Just a reminder that I made multiple threads challenging you gnostics to provide evidence of your claims that the one true holy God of this universe created evil, and none of you "gnostics" here were ever able to provide any evidence of this whatsoever from the bible. It does not imply this anywhere in the texts, when viewed within the contexts of their original languages.The only thing you were ever able to provide were known-faulty mistranslations from one Hebrew passage, which was easily dispelled. Face it, gnostics, you're nothing but Luciferians in disguise, who peddle lies.You just continue peddling your propaganda, but no one believes it.
gnosticism is about journey to one's self in search of enlightment you retard
>the bible is a proofNo, if anything the bible proves you're the kindbof retard who believes in the bible
>>42930537it's about raping kids and not having an ounce of humility you degenerate
evil naturally arises from interaction
>>42930530I’m not a Gnostic. Are you suggesting that something that God did not create exists in his Creation? If He did not create evil, did He not do so indirectly by creating what created evil? Or if He did not create what created evil, did He not create the conditions necessary for the creation of something that created evil?
>>42931519To clarify, God created the trees on the third day and man on the sixth. It is said He created the trees of the Garden of Eden, including the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Evil existed prior to the existence of man. It’s my understanding that this is interpreted as the falling of angels predating the creation of man. Angels were evil by free will, but God made angels with free will and evil was made of what God had created. Evil does not seem to predate God’s creation of angels. Further, God created man with free will which is why Eve ate of the fruit of knowledge of good and evil despite God’s command. By giving that command, God created an opportunity for evil to be created and through the tree and fruit for knowledge of evil to proliferate. God did not make a tree of knowledge of good, but of good and evil specifically. In some indirect way, whichever way we spin it, God created the necessary components for the creation of evil and the proliferation of evil. Whether it be through His creation of angels, His creation of the tree, or His creation of the opportunity through the command to not eat the fruit.
>>42931519Yes he created evil,? and he created hell, gonna cry about it?>but le demiurge! ahhh im a pussy who listens to freemasons!
>>42931568I don’t particularly care. Either God created evil directly or he indirectly created it and even created opportunities for it to proliferate. I’d find it more interesting if He intentionally created it. It would make Him seem more powerful as opposed to manipulative.
>>42931574he directly created everything. he's not manipulative, you're manipulative, and you're a faggot
>>42931591>>42931574this also means he made you a faggot, one of the many who are most likely damned, to prove a point to believers that they should obey what he has commanded
Evil naturally arises from fragility.
>>42930530>Just a reminder that I made multiple threads challenging you gnostics to provide evidence of your claims that the one true holy God of this universe created evil, It literally says in Isaiah that he creates both good and evil. Just what is this cope? Paul also says everything has come down from God. Just what is this cope?
>>42930530So the Nag Hammadi texts are completely irrelevant? I'd like you to explain to me how you derive Luciferianism from the Gnostic gospels? It never says you're God. It says we were created from the divine spirit, just as Adam and Eve were in the Bible. It's a rejection of the Church as a corrupt creation of the Demiurge. Jesus never said you needed the Church to find salvation. The only way to the Father is through HIM. It's weird how you don't hold the same energy for the Catholics who burned Gnostics alive for simply having a difference of opinion and being a threat to their power.
>>42930530What needs proving? The statement answers itself.If there is one true god then there is one true creator of evil (or the conditions in which evil can flourish -- same thing)
>>42930530Once again, the gnostic claim is not that the old testament god created evil, it's that the old testament god IS evil. No one creates evil, it is a by-product of free will. It's a judgement of an action. It's by examining the actions of god and passing judgment on those actions, that leads us to determine that he is evil.
Wow.Gnosticism is really gay huh
>>42930530The one true holy Monad is shrimple, unchanging, infinite and perfect. What appears to move/change is the Kenoma. It depends upon the Monad in order to appear, while the Monad depends upon nothing. Since the Monad is unchanging, it did not produce change. The Kenoma exists only so long as there remains ignorance of the Monad. With gnosis, its apparent separateness disappears.Thus evil has no ultimate existence nor, technically, does "good" as we ordinarily conceive it. Good and evil, and ultimately everything possessing name and form, belong to the realm of differentiation and mimicry. They appear within the Kenoma, while the Monad itself remains indivisible, changeless and beyond all such distinctions. If you know the Monad through gnosis, you know Good as Good truly is. Not the relative good defined against evil, but the Good beyond all opposites.
>>42930530Actual gnostic with gnosis here. I don't believe Evil is a problem, since acting evil will castigate my enrmies. Do uou even know what a gnostic is?
>>42931539>>42931519Nothing like checking in on an old /x/ thread you posted and noticing people began responding to comments as if they were the OP, when they're not.I know it's an anonymous board, and doesn't matter, but nevertheless. You make an OP. You take the position. The fuckers just butt in pretending to be the OP and pushing things which you've never written.
