature just does what God programmed "her" to do... then the chaos, violence and abuse that comes from nature, ultimately comes from God.

If I design a game as the admin and progammer and create a force or NPC to do something specifically and the force or NPC acts accordingly, then it is my blame and choice.

>>42896194
If women have such intuition, then why so many of them are single mothers?
If women are so great spiritually, why are wizards the ones that master the world and not witches?
Women are the blank slate where men spread their seeds to birth a successor, preferably one in their image rather than another birthing machine.

God made man in his image, so it is most obvious that when He made woman He made her to be man's companion, sidekick, physically lover and nothing more.

Women play with strong forces much more because they're too dull to comprehend the sheer scale of what they're affecting and putting their hands into, yet they have less control and less say over those things, the only reason women don't get instantly evaporated is because the spirits have pity for their idiotic souls and because they can looshfarm and rape these rotten wenches for their pure enjoyment.

One more argument is that women don't see men as humans, they see men as objects, objects that give them money, cars, houses, sex, 9 months of torture and exciting experiences. Women are incapable of love towards men, their only love being directed strictly towards their children and whatever is under their subordination, abusing said subordinates every once in a while for kicks and to feel important.

Without men women are nothing but cannibalistic devils that each eachother for their entertainment, this is one of the many reasons men constantly attempt to appease and entertain their bitches. Men dislike drama, sadism and all that isn't righteous, while women love these to the moon and back since they are incapable of abstract thoughts related to higher levels of thinking.

>>42900516
Look at this spiritual weakling trying to rationalize the divine. You have the opposite of psychic ability. Women mog you.

>>42901118
>Unironically using the term "mog"
Lol, LMAO even.

>>42900890
>why are wizards the ones that master
this nigga talking like there are wizards walking around who mastered the world LMFAOO goof

File: 1687633917185123.jpg (121 KB, 795x863)

121 KB JPG

>>42900890
"Without men women are nothing but cannibalistic devils that each eachother for their entertainment, this is one of the many reasons men constantly attempt to appease and entertain their bitches. Men dislike drama, sadism and all that isn't righteous."

>looks at rape, animal torture, murder and torture statistic in every country regardless of culture
>the most fucked up serial killers or torture rings in history
>it's 90%+ men
>no exception anywhere (including anti-feminist countries who don't give out any pussy passes)

>>42896180
Women have soul but no spirit.
Men have spirit but no soul.
Women are better.

>>42900890
>If women have such intuition, then why so many of them are single mothers?
KEK

>>42901131
Of the men capable of radiating light, greatness and life changing feats, the opposite is also true due to the law of opposites. Just look at the IQ bell curve graph between men and women (https://medium.com/@Star.index/how-different-are-men-and-women-and-why-is-this-question-so-important-to-people-d17526165bd4). For every male super genius, there's a male that's mentally retarded. But women tend to be collected around the middle - aka normies. And that's pretty accurate imo from what we see today

>>42900853
If you program a robot to do certain things, and it goes against that programming when it becomes sentient, then that thing is exhibiting its autonomy and free will. If you moved out of your Dad's house at 18, started a business, then became a millionaire at 25, would you owe your dad money? Is he responsible for your success?

>>42901299
Sure. Men are creatures of extremes and also produce more heroes and geniuses. But to deny that men are far more capable of sadism and brutality is an insane cope from that other anon.

>>42901322
There is no such sentient entity as men. Men are merely spiritual vessels for the divine. Or this can be hijacked by demons, or the demiurge. Possession is very real. Again, this is why you see heroes as well as sadists. No one is born a monster. Slowly they accept the spirits or demons over time.

>>42896180
it is a fact that men tend to be more spiritual, yes, while women tend to be more physical. A man can live with almost zero things, but a woman can't. A woman needs a lot of things, a lot of items. Generally speaking, women make men fall. I have seen a lot of men getting their lives destroyed because they did end up falling in love with a woman and then they get fucked when the woman asks for divorce. If anything, women are here to distract us. Women only exists so babies can be born. Women were not supposed to exist, they only exist because nature, God, or whatever, had to find a way for reproduction to exists so natre, God or whatever had to create the woman to hold the baby inside them. This is why women are material. Because they host the baby and the baby needs physical food. So woman are wired to want material things in order for their baby to survive. I advise any men here to not fuck women. Why? It's because womena are dangerous and they are a waste of time. The greeks got it right. They would only go after women when they wanted an offspring. If they wanted to have pleasure or whatever, then they would be around other men. Greeks were so red pilled that they prefered to fuck each other than to fuck women. They would only fuck women in order to have children. They knew stuff. They knew how lame ass women were. Women are fucking shallow as fuck.

>>42901369
God doesn't have to do anything. God could have made it possible for men to get pregnant or for babies to come out of spiritual portals, are you dumb?

>If they wanted to have pleasure or whatever, then they would be around other men.

Yeah, gay and bisexual men are infamous for having stable relationships and not drifting into absolute degeneray, non-stop cheating, orgies and stds spreading.

>>42896180
By teh way, the only kind of spirituality women can have is the one where the religion uses their pussy as a symbol for something divine. Take the christianity for example, they have a pussy symbol which represents Mary. They got the pussy anatomy an its shape and then based in this they created the idol of the virgin mary, the catholics. Then women feel atraction towards Mary because they used the pussy to hook both men and women. My point is that the only kind of spirituality women can have is the one linked to their female genitalia. Think about the witchcraft religions, satanic religions, all the female religions, they are all based in the pussy, they use their pussy as some sort of portal. This is the only kind of spirituality that women are capable of having. Lame. *Verification not required.

>>42901369
LOL this is funny, but there is truth to this.

Mater- is the prefix of maternal. And this relates to the realm of matter, maternal, matrix, material, etc. Man is supposed to chase God, but if he chases women (the material realm) instead of God, this inverts polarity and leads man into a 'falling' state, rather than his birthright as a 'rising' spirit. And yes, women are a distraction from one's spiritual progress - that's why ancient texts referred to them as maya for men.

>>42901376
>God doesn't have to do anything. God could have made it possible for men to get pregnant or for babies to come out of spiritual portals, are you dumb?
You can't have free will if there was no choice. If God made men to serve him, there would be no need for reproduction. However, God created the ultimate game / test - either man chooses God / spirituality, or choose women (which inevitably leads to man choosing the material realm). If man chooses God, he may be granted eternal life (actually legit). If man chooses women, he will be subject to the wheel of samsara. But why? Because he is being led back into the cosmic womb (aka the meatgrinder of the universe / matrix. btw look up the etymology of the work matrix and what it means). So because he brings a new soul to this planet - thus fragmenting God even more and a new attachment to this material realm.

>>42901466
>You can't have free will without (insert something)

Wrong. If God is omnipotent he defines what free will includes and what it doesn't.
Dead babies go to Heaven, at least in the big 3 religions, without ever making any "free will choices on Earth" and they still fully have free will in Heaven. Funny how that works.

So no, women were not needed for free will. God made women cause he wanted women to exist for his own happiness.

>>42901476
>Wrong. If God is omnipotent he defines what free will includes and what it doesn't.
Silly take my bro, and it's obvious you didn't read the whole thing. There is no free will without choice. And you do have a choice - you can seek one-ness with God (ultimate consciousness) or you can fragment yourself further by chasing women (going deeper into unconsciousness).

>God made women cause he wanted women to exist for his own happiness.
God is whole and complete and doesn't need anything or anyone for happiness. That's why a man who chases God will embody that wholeness with or without a woman. A man who chases women will never be whole and will always be dependent on an external source to feel whole, which never lasts, as women's feelings are always fleeting as it is illusory.

>>42901497
>There is no free will without choice.

That's your human logic. Why would God not to obey that logic? And let me know what happens to babies or children who died young unable to make any meaningful choices and going straight up to Heaven. Odd how they have free will in Heaven and aren't robots despite that.

>God is whole and complete and doesn't need anything or anyone for happiness.

If women didn't please God, they wouldn't exist. Nothing would exist without God's approval.
If God didn't like it, it would simply not exist. Unless you think God is a masochist and wants to torture himself cause it gets him off.

>>42901401
>>42901466
Lol, I thought I was the only one.
I tried telling this stuff to people 20 years ago, none of them took me seriously. I hope those shitheads get re-incarnated forever.

>>42901507
>And let me know what happens to babies or children who died young unable to make any meaningful choices and going straight up to Heaven
I don't claim to know as these unfortunate events are out of my control. I focus on my own spiritual development and trust that everything happens for a reason.

>Odd how they have free will in Heaven and aren't robots despite that.
In heaven you don't experience that same choice - there is only will and God's will and yours are inseparable.

>If women didn't please God, they wouldn't exist. Nothing would exist without God's approval.
>If God didn't like it, it would simply not exist. Unless you think God is a masochist and wants to torture himself cause it gets him off.
You really don't bother reading and just say whatever you're 'mad at God about' right? You type like a spoiled child. God doesn't need anyone. God doesn't lust, or need a woman to validate him because his wholeness is what you should seek. God just is. However, you do. And you're looking for any reason to justify you not believing in him and being a hedonist

>>42901536
Yeah most people are hylics and blinded by their material desires and social programming to really wake up

>>42901544
>In heaven you don't experience that same choice - there is only will and God's will and yours are inseparable.

So does God turn every man who goes to heaven into a puppet who can only want and desire what God wants?
If not, if man still has a personality and soul of his own, then this proves that you don't need "women" or "evil" for free will, because these things don't exist in heaven according to your logic.

>God doesn't need anyone.

You are unable to explain your position. If God didn't want women or men to exist, why do they exist?
I say because it pleases God and he wants them to exist. Explain how this is not true - we wouldn't exist if God didn't want us to exist. And why would God do things he doesn't enjoy?

>>42901131
>look at the rate of fatherlessness/lack of a father figure and/or exigent/prying/abusive/enabling mothers in those psychopaths and socipaths
>it's significantly over 95%
Men are capable of great things, be them positive or negative. The only way a man would engage in negative things, such as torture or killing, is because they've been emasculated and feminized through years of abuse, neglect and bad-behaviour enabling by their mothers, as well as a general lack of male oversight of any kind.
Women don't usually engage physically in their plans, preferring to either offload it to simps, their subordinates, or whoever is willing to be their mercs.
Not without reason most inmates are less likely to have a father, and it's not because their father disowned them for their deeds.

Women are incapable to raise men as their should be raised, instead they project their ideals of what a man should be, while also castrating their boys into submission to get pleasure from feeling important via a master-slave dynamic that is way too common across women and niggers that it is to men and chinks.

Like always, black is feminine, white is masculine, hence why niggers are as or more impulsive and sexually depraved than women are. Although I don't condone interracial mixing, you have to observe that a white man and black woman tend to cooperate better in a couple than a white woman and a nigger. When pure masculinity and pure femininity mix, you have a perfect bland, but when you have wannabe masculine femininity with feminine masculinity, the latter being caused by lacking a father figure that would teach the nigglet how to be a black man instead of a gangster nigger, you have a bland of pure sexual depravity filled with illicit substances and peerverse and vulgar thoughts with not concept of tomorrow, next week, next month, next year or next decade.

BTW this is a schizo board, not normie/autismo board where only the first details matter, for those btfo to /r9k/.

>>42901580
>So does God turn every man who goes to heaven into a puppet who can only want and desire what God wants?
I mentioned this earlier. At the highest levels, man would be aligned with God and is inseparable from Him. This would happen because the man made the decision to, out of his free will to align with God.

>If not, if man still has a personality and soul of his own,
Man's 'personality' is a temporary egoic illusion revolving around limitation. You don't keep anything of your 'egoic personality' after death because there wouldn't be separation.

>You are unable to explain your position. If God didn't want women or men to exist, why do they exist?
I don't bother to explain because arguing with you is like arguing with the 3rd grader who questions Christianity for the first time referring to the same, dumb, shallow arguments - "If God is good then why do BAD TINGS happen hurrr." "If God doesn't need this to exist why does this exist?" And here's a question for you: Why does anything exist at all? It's because God is pure creation, and man is his magnum opus. Greatness needs to be tested, and women are a part of that test. Everything has a purpose

>>42901726
>look at the rate of fatherlessness/lack of a father figure and/or exigent/prying/abusive/enabling mothers in those psychopaths and socipaths

Men were already rocking the rapist/murderer/animal-torturer statistic before modern "single mom" epidemics far back into human history. During those times, if there was a lack of father figure in most cases it was the fault of men for leaving and abandoning their families. Because if a man died, there would be other males in the family who could step up to the occasion. So your explanation doesn't explain the high % of evil and sadistic men, compared to women.

And for the "abusive" mom argument. An abusive mom leads a grown adult man to raping little children or torturing animals. LMFAO. Pathetic.

>>42901726
Women get abused all the time growing up by everyone while men are put on pedestals (the sons) in islamic shitholes and it's still almost only men who commit the most sadistic and violent crimes and torture.

>>42896807
Men are weak, when they recognize their own weakness as undefeatable, they turn to god as an easy way out of shame/guilt.
And because they are especially weak, they then feel the need to derive a sense of superiority from their sacrifical devotion. Meanwhile, better and stronger men are shaping their lives and they will call it fate. Yes, your poverty is god testing your faith and totally not you being a self absorbed sperg uncapable of holding comfortably a job, let alone develop a career.

>But god is my true call !
You are a rancing egoistical stain whose idleness is so great you simply cannot desire serving a cause or someone else besides your own stagnant uselessness.

Surely you will find great comfort by adjusting your entire worldview so your incapability to serve anything tangible will reap you great rewards in a theoretical afterlife though. How else would you pull through ? I do not know of any religious man who isnt motivated by a heaven he simply could not create of his own during his lifetime.

>My devotion is my heaven
Your devotion reaps not. Your devotion harvests nothing. Your devotion serves no one else but yourself.

>>42901745
>I mentioned this earlier. At the highest levels, man would be aligned with God and is inseparable from Him. This would happen because the man made the decision to, out of his free will to align with God.

Okay so claim that in heaven man is fully aligned with God... yet this alignment supposedly does not make him a mindless puppet because he freely chose it. Okay. But then you have already conceded my central point: free will does not require the eternal presence of evil or alternative sinful desires. If a person in heaven can freely exist in a state where he does not desire evil, then evil is not necessary for free will itself.

Do you believe dead babies go to hell? No? Then how come that they end up in heaven with God without ever having to do choose between good and evil on Earth?

>Man's 'personality' is a temporary egoic illusion revolving around limitation. You don't keep anything of your 'egoic personality' after death because there wouldn't be separation.

So if nothing of the individual personality remains after death because there is no separation from God... then who exactly made the free choice to align with God and who receives the result of that choice? If the individual person (or "egoic illusion" as you call it) effectively disappears then saying "he freely chose God and is now in heaven" makes no sense anymore. The person who made the choice no longer meaningfully exists as an individual.

How are you simultaneously arguing that individual free choice is extremely important and then claim that individuality itself is ultimately an illusion? Actually EXPLAIN yourself and stop trying to evade or wiggle yourself out of this.

>dumb, shallow arguments - "If God is good then why do BAD TINGS happen hurrr."

This is one of the most important questions and argument of existence itself. How pathetic do you have to be to not question why children get raped and animals slaughtered in brutality every single day?

women. that's why they call it the snatch, cause it snatch ya soul. you motherfuckers here on this website, especially /b/ know that better than anyone, but refuse to take the necessary actions to prevent ascension from the very hell you created yourself.