Why doesn't it look real? Why does it look like crappy CGI?
>>42946113Your brain isn’t used to seeing things with that much mass and speed collide. At those kinds of energies, solids act like liquids.
>>42946113
>>42946119Why is the smoke completely static?
Are 9/11 conspiracycucks genuinely the most annoying conspiracytards in existence? They just spam the same nonsense over and over: “saar CGI,” “saar controlled demolition,” “saar those towers never existed.” No evidence, no coherent logic, just recycled talking points and mental gymnastics. Ask for actual proof and they dump another blurry screenshot, some random 12-second clip, or a guy with a YouTube channel explaining how physics is fake. Even flat earthers are less exhausting. At least they usually commit to one stupid theory. These dudes just spam buzzwords, ignore anything that contradicts them, move the goalposts, and call everyone else a sheep
>>42946883it's schizos and jews, mostly jews trying to make 9/11 skeptics look crazy and muddy the waters all these years
it looks like how older holographic projections looked
https://youtu.be/IAwPqfJqccAThe Euro was created as a special reserve banking currency in 1957. The following year at the builderburg meeting it was scheduled to be used as a public currency on the future date of November 2001.The events that impacted Wallstreet were coordinated to contribute to the exchange. The events that occurred in Oklahoma are related. In Bosnia an American soldier had been presented with a UN uniform and told he had to wear it. He refused on the basis that they could not show anything he had signed that would obligate him to wear it. During his court marshal his lawyers found what had been signed.. by Clinton. The office that was processing the impeachment for treason was in the Oklahoma city federal building. Only 7 of the 77 people who wereexpected to be at work on that floor were actually there. And then the rest of the covert American government was made aware that the united states had no sword in its proverbial scabbard.. the join chiefs would have to ask the un for permission to deploy the united states military under the agreement that Clinton had signed.. unless a long series of unusual extreme events were to occur. Direct attack on the financial institutions of the united states. Direct attack on the civilian population of the United States. Direct attack on the command staff of the united states.Interstate transportation and commerce etc.I forget the specific line items but I think there were 5 separate clauses that had to be fulfilled before the united states could take the command control of the united states military back away from the united nations. Each of these 5 were fulfilled by the events of September 11th 2001.https://youtu.be/7md2QzNsAe4
>>42946883>saaryou glow>>42946113Watch september clues if you havent already
>One justifying the wicked, and condemning the just—even the two of them are an abomination to YHWH.
>>42946280come on glowbitches, address the static smoke. you sure wouldn't shut the fuck up about the clouds, which were a lot further away and not static after all, in the mh370 videos. where you at?
>>42947124>The "Dive Bomber" or "Fast Mover" Object: During the live Fox News broadcast, right as the second plane (Flight 175) struck the South Tower, a small, silver/bright object is seen crossing the screen at an incredibly high speed. It approaches from the background, moves behind or past the towers, and streaks out of frame.>The Chopper 4 / Chopper 5 Anomalies: Live feeds from news helicopters captured multiple bright, metallic-looking specks moving through the airspace around Lower Manhattan. While official reviews attribute these to birds, paper catching the sunlight, or lens artifacts, the live footage shows them appearing to move independently against the smoke.>The "Scramble" Jet Confusions: In the chaotic live coverage, networks reported on objects in the air before the military confirmed that NORAD had scrambled F-15 and F-16 fighter jets over Manhattan, adding to the visual confusion of what was zooming through the smoke.
>>42946113Aircraft are quite fragile, look at a cross section for any aircraft and you'll see it's very thin. It needs to be light enough to fly after all. The engines are relatively solid/dense, so they don't crumple like the body of the aircraft. I remember watching the second plane hit live, it wasn't fake.
>this looks fakeHow would you know? Have you seen a lot of others planes crashing into a skyscraper to compare?
>>42946883Yes. They're called schizo muslims
really frustrated because I used to watch this obscure found footage youtube documentary (no voiceover/narration just clips edited together) about September 11th and the heaven's gate cult every year at this time and now I can't find it I can't remember what it was called or what the channel was called
>>42946119Stop mudding the water. It's against physics. It completely enters the surfaces and DISAPPEARS. THEN, after that, you see no damage no nothing. Then, after that, a comical cut in the form of a plane like we are in a roger rabbit cartoon. Then the explosion. You know that or are too stupid to play those vids frame by frame.
Airplanes are very fragile. It looks fake because it doesn't slow down one bit as it hits. There is no sign of any resistance. Your brain expects it to bounce back like a car would. This F-4 fighter jet almost looks like it is flying through a portal.
>>42947124OP clip is like .5 seconds of total time. Not enough to spot the smoke moving.
>>42946113I was under the impression that the planes weren't even real and that they were edited in later. I mean c'mon. It's so obvious now. A long time ago I would've looked at you like you were a quack but now the duck stops here.
>>42947124the smoke isn't static it clearly moves albeit slowly on video because of the scale and distance
>>42947581not true, go watch the smoke videos, it's pumping, it'll be different every frame, you have like 100 frames there.
>>42946113Those towers didn't fall because of planes.
>>42947628the only video i ever had directly removed from google for "hate speech" was john lear explaining that there were no planes on 911.
>>42946113if you want to believe it's fake, that's understandable. but what are the implications?https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cUR4up6EBLA&ra=m
>>42946883As if double-digit IQ Arabs armed with nothing but box cutters could bring down 3 towers and damage the Pentagon. Try again boomer.
>>42947625>you have like 100 frames thereLook again, you can literally count the frames, it's like 8. Particularly noticeable in the lower camera angle. All this footage was likely taken on consumer grade cameras with analog video tape at 25-30 fps. When you slow it down as in OP clip you can actually see the plane jittering across the frame.There are not enough frames in the short clips to see the smoke move.
>>42948116either way, the smokes pumping, more than enough for movement.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgLJGCrHMg8
>>42948042>As if double-digit IQ Arabs armed with nothing but box cutters could bring down 3 towers and damage the Pentagon.literally yes, your empire ain't that mighty lmao
>>42948637>pretend that kerosene and burning printer paper even with wind on it was hot enough it to weaken super thick structural steel and make buildings pancake on themselves à la controlled demolition>not once but twice>then a third time with a building that wasn't even hit>conveniently ignore the grenfell tower which didn't pancake or do anything even though it was a raging inferno from top to bottom>just keep babbling about ay-rab terra-rists and box cutters
>>42947639There weren't. As told by Aquino himself.https://rumble.com/v68657y-if-you-know-or-believe-airplanes-were-not-used-on-911-michael-aquinos-accou.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o&sci=058c960a-9948-4bc1-99e1-ed279316cdc7Sharing this link on youtube gets deleted immediately.
