How do energy and thoughts imprint on an environment? Like when a place gives you a positive or negative feeling, how was that energy imprinted on that environment?Secondly, how does an individual pick up on it without seeing or hearing or the other gross senses?Thirdly, why is mind most affected by this energy, whereas the gross physical world is less affected, like in the bodies of plants and animals?Finally, why are you most receptive to this energy at night when sleeping?
Tough crowd.
>>43012116it doesn't only the imagined memories based on stories and fears put onto an environment affect your interpretation of it>this place is haunted and dangerous with tons of people were murdered hereyou feel nerved>this place is super safe with everyone who ever came having a great timeyou walk around safely at night even if you are a womanmy example is Los Angeles. Every time I go until dark I see women walking around the very street my dad used to tell me he wouldn't dare step foot in after dark
>>43014526I keep seeing >affect your interpretation of itAs if the universe is totally dependent on your interpretation and this is simply wrong. A lake is safe. If you change the water to acid, it's dangerous. It's not up to interpretation. You could still claim IT IS, that acid is safe or neutral, fundamentally in a cosmic sense, but at that point you cease to possess any interpretation of anything and you cease to be. Being requires interpretation, without interpretation it ceases to Be. And although this is useful to understand the fundamental nature of the universe it is not applicable for a lived life.Your example is based on the dissonance between what your father advised and what you observed, and yet a great deal of time has passed since your fathers time and yours. That street could very well have been more dangerous, or the people more accepting of danger. Both could be true. It does not change the fact of the increased danger faced by bodies from an environment. The increase in chance of bodily harm from one time or place to another is not up to interpretation. Imagine a haunted wood. Something traumatic or strange happened, and now the trees grow crooked, their leaves block out the sun, and the birds and squirrels are uneasy and on edge. The event has long since passed yet the "memory" remains. The strangeness of that place isn't up to interpretation but a real observable phenomenon, the question that you must ask is why the place remains strange after the event.
>>43016040thats why i brought up LA, women wearing club outfits are walking the most dangerous streets of LA that have been gentrified don't lose that "energy" but because they believe its safe they are no longer scared even if it is high riskthat is why i don't see the energy as anything other than memories and expectations causing you to interpret it as scary
>>43016061If it was gentrified that means the environment was radically changed. We're talking about totally replacing a demographic, I would absolutely expect the feel of the place to change. It wouldn't be surprising for the energy of the place to change drastically after such a drastic physical change, like a forest being cleared.The example you've given does prove that the energy of a place does change depending on physical circumstance, but we always just attribute that to the physical changes. That makes sense. I'm talking about a more subtle change, where there is no structural change yet the feel of a place changes. You can also think of it this way: a small event has a large effect on the energy of a location. Perhaps the event only lasted a few hours, but its effects extend beyond the nearby boundaries of the location
>>43016127the area im talking about didn't demolish the buildings but just added walls and called it apartments and bars when a few decades ago there were dead bodies filled with bullets in and around these warehouse style buildings.adding more plumbing and separating everything into liveable sections doesn't change how haunted something could be
bump
