been a while since we've seen your software. it is getting a little stale around /x/ lately and I, for one, am interested to see what changes you've made. for those of your not aware-https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/41966207/bibliomancyanon built an LLM trained on all the esoteric and occult texts none of you ever bother to read. it operates in many different modes, the most interesting one was his horoscope module which gathered additional data from those texts to build a more impressive analysis than I've ever seen. everything it said about me was accurate, and I went in skeptical. he had begun work on a chaos module focusing more on the elements of the process rather than training the LLM to digitally splaff onto some sigils as an output.super interesting.
>>43014779Why are you beginning your post by insulting those you wish to engage with this man's technology
>>43015847because no one actually reads texts. they just listen to grifters and amateurs. nothing beats first hand info. when anons talk on a topic, it is like watching a student pretend they did a reading assignment during course lectures./x/ is getting stale, just like everywhere else online. his tech is novel and interesting- rare. I'm also a prick, which doesn't help. besides, it doesn't matter. he is looooon gone.
>>43016275>because no one actually reads textsAs opposed to you, who listens to an AI give sentence-long aphorisms based on texts
u can do it yourself
>>43016275>his techIT'S YOU, NIGGA.YOU.
I used to do this with a dictionary. It worked surprisingly well. Of course you apply your own meaning to the results tho
>>43017062nope. I'm Cubananon, apparently.
>>43017583
